Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by hampsteadclaret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:10 pm

Bad news for some..don't think that particular dad will be ecstatic.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-39504338" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Chobulous
Posts: 2132
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:27 am
Been Liked: 955 times
Has Liked: 11 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Chobulous » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:33 pm

The problem lies with the tour operators being able to have such a massive difference in their prices out of term time. Rowls would say it's the market that drives the prices and he is correct. Doesn't make it any more palatable though.

The good thing is if you choose the right time you can have a nice quiet, reasonably priced holiday without any screaming ankle biters disturbing your flight, jumping in and out of the pool soaking you through while you are enjoying the rays, making an unholy racket while you are dozing in the sun after a lunch time beer, if like me your are a grumpy old tw@t.
These 4 users liked this post: JohnMac PaintYorkClaretnBlue CJW CoolClaret

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3547 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sidney1st » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:38 pm

His argument was his daughter had 92.5% attendance record.

That's better then some adult workers I know.

The schools/education system didn't define what they meant by regular attendance, but from the looks of it they mean every single day, barring a death , illness or other family reasons.

The daylIght robbery by travel agents needs addressing and one way to do this is to spread school holidays about a bit if possible.
It then highlights even more how much holiday firms are bumping up prices.

Would I take my kids out of school for a one off holiday?
Damn right I would for the sake of a few thousand pound and I'd happily pay the £60 fine too, it would be totally worth it.

MACCA
Posts: 15591
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by MACCA » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:50 pm

The problem is a child can have 8 single days of once a month with no questions asked.
Toothache
Tummy ache
Sick
Runs
Temperature
Etc
Not an issue.

Have 100% attendance up until July but book the last 8 days off to save 50% cost on a holiday to Florida and the school goes ape sh1t.

Exactly the same but different punishments.

And if truth be known they toss it off usually for the last 2 weeks with sports days, summer concerts/fairs, toy/film days etc.

If they get fined for dipping under 95% it should be done at the end of each year for every child, Whatever the absence is for IMO.

But shush don't mention the regular teacher strikes , teacher training days, or closures for weather as they obviously dont effect the childs education the same as a few days off for sickness/holiday....
These 7 users liked this post: Sutton-Claret ten bellies bf2k NRC THEWELLERNUT70 CoolClaret Dazzler

Barry_Chuckle
Posts: 1763
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
Been Liked: 586 times
Has Liked: 203 times
Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Barry_Chuckle » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:53 pm

I do have a little sympathy with this bloke........There's a massive lack of consistency with this ruling though, when my children went to school I had leave granted for a family holiday, mainly due to the fact that my wife works in a role where she wasn't able to choose the exact dates she could take time off, resulting in the only time we could take a family holiday was during term time.
I am aware of other parents who had requests declined and not overturned on appeal, whilst others at appeal claimed the request was to take a "cultural visit" when they were really going to visit relatives overseas, and due to this being a "Cultural visit" they were then granted permission. This then causes further issues with "one rule for one and another rule for others" mentality.
Rules should be rules with clarity around them, things like 95% attendance average over the previous 12 months as a minimum. Homework in on time 100% of the time, 0 late marks etc.

dsr
Posts: 15139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4549 times
Has Liked: 2241 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by dsr » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:58 pm

A lot of schools believe that education is not just the most important part of a child's upbringing (which it isn't), they think it's the only important part. If a child can't have a holiday in school holiday tim,e they think the child is better off with no holiday at all.

It was better when term times were non-standard. Eg. Colne-Nelson-Burnley schools used to finish in early July and have two weeks in September - ideal to pick up the cheaper holiday prices. But this was deemed inconvenient for teachers and for education authorities, so it was scrapped.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5744
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1868 times
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:07 pm

As a one off every now and again I think time away on a family holiday is as important as being in school for the week. If it's a regular occurrence then leaves the headteachers little option.

