Trump's lost it. Truely lost it.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:14 am

Golfing again though so Twitter should be quiet until Monday but earlier on Saturday he flipped the **** out and ranted about Obama for 5 tweets. Many presidential. Much pivot.

For those who believes everything Trump says, no! Obama didn't tap Trump's phones.

gandhisflipflop · Post by **gandhisflipflop** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:39 am

Imploding Turtle wrote:Golfing again though so Twitter should be quiet until Monday but earlier on Saturday he flipped the **** out and ranted about Obama for 5 tweets. Many presidential. Much pivot.

For those who believes everything Trump says, no! Obama didn't tap Trump's phones.

I will not have a bad word said about the great Donald Trump on this board.

ClaretMoffitt · Post by **ClaretMoffitt** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:15 am

DownUnderClaret · Post by **DownUnderClaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:10 am

Yes, he is.

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:55 am

One of the papers today reckons Blair is trying to become Trumps middle eastern peace envoy.

If that happens then I'll accept that Trump is a brainless idiot.

mikeS · Post by **mikeS** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:58 am

Infamy, infamy.

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:04 am

He then tweeted about the apprentice.

As someone one said on twitter "Imagine finding out about the biggest scandal since watergate, and then watching tv and tweeting about that half an hour later".

As long as pillocks keep believing the crap he comes out with, then the fact he's completely unsuitable for his current role won't be addressed. Just how much damage can he do to the role of US President based on his first few weeks?

scouseclaret · Post by **scouseclaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:28 am

Surely Obama would have a libel(or is it slander in twittter??) case against him. If he won such a case, surely even trump couldn't continue.

morpheus2 · Post by **morpheus2** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:44 am

What's his evidence based on that his phones were tapped? If he has evidence then wouldn't it be better to go through the established legal process rather than a casual tweet before moving on to the more pressing concern of The Apprentice?

Alright, seeing as you lot are so lazy I had a google and found this on a far left media outlet -

Mr Trump's tweets follow allegations made by conservative radio host Mark Levin, including that the Obama administration "sought, and eventually obtained, authorisation to eavesdrop" on the Trump campaign last year.
Other media reports had previously suggested the FBI had sought a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance court (Fisa) in order to monitor members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials.
The warrant was first turned down but then reportedly approved in October, though there has been no official confirmation.
Under Fisa, wire-tapping can only be approved if there is probable cause to believe that the target of the surveillance is an agent of a foreign power. Mr Obama could not lawfully have ordered such a warrant.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39170985

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:49 am

If only the internet wasn't full of the legal framework required for a president to get a wire tap on an American citizen.

I'm not sure you've been keeping up with current news, but I hate to break it to you, apparently (and this is the really shocking bit!) that the allegations are that Trump was backed and most of his staff had lots of chats with the Russians. How un-American is that?

And guess what, under that level of suspicion (and a court order), its perfectly legal for his phones to be tapped (if they were, but thats still not certain)

C

Corky · Post by **Corky** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:03 am

Say what you like about the Donald but he sure is great entertainment.

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:31 am

Hope he finds it soon. I tend to look behind or under the settee first.

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:40 am

Corky wrote:Say what you like about the Donald but he sure is great entertainment.

Yes but is not a tv show. The decisions he makes will effect millions of people for years to come.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:42 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:Yes but is not a tv show. The decisions he makes will effect millions of people for years to come.

Which makes it all the more worrying that he can be pursuaded into a military action with "pssst! Obama wouldn't do this, the pussy!"

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:55 am

Some of his buddies aren't taking it very well.

Imagine what they'll be like when he's impeached, or quits.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/unh ... 65b844b44f" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

biggles · Post by **biggles** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:29 am

TRUELY.............REELY?

ClaretMoffitt · Post by **ClaretMoffitt** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 1:14 pm

Cant find these tweets, he deleted em?

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 1:18 pm

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Cant find these tweets, he deleted em?

No. @realdonaldtrump

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:19 pm

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/youre-i ... -of-crime/

Rowls · Post by **Rowls** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Breaking news: Donald Trump may be a bit of a fantasist who believes his own propaganda.

Immeasurable thanks to ImplodingTurtle for bringing this to the attention of the world.

Keep up the good work, guarding the planet against Fascism.

LongsideFacingUp · Post by **LongsideFacingUp** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:30 pm

Didn't we establish with Trump's 'wet and wild party' that you don't need any evidence to make outrageous claims?

Truely, I am confused.

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:42 pm

Sidney1st wrote:One of the papers today reckons Blair is trying to become Trumps middle eastern peace envoy.

If that happens then I'll accept that Trump is a brainless idiot.

In case anyone mistakes my "like" - I'm laughing out loud. Sidney, your comment is so ridiculously funny.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:42 pm

As usual, ignoring the issue at hand and pointing to something else.

Incidentally, that dossier you're dismissing is looking more and more credible, according to Intel sources reported on by the press. But I suppose when you've decided that any and all press that you don't like is 'fake news', or biased, then you don't have to accept the information they share.

