Wow you are so sympathetic!!dsr wrote:
(Anyway, obesity reduces tax, not increases it. Fat people die young.
Get fat and then kill yourself off save the country a fortune.
Glad you arent in politics smh
Wow you are so sympathetic!!dsr wrote:
(Anyway, obesity reduces tax, not increases it. Fat people die young.
That would be a lovely scheme but a subsided scheme it would have to be. If it was a voluntary way to top up your JSA numbers day to day numbers could vary hugely. No good for the farmer If 10 people turn up one day and 3 the next; meanwhile next door has 12 Bulgarians working every day 8am-6pm.FulledgeClaret wrote:It could be used in areas were labour is needed and you could bus people in from close by surrounding areas. It should pay at least minimum living wage which would with current income tax be un-taxed they could then be given the opportunity to earn more than their jobseekers benefits should they wish by doing more hours but as a minimum do say 12 hrs a week which would earn them more than standard JSA...
It could help some of these people back into permanent work by breaking the signing on cycle and getting them motivated for work...
Help solve the labour shortage the farmers are currently seeing.
and give up my 102000 euro a year job in strasbourg no thanksUpTheBeehole wrote:Why don't you start picking fruit for a living?
No doubt if you check the court reports you can find evidence of all sorts of illegal activity. It doesn't necessarily follow that that's the norm. Now, you may be right or you may be wrong about the average Romanian working for corrupt and criminal bosses who pay way below the legal minimum wage; but if you're right, then it surely would be a good thing if they all went bust and we had to pay more for our food.Walton wrote:There are countless examples if you bother looking.
Here's your starter for ten: http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/mi ... h-11946683
Sympathetic to who, exactly? The suggestion was that obesity was costing the country a lot of money. Which is the more valid answer - "it isn't costing a lot, and here's why" - or "those poor poor fat people, don't you feel sorry for them"? I never said I wasn't sympathetic - it just wasn't relevant to what I was saying.dpinsussex wrote:Wow you are so sympathetic!!
Get fat and then kill yourself off save the country a fortune.
Glad you arent in politics smh
He's asked that same question before, months ago, and couldn't get an example of a single law from a similar caller.Lancasterclaret wrote:Leave caller on James O'Brien yesterday.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/j ... m=referral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Imploding Turtle wrote:He's asked that same question before, months ago, and couldn't get an example of a single law from a similar caller.
Here it is: http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/j ... to-losing/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And this is why i opposed the referendum in the first place. We don't have a press that is capable of the impartiality required (not complete impartiality, just enough impartiality to inform us). These people who voted leave yet can't give an example of a power we're regaining are probably among the most politically engaged. They'll be the types who will read every Mail or Sun article about Taking Our Country Back™ yet because these sources of information are providing them with absolutely no information at all that isn't just lies, then while being so politically engaged they're still completely misinformed about the thing the were crying out for a referendum about. Yet if anyone tells them how wrong they are they just dig their heel in in the manner that called did when O'Brien asked would it be better if each country could veto laws it didn't like, the caller says it would and then when O'Brien reveals that that's already the case the caller's position was unmoved.
Facts don't matter to these people unless they validate their feelings and it's because of attitudes and intellectual stubborness like this, to borrow a quote from one senior Tory recently, "this country is f*cked" and "when the public realize they have been sold a pup they will turn on the [Conservative] party."
And because I know there's no changing the minds of these people i've got many years of smugness in front of me as people like me are proven time and again to be right.
Edit: As a perfect example - Imagine if the right-wing press had spent their ink informing its readers that it isn't the EU that's forcing free movement on the UK but infact it's our own politicians who are choosing not to restrict free movement by enacting perfectly legal restrictions. http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk ... mmigration" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Or simply buying a packet of multivitamins & leaving the fruit well alone.UpTheBeehole wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:10 pmShouting YOU LOST, GET OVER IT and then punching themselves in the face every two minutes.
All the while paying £87 for a punnet of strawberries and £5.50 for a lettuce
We should quarantine them by confining them to agricultural land away from a city center for at least 8 hours a day then minibus them back to their private shared accommodation.
James O'Brien doing an hour of this on LBC right now, makes the point location and travel is a huge factor here. Imported labour usual stay on site, the farms need you to start essentially at dawn.
Can’t be picky when it comes to work!CombatClaret wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 12:01 pmJames O'Brien doing an hour of this on LBC right now, makes the point location and travel is a huge factor here. Imported labour usual stay on site, the farms need you to start essentially at dawn.
So where is the public transport to these far flung rural sites, If you own a car and have to travel these expense of that will not make the job barely economically viable. Do you want to spent weeks in essentially a shared dorm for several weeks on nmw? I did it one summer When I were a lad (TM, you're cheque's in the mail) but only because I lived next to the farm.
The idea we'd fill this labour gap was always pie in the sky.
Things like this still make me weep with despair. Halfwits given a vote on something they have no idea about. Of course, we’ll be alright when we get rid of all these Muslims, renounce Europe and set up a multitude of trade deal with China. Oh..................wait a minute.... erm...........Lancasterclaret wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:28 pmLeave caller on James O'Brien yesterday.
http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/j ... m=referral" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That's all very nice as a saying but doesn't really address the meta issues here.
I see what you did there.