As pointed out above the real issue is the travel agents charging so much during the school holidays which leaves some with little option but to go in term time.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:55 pm

Do the kids get compensation when the Teachers don't turn up and are stuck with a sub who hasn't the foggiest what they are doing ? Do they ********, take your kids out whenever you want, it's amazing how many really smart people come out of the home schooling system too

mikeS
Posts: 1742
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:21 am
Been Liked: 650 times
Has Liked: 25 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by mikeS » Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:58 pm

Whatever happened to the School Board?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:59 pm

and further, can anyone explain to me how a fine is going to improve a child's education ? bullshite factor of 10
This user liked this post: NRC

tybfc
Posts: 3326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 1304 times
Has Liked: 318 times
Location: Accrington

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by tybfc » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:05 pm

My youngest has an EHC plan (statemented) and should be taught on a 1:1 basis.

Twice in the past two weeks I have received a phone call within an hour of me taking him to school to say that they had no teacher available and could I keep him at home for the day.

I wonder what the Supreme Court would make of that?
These 5 users liked this post: cloughyclaret bf2k NRC THEWELLERNUT70 djt2006

Tall Paul
Posts: 7171
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 690 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Tall Paul » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:15 pm

So this bloke can afford to spend a fortune on a legal challenge, but he can't afford to take his children on holiday outside school time?
These 3 users liked this post: StevieP Shipclaret Blackrod

Barry_Chuckle
Posts: 1763
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:24 pm
Been Liked: 586 times
Has Liked: 203 times
Location: Oldfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Barry_Chuckle » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:21 pm

Tall Paul wrote:So this bloke can afford to spend a fortune on a legal challenge, but he can't afford to take his children on holiday outside school time?
No, I believe this guy has children at 2 different schools who chose to have 2 different school terms and specified holiday dates. So to have a family holiday, he had to take one of them out of school.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30275
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10917 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Vegas Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:21 pm

tybfc wrote:My youngest has an EHC plan (statemented) and should be taught on a 1:1 basis.

Twice in the past two weeks I have received a phone call within an hour of me taking him to school to say that they had no teacher available and could I keep him at home for the day.

I wonder what the Supreme Court would make of that?
exactly my point, it's a joke

btw I don't have any kids but I remember how shite some of my schooling was in terms of teachers not turning up etc

Caernarfon_Claret
Posts: 5044
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
Been Liked: 1473 times
Has Liked: 633 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Caernarfon_Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:30 pm

He won the original case. It was the education department that appealed the original decision that he didnt have a case to answer.

hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by hampsteadclaret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:32 pm

post 8... 'it's amazing how many really smart people come out of the home schooling system too..'

At a guess,.. you were taught in a school..?
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

RMutt
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 pm
Been Liked: 373 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by RMutt » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:38 pm

92.5% attendance is a day off every three weeks or so.

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1420
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 164 times
Location: York

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sutton-Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:39 pm

We took our kids out (aged 9 and 11) to go skiing 2 weeks ago (along with 2 other families we went with). If we'd have gone during Easter it wouldv've cost us £1200 more. Both my kids have never had a day off this school year (apart from 5 days skiing) - they're always on time. Even with the week off they have a better attendance than most kids in the school. The whole thing drives me mad......

RMutt
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 pm
Been Liked: 373 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by RMutt » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:45 pm

Are people who go on holiday in the school holidays subsidising the holidays of those who go in term time?

No Ney Never
Posts: 2637
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 894 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by No Ney Never » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:47 pm

Don't worry too much, it's simply another rule of today's society where you need to weigh up the cost to benefit ratio. A bit like whether to park on a yellow line when you nip out to somewhere, £1.50 in a car park, £60 fine if you're caught or free if you get away with it.
Potentially late for work, get docked pay or put your foot down and risk getting caught speeding. You may not get caught and arrive at work in time, then again....
If a holiday is £500 or whatever cheaper in term time, what's £60? At the level of fine as it is, I don't know why more people aren't doing it!

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:58 pm

Whilst the fine of £60 is a lot less than the saving on a holiday price, parents of primary school children shouldn't complain when they don't get their first choice of secondary school when the time comes.... it all stays on the record for a few years and is taken into consideration when secondary school places are allocated.