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:30 pm

Paul Waine wrote:In case anyone mistakes my "like" - I'm laughing out loud. Sidney, your comment is so ridiculously funny.

Which bit?
Blair trying to get back the job he was clearly rubbish at and had no intention of doing properly or trump being a brainless idiot if he gives said job to that war mongering bell wipe Blair?

biggles · Post by **biggles** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:32 pm

and all press that one does like [ie stuff that confirms one's personal opinion] is gospel, perhaps? just saying.

Holmeclaret · Post by **Holmeclaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:43 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Surely Obama would have a libel(or is it slander in twittter??) case against him. If he won such a case, surely even trump couldn't continue.

Defamation laws are very weak in the US and not nearly as enforcible as they are here. The upside is that there is real freedom of speech. The downside is that you can make up whatever you like about an individual or entire communities of people.

Clareting · Post by **Clareting** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:47 pm

http://www.dailywire.com/news/14101/tow ... en-shapiro" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

KeighleyClaret · Post by **KeighleyClaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:05 pm

Corky wrote:Say what you like about the Donald but he sure is great entertainment.

So, in their day, were Jimmy Savill, Gary Glitter and Rolf Harris.

Stayingup · Post by **Stayingup** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:13 pm

All conjecture. Just like the Russian phone tapping during the run up to the election. Nothing found at all. Democrats saying they had never met a Russian Diplomat when they had. How low.can this get?

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:17 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Which bit?
Blair trying to get back the job he was clearly rubbish at and had no intention of doing properly or trump being a brainless idiot if he gives said job to that war mongering bell wipe Blair?

The beauty of "good comedy" is the combination of two silly things to make one absolutely ridiculous, very funny, laugh out loud thing.

You've got that in Blair/middle east peace envoy. You've also got it in Trump, full stop.

You've also joined two guys with the same degree of self-awareness. Possibly, politically on different sides of the left/right divide, or possibly not. Who knows.

Paul Waine · Post by **Paul Waine** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:48 pm

For something a little lighter: Saturday Night Live imagines Jeff Sessions as Forest Gump at the bus stop. (Washington Post - and probably elsewhere).

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:13 pm

It would be more believable if Trump claimed Obama had hacked his twitter to post fake mad ramblings.

Jamesy · Post by **Jamesy** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:13 pm

Truly lost it.

SmudgetheClaret · Post by **SmudgetheClaret** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:17 pm

How dare Trump accuse that pillar of truth and integrity known as Obama Clinton and the Democrats?

morpheus2 · Post by **morpheus2** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:14 pm

I think we should all spare a thought for this poor chap -

Hipper · Post by **Hipper** » Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:21 pm

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/?ref_=nv_sr_1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 1:40 am

Bet he can spell truly unlike some

grapidianclaret · Post by **grapidianclaret** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 1:57 am

FCBurnley wrote:Bet he can spell truly unlike some

But not Heereby, I mean earby, sorry, I got it this time , hereby.

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:55 am

FCBurnley wrote:Bet he can spell truly unlike some

He can't even spell "tap".

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:07 am

You know you've scored a huge point when the only comeback from those who defend everything Trump does is that you can't spell.

Corky · Post by **Corky** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:09 am

KeighleyClaret wrote:So, in their day, were Jimmy Savill, Gary Glitter and Rolf Harris.

That is a seriously weird comparison. But whatever rocks your boat.

morpheus2 · Post by **morpheus2** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:41 am

FCBurnley wrote:Bet he can spell truly unlike some

Strange how I was writing 'truely' in a comment and I spelled/spelt it the same until autocorrect corrected me, then I started staring at the correct spelling and it looked completely wrong, the more I stared at it the more ridiculous and unrecognisable it looked. A real case of jamais vu.

Guich · Post by **Guich** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:50 am

Indeed. I always find if the 'fascist' label doesn't work then it's best to move on to insinuations of paedo behaviour.

It does make you wonder though, while he makes so much effort to keep kicking up the silly media storm, how is his administration actually doing?

And did he ever actually have it?

biggles · Post by **biggles** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 5:36 pm

lesson here is - if you have a big gob and get off on having a go at everyone who's opinions you don't like then ensure your posts are 100% beyond reproach else you'll look like an idiot

Imploding Turtle · Post by **Imploding Turtle** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:31 pm

biggles wrote:lesson here is - if you have a big gob and get off on having a go at everyone who's opinions you don't like then ensure your posts are 100% beyond reproach else you'll look like an idiot

I never mock people for their spelling errors unless its in response to them picking on spelling errors themselves.

You've opened yourself up to the mockery that follows your misspelled posts.

ClaretMoffitt · Post by **ClaretMoffitt** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:34 pm

Imploding Turtle wrote:I never mock people for their spelling errors unless its in response to them picking on spelling errors themselves.

You've opened yourself up to the mockery that follows your misspelled posts.

People who mock or ignore someones argument because their language ability is limited really are the lowest of the low when it comes to internet debates.