Grammar police
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Grammar police
Grammar police. Boring question I appreciate.
When writing about a company / business / organisation do you use have or has? And do you use are or is?
In Burnley language we would say have and are but I am pretty certain this is wrong? Boring question I know but someone must know for sure and I need to clear it up ASAP.
Thanks
When writing about a company / business / organisation do you use have or has? And do you use are or is?
In Burnley language we would say have and are but I am pretty certain this is wrong? Boring question I know but someone must know for sure and I need to clear it up ASAP.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Grammar police
Go and have a cuppa coco...
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
HA! I am just about to have a camomile tea after this burning question has frazzled my brain at this hour!tim_noone wrote:Go and have a cuppa coco...
Re: Grammar police
Whichever sounds better. Technically, Burnley FC is singular, just one company, or one team, so it's has. Eg. Burnley FC has a better league position than Blackburn.
But when you're talking about the club or team that essentially refers to the group of players, eg. Burnley have been magnificent today, then it often sounds better with have. So in that case, use have. Go with the flow - with whichever sounds better.
Don't rely on hard and fast rules to meet all circumstances. The English language especially, to a greater degree than many others, is about communication - if what you say breaks a technical rule but sounds better than if you followed the rule, then say it your way not the technical way.
But when you're talking about the club or team that essentially refers to the group of players, eg. Burnley have been magnificent today, then it often sounds better with have. So in that case, use have. Go with the flow - with whichever sounds better.
Don't rely on hard and fast rules to meet all circumstances. The English language especially, to a greater degree than many others, is about communication - if what you say breaks a technical rule but sounds better than if you followed the rule, then say it your way not the technical way.
These 4 users liked this post: tim_noone minnieclaret cricketfieldclarets Rowls
-
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
- Been Liked: 2012 times
- Has Liked: 2287 times
- Location: lismore co. waterford
Re: Grammar police
googled this.
https://www.thebalance.com/business-ref ... le-2062897" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
if you hit 'show full article' it refers to the business as THEY which would lean towards have and are.
https://www.thebalance.com/business-ref ... le-2062897" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
if you hit 'show full article' it refers to the business as THEY which would lean towards have and are.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Grammar police
I did it deliberately, wait for it.
'Have' when you're talking about a group of companies, either when you're talking about one.
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers have an intense rivalry. - Yes
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers has an intense rivalry. - holy fuckballs no, never. No!
Burnley FC has a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - yep
Burnley FC have a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - fine
I think this is right.
is/are
Burnley FC is better at football than Blackburn Rovers
Burnley FC and Read Utd are better at football than Blackburn Rovers.
That said if you wrote "Burnley are better than Blackburn Rovers" then i don't think you'd be pulled up on it unless grammar is, like, super-duper important, bro. Same with most companies, i assume. And with have/has. Just make sure it makes sense when read allowed.
'Have' when you're talking about a group of companies, either when you're talking about one.
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers have an intense rivalry. - Yes
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers has an intense rivalry. - holy fuckballs no, never. No!
Burnley FC has a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - yep
Burnley FC have a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - fine
I think this is right.
is/are
Burnley FC is better at football than Blackburn Rovers
Burnley FC and Read Utd are better at football than Blackburn Rovers.
That said if you wrote "Burnley are better than Blackburn Rovers" then i don't think you'd be pulled up on it unless grammar is, like, super-duper important, bro. Same with most companies, i assume. And with have/has. Just make sure it makes sense when read allowed.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets tim_noone
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
Thanks. Its for an important document so wanted to ensure it was right.
What DSR says makes sense. And how I want it to word sounds wrong even though I think its right. In all honesty it is probably OK either way. But if someone especially pedantic reviews it I would prefer the correct way if there is one.
And to think I am learning ******* Russian!!!!
What DSR says makes sense. And how I want it to word sounds wrong even though I think its right. In all honesty it is probably OK either way. But if someone especially pedantic reviews it I would prefer the correct way if there is one.
And to think I am learning ******* Russian!!!!
-
- Posts: 10974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5188 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Grammar police
My grammar used to police me when she had made a cake.
She always made me share it.
She always made me share it.
These 2 users liked this post: Imploding Turtle tim_noone
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Grammar police
I would always go with a Company or team being a group and therefore becoming a single entity.
So is and has.
So is and has.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Grammar police
The cake is a lie.Bin Ont Turf wrote:My grammar used to police me when she had made a cake.
She always made me share it.
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Grammar police
Well that's different.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Thanks. Its for an important document so wanted to ensure it was right.