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:10 pm

RMutt wrote:Are people who go on holiday in the school holidays subsidising the holidays of those who go in term time?
No, they are simply boosting the profits of the holiday companies.

d1sc0
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:39 am
Been Liked: 24 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by d1sc0 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:18 pm

What really gets my goat on this is not the holiday prices etc etc. It's as usual with Britain it's the disorganisation. We have two children 12 and 8. They go to different schools who see fit to operate different holiday callenders. Factor in work commitments etc and it becomes impossible to find compatible dates.

Why doesn't every school follow the same calender and have the same holiday dates in the uk. That would be a good start.

Garnerssoap
Posts: 1348
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:50 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 514 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Garnerssoap » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:27 pm

He should've been banged up for subjecting his kids to Disneyland

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 17917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3842 times
Has Liked: 2065 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:32 pm

I have just put a holiday request form in for one of my sons who has different holidays to my other son. I will give the head teacher the chance to look after son number two if they refuse permission. See how that goes down.

Sean Dyche's Watch
Posts: 827
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 233 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sean Dyche's Watch » Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:38 pm

The headteacher at my daughter's school asked for time off in term time, which was rejected by the governers.

He then went off sick, saying he was stressed. He went away in that time. He was suspended, and later resigned (I suspect before he was dismissed).

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -time.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

dsr
Posts: 15139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4549 times
Has Liked: 2241 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by dsr » Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:55 pm

d1sc0 wrote:What really gets my goat on this is not the holiday prices etc etc. It's as usual with Britain it's the disorganisation. We have two children 12 and 8. They go to different schools who see fit to operate different holiday callenders. Factor in work commitments etc and it becomes impossible to find compatible dates.

Why doesn't every school follow the same calender and have the same holiday dates in the uk. That would be a good start.
It would certainly restrict school holidays to 12 weeks of maximum prices, and make the other 40 weeks very much cheaper and child-free for the rest of us. I suspect most parents wouldn't see that as a good thing.

If travel companies tried increasing prices at off-peak rates, that wouldn't help the parents. For example, a hotel charges lower rates in term time, which incidentally is also out of high season. They are forced to put the price upin May-June-September and reduce prices in July-August; so they get less income in July-August because prices are less, and they get less income in May-June-September because people won't pay high season prices; so they have to put the prices up again to peak summer prices, which takes July-August income back to the level it was before, but they still can't sell May-June-September. So they're still losing income, so prices go higher still. Practical communism, in fact - everyone gets poorer, but it's a more equal poverty.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 17917
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3842 times
Has Liked: 2065 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:58 pm

Most teachers are on the side of the parents by the way and a lot of teachers who are parents get caught up in it, but get special dispensation.

Claretforever
Posts: 2928
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 507 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Claretforever » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:13 pm

RMutt wrote:92.5% attendance is a day off every three weeks or so.
Yes, but the 92.5% included the holiday in question. I think the child had 95-96% attendance not including that. Basically 2 weeks illness besides that incident.

I'm actually on holiday now having taken mine out of school for a single day. The difference would have been over £500 to go the day later. In fact, it was almost that much more to go the same say, but later that night rather than an AM flight, knowing the schools finish. It's not even officially Easter yet, but a lot of schools are taking these two weeks, and the travel companies know this. No brainier to take our child out. Attendance is at close to 99%, but that £500 was seriously the difference between going and not going.

What have we gained by going? My little one has spend every day with both working parents in the sunshine, hours upon hours in the pool and learned to swim properly and confidently. We've seen sights and had tours, learning about animals at an animal park, plus different countries an bits of languages by meeting friends from Germany, France and Yorkshire ( :lol: ). What has been missed? This has been confirmed by a class friend, but all they did that day at school was played games all day. I'll repeat for clarity, they had a bloody "toy day". How is that benefitting my child over this holiday?

The £60-120 fine (for each parent!!!) is a money maker, and no more. Head teachers should be able to make a judgement on the time of year, the overall attendance record and level the child is at, amongst other things, and decide whether to grant permission. The government also need to take ownership of the problem with holiday companies. It's an absolute joke, and is one of the main reasons parents do it.

