£14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
£14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
One of the worst defenders iv ever seen imagine what we will be getting for keane.
-
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 698 times
- Has Liked: 4020 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Absolute joke! He is pants. BF'S is once again getting rinsed in a transfer windows. They're paying more for him than we are for Brady????
That is funny!
That is funny!
-
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2009 times
- Has Liked: 2904 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
It seems once a player is held up as someone special it takes some time for the football world to see through the hype. Its often a couple of big money moves before someone decides "he's pants" then suddenly the swell turns and no-one rates him, leaving a club with a player who has stung them fro a fortune with little re-sale value. Some players get entire careers from "reputation" with very little real substance to back it up.
Edit for typo
Edit for typo
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
And some people take an age to see the skills of players, Ings And Mee were often derided on here, and managers often don't see the best positions for their players or the sides best formation, funny game.
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:56 am
- Been Liked: 389 times
- Has Liked: 1022 times
- Location: Dnipropetrovsk
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Saw this before my first coffee of the day whilst wiping sleep from my eyes.
Thought it said 14M for an ****hole.
I thought, oh god, who've we signed in a panic.
Thought it said 14M for an ****hole.
I thought, oh god, who've we signed in a panic.
This user liked this post: vinrogue
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Unreal price.
Surely only a matter of time before we get Brady then?
Surely only a matter of time before we get Brady then?
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:03 pm
- Been Liked: 52 times
- Has Liked: 58 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
To be fair going forwards and on the ball he looked very assured. Decent left peg. But is not sign him as a left back.
Then again id not have signed alonso and look at him at chelsea now.
Then again id not have signed alonso and look at him at chelsea now.
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Very soon, hopefully!Claretmatt4 wrote:Unreal price.
Surely only a matter of time before we get Brady then?
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 164 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Very good going forward & he caught my eye.
If we're paying £10m for Hendrick & £13m for Brady, I think £14m for Van Aanholt is probably about right.
If we're paying £10m for Hendrick & £13m for Brady, I think £14m for Van Aanholt is probably about right.
-
- Posts: 6951
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1485 times
- Has Liked: 1846 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Overpriced overated but if it bankrupts WHU it can't be a bad thing
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Sam Allardyce is the manager of Crystal Palace now.Woodleyclaret wrote:Overpriced overated but if it bankrupts WHU it can't be a bad thing
This user liked this post: Braindead
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3547 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Mee possibly when he was at LB, but that's more a Burnley thing about disliking LB's more then the player themselves.ablueclaret wrote:And some people take an age to see the skills of players, Ings And Mee were often derided on here, and managers often don't see the best positions for their players or the sides best formation, funny game.
As for Ings, you're a little wide of the mark there I think.
As for taking an age to see the skills of players, you stated the other day it takes 20mins to see it.....
-
- Posts: 18049
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3862 times
- Has Liked: 2070 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Strange signing after getting Schlupp from Leicester. Out and out defenders are needed at Palace, going forward they were fine.
-
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
- Been Liked: 2009 times
- Has Liked: 2904 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Don't think Ings is the best example but Vokes was derided to the heaven's for quite some time. He's still not rated by everyone, but I think he's the best target man we've had since King Billy.
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Great News for us as they won't need Brady now
-
- Posts: 10309
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3337 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Didn't a prominent poster say Ings wouldn't get any better because he didn't lift his head?
A promotion and player of the year award later..
A promotion and player of the year award later..
-
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
No but Sunderland might !SalisburyClaret wrote:Great News for us as they won't need Brady now
-
- Posts: 11114
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
- Been Liked: 1571 times
- Has Liked: 360 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Pretty sure he has the most assists and goals for a defender since 2014.
Not a bad stat. But defensively he is shocking. I imagine he will play as a wing back for palace so could work out well
Not a bad stat. But defensively he is shocking. I imagine he will play as a wing back for palace so could work out well
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Brady has already told Sunderland he has no interest in joining. Sunderland are also on the verge of signing Bordeaux left back Contento on Loan.LaLigaClaret wrote:No but Sunderland might !
-
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 927 times
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Reading this and brought back the first time I saw Trevor Sinclair playing for (I think) Blackpool Reserves against our mob on the Turf (late 80s/early 90s?) and thinking `bloody hell! He`s going to be one HELL of a player!!!!` He didn`t do badly at all!Sidney1st wrote:Mee possibly when he was at LB, but that's more a Burnley thing about disliking LB's more then the player themselves.
As for Ings, you're a little wide of the mark there I think.
As for taking an age to see the skills of players, you stated the other day it takes 20mins to see it.....
-
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: £14m for van aanholt!!!!!!!
Sunderland wouldn't be signing Brady as left back but rather as a supplier to Defoe. Brady has no interest in joining Sunderland no but they may up a bid to above ours and so we are put in between a rock and a hard place if Norwich publicise that fact. Oh and Brady might get more wages than we can offer and that might put our offer in jeopardy.Slurpy wrote:Brady has already told Sunderland he has no interest in joining. Sunderland are also on the verge of signing Bordeaux left back Contento on Loan.