UpTheClarets.com

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:Nope, you have massively over reacted to me pointing out that you've drawn an unfair and incorrect assumption from my posts on the petition.

Thought you were a bit bigger than that, but hey ho.

Lancasterclaret wrote:Porn at a guess

OK.

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:Don't you think it would be easier just to go "Fair play LC, I overreacted a bit to you mentioning the petitions"?

Easier than what? Proving you wrong again couldn't be easier.

taio

Of course they are, but as I've also said the Brexit heavyweights have really gone for this. The underlying trend is that remain/pv/revocation (which was absolutely nowhere six months ago) is really gaining ground, and the petition is a sign of that. You get that yeah? Always going to happen as I'v...

taio

Yup. Because it has. Are you saying it hasn't? I've said three times on this page that this doesn't count, but its shows something. You decided that means "If you seriously think petitions such as this should be at the heart of our governance and decision making and is what should happen then&...

taio

Imploding Turtle wrote:Calm your tits. The petition only sparks a debate, you daft ****. No one's saying that it's going to become the new Magna Carta.

When did I suggest that you daft ****

taio

On its own, completely agree, even though you are implying that you think I'm stupid! :shock: ;) But its that plus everything else. It all adds up. You've spent the best part of three years of your life saying how messed up this country is because of our political system and democracy. If you serio...

taio

And the important point is here is that a lot of people have bothered their arse signing it. You can ignore it if you so wish, but I'm not sure all MPs will, and this could be sorted down to one or two votes. Which is why I think its important. Quick question, if it was so easy to game, why is the ...

taio

****, I only went and found the official twitter feed of the petitions committee but thats "vague and meaningless" For example, I'd be amazed if five e-mail addresses from the same location wouldn't trigger any simple checking device. But no, its got to be fixed. The official site is, as ...

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:This one

https://twitter.com/HoCpetitions/status ... 1180227584

Vague and meaningless.

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:Going of what I've read taio.

They estimate that 95% of all votes on these things are iffy (thats the official petitions website)

I'll try to find a link (looking at it this aft and its long gone!)

I'd be interested to know how you think it's not possible to sign the petition four times.

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:By now, only one vote will have registered, the other four will have been removed.

Its all down in the t & cs

Please explain that. Complete rubbish.

taio

Well no, they will be talking to their constituencies members and getting an idea of how the wind is shifting. I think its only in Yorkshire that support for leave hasn't wavered according to the underlying polls. And everyone appears to see that if its a GE, Brexit just becomes another factor, not...

taio

Lancasterclaret wrote:All this will be having an effect on the MPs, especially if its a free vote.

How their constituents voted in 2016 will, not a pointless petition

taio

nil_desperandum wrote:And Leadsom's comment on record in Hansard?

What's your point?

taio

nil_desperandum wrote:So I assume you used 5 different identities as well, and sought their permission?
These programmes are pretty clever nowadays and can quite easily sniff out fraud.

I've signed it three times.

taio

nil_desperandum wrote:Leadsom, the leader of the house said 17.4 million. Do you agree with her?

No.

taio

It's almost at 4 million after 48 hours, and is still struggling to keep up with demand. (I know a couple of people who registered this morning, but they still haven't had their email verification sent to them yet). Most of the 4 million would seem to be genuine if you look into it. So how many sig...

taio

TheFamilyCat wrote:Why do you have five email addresses?

I'm sort of guessing he created at least four of them to prove his point. His point will be right.

taio

Whether you're Remain or Brexit the petition should be seen as utterly pointless.

taio

martin_p wrote:But isn’t the whole point to find an alternative to May’s deal?

I would have thought the point would be to get clarity on which option or options the HoC favours most when considering those options alongside each other.

taio

martin_p wrote:Because we already know there isn’t a consensus for May’s deal (three times by next week).

It would be absurd given it hasn't been voted on alongside other options and it's May's deal that the EU has agreed upon.

taio

martin_p wrote:I believe no deal and (unbelievably) May's Deal are on the list as well, making it seven options.

Why would May's deal being an option be unbelievable? If a number of options are put forward it'd be right for that to be on the table too.

taio

Let's face it, he doesn't need to. This isn't a brickie we are talking about. What message does it send to the families in the stand if your club signs him? I suspect he will sign somewhere like China, Qatar and the like Suspect he would have difficulty getting visa entry to work in such countries.

taio

and as I've pointed out at least twice Dyche manages Burnley and he obviously thinks a completely out of form Cork is still a better option than Hendrick. Dress it up any way you want, call him whatever you want, our manager doesn't seem to think he's up to it. My opinion and yours along with Walte...

taio

Spijed wrote:Is Warnock know for being able to think out of the box though?

Ask any football supporter and they call him a football dinosaur.

