Claret Incoming Rumours
-
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 87 times
- Has Liked: 5 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
I reckon Dyche would play Walters as a defensive winger similar to Boyd or Arfield. I don't think he'd be replacing Vokes or Barnes.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Of course we would, you see, that's exactly how football works.LaLigaClaret wrote:If we bought Walters and sold either Barnes or Vokes then WE WOULD be relegated without doubt and it would be a seriously stupid move.
On the other hand, that's a seriously stupid post.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Shuddernorthernpowerhouse wrote:I reckon Dyche would play Walters as a defensive winger similar to Boyd or Arfield. I don't think he'd be replacing Vokes or Barnes.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
It always amazes me just how many premier league managers out there read and contribute to threads on this site, I mean on this thread alone there must be at least a dozen!
This user liked this post: BennyD
-
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Which still makes my point a million times more logical than your nonsense. Do you seriously think that posters wouldn't go ballistic if we sold Vokes or Barnes and instead signed Walters as a direct replacement. Dyche would be rightly lambasted even if he is the Burnley manager. It would be absolutely ridiculous and the fact you can't see it makes me wonder if you understand anything about football. I don't give a monkey's doo-dah what you think on this matter just go back to playing Championship Manager the 2001 edition on the Spectrum as that is about your level of knowledge.
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:02 pm
- Been Liked: 53 times
- Has Liked: 24 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
claretblue wrote:Edam!
randomclaret2 wrote:Adam
Mala591 wrote:Blacklaw
This isn't Adeola Friday you guys
This user liked this post: IanMcL
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
- Been Liked: 228 times
- Has Liked: 137 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Sorry just more stories floated in the press to fill a few pages, we get rid of Boyd at 31 hence the 1 year deal & sign a 33 year old on a 3 year deal I work with several Stoke season ticket holders & they says it's not true.
-
- Posts: 3233
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
- Been Liked: 1768 times
- Has Liked: 41 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Posters may go ballistic, the nodders and dribblers like you obviously would and if that was the scenario that played out I'd say they'd maybe have just cause.LaLigaClaret wrote:Which still makes my point a million times more logical than your nonsense. Do you seriously think that posters wouldn't go ballistic if we sold Vokes or Barnes and instead signed Walters as a direct replacement. Dyche would be rightly lambasted even if he is the Burnley manager. It would be absolutely ridiculous and the fact you can't see it makes me wonder if you understand anything about football. I don't give a monkey's doo-dah what you think on this matter just go back to playing Championship Manager the 2001 edition on the Spectrum as that is about your level of knowledge.
However, that simply hasn't happened and yet again we see a huge over reaction to nothing other than a link. We may sign Walters, we may not, we may keep Gray or sign a star replacement for Gray, who knows?
The thing is, some fans look at everything in isolation. If signing Walters is at the direct expense of signing other players by all means shout and scream about. If however he's one of a number of signings this summer, which is far more likely, then let's look at what we have when the season starts and when the window closes and cast judgement then.
This user liked this post: taio
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 835 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
It'll still be above yours.BennyD wrote:I don't have to explain why I didn't justify your post. If Walters is good enough for SD then he is good enough for me despite what you say. When you have SDs management record, THEN I'll listen to you. Until then, as far as I'm concerned, your opinion is worth two tenths of the square-root of f*ck all.
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
In your opinion which is, again, worth f*ck all.
-
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Poor BennyD you are really clueless so I will explain it to you in easy stages.
Walters wants regular starting football having played only 13 times last season. He would only come to us if he thought he would get regular playing time. We have our leading goal scorer from last season Vokes. We have Gray who is in the last year of his contract and wants to leave. We have Barnes who scared Prem defenders to death last season. We don't have a 4th striker ready to step up in regular contention at the standard we need. Walters doesn't fit the 4th Striker model because he wants regular football.
Walters does not score much and certainly wouldn't replace Vokes. So we have Gray and Barnes to consider when seeing how he would fit in. A replacement for Gray ? Ha ! Ha! This doesn't need explanation as it couldn't possibly be justified at any level. A replacement for Barnes ? Hmmm now it starts to get interesting because Barnes was subject to speculation about clubs wanting him and likely to be subject to a bid. Barnes would be valued at a higher value than Walters not only because he offers more as a player but is younger and is not in the last year of his contract.
