ARTICLE: The Brady link

Rick_Muller · Post by **Rick_Muller** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:12 pm

ClaretTony wrote:I think it is likely he has just played his last game at Carrow Road as a Norwich player

subtle CT, subtle...

have you got the article ready then

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:15 pm

Is that CT hinting he wont be far off coming to burnley ?

Claretmatt4 · Post by **Claretmatt4** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:18 pm

ClaretTony wrote:I think it is likely he has just played his last game at Carrow Road as a Norwich player

Such a tease!

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:19 pm

The brady bunch

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:20 pm

Kissing it bye bye

ewanrob · Post by **ewanrob** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:22 pm

I find it unbelievable that someone on the point of leaving for the fee reported, is actually playing. Crazy taking this sort of chance of getting an injury.

minnieclaret · Post by **minnieclaret** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:23 pm

ewanrob wrote:I find it unbelievable that someone on the point of leaving for the fee reported, is actually playing. Crazy taking this sort of chance of getting an injury.

Not his call. He's a Norwich registered player and they've just sold their LB.
You wouldn't want him doing a Payet, I hope.

ewanrob · Post by **ewanrob** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:33 pm

Not so much him but his club.

Woodleyclaret · Post by **Woodleyclaret** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:41 pm

Penalty king Brady scored today v Wolves

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:42 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:Is that CT hinting he wont be far off coming to burnley ?

I think it is me saying he'll be leaving Norwich. I hope his destination is Turf Moor.

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:51 pm

According to alex neil in his press conference . He says no club has matched his valuation yet and not even come close too . And also they dont need to sell now olsson has gone . Strengthens there hands

Funkydrummer · Post by **Funkydrummer** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:55 pm

ClaretTony wrote:I think it is likely he has just played his last game at Carrow Road as a Norwich player

So, he's just playing the away games is he ?

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:57 pm

Funkydrummer wrote:So, he's just playing the away games is he ?

Potentially

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:16 pm

The last drawn out will he won't he affair we had with Norwich was for Lambert. Thank F that one fell through

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:22 pm

bfcjg wrote:The last drawn out will he won't he affair we had with Norwich was for Lambert. Thank F that one fell through

That was when Howe came in. Norwich were convinced he was going because they'd already interviewed Watford boss Malky Mackay.

KRBFC · Post by **KRBFC** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:25 pm

ClaretTony wrote:That was when Howe came in. Norwich were convinced he was going because they'd already interviewed Watford boss Malky Mackay.

Was it not before we ended up with Laws? Who were the other candidates instead of Laws? I can't remember the names being mentioned at the time.

StuffyClaret · Post by **StuffyClaret** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:35 pm

AVB was interviewed

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:40 pm

I think he used us to get a better deal.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:57 pm

bugger

"Norwich have missed out on Bordeaux left-back Maxime Poundje – after he signed a new two-year contract with his club.

The 24-year-old was due to become a free agent this summer and the Canaries were close to a deal."

CnBtruntru · Post by **CnBtruntru** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:43 pm

Well that's that then.

burnmark · Post by **burnmark** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:53 pm

KRBFC wrote:Was it not before we ended up with Laws? Who were the other candidates instead of Laws? I can't remember the names being mentioned at the time.

Definitely before Howe.

Seem to remember Lee Clark was linked before Laws got the job.

KRBFC · Post by **KRBFC** » Sun Jan 22, 2017 11:13 pm

StuffyClaret wrote:AVB was interviewed

Was he actually? I remember a story saying he'd shown interest.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:30 pm

this seems to have gone very quiet

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:32 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:this seems to have gone very quiet

Gary Jacob in today's Times writes under heading: "One week left, so who will go before transfer deadline"

Robbie Brady Norwich to Burnley valuation £13m. Likelihood of move 10/10.

I wasn't able to post earlier today. I was expecting to see a lot of activity on this thread.

I hope Jacob is reporting this correctly.

UTC

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:34 pm

Gary Jacob also mentions Robert Snodgrass, valuation £8m. Hull to M'boro or Burnley. Likelihood of move 8/10.

Perhaps its all a "page filler."

Papabendi · Post by **Papabendi** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:38 pm

It's probable Brady won't go until Norwich get a player in, but it is not done until it is done and Howe is now sniffing.

