FA & Joey

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

FA & Joey

Post by LoveCurryPies » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:47 am

Joey was due to reply to FA on the 5th but appealed for more time.
My thought is....why did the FA not extend it to say 19th (2 weeks) rather than 31st (deadline transfer day).

Coincidence?

If they give him a long ban...we won't have time to sign a replacement.
Could somebody in London really dislike us so much?

Spijed
Posts: 17125
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by Spijed » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:50 am

Regardless of a ban or not, surely the club would be looking at other players.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: FA & Joey

Post by Sidney1st » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:19 am

You've been hanging around with bluelab too much if you've come up with that conspiracy theory.

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1771 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: FA & Joey

Post by claptrappers_union » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:20 am

Joey is going to get banned anyway, even if its 3 games, 3 months or 3 years or whatever and I'll imagine that there will be some kind of termination clause in his contract depending on the outcome, but by that time, his people will have delayed the hearing that much we will will have had the best from him for this season. Everyone knows where they stand, from the clubs point of view, Barton is a luxury signing and wont alter the progression of other long term targets.
Last edited by claptrappers_union on Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:25 am, edited 3 times in total.

Goobs
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1467 times
Has Liked: 997 times
Location: Burnley

Re: FA & Joey

Post by Goobs » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:21 am

Isn't it the case that he has until the end of the month to reply to the FA? Can he not then ask for an official hearing, thus delaying the case further before any potential ban?

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8023
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: FA & Joey

Post by ClaretAndJew » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:41 am

Conspiracy chaos

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1650 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:01 pm

I suspect we are very much involved in Joey choosing to delay. I expect between 6 and 10 game ban (hence a cup run could be important). I think having him for these few games and then the final few may be what Dyche is thinking. There are some crucial winnable games in that lot.

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: FA & Joey

Post by minnieclaret » Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:18 pm

Didn't he ask for the long extension?
As said on another thread: A later date, appeals, could see this season through.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by LoveCurryPies » Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:21 pm

Sidney1st wrote:You've been hanging around with bluelab too much if you've come up with that conspiracy theory.

Or, spending too much time on this forum, it's worrying.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10974
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5188 times
Has Liked: 804 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: FA & Joey

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:23 pm

Infamy infamy, they've all got it in for me!

claretman1
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 15 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by claretman1 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:41 pm

Think the FA charge is wrong anyway. I believe it became against FA rules to bet on any football match if you are involved in football in August 2014. Therefore before that date you can't have breached the current FA betting rules. So to charge Joey for breaching the rules for 10 years is Tosh. They have also cited 1260 bets over that 10 year period. An accumulator is 5 bets in 1. Does Joey bet on accas or in single bets? I think the FA have cocked this up. Hopefully Joey's legal team can spin this out to the end of the season.

jurek
Posts: 1793
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 309 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by jurek » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:17 pm

Presumably we can't rely on Barton being available for at least 3/4 games - maybe more if he gets a
lengthy ban. Presumably we aren't putting all our eggs in Joey's basket?
Presumably we've got a few other targets.

Would feel a lot happier if we'd got one or two signed up by now in addition to Barton.
Just hope Dyche doesn't believe he can do it with the current squad.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: FA & Joey

Post by BleedingClaret » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:35 pm

As long as they ban all the other footballers who bet on football too - tip of the iceberg time

starting_11
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: FA & Joey

Post by starting_11 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:41 pm

Don't forget your tinfoil hat!

Post Reply