So there is the possibility that the idea could be Walters in and Barnes out because we would make money on the deal. The question is would you prefer the slowing Walters at age 33 who doesn't play regularly or the physical Barnes who terrorises defenders and done a great job for us. The thing is that would leave us Vokes, Walters and the likely to depart Gray who would then need replacing and we still wouldn't have the 4th striker we need. So I don't see why we are bidding on Walters unless he will be happy to be 4th striker, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Gray, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Barnes. If Barnes is the choice then I don't think fans would be particularly happy and it would be very unfair on him and frankly I don't think Walters would give us anything above what Barnes offers. I still stick by my belief that it would be a very poor outcome for us.
Walters wants regular starting football having played only 13 times last season. He would only come to us if he thought he would get regular playing time. We have our leading goal scorer from last season Vokes. We have Gray who is in the last year of his contract and wants to leave. We have Barnes who scared Prem defenders to death last season. We don't have a 4th striker ready to step up in regular contention at the standard we need. Walters doesn't fit the 4th Striker model because he wants regular football.
Walters does not score much and certainly wouldn't replace Vokes. So we have Gray and Barnes to consider when seeing how he would fit in. A replacement for Gray ? Ha ! Ha! This doesn't need explanation as it couldn't possibly be justified at any level. A replacement for Barnes ? Hmmm now it starts to get interesting because Barnes was subject to speculation about clubs wanting him and likely to be subject to a bid. Barnes would be valued at a higher value than Walters not only because he offers more as a player but is younger and is not in the last year of his contract.
So there is the possibility that the idea could be Walters in and Barnes out because we would make money on the deal. The question is would you prefer the slowing Walters at age 33 who doesn't play regularly or the physical Barnes who terrorises defenders and done a great job for us. The thing is that would leave us Vokes, Walters and the likely to depart Gray who would then need replacing and we still wouldn't have the 4th striker we need. So I don't see why we are bidding on Walters unless he will be happy to be 4th striker, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Gray, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Barnes. If Barnes is the choice then I don't think fans would be particularly happy and it would be very unfair on him and frankly I don't think Walters would give us anything above what Barnes offers. I still stick by my belief that it would be a very poor outcome for us.
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
2/10√FuckAll = ?
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
This is absolutely spot on, but unfortunately some people don't have the capacity to understand this or they are just trying to find problems before they exist. It's best to save strong views until we have the full picture rather than odd pieces of a jigsaw.arise_sir_charge wrote:Posters may go ballistic, the nodders and dribblers like you obviously would and if that was the scenario that played out I'd say they'd maybe have just cause.
However, that simply hasn't happened and yet again we see a huge over reaction to nothing other than a link. We may sign Walters, we may not, we may keep Gray or sign a star replacement for Gray, who knows?
The thing is, some fans look at everything in isolation. If signing Walters is at the direct expense of signing other players by all means shout and scream about. If however he's one of a number of signings this summer, which is far more likely, then let's look at what we have when the season starts and when the window closes and cast judgement then.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Then just don't contribute to threads like this, go and sleep in a corner somewhere until the time is right.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
I'll contribute to what I choose especially to your inane rubbish. You should have taken your own advice, but I see you went back on that.ablueclaret wrote:Then just don't contribute to threads like this, go and sleep in a corner somewhere until the time is right.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
And less goals.Guich wrote:I'd be very keen on a Gray swap with Shane Long. More pace and more control.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Touchy taio in need of a holiday
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Rumour: there is more incoming irrelevant shite to be spouted on these threads
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Haha!..let's hope so Firthy !
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Heard Dyche has decided he's only going to target players he knows posters on this messageboard won't rate.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Makes sense.
Its what I'd do, just for shits and giggles
Its what I'd do, just for shits and giggles
-
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
All this with Walters reminds me of the types of posts we were seeing when we were "about to sign" Kevin Davies and Dean Whitehead.
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Yeh you can tell he has no real interest in progressing the club any further just by the types of players the tabloids are linking us with.Lancasterclaret wrote:Makes sense.
Its what I'd do, just for shits and giggles
-
- Posts: 10974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5188 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
I've heard that we are re-signing one of these two (why's that man in the background got a black cotton bud sticking out of his ear?)
Source - Lancaster's twitter thingy
Source - Lancaster's twitter thingy
-
- Posts: 3129
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1156 times
- Has Liked: 1068 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Chancel Mbemba Mangulu From Newcastle coming in to replace Keane
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
" Look Juke....just score me a goal, 1 goal, just one goal.......watch what Ingsy does and you do the same....….please ?"
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Foreign and ex-Anderlecht. He'll get subbed after an hour, no matter how well he's playing.AGENT_CLARET wrote:Chancel Mbemba Mangulu From Newcastle coming in to replace Keane
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
LaLigaClaret wrote:Poor BennyD you are really clueless so I will explain it to you in easy stages.