I would say Warnock has proven to be a canny operator

taio

no it isn't, you seemingly don't have a sense of humour. For you to take that seriously shows how unfortunately pedantic you are being. edit: I actually don't remember his performance in ONE game On it's own it might be pedantic. But I'm correcting you because you were being disingenuous to suit yo...

taio

and was crap at it, which again means we should have signed a CM. Joe Hart could be put in CM and have CM listed as his position, I can only judge what the manager does not what position he is listed on in FIFA Was referring to game against Olympiacos when he played well did he not? Your Hart compa...

taio

no you are not getting my point (or i'm not explaining it correctly) - Dyche doesn't like playing him there and as his is the only persons opinion that counts it would suggest he thinks he isn't the best option, all I am adding is that with the loss of form of Cork our options are undeniably limite...

taio

Controlled play in the second half after incorrect tactics in the first half. We weren't remotely close to creating enough clear cut chances considering the extra man - Schmeichel barely tested. Disappointing performance and result.

taio

agree to disagree then. Just cause I've said play him doesn't mean he should, I'd rather play anyone in there than Jack Cork at the moment. He started the season as our best player in the European games but something has happened to him, dunno if it's confidence or just severe lack of form but for ...

taio

but he doesn't or very rarely plays him there because Dyche either doesn't think it's his best position or thinks that Cork and Westwood are either better individually or collectively. That means, should Cork or Westwood get injured we have to play the person Dyche doesn't want to play there in the...

taio

Vegas Claret wrote:Westwood and Cork - looks rather factual to me given the fact Dyche can't figure out where to put Hendrick

Yes Hendrick is a CM who has often plays on the right and of course Dyche played him in the hole. Still a CM though.

taio

Vegas Claret wrote:I'm not saying spend 100 million or even 50 for that matter. How do we go into a season with 2 CM's, Defour injured, Brady injured etc ?

2 central midfielders - is that fact or opinion?

taio

He'd be out of our price range.

taio

jrgbfc wrote:Most pointless thread ever. If everyone is fit will be the same as today.

It's people saying what team they'd play, not predicting who Dyche will select.

Heaton
Lowton
Tarkowski
Gibson
Taylor
JBG
Cork
Westwood
McNeil
Barnes
Wood

taio

Terrible from the keeper.

taio

Steve1956 wrote:Are you a politician ?

So it's you who doesn't have a clue

taio

Right so you haven't a clue why our joint record signing can't oust a player from our leaky defence,not even been given a sniff,and Crouch playing before 9million pound Vydra,like I said when we spend money we waste it,how much did we spunk on Wells? As I said injuries and Dyche's rigidity. What el...

taio

we are a lower sized Championship club at best, that's what make's the summer opportunity the biggest missed opportunity for Burnley Football Club in my life time. Small minded, lack of ambition and it's coming right back to bite us. Garlick's worst hour as such. If you believe we are a lower sized...

taio

Steve1956 wrote:You still haven't explained why we don't use them.

I've given you one entirely legitimate explanation. Another one would be that Dyche is rigid which has brought him so much success.

taio

Steve1956 wrote:Can you explain why we don't use these players that are bench warming?

One reason is we've be ok on the injury front. If key players got injured and there wasn't sufficient cover people would be moaning that we've no strength on the bench.

taio

gandhisflipflop wrote:The club reeks of small town small time mentality from boardroom to fans. Little old Burnley line is incredibly tiresome and it has held us back for far too long.

Realism that's all. And most successful period in my life time.

taio

Siddo wrote:You know what? I give up. We are now a team followed by plastics.

Stick with it. I'm convinced most of the moaners don't step foot inside Turf Moor.

taio

Steve1956 wrote:When we do spend money it's wasted,probably the bench yesterday cost more than what was on the pitch.

Read this a few times. People would moan even more if we didn't have quality on the bench. It's a nonsense argument. And the bench didn't cost more.

taio

I'd bring Gibson but alongside Tarkowski. I'd be tempted to Lowton in as well but to be fair to Bardsley he's been reliable.

taio

Disappointing as it may have been it would almost certainly have meant that Cardiff would be coming here behind us in the table. Even if they were to somehow beat Chelsea they would still have been behind us on goal difference as the chances of them getting anything at the Etihad are almost none. T...

taio

Imploding Turtle wrote:Right, but they don't know more about football because they're men. What you're really saying is that you prefer pundits who are more knowledgeable than pundits who are less knowledgeable.

Yes and they happen to be men.

taio

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Having seen him first hand at that level alongside Ings, Gray and even Austin I dont need to hear what they think.

Me neither. Couldn't give a toss what Stoke fans think of him. Vokes was good for us - that's all that matters - and was sold prematurely.

taio

I prefer men pundits to women. Not because I have anything against woman - I just think men know more about football. My missus happens to agree. If that makes someone think I'm sexist I couldn't give a ****.

taio

He doesn't look anywhere near the required standard, and I remain surprised at the number of people were were a-ok with losing Vokes and replacing him with a 38 year old who couldn't get into a piss-poor Stoke team. He provides an awkward presence at best, and frankly, that just isn't good enough. ...

Search found 3234 matches