Vokes mobility

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
cblantfanclub
Posts: 419
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:11 pm
Been Liked: 118 times
Has Liked: 306 times

Vokes mobility

Post by cblantfanclub » Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:57 pm

Sam's never been particularly fleet of foot but recently he seems slower than ever and without wanting to be unkind a bit lumbering.
Is he carrying an injury - it looks like it at times ?

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 468 times
Has Liked: 190 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by KefkaClaret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:00 pm

He's certainly carrying some timber

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Lord Beamish » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:01 pm

Great! Now it's Sam's turn for a bit of abuse.
These 5 users liked this post: Diesel Sidney1st Funkydrummer CHEWBACCA Tribesmen

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30628
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11034 times
Has Liked: 5647 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:18 pm

I didn't see one bit of abuse from the OP. Some people need to learn the difference between an observation/question and abuse

Some of you obviously went to the Donald Trump school

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Blackrod » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:33 pm

His movement was the same as always. He always lumbers. It's when he doesn't win headers, create chances, score easy chances and get headers on target there's a problem....
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace

warksclaret
Posts: 6680
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1697 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by warksclaret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:47 pm

You can rotate Barnes, Gray and Vokes as much as you like. All 3 are great servants and squad members but all 3 lack the cutting edge of the PL

We will inevitably sell MK in the Summer and that's where we need to use the money, maybe trying to get Ings or Rodriguez and another quality striker

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8022
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2819 times
Has Liked: 503 times
Location: Earth

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by ClaretAndJew » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:47 pm

Ings or Rodriguez??? No thanks.

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3549
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 654 times
Has Liked: 2894 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Burnley Ace » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:51 pm

We need a quality striker. For all AG's promise he is an £8m stricker not £18m

RocketLawnChair
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 832 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by RocketLawnChair » Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:59 pm

Burnley Ace wrote:We need a quality striker. For all AG's promise he is an £8m stricker not £18m

His goals earned us roughly £170 million..

Look thread after thread will dissect today. Summary,,,, today was S H I T but I've followed the clarets since 1980 and I've left the ground feeling a whole lot S H I T T E R than today...

See you all at Hull X
These 3 users liked this post: Cooperclaret Oppycat BFCmaj

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 614 times
Has Liked: 680 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 6:13 pm

He's too soft for a big lad, should have been bossing their centre halves today, Barnes first challenge when he came on was more positive than anything Sam did all game. Toughen up please.

Ooogeorgeorgeoghani
Posts: 934
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
Been Liked: 212 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Ooogeorgeorgeoghani » Sat Feb 18, 2017 6:25 pm

Thought he hqs looked a lot sharper recently, today excepted

MDWat
Posts: 2527
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 878 times
Has Liked: 271 times
Location: Bradford
Contact:

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by MDWat » Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:36 pm

Vokes tends to find a while to get going if he spends time out of the team.

Stayingup
Posts: 5603
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 921 times
Has Liked: 2751 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Stayingup » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:01 pm

warksclaret wrote:You can rotate Barnes, Gray and Vokes as much as you like. All 3 are great servants and squad members but all 3 lack the cutting edge of the PL

We will inevitably sell MK in the Summer and that's where we need to use the money, maybe trying to get Ings or Rodriguez and another quality striker
Agreed. We need a good striker. I thought we should have tried to get Rhodes.

KRBFC
Posts: 18102
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by KRBFC » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:05 pm

He could learn a thing or two from that lump they had upfront.. as crazy as that sounds.

RocketLawnChair
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 832 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by RocketLawnChair » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:07 pm

warksclaret wrote:You can rotate Barnes, Gray and Vokes as much as you like. All 3 are great servants and squad members but all 3 lack the cutting edge of the PL

We will inevitably sell MK in the Summer and that's where we need to use the money, maybe trying to get Ings or Rodriguez and another quality striker
Well the 3 you suggest lack the cutting edge have got us to 12th in the Premier League so I personally am going to afford them the benefit of one collective crap performance...

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3547 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Sidney1st » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:09 pm

Why do people keep suggesting we sign 2 injury prone strikers?

Can't we try and sign someone else, or aren't completely new strikers allowed?

elwaclaret
Posts: 8987
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2009 times
Has Liked: 2904 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by elwaclaret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:10 pm

To be fair thought Sam didn't look 100% today. I'm a big fan of Vokes but he looked off the pace and never at any point looked the player we know he can be.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15234
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3156 times
Has Liked: 6743 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by boatshed bill » Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:11 pm

KRBFC wrote:He could learn a thing or two from that lump they had upfront.. as crazy as that sounds.
Perhaps some help with diet?
Nothing to learn there, he was just up for it.
Basically Tarkowski and Keane had very little trouble from him, our problems lay elsewhere in my humble opinion.