All this will lead to is more parents teaching their children to lie about being sick. It's not what we've done by the way, but I've learned my lesson there. :|
This user liked this post: cloughyclaret

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5744
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1868 times
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:16 pm

Maybe people should take the issue up with their MP's and local councillors given that's who decided to start forcing headteachers and governors to implement fines.

Shore claret
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 267 times
Has Liked: 660 times
Location: Starbug

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Shore claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:18 pm

Can people not simply stick to fairly simple rules, school term time is for learning then when they have a holiday have a family holiday. If the guy has put his kids in 2 different schools that's the consequences.
Don't see why society these days has to argue and find problems with every single thing.

dsr
Posts: 15139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4549 times
Has Liked: 2241 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by dsr » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:30 pm

Shore claret wrote:Can people not simply stick to fairly simple rules, school term time is for learning then when they have a holiday have a family holiday. If the guy has put his kids in 2 different schools that's the consequences.
Don't see why society these days has to argue and find problems with every single thing.
Rank the following in order of importance to a child's upbringing:
A - Education.
B - Family life.

If you put A before B, you're wrong. But if you put A first and only, and B totally irrelevant, you're wronger.

Most children can expect to have about 560 weeks of school in their childhood. They can also expect perhaps 40 weeks family holiday in the same period, if they're from a fairly well-off family. But what if the family can't afford the full 40 weeks, especially at school hliday prices - what would be a fairer balance? 560 school, 20 holiday? What if it's only 10? Does there ever come a point where it's worth missing some school to get some more holiday, or would you go right down to 560 weeks at school and never have a family holiday at all? Because in some cases it would come down to that, eg. people who work in the UK tourist industry and can never be off work in school holidays.

I had three and a half weeks of school when I was 10, because we had the chance of 6 weeks in a cottage in Denmark. I have loads of happy memories of that holiday, even 40+ years later, including memories of my Dad who is no longer with us and the family we stayed with, also no longer with us. If I had gone to school for three more weeks, would I (a) have been happier? (b ) got better exam results? Answer - No and No. My parents made the correct decision for me, as you would expect parents to do, because they knew me better than the local council does.

It's the same argument as with the 11 year olds trying to go to the toilet at Turf Moor - who knows the child best - the parents, or the officials? (And if the parents will make wrong decisions and bring up the children to be little hooligans, no amount of official box-ticking would make that better anyway.)
This user liked this post: Claretforever

Claretforever
Posts: 2928
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 507 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Claretforever » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:44 pm

Shore claret wrote:Can people not simply stick to fairly simple rules, school term time is for learning then when they have a holiday have a family holiday. If the guy has put his kids in 2 different schools that's the consequences.
Don't see why society these days has to argue and find problems with every single thing.
So you see only your own situation but not that of others. Fair enough. Before I was a parent I'd probably have a similar view.

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5231
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 397 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:50 pm

We were at Drayton Manor today because my little one is on schools hols but that area isn't so it would be quiet.

Sat down for 5 minutes and looked at this article on BBC News for a breather while the little 'un was taken on some spinning teacup or some such nightmarish ride.

What did I see while I was reading it......?

About 100 kids swarming in whilst in their school uniforms accompanied by teachers.

The thought occurred to me - what hypocrisy to ban well meaning parents from making decisions (which are often due to money, but aren't always) when schools take kids themselves during term time to the same places. We had the same whilst skiing last winter with kids there during term time. Tell me which bit of that day or week out is educational? That's before I get to inset days, strikes and days when the kid is left with a teaching assistant because the teacher is swanning off somewhere.

When in glass houses, never throw stones.

d1sc0
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:39 am
Been Liked: 24 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by d1sc0 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:53 pm

Shore claret wrote:Can people not simply stick to fairly simple rules, school term time is for learning then when they have a holiday have a family holiday. If the guy has put his kids in 2 different schools that's the consequences.
Don't see why society these days has to argue and find problems with every single thing.
In the case of ours one is 8 and one is 12. We have no choice but to use separate schools. Who in the same village choose to have different holiday dates.

