Barnes over Vokes?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
PutTheWheelieBinsOut
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 194 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Barnes over Vokes?

Post by PutTheWheelieBinsOut » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:41 pm

I know everyone is talking about the Gray substitution. But I just don't get why Dyche favours Barnes over Vokes? I think Vokes is much the better player, has more class, is more lethal infront of goal, think his partnership with Gray is better. I would go so far as to say Vokes is Premier League quality whilst Barnes isn't :? :? :?

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Blackrod » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:42 pm

Vokes lethal. Yes of course he is.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret

PutTheWheelieBinsOut
Posts: 499
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 194 times
Has Liked: 16 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by PutTheWheelieBinsOut » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:44 pm

it says 'more' or did you just completely miss that??

Il Duce
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Il Duce » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:48 pm

Vokes is a decent player but far too polite for a big lad. Barnes is decent player but frustrating at times. Neither receive good service and mostly feed off scraps.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Blackrod » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:49 pm

No I can read. It's the term 'lethal' I am drawing attention to. Neither Barnes or Vokes are lethal in front of goal. You missed that. Look in a dictionary and you may understand.

randomclaret2
Posts: 6903
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by randomclaret2 » Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:59 pm

What I struggle to understand is why we only have 3 strikers...
This user liked this post: k90bfc

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30680
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11047 times
Has Liked: 5656 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:03 pm

Vokes is not PL standard and never will be (imho) BUT we don't help either him nor Barnes by getting good crosses in for them. Barnes will battle and chase anything, that's not really Sam's strength. We need creativity to get us in better positions to feed the strikers. They aren't even feeding on scraps at the moment

randomclaret2
Posts: 6903
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by randomclaret2 » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:06 pm

That's true...the 3 creative players in the squad...Defour, JBG and Brady rarely play, for a variety of reasons.
This user liked this post: k90bfc

jedi_master
Posts: 7172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3603 times
Has Liked: 1032 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by jedi_master » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:07 pm

By all means go with Barnes/Vokes up top if you feel that their physical presence will better against the absolute beasts that are Vertonghen and Alderweireld...

But if you insist on that, then for Gods sake, put Robbie Brady on the left bloody wing. The lad looks a fish out of water on the right hand side.

cockneyclaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 278 times
Has Liked: 3308 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by cockneyclaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:07 pm

Both need replacing if we stay up.
Too slow and not got that extra thing in there lockers to be PL class

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:12 pm

Whatever. Can't play two lumps together in the PL, really don't want to see the Vokes - Barnes combo again. Gray and one of them, my preference would be Vokes but there's not much in it - neither are good enough long term if we're looking to progress.

DCWat
Posts: 9334
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4142 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by DCWat » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:14 pm

Would have been a perfect opportunity to try Hendrick on the right (especially considering he didn't have one of his better games) from where he could have still come narrow to support in the middle.

Brady Barton Defour Hendrick would have been fewer round pegs in square holes, especially considering Hendrick has played on the right internationally and I think for Derby on occasion, too.

We have to get Defour into the side and Brady now needs a run in his favoured position. Maybe a step too far for Tuesday but I might even consider a 4141 with Westwood holding, giving more license for Defour to link midfield and attack.

Guitargeorge
Posts: 810
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:03 am
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 93 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Guitargeorge » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:43 pm

None of the three strikers are Premier league class, imo

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Blackrod » Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:46 pm

Unfortunately you will be seeing Barnes and Vokes together again. It was a waste of time today.

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:13 pm

Guitargeorge wrote:None of the three strikers are Premier league class, imo
Possibly but I suspect most opposition managers will be more wary of Gray than the other two, at least he poses some threat with his pace which can, potentially, stretch teams. However it's questionable whether he has the touch for a long term career in the top division.

bfcjg
Posts: 13331
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5080 times
Has Liked: 6878 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by bfcjg » Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:19 pm

Barnes jumps into defenders and appeals for fouls...................... then moans and kicks people.

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:36 pm

bfcjg wrote:Barnes jumps into defenders and appeals for fouls...................... then moans and kicks people.
He's a bruiser who's very fortunate to be starting PL games. Absolute must that we upgrade in the summer.

bobinho
Posts: 9325
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
Been Liked: 4105 times
Has Liked: 6586 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by bobinho » Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:52 pm

PutTheWheelieBinsOut wrote:I know everyone is talking about the Gray substitution. But I just don't get why Dyche favours Barnes over Vokes? I think Vokes is much the better player, has more class, is more lethal infront of goal, think his partnership with Gray is better. I would go so far as to say Vokes is Premier League quality whilst Barnes isn't :? :? :?
Hi Sam. How do you feel about your performance today? I thought you were very disappointing. You certainly weren't PL quality today. I'll be honest, I've always quite liked you, but today you weren't very good. You certainly won't start ahead of Barnes until you show you can do much better.

KRBFC
Posts: 18126
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3802 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by KRBFC » Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:55 pm

I think they're both as sh*te as each other at Pl level.

chorleyhere
Posts: 2447
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 pm
Been Liked: 206 times
Has Liked: 257 times
Location: Chorley Lancs

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by chorleyhere » Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:02 pm

"Barnes jumps into defenders and appeals for fouls"...... whereas Dele boy knows a player is nearby, falls over and gets a foul !!! Mee was incensed with his shenanigans . One law for one side, different one for us.

jojomk1
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 850 times
Has Liked: 581 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by jojomk1 » Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:05 pm

They are both way below Premier League standard lacking the necessary composure and pace - Championship at best

Having said that we don't give them much opportunity when our standard ball is to hoof it up the middle where decent central defenders will cope with them easily - its no coincidence that we are the lowest scorers outside of the bottom three

Without wide men who can get near to the bye line and pull balls across they are always facing away from the goal so any threat from height is pretty much nullified - the Barnes goal at Anfield is a good example of what can be achieved but that cross came from our full back

They are both contracted until 2019 so we have plenty of time to see more of the same

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3080 times
Has Liked: 5048 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:18 pm

I like Sam, but I'd pick Barnes everytime. He frightens defenders, Sam doesn't. He's also a lot better with the ball at his feet than Sam.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 619 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by BabylonClaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:19 pm

Because barnes is far more mobile. Vokes really struggles pace wise at this level.

HyperClaret
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:48 pm
Been Liked: 64 times
Has Liked: 91 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by HyperClaret » Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:23 pm

Man scoring against Belgium and the winning goal to take us up doesn't count for anything these days ;)

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Barnes over Vokes?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Apr 02, 2017 1:15 am

Strikers goal records alongside Sam speak for itself. Ings and Gray being just two examples.

Then you have a decent return from him himself too.

Needs to feature more.

Post Reply