Walters wants regular starting football having played only 13 times last season. He would only come to us if he thought he would get regular playing time. We have our leading goal scorer from last season Vokes. We have Gray who is in the last year of his contract and wants to leave. We have Barnes who scared Prem defenders to death last season. We don't have a 4th striker ready to step up in regular contention at the standard we need. Walters doesn't fit the 4th Striker model because he wants regular football.
Walters does not score much and certainly wouldn't replace Vokes. So we have Gray and Barnes to consider when seeing how he would fit in. A replacement for Gray ? Ha ! Ha! This doesn't need explanation as it couldn't possibly be justified at any level. A replacement for Barnes ? Hmmm now it starts to get interesting because Barnes was subject to speculation about clubs wanting him and likely to be subject to a bid. Barnes would be valued at a higher value than Walters not only because he offers more as a player but is younger and is not in the last year of his contract.
So there is the possibility that the idea could be Walters in and Barnes out because we would make money on the deal. The question is would you prefer the slowing Walters at age 33 who doesn't play regularly or the physical Barnes who terrorises defenders and done a great job for us. The thing is that would leave us Vokes, Walters and the likely to depart Gray who would then need replacing and we still wouldn't have the 4th striker we need. So I don't see why we are bidding on Walters unless he will be happy to be 4th striker, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Gray, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Barnes. If Barnes is the choice then I don't think fans would be particularly happy and it would be very unfair on him and frankly I don't think Walters would give us anything above what Barnes offers. I still stick by my belief that it would be a very poor outcome for us.
hark at this arrogant condescending **** !
This user liked this post: BennyD
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Well if that's a mathematical equation, the answer is "a big number"randomclaret2 wrote:2/10√FuckAll = ?
This user liked this post: randomclaret2
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
You just made that one upAGENT_CLARET wrote:Chancel Mbemba Mangulu From Newcastle coming in to replace Keane
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Mbemba would be a quality signing I can't see Newcastle letting him go though.
-
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 34 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
So you think I am an arrogant condescending **** well your entitled to an opinion however I would point out that if you actually read my messages on the points I raised I think you will find that I was subjected to just personal abuse but no actual sensible answer in response. I then sought to clarify in very simple terms what my points for debate were.Wile E Coyote wrote:hark at this arrogant condescending **** !
You then decided to launch into personal abuse as in your quote above. I would be more than happy to consider or debate any counter points you wanted to counter mine with but you obviously lack the mental capacity to do that do that so instead resorted to plain abuse.
Here's the thing you see I don't think that you are an arrogant condescending **** because you have clearly demonstrated quite ably to every poster and reader on this board that that by just using personal abuse in fact you ARE an arrogant condescending ****. So job well done.
-
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 494 times
- Has Liked: 162 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Not sure whether it's hidden on thread, so sorry in advance but possible rumour for Pontus Jansonn.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:33 pm
- Been Liked: 597 times
- Has Liked: 541 times
- Location: bonlah
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Ha ha them salty Leeds fans would go into meltdown.ashtonlongsider wrote:Not sure whether it's hidden on thread, so sorry in advance but possible rumour for Pontus Jansonn.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 194 times
- Has Liked: 78 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
. heard a rumour that there was a possibility of Burnley looking at Lois Diony from Dijon. The person who told him this has been right and wrong before about rumours but is somewhat connected to the club.
He is informed that the player is more of a Barnes type forward than a Gray, but he is apparently quite tricky with the ball at his feet for a man of his size. . can't confirm or deny this as he'd never even heard of him, let alone see him play.
He is informed that the player is more of a Barnes type forward than a Gray, but he is apparently quite tricky with the ball at his feet for a man of his size. . can't confirm or deny this as he'd never even heard of him, let alone see him play.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Pontus "Yellow Card" Jansonn?
He'd have to calm down a bit (ok, a lot) to play in the prem, but he is a good defender.
He'd have to calm down a bit (ok, a lot) to play in the prem, but he is a good defender.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Dibraidio has no idea if Jeremy Bentham is talking out of his anal sphincter but the 24 year old striker he mentioned from Dijon who scored 11 goals in D1 last season is available for 7 to 8 million euros according to the French press. Birmingham City are reported to be interested and were following flight trackers a few days ago to see which direction he was heading in after flying out of Bordeaux. Bournemouth and Brighton are also rumoured to be interested.. wrote:. heard a rumour that there was a possibility of Burnley looking at Lois Diony from Dijon. The person who told him this has been right and wrong before about rumours but is somewhat connected to the club.