What DSR says makes sense. And how I want it to word sounds wrong even though I think its right. In all honesty it is probably OK either way. But if someone especially pedantic reviews it I would prefer the correct way if there is one.
And to think I am learning ******* Russian!!!!
Just put Putin
These 2 users liked this post: tim_noone cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
tybfc wrote:Well that's different.
Just put Putin
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: Grammar police
It is possible to use both, dependent on whether you are referring to the entity as a whole or to the individuals in the entity.
'Burnley is the greatest football club in the world', is correct.
'Burnley are about to sign Messi', is correct.
same with 'have' and 'has".
'Burnley is the greatest football club in the world', is correct.
'Burnley are about to sign Messi', is correct.
same with 'have' and 'has".
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets tim_noone
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Grammar police
One out of two isn't bad....I can't see us getting messi!
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
FFS Wish I never asked, I will end up with a blend of both now.
We should just all speak Esperanto!!!
We should just all speak Esperanto!!!
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Grammar police
Go to dsr's post paragraph three. Keep calm drink tea.
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Grammar police
You need spades but she will be long asleep.
These 2 users liked this post: The Enclosure spadesclaret
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
Just read the companies mission statement that this question is for. They use a combination of both. So think that answers my question. Thanks for the help all .
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Grammar police
We just all should speak esperanto. Should we all just speak esperanto. We should just all speak esperanto
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
I knew I should have just said ******* charity!Vino blanco wrote:It's company's not companies
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
Re: Grammar police
Imploding Turtle wrote:I did it deliberately, wait for it.
'Have' when you're talking about a group of companies, either when you're talking about one.
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers have an intense rivalry. - Yes
Burnley FC and Blackburn Rovers has an intense rivalry. - holy fuckballs no, never. No!
Burnley FC has a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - yep
Burnley FC have a rivalry with Blackburn Rovers. - fine
I think this is right.
is/are
Burnley FC is better at football than Blackburn Rovers
Burnley FC and Read Utd are better at football than Blackburn Rovers.
That said if you wrote "Burnley are better than Blackburn Rovers" then i don't think you'd be pulled up on it unless grammar is, like, super-duper important, bro. Same with most companies, i assume. And with have/has. Just make sure it makes sense when read allowed.
No, that's completely wrong.
-
- Posts: 19799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
- Been Liked: 5483 times
- Has Liked: 2540 times
- Location: Burnley, Lancs
Re: Grammar police
boatshed bill wrote:No, that's completely wrong.
Your post is worthless. Improve it.
Re: Grammar police
Some good explanations have been given.
A business is singular, so look to do that as a first thought. However, the examples folk have written where are becomes appropriate are correct.
A business is singular, so look to do that as a first thought. However, the examples folk have written where are becomes appropriate are correct.
-
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: Grammar police
I'm waiting on spades
....or shovels!
....or shovels!
-
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Been Liked: 2147 times
- Has Liked: 3782 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Grammar police
Here you go - ♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠claretblue wrote:I'm waiting on spades
....or shovels!
As to the OP's question, the strictly pedantic answer is 'has' and 'is'. Most of the examples above have used Burnley to illustrate their answers. Think of the town of Burnley. It is one unit comprising many individuals. We say, "Burnley is a town in the north of England. It has a Premier League football club."
Now think of Burnley Football Club. It is also one unit comprising many individuals. We say, "Burnley is a football club in the north of England. It has a passionate following."
The above examples are correct and sound correct.
When we think of the team or squad we are still thinking of one unit comprising many individuals so, strictly, we should say, "Burnley has just scored the winning goal and is safe from relegation," but it just doesn't sound right (maybe because of long misuse) so we are in the habit of saying "Burnley have...and are..." This is now the acceptable norm.
These 3 users liked this post: tim_noone The Enclosure cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 67895
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32545 times
- Has Liked: 5279 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Grammar police
Thanks for that spades because I always wonder whether I should be writing such as Burnley has taken the lead rather than my preferred Burnley have taken the lead. Using have just sounds right, even though it isn't.spadesclaret wrote:Here you go - ♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠
As to the OP's question, the strictly pedantic answer is 'has' and 'is'. Most of the examples above have used Burnley to illustrate their answers. Think of the town of Burnley. It is one unit comprising many individuals. We say, "Burnley is a town in the north of England. It has a Premier League football club."
Now think of Burnley Football Club. It is also one unit comprising many individuals. We say, "Burnley is a football club in the north of England. It has a passionate following."
The above examples are correct and sound correct.