Then let's add in those where parents are no longer together and with new partners who have kids from previous relationship who go to different schools. Etc etc
This user liked this post: NRC

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1420
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 164 times
Location: York

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Sutton-Claret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:54 pm

Sean Dyche's Watch wrote:Whilst the fine of £60 is a lot less than the saving on a holiday price, parents of primary school children shouldn't complain when they don't get their first choice of secondary school when the time comes.... it all stays on the record for a few years and is taken into consideration when secondary school places are allocated.
No it isn't

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5744
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1868 times
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:58 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:We were at Drayton Manor today because my little one is on schools hols but that area isn't so it would be quiet.

Sat down for 5 minutes and looked at this article on BBC News for a breather while the little 'un was taken on some spinning teacup or some such nightmarish ride.

What did I see while I was reading it......?

About 100 kids swarming in whilst in their school uniforms accompanied by teachers.

The thought occurred to me - what hypocrisy to ban well meaning parents from making decisions (which are often due to money, but aren't always) when schools take kids themselves during term time to the same places. We had the same whilst skiing last winter with kids there during term time. Tell me which bit of that day or week out is educational? That's before I get to inset days, strikes and days when the kid is left with a teaching assistant because the teacher is swanning off somewhere.

When in glass houses, never throw stones.
So schools should ban any form of trips? Also most teaching assistants I know are more then capable of teaching a class while the teacher is 'swanning about' (or most probably away doing CPD or meetings).

lakesclaret
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 6:49 pm
Been Liked: 151 times
Has Liked: 4 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by lakesclaret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:06 pm

I thought the old " holidays too expensive in term holidays" a bit of a well worn out red herring .Dont non Asian parents just get a bit fed up when many Asian kids just disappear to Pakistan for 2/3 months etc? Semmingly willy nilly without warning nor adherence to school holidays or indeed fines? Then get a bit p1ssed off when they go on hol themselves a few days early only to be fined and hauled over the coals ?

yorkyclaret
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 246 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by yorkyclaret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:11 pm

Why not make school pupils passports invalid during term time? In fact add kids under school age to that, then I can have a really enjoyable holiday.

tybfc
Posts: 3326
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
Been Liked: 1304 times
Has Liked: 318 times
Location: Accrington

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by tybfc » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:17 pm

yorkyclaret wrote:Why not make school pupils passports invalid during term time? In fact add kids under school age to that, then I can have a really enjoyable holiday.
Pathetic

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 361 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Roosterbooster » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:25 pm

One of the government's arguments is that the more time pupils have off school, the worse their GCSE results. Every extra day off relates to a measurable reduction in results.

The problem with this argument, is that the study is only able to show a relationship between the 2, and not a cause / effect.

There is a logical, and measurable, argument that students, who are more likely to receive good grades, are less likely to take days off school anyway, and conversely, students predicted to do worse in exams, are more likely to take days off.

Just as the government can argue that taking days off school makes your exam results worse, others can argue that both exam results and days taken off school are both dependent upon the student themselves, and not directly related to each other.

If this were the case, then taking a few days off school is very unlikely to affect exam results, and if it improves the family life for that individual, it might even improve them.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16689
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6901 times
Has Liked: 1471 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:48 pm

Surely you're not saying that taking days off school doesn't affect a child's education for the worse? How can it possibly not? The less education they're receiving, the less educated they are. It's pretty simple really.

As for whether children gain more from taking holidays than a school education, I'd imagine that would vary greatly based on a number of factors.

Claretforever
Posts: 2928
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 507 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Claretforever » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:49 pm

How about the argument that those families which holiday together, bringing them closer, have more respect within the family unit and have less occurrence of skiving off, so get better grades? Maybe a bit more respect to their parents? Be interesting to see figures, if they existed, just for those families taking term time holidays.

yorkyclaret
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 246 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by yorkyclaret » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:50 pm

tybfc wrote:Pathetic
Moronic

Vince Fontaine
Posts: 518
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:41 pm
Been Liked: 174 times
Has Liked: 41 times
Location: Colne

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Vince Fontaine » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:59 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Surely you're not saying that taking days off school doesn't affect a child's education for the worse? How can it possibly not? The less education they're receiving, the less educated they are. It's pretty simple really.