Following that argument to its logical conclusion would, for example, place a demand on an unemployed woman unable to find work to take up prostitution. Factor in the viability of work (physical, geographic, economic) before demanding others carry out labour which provides you a comfortable life. Sure, you could argue she should be made to starve, but then the conversation becomes about the merits of the ways in which society is organised, what kind of safety nets we put in place, the right of a citizen to a modicum of dignity, and from that, the merits of law and the philosophical justification for a person to actually adhere to it. Society telling a person 'you should just die then' is the quickest way of ensuring a person lashes out against it, because society is working against them at that point. It's a matter of self preservation. Primal, base. If your value judgements about other people result in them being viewed as, or treated with the implied assumption that they're a drag on society, you can't be surprised if they drag you down with them. This isn't all abstract; there's a huge crime wave washing over southern Italy as we speak. The black economy is exploding.
No $hit, Sherlock, but since the onset of the pandemic, the lockdown, and a huge spike in unemployment, hijackings have risen and shops are taking to hiring security to guard their deliveries. In fact, the mafia has increasingly taken upon itself to fulfil community responsibilities (care to the elderly and infirm, food parcels) that are traditionally done by the state. If you believe crime syndicates increasingly supplanting the state in communities is something to shrug off, you're short-sighted.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:59 pmThere's been a huge crime wave washing over Southern Italy for more than 100 years, pal. They are called the Mafia.
hahahah. The mafia has increasingly taken upon itself to fulfil community responsibilties. I'll repeat Sir, that is what it has been doing for more than 100 years serving the families, elderly, everyone who worked for them. Mafia isn't just a few drug smugglers and dealers, chief. Obviously, the pandemic isn't helping the situation there and will just feed in more criminality but the South of Italy has always been **** poor so nothing will change much there and not exactly a good example to highlight you point, whatever that is.Spiral wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:21 pmNo $hit, Sherlock, but since the onset of the pandemic, the lockdown, and a huge spike in unemployment, hijackings have risen and shops are taking to hiring security to guard their deliveries. In fact, the mafia has increasingly taken upon itself to fulfil community responsibilities (care to the elderly and infirm, food parcels) that are traditionally done by the state. If you believe crime syndicates increasingly supplanting the state in communities is something to shrug off, you're short-sighted.
Do you have in depth knowledge of the inner workings of the Cosa Nostra?diamondpocket wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:32 pmhahahah. The mafia has increasingly taken upon itself to fulfil community responsibilties. I'll repeat Sir, that is what it has been doing for more than 100 years serving the families, elderly, everyone who worked for them. Mafia isn't just a few drug smugglers and dealers, chief. Obviously, the pandemic isn't helping the situation there and will just feed in more criminality but the South of Italy has always been **** poor so nothing will change much there and not exactly a good example to highlight you point, whatever that is.
My point is that desperation begets criminality, and so the argument 'let them starve' is utterly ridiculous.diamondpocket wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:32 pmhahahah. The mafia has increasingly taken upon itself to fulfil community responsibilties. I'll repeat Sir, that is what it has been doing for more than 100 years serving the families, elderly, everyone who worked for them. Mafia isn't just a few drug smugglers and dealers, chief. Obviously, the pandemic isn't helping the situation there and will just feed in more criminality but the South of Italy has always been **** poor so nothing will change much there and not exactly a good example to highlight you point, whatever that is.
Hence why I posted that the argument becomes one about the philosophy of law and the rights of one person or group or people to dominate another person or group of people. You lean in favour of dominating through force (stricter punishment), I lean more in favour of a community (a country) pooling its resources where possible, lifting those who find themselves living under difficult circumstances, thus providing them greater liberty. I'm sure we each believe our own preferred approach to be more pragmatic than the other.thatdberight wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:44 pmSo put in place a stricter penal code. For every "we need to be more liberal" argument, there's a simple counterpoint.
A rather unfair synopsis of both our points of view. I believe in the latter backed up by the former.Spiral wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 4:00 pmHence why I posted that the argument becomes one about the philosophy of law and the rights of one person or group or people to dominate another person or group of people. You lean in favour of dominating through force (stricter punishment), I lean more in favour of a community (a country) pooling its resources where possible, lifting those who find themselves living under difficult circumstances, thus providing them greater liberty. I'm sure we each believe our own preferred approach to be more pragmatic than the other.
In-depth knowledge and first hand certainly not, no. But my girlfriend has lived in the South of Italy for a fair few years, is Italian and we know & have friends who also live there. There are also many books on the topic, including probably the best one by John Dickie that I've read a couple of times. I'm looking forward to doing a grand old tour of Sicily one day including some famous hotspots.ClaretAndJew wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 3:39 pmDo you have in depth knowledge of the inner workings of the Cosa Nostra?
Fair enough. Carrot vs stick. We both want the horse to move, I know that. I believe that more purposefully and effectively pursuing the latter dramatically reduces (if not entirely negates) the need for the former. Don't get me wrong, both are upheld by domination in some form (tax evasion being punishable) and are upheld by at their most basic level by a police and court system with the legitimacy to accost and apprehend a person.thatdberight wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2020 4:07 pmA rather unfair synopsis of both our points of view. I believe in the latter backed up by the former.
I guess there's a first time for everything...