KRBFC
Posts: 18102
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by KRBFC » Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:56 pm

boatshed bill wrote:Perhaps some help with diet?
Nothing to learn there, he was just up for it.
Basically Tarkowski and Keane had very little trouble from him, our problems lay elsewhere in my humble opinion.
He offered a physical threat and won alot more in the air than Vokes.
This user liked this post: golden

1fatclaret
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
Been Liked: 169 times
Has Liked: 100 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by 1fatclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:43 am

Pimlico_Claret wrote:He's too soft for a big lad, should have been bossing their centre halves today, Barnes first challenge when he came on was more positive than anything Sam did all game. Toughen up please.
Barnes first challenge? You mean the one where he jumped into the defender about 5 seconds before the ball arrived, giving away a free kick? That one. Yeah, really positive that was.

RocketLawnChair
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 832 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by RocketLawnChair » Sun Feb 19, 2017 7:58 am

1fatclaret wrote:Barnes first challenge? You mean the one where he jumped into the defender about 5 seconds before the ball arrived, giving away a free kick? That one. Yeah, really positive that was.

I think it's a big part of the game personally. Yes it was a foul by Barnes but he's letting his direct opponent know this is going to be a physical battle and I'm up for it. Vokes does lack this and I've thought it ever since he signed, not just today.

Barnes does this every game and doesn't always concede a free kick btw.

warksclaret
Posts: 6680
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1697 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by warksclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:19 am

Barnes is in your face and is not easy to play against and his touch is good,tso the striking colleague on the day can often pick something from it. He also usually plays well against the top sides ie Man City, Chelsea, Arsenal. Particularly away Barnes & Vokes are easy to contain

As for the post that says our 3 strikers have got us to 12th in the PL lets see how many goals come from these 3 between now and May

warksclaret
Posts: 6680
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
Been Liked: 1697 times
Has Liked: 789 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by warksclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:21 am

That should have read "Gray & Vokes are easy to contain"

1fatclaret
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
Been Liked: 169 times
Has Liked: 100 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by 1fatclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:26 am

RocketLawnChair wrote:I think it's a big part of the game personally. Yes it was a foul by Barnes but he's letting his direct opponent know this is going to be a physical battle and I'm up for it. Vokes does lack this and I've thought it ever since he signed, not just today.

Barnes does this every game and doesn't always concede a free kick btw.
He does concede the same free kicks every single game. He wins less in the air than Vokes by some distance. Vokes isn't "too soft" he just doesn't recklessly jump into his opponent.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:28 am

KRBFC, we actually dealt with Rhead fairly easily.

Lincoln created one chance, which they scored from, and even that wasn't a corner.

Its a complete one off, and comparing someone who plays up front in the conference to premier league strikers who have done well this season is frankly, a bit like people saying Barton has always been a liability.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10311
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3337 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:34 am

To be fair Lincoln missed their best chance in first half.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Blackrod » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:45 am

I'd be shipping both Vokes and Gray out in. Summer and upgrading if we want to improve. I would keep Barnes as he offers much more with his presence although not too many goals.

Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Spijed » Sun Feb 19, 2017 8:48 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:KRBFC, we actually dealt with Rhead fairly easily.

Lincoln created one chance, which they scored from, and even that wasn't a corner.

Its a complete one off, and comparing someone who plays up front in the conference to premier league strikers who have done well this season is frankly, a bit like people saying Barton has always been a liability.
Matt Rhead is 32. He isn't good enough to play professional football at a higher level. That's why he drives JCB's for a living.

And yet he's been compared to someone who, at the very least, is a very good Championship striker.

Holtyclaret
Posts: 1131
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:35 pm
Been Liked: 345 times
Has Liked: 1568 times
Location: Wantage

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Holtyclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:07 am

It always seems to me and I like Sam, that he's not worth playing if we're not going to get crosses in. Same situation as Andre, with the wrong type of service there's little chance he'll score.

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by ablueclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:10 am

Remember Vokes didn't get the summer break, in my opinion would have been better to start with him alone up front get a shift out of him and then bring on Barnes and Gray to raise the pace of the game.No element of surprise yesterday.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:10 am

Sorry Bordeaux, you are right, they created two chances, one of which they scored from.

boiledclaret
Posts: 1592
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:56 am
Been Liked: 389 times
Has Liked: 1022 times
Location: Dnipropetrovsk

Re: Vokes mobility

Post by boiledclaret » Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 am

He offered a physical threat and won alot more in the air than Vokes.

:lol: :lol: yeah I'm sure he'd have had memorable performances against City in a 1-0 and scored 20+ in a promotion season to the Prem.

Rheid is a big lump who had his momemt in the Sun because the ref was soft as **** And for all those fans turning on Barton whatabout the hatchet job they did on Gudmundssen.

Am I the only one here who really wanted to see that cheating t*** take a right crack off the ball?

Post Reply