He is informed that the player is more of a Barnes type forward than a Gray, but he is apparently quite tricky with the ball at his feet for a man of his size. . can't confirm or deny this as he'd never even heard of him, let alone see him play.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Di ony player from France I've seen us linked with so far
These 2 users liked this post: lucs86 HiroshimaClaret
-
- Posts: 3155
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
- Been Liked: 836 times
- Has Liked: 544 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Immediate ban for that Walt. Shocking pun!Walt wrote:Di ony player frgom France I've seen us linked with so far
This user liked this post: Walt
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
That's all very interesting, but what's the point of it? Nowhere have I said we should, or shouldn't, buy Walters or, if we do, how we use him. All I said was that if SD thinks he will improve our team, I'm fully behind him as we all should be. Until you have a record of managing a Premier League team, not an Internet team, then I will listen to you. Until then, all you've got is an opinion and a condescending attitude which makes you look like a bit of a kn0b.LaLigaClaret wrote:Poor BennyD you are really clueless so I will explain it to you in easy stages.
Walters wants regular starting football having played only 13 times last season. He would only come to us if he thought he would get regular playing time. We have our leading goal scorer from last season Vokes. We have Gray who is in the last year of his contract and wants to leave. We have Barnes who scared Prem defenders to death last season. We don't have a 4th striker ready to step up in regular contention at the standard we need. Walters doesn't fit the 4th Striker model because he wants regular football.
Walters does not score much and certainly wouldn't replace Vokes. So we have Gray and Barnes to consider when seeing how he would fit in. A replacement for Gray ? Ha ! Ha! This doesn't need explanation as it couldn't possibly be justified at any level. A replacement for Barnes ? Hmmm now it starts to get interesting because Barnes was subject to speculation about clubs wanting him and likely to be subject to a bid. Barnes would be valued at a higher value than Walters not only because he offers more as a player but is younger and is not in the last year of his contract.
So there is the possibility that the idea could be Walters in and Barnes out because we would make money on the deal. The question is would you prefer the slowing Walters at age 33 who doesn't play regularly or the physical Barnes who terrorises defenders and done a great job for us. The thing is that would leave us Vokes, Walters and the likely to depart Gray who would then need replacing and we still wouldn't have the 4th striker we need. So I don't see why we are bidding on Walters unless he will be happy to be 4th striker, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Gray, unlikely in my opinion or to replace Barnes. If Barnes is the choice then I don't think fans would be particularly happy and it would be very unfair on him and frankly I don't think Walters would give us anything above what Barnes offers. I still stick by my belief that it would be a very poor outcome for us.
-
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:40 pm
- Been Liked: 194 times
- Has Liked: 78 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
. may well have been misinformed. He got the information from the same source who told him Dyche was going to be appointed a few days before he was. However this same source has also been wide of the mark on a couple of transfers he's told him about.dibraidio wrote:Dibraidio has no idea if Jeremy Bentham is talking out of his anal sphincter but the 24 year old striker he mentioned from Dijon who scored 11 goals in D1 last season is available for 7 to 8 million euros according to the French press. Birmingham City are reported to be interested and were following flight trackers a few days ago to see which direction he was heading in after flying out of Bordeaux. Bournemouth and Brighton are also rumoured to be interested.
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
There's a rumour on one of the Burnley Facebook pages about Crystal Palace and Burnley both being in for Van Persie who wants to move back to the prem. It credits the guardian for the rumour. Probably ******** but would push the boat out for him!
-
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:33 pm
- Been Liked: 597 times
- Has Liked: 541 times
- Location: bonlah
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
It's 100% bull.ashtonlongsider wrote:Not sure whether it's hidden on thread, so sorry in advance but possible rumour for Pontus Jansonn.
A mate of mine knows the twitter account sportsmole and he asked him to put something out there to wind up the Leeds fans.
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Ha ha ha ha ha ha haConroy92 wrote:There's a rumour on one of the Burnley Facebook pages about Crystal Palace and Burnley both being in for Van Persie who wants to move back to the prem. It credits the guardian for the rumour. Probably ******** but would push the boat out for him!
-
- Posts: 8528
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
think van persie reference was originally in the Guardian, obvious nonsense, but it wasnt just some mischievous claret just making it up at least.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
There's more chance of van morrison signing.
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Jota from Brentford. Fingers crossed.
-
- Posts: 6904
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 2758 times
- Has Liked: 4325 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
We need a bit of a spark up front, so the big Dutch lad, Van dergraafgenerator , might be worth a shout...
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Why do so many people from Burnley like Van der Graff Generator? Abysmal.
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Claret Incoming Rumours
Sorry, that will probably be classified as musical snobbery.