When we think of the team or squad we are still thinking of one unit comprising many individuals so, strictly, we should say, "Burnley has just scored the winning goal and is safe from relegation," but it just doesn't sound right (maybe because of long misuse) so we are in the habit of saying "Burnley have...and are..." This is now the acceptable norm.
-
- Posts: 3326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 1304 times
- Has Liked: 318 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: Grammar police
You must write 100 lines today CT on how to say have or has as your punishment.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: Grammar police
I hate it when Americans use has in relation to sport.
Atlanta Falcons has beaten the Miami Dolphins.
Just wrong.
Atlanta Falcons has beaten the Miami Dolphins.
Just wrong.
-
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Been Liked: 2147 times
- Has Liked: 3782 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Grammar police
It sounds wrong and is wrong because Falcons and Dolphins are both plural. However, if you add the missing word 'Club' to the titles then it becomes correct -UpTheBeehole wrote:I hate it when Americans use has in relation to sport.
Atlanta Falcons has beaten the Miami Dolphins.
Just wrong.
Atlanta Falcons Club has beaten the Miami Dolphins Club.
Re: Grammar police
On the other hand, you ask the head coach after the game how they went on, and he will always use the plural "we" - we, the Atlanta Falcons Club, have beaten them, the Miami Dolphins club ...
Just to further muddy the waters!
Just to further muddy the waters!
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:27 am
- Been Liked: 84 times
- Has Liked: 371 times
- Location: Highlands
- Contact:
Re: Grammar police
This is not a question, why have you used a question mark? (that was a question)cricketfieldclarets wrote:In Burnley language we would say have and are but I am pretty certain this is wrong?
I see this happening all the time these days and it drives me nuts.
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2977 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Grammar police
The second sentence is a question, and therefore requires a question mark at the end.tim_noone wrote:We just all should speak esperanto. Should we all just speak esperanto. We should just all speak esperanto
Any road up, a collective noun is singular by its very nature. However, as someone has already
stated, the vernacular very often prevails irrespective of the grammatically correct.
-
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: Grammar police
'...Burnley has just scored the winning goal and is safe from relegation, but it just doesn't sound right...'
it sounds ok to me spades!
it sounds ok to me spades!
-
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Been Liked: 2147 times
- Has Liked: 3782 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Grammar police
Some folk are just plain awkward!claretblue wrote:'...Burnley has just scored the winning goal and is safe from relegation, but it just doesn't sound right...'
it sounds ok to me spades!
-
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 383 times
- Has Liked: 236 times
- Location: Skipton
Re: Grammar police
http://blog.dictionary.com/collective-nouns/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Interesting - "Generally, however, in American English, collective nouns take singular verbs. In British English, collective nouns are more often treated as plurals that take plural verbs."
Interesting - "Generally, however, in American English, collective nouns take singular verbs. In British English, collective nouns are more often treated as plurals that take plural verbs."
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Grammar police
Its a hybrid question statementSonic wrote:This is not a question, why have you used a question mark? (that was a question)
I see this happening all the time these days and it drives me nuts.
-
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
- Been Liked: 1835 times
- Has Liked: 962 times
- Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed
Re: Grammar police
'...Some folk are just plain awkward!...'
I meant Burnley winning and avoiding relegation...not to do wiv granma!
I meant Burnley winning and avoiding relegation...not to do wiv granma!
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5174 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Grammar police
Good answer.dsr wrote:Whichever sounds better. Technically, Burnley FC is singular, just one company, or one team, so it's has. Eg. Burnley FC has a better league position than Blackburn.
But when you're talking about the club or team that essentially refers to the group of players, eg. Burnley have been magnificent today, then it often sounds better with have. So in that case, use have. Go with the flow - with whichever sounds better.
Don't rely on hard and fast rules to meet all circumstances. The English language especially, to a greater degree than many others, is about communication - if what you say breaks a technical rule but sounds better than if you followed the rule, then say it your way not the technical way.
You can choose what you want to stress if you are open to using both forms. For example, say you are writing a speech about how well the employees work together in the organisation - you can use "have" and "are" in that situation to stress the fact that you are talking about individuals (plural) within the business. Eg. "Clarets Ltd have the best sports and social facilities"
Conversely, if you want to stress the organisation as a single unit then use the singular forms eg. "Clarets Ltd is far superior to Venky Rovers Plc" which helps personify and create a mental image of the point.
-
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Been Liked: 2147 times
- Has Liked: 3782 times
- Location: Norfolk
Re: Grammar police
Brilliant! You got me there, blue ❤claretblue wrote:'...Some folk are just plain awkward!...'
I meant Burnley winning and avoiding relegation...not to do wiv granma!
This user liked this post: claretblue