Hull quiet on our Snodgrass offer quiet but clearly not accepted.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:41 pm

Hull want 10 million for Snodgrass then he can go "apparently"

100percentclaret · Post by **100percentclaret** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:42 pm

burnmark wrote:Definitely before Howe.

Seem to remember Lee Clark was linked before Laws got the job.

Might be wrong but wasn't Grayson heavily linked too ?

MACCA · Post by **MACCA** » Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:58 pm

Steve Lomas too wasn't it, or was that a load of cattle dung?

CFS · Post by **CFS** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 12:34 am

CFS wrote:Burnley struggling with his £60k a week wage demands from what iv heard.

Bump
Got shot down for saying something I heard now from what iv heard nothing different same stance wants the big bucks does our rob.

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:06 am

CFS wrote:Bump
Got shot down for saying something I heard now from what iv heard nothing different same stance wants the big bucks does our rob.

Translating with grammar correction, does that mean he wants a wage higher than we're willing to give?

CFS · Post by **CFS** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:05 am

FactualFrank wrote:Translating with grammar correction, does that mean he wants a wage higher than we're willing to give?

That's correct there is no middle ground he wants the lot. Chips all in. Touching the ceiling. So basically like iv stated a week ago he won't be signing.

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:14 am

CFS wrote: That's correct there is no middle ground he wants the lot. Chips all in. Touching the ceiling. So basically like iv stated a week ago he won't be signing.

If this turns out to be the case . Why didnt we know this sooner ? According to mike garlick we was planning for january transfer window around september last year . Have the club not been doing there research finding out how much players are already on at the parent clubs and also if there willing to come ?

Firthy · Post by **Firthy** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:26 am

So many people in the know and so much crap posted on this thread that us pure mortals haven't a hope in hell of knowing what's going on.

CFS · Post by **CFS** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:31 am

Reecey1987 wrote:If this turns out to be the case . Why didnt we know this sooner ? According to mike garlick we was planning for january transfer window around september last year . Have the club not been doing there research finding out how much players are already on at the parent clubs and also if there willing to come ?

Sorry but I'm not the one doing the deals just posting what I hear.

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:34 am

CFS wrote:Sorry but I'm not the one doing the deals just posting what I hear.

Im not saying you are im just asking a question . Surely if that was the case this deal should of been ended before it had even began

Dyched · Post by **Dyched** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:34 am

Im 100% behing the club having a ceiling for wages and not willing going over that. But if its true we've been working on this window since September than its rather poor chasing players we simply can't afford.

Royboyclaret · Post by **Royboyclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:35 am

"That's correct there is no middle ground he wants the lot. Chips all in. Touching the ceiling. So basically like iv stated a week ago he won't be signing."

You see this is the problem we have when attempting to sign anyone from the Prem or the top half Championship.
We all believe Brady is asking for top dollar when in fact he'll be earning over £40k per week at Norwich and therefore believes moving to the Prem and asking for £50k is not unreasonable.
Our wage structure is admirable but when it comes to this kind of negotiation it puts us in a massively disadvantageous position.

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:43 am

Still 1/9 at Paddy Power that he'll be a Burnley player by the end of the window.

Money to be made for those that are so confident it won't happen.

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:48 am

Reecey1987 wrote:If this turns out to be the case . Why didnt we know this sooner ? According to mike garlick we was planning for january transfer window around september last year . Have the club not been doing there research finding out how much players are already on at the parent clubs and also if there willing to come ?

Hi Reecey, we all know that the club any player is signed for knows what they are paid. We also know that it's far from unusual for players to go to their own club and say "I want more money... I think I'm worth more than you are currently paying me...." And, I'm sure that happened before players had agents...

So, new club, any new club (not just Burnley) want to sign a player it's a negotiation: what are you on now? we can pay you so much more? (and we offer other things as well). Does this meet your expectations? How much do you want? Wow, that's a big number.... what makes you think you are worth so much? OK, what's the number that works for you and we can afford?

Burnley got this sorted with Steven Defour and Jeff Hendrick last summer. We've got this sorted twice with Joey Barton - and he went to Rangers when it didn't get sorted - though we can guess that Joey is not "about money" in the same way...

