DAVETHEVICAR wrote:Wood played as well as most and better than some
No he didn't, he was by far our worst player.
dougcollins wrote:Unlike some, Barnes never looks over-awed regardless.
It was like we had some football tourists out for us today.
claret2018 wrote:Unfortunately, they are not just rich, but almost un-imaginably rich. They could spend 100 times this and not notice.
ksrclaret wrote:If you google Danny Drinkwater salary, you find a lot of sites suggesting he's on 100k a week at Chelsea.
If that's true he won't be coming here, even on loan.
AlargeClaret wrote:A not unreasonable point but the way it has been done virtually blocks out the river and the Butts always seems like a no mans land people can’t wait to get out of.
You can’t polish a turd .
Hibsclaret wrote:Starc. 1 for 70. That pretty much sums it up.
Roy wasn’t even out. It is a shame he couldn’t get a big ton.
FactualFrank wrote:Check the link I posted above, although I'm sure you'll have seen the programme.
Spijed wrote:With regards to David Warner, I wonder if he'll ever be forgiven by the cricketing public, or forever booed?
Siddo wrote:Why do you say that? Can you add some detail?
FactualFrank wrote:I thought we were talking about the penalty in this game for the USA to go 2-1 up?
If so, then the contact caused the USA player to go down so it was a penalty.