Robbed

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
quoonbeatz
Posts: 4546
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2603 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Robbed

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:42 pm

Clearly offside and it's not even a foul. It's just a clash which happens in football. Mee is looking at the ball the entire time and just goes to clear it.

A complete joke of a decision.

The game needs to be officially non-contact if we're calling something like that a foul.
Last edited by quoonbeatz on Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5371
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1654 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Robbed

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:42 pm

A clear offside - coming back on before making a 2nd run doesn't excuse it, same phase of play.

That's 4 official's errors in 2 Arsenal winners this season (2 offsides, a handball and allowing too much time).

I thought Ben lost his man, made a desperate challenge and made yet another error at a crucial time after an incredible performance by him. Something I am writing again and again. Koscielney cheated by holding his face when he got a boot on the shoulder, influencing the ref in that it may not have been a foul technically, but his manager shoves officials so what else should we expect?

Still robbed again though. Maybe we are saving our luck on these matters? Marney being out potentially and Joey banned could be Groundhog Day but at least it is Jan 22nd not early Feb like last time. That could be one bit of good luck from what seems like desparate bad luck initially for Deano.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Robbed

Post by fidelcastro » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:43 pm

WE should have had a penalty against Man. City at home... if you ignore the offside before the push on Hendrick.

Exactly the same situation today, but frustratingly, in both instances, the final decision has gone against us! :(

FCBurnley
Posts: 9853
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2002 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Robbed

Post by FCBurnley » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:48 pm

Clear offside so no decision to make. Arsenal should have had a pen for tackle by gray. Veneer should get long long ban for pushing third official after being sent off.

fidelcastro
Posts: 7361
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2220 times
Has Liked: 2211 times

Re: Robbed

Post by fidelcastro » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:51 pm

Wenger's interview was utterly surreal. He claimed there was no jostling with the fourth official, when he's actually caught on camera doing just that!

Goodclaret
Posts: 1076
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
Been Liked: 543 times
Has Liked: 1514 times

Re: Robbed

Post by Goodclaret » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:51 pm

Surely we defended the cross in to the box as we played their player offside. Job done. Defended spot on but you rely on officials doing their job. That was not a hard offside to give as Koschelny was the nearest player to the lino so he had a clear view and he is bang on in line.

I thought the Gray challenge was a penalty though so we did get away earlier.

Wenger has said "clear penalty and Mee should have been sent off" This guy is becoming as much as a desperate bell end as Jose. Hopefully a nice ban and a fine heading his way for pushing the fourth official but I won't hold my breath with the incompetent FA.

Flat Stanley
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 60 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Robbed

Post by Flat Stanley » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:51 pm

Definitely offside, but silly challenge from Mee. No way he would have scored from there. Definitely a penalty his foot was very high. We would have been extremely fortunate to get something today far too negative again until the sending off. We can't just Expect to defend all game and give the ball away and get points. Really poor ball retention again today. Playing a very good side who were always going to have more possession but we must keep the ball better when we manage to get hold of it or it eventually costs you.

dsr
Posts: 15240
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2270 times

Re: Robbed

Post by dsr » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:56 pm

Flat Stanley wrote:Definitely offside, but silly challenge from Mee. No way he would have scored from there. Definitely a penalty his foot was very high. We would have been extremely fortunate to get something today far too negative again until the sending off. We can't just Expect to defend all game and give the ball away and get points. Really poor ball retention again today. Playing a very good side who were always going to have more possession but we must keep the ball better when we manage to get hold of it or it eventually costs you.
We had the same number of shots on target (3) as they did in the first half; over the whole game we were down by 1 (8-7). We weren't any more negative than most teams at Arsenal, IMO. It's not like they're a bunch of patsies there for the taking - they have won 8 out of 11 at home, lost only 1. It's a tough call to say what we could have done to guarantee the win or draw.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Robbed

Post by Blackrod » Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:01 pm

We lose the ball far too easily - main criticism of today.

HB Claret
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:09 am
Been Liked: 172 times
Has Liked: 81 times

Re: Robbed

Post by HB Claret » Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:13 pm

Bloody Sourness couldn't keep the smirk off his face after the match. It was interesting that Gray's penalty was a "poor penalty" because it was down the middle and their keeper nearly got a hand to it but the Arsenal penalty was "class". Thought the team were excellent today, defended resolutely and we created some decent chances which don't warrant a mention. Yes we have a problem with keeping the ball but considering where we have come from and who we were up against I think we will be okay.

Post Reply