Maybe we will get it sorted with Robbie Brady and maybe we wont. If we don't it is possible that Robbie will still be at Norwich until the summer - playing Championship football, and on a lower wage than he will have been offered by Burnley. (And, I don't think his agent makes any money if he stays at Norwich). Those are the things Brady will have to work out, will any club pay him the money he believes he is worth?

UTC

kentonclaret · Post by **kentonclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:48 am

Paddy Power are not quoting a price for him still to be a Norwich player at the end of this window which is the most likely outcome.

Royboyclaret · Post by **Royboyclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:55 am

"Maybe we will get it sorted with Robbie Brady and maybe we wont. If we don't it is possible that Robbie will still be at Norwich until the summer - playing Championship football, and on a lower wage than he will have been offered by Burnley."

What!?!........I think you're missing the point completely.

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 10:56 am

kentonclaret wrote:Paddy Power are not quoting a price for him still to be a Norwich player at the end of this window which is the most likely outcome.

More likely than 90%, which is what 1/9 represents?

For comparison, they have a market on Michael Keane and Everton are favourites at 5/2.

kentonclaret · Post by **kentonclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:01 am

The fact that Paddy Power does not even quote a price for the player remaining at Norwich after the window (a very distinct possibility if Norwich fail to make the required signing) means that they think it is a 33/1 shot or bigger?

I don't think so.

If Paddy Power quoted a price for Brady remaining at Norwich Burnley would not be 1/9.

Claret&Green · Post by **Claret&Green** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:02 am

randomclaret2 wrote:If he's half as good as his dad Liam, he'll do for me...

Just hope his uncle ain't Ian

Steddyman · Post by **Steddyman** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:05 am

Actually SkyBet have reduced the odds from 1/8 to 1/2 for Burnley to sign Brady. Not so confident after all.

Tall Paul · Post by **Tall Paul** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:08 am

Steddyman wrote:Actually SkyBet have reduced the odds from 1/8 to 1/2 for Burnley to sign Brady. Not so confident after all.

It still means they think he's twice as likely to be at Burnley than anywhere else by the end of the window.

As I said, money to be made for those that are saying it's not happening.

Reecey1987 · Post by **Reecey1987** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:12 am

Paul Waine wrote:Hi Reecey, we all know that the club any player is signed for knows what they are paid. We also know that it's far from unusual for players to go to their own club and say "I want more money... I think I'm worth more than you are currently paying me...." And, I'm sure that happened before players had agents...

So, new club, any new club (not just Burnley) want to sign a player it's a negotiation: what are you on now? we can pay you so much more? (and we offer other things as well). Does this meet your expectations? How much do you want? Wow, that's a big number.... what makes you think you are worth so much? OK, what's the number that works for you and we can afford?

Burnley got this sorted with Steven Defour and Jeff Hendrick last summer. We've got this sorted twice with Joey Barton - and he went to Rangers when it didn't get sorted - though we can guess that Joey is not "about money" in the same way...

Maybe we will get it sorted with Robbie Brady and maybe we wont. If we don't it is possible that Robbie will still be at Norwich until the summer - playing Championship football, and on a lower wage than he will have been offered by Burnley. (And, I don't think his agent makes any money if he stays at Norwich). Those are the things Brady will have to work out, will any club pay him the money he believes he is worth?

UTC

So basically you think its down to wages what were struggling on ? Which is fair enough . But what i dont understand is why we have left it so late to make a move for a player in the window if we already knew that we couldnt match his wage demands . Unless the club are hoping that the lure of premier league football could tempt him to leaving

kentonclaret · Post by **kentonclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:13 am

Skybet have odds of 11/2 that he will still be at Norwich and Sunderland at just 3/1.

Let's hope he doesn't get injured playing for Norwich this afternoon.

Very strange that he is playing if Burnley have had a bid accepted which several posters on here were claiming further up the thread.

mickleoverclaret · Post by **mickleoverclaret** » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:18 am

Tall Paul wrote:More likely than 90%, which is what 1/9 represents?

For comparison, they have a market on Michael Keane and Everton are favourites at 5/2.

1/9 doesn't represent a 90% chance at all. If that were the case then 10/1 would be the maximum odds quoted for anything.