As for whether children gain more from taking holidays than a school education, I'd imagine that would vary greatly based on a number of factors.

Lord street school in colne will be closed for an extra week at Easter because there is dry rot. No detriment to every child in the school because the county council closes it.

Double standards at best!!!!!

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by South West Claret. » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:00 pm

hampsteadclaret wrote:Bad news for some..don't think that particular dad will be ecstatic.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-39504338" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Frankly getting a bit tired of the "I want" society, if you can't afford them don't have them and if there are accidents involved then please be a bit more careful in the future.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 361 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Roosterbooster » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:01 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Surely you're not saying that taking days off school doesn't affect a child's education for the worse? How can it possibly not? The less education they're receiving, the less educated they are. It's pretty simple really.

As for whether children gain more from taking holidays than a school education, I'd imagine that would vary greatly based on a number of factors.
If you think back to school, did you learn something useful every single day? Probably not. And if you missed just one day, do you really think it would make a difference over 12 years of education before GCSEs? I think you would struggle to argue this case.

A good education at school is only part of a child's development. Being in school for 6 hours in a day doesn't necessarily mean they receive 6 hours of good education. Similarly, being in school every day doesn't necessarily mean you are well educated. The child has to be engaged and willing to learn. Of course, if you are off school regularly, you wouldn't expect to be well educated. But missing a bit of school here and there in a child who is conscientious and happy to catch up with a bit of extra homework later on, is unlikely to affect them when compared to a child who is not at all engaged with the education they receive.

I'm not an advocate for parents taking kids out of school for holidays willy-nilly, but if there is a good reason for it, and the pupil has a good attendance history, then I cannot see the long term harm. It should be left up to the headteacher.
This user liked this post: cloughyclaret

Rileybobs
Posts: 16689
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6901 times
Has Liked: 1471 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:04 pm

Vince Fontaine wrote:Lord street school in colne will be closed for an extra week at Easter because there is dry rot. No detriment to every child in the school because the county council closes it.

Double standards at best!!!!!
How's that double standards? Seems like the school has been closed because it's not a fit/safe/healthy environment for children to be in. There's seems like there's very much an 'us vs them' attitude running through this thread and it comes across to me as both selfish and pathetic.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16689
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6901 times
Has Liked: 1471 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:08 pm

Roosterbooster wrote:If you think back to school, did you learn something useful every single day? Probably not. And if you missed just one day, do you really think it would make a difference over 12 years of education before GCSEs? I think you would struggle to argue this case.

A good education at school is only part of a child's development. Being in school for 6 hours in a day doesn't necessarily mean they receive 6 hours of good education. Similarly, being in school every day doesn't necessarily mean you are well educated. The child has to be engaged and willing to learn. Of course, if you are off school regularly, you wouldn't expect to be well educated. But missing a bit of school here and there in a child who is conscientious and happy to catch up with a bit of extra homework later on, is unlikely to affect them when compared to a child who is not at all engaged with the education they receive.

I'm not an advocate for parents taking kids out of school for holidays willy-nilly, but if there is a good reason for it, and the pupil has a good attendance history, then I cannot see the long term harm. It should be left up to the headteacher.
I agree that taking children out of school could be beneficial in some cases. There's a whole number of circumstances which can be considered. But rather like when we have debates on here about away ticketing policies, it's impossible to have a system that assesses each individuals circumstances fairly. It's selfish to assume otherwise.

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2583
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 361 times

Re: Term time holiday dad loses court battle...

Post by Roosterbooster » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:12 pm

Rileybobs wrote:I agree that taking children out of school could be beneficial in some cases. There's a whole number of circumstances which can be considered. But rather like when we have debates on here about away ticketing policies, it's impossible to have a system that assesses each individuals circumstances fairly. It's selfish to assume otherwise.
I'm not sure why that's selfish. But I think there are too many factors to consider to have a national blanket policy. Especially one based upon a theory which, as explained above, may well be incorrect.

Post Reply