Cleveleys_claret wrote:Another month....another 0 goals. Setting the league on fire with his missed chances, todays was a sitter.
Looked deadly again
MACCA wrote:At a guess Bardsley, as although not a full on tool like DD, has all the attributes to be a silly billy, and does like a night out.
Firthy wrote:Liverpool draw
I genuinely believe we will get at least 8 pts from these games. Maybe even 11 pts depending which Villa team turns up on the day.
bobinho wrote:Well you’re having the best of the argument so far. I particularly like the way you explain your point using all the facts (as you see then) at your disposal, and the eloquent way you get that across. Please feel free to continue your persuasive argument.
dandeclaret wrote:Maybe because Leicester don't expect to sign players from Arsenal's first XI?
Tall Paul wrote:What if we've been working on a deal for a while but the story has only just broken in the media. Would it still be too late to get him?
Tricky Trevor wrote:Brady can also cover for LB, although he doesn’t fit the 6’+ criteria for our back 4.
Bosscat wrote:Cheers m8 but I will save the other 75% too and go out for a few beers
RalphCoatesComb wrote:but, WHY does it have to be one game in five that they play so well?
ClaretAndJew wrote:Would be excellent for Bournemouth if these come off. Shame we don't have the type of money. Would love Clyne here.
claret2018 wrote:Playing ‘well’ and having fight is all well and good if you’re getting points from games. With the last 2 games we’ve played well according to some, but have been soundly beaten in both games.
It’s not looking good. I think we’ll finish bottom by some distance.
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:4-5 years playing for Toronto, yet you're telling us he's better than what we've got?
Next you'll be telling us to sign Bradley Wright-Phillips
Pimlico_Claret wrote:Just seen a pic of Swansea shirt with a tasteful looking Mod style bullseye target next to the betting sponsors name, would have much preferred that on ours.
Rayaforspain1875 wrote:And how old is jayrod too? Must be 30 by now?
Woodleyclaret wrote:A good Championship player who couldn't raise his game to the demands skillwise and ability wise to the Premier league.
Good luck to him in the lower league North of the Border.
The rules are a little fluid and Scottie will have to vastly improve his tackling and ball retention.
piston broke wrote:The first sub should be GKNK. Lennon said he wouldn't celebrate if he scored and he won't.
Barnes and Hendrick have both been fine. We just need that killer delivery.
box_of_frogs wrote:King of time wasting? It’s embarrassing. Absolutely no need for it and deservedly booked several times for it already. Why he feels the need to time waste when we’re 0-0 with Huddersfield I’ll never know.
Saxoman wrote:The only way you'll go further than this is with a backer willing to facilitate it financially, I.e. not your current ones.
cricketfieldclarets wrote:Good player for us. Great in fact. Just a character I could never take to.
Did his job very well though. And was great value. Was gutted when he left in fact. But much like when Austin left we replaced from within.
Lowbankclaret wrote:Nope not struggling.
If I was a rising person in a profession that sacks people at the drop of a hat. I would not sign a contract that holds me into 12 months to them.
Looks like I am obviously wrong but his advisers need sacking. IMHO