Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
-
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
- Been Liked: 543 times
- Has Liked: 1512 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Where the hell has SD come out and indicated he is unsettled?? The only brief interviews I've seen of him recently show a relaxed chap who appears to be very much looking forward to next seasons challenge. I was never worried he'd join Palace and I'm very, very sure he'll be our manager next season.
-
- Posts: 67864
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32526 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Check who started the thread and it explains itGoodclaret wrote:Where the hell has SD come out and indicated he is unsettled??
These 2 users liked this post: Goodclaret evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Of course SD will come out and say he's never wanted a move away but the available evidence suggests otherwise, after successfully negotiating Premier League waters last year it was his opportunity to get a more prestigious job, but it has not happened.
There do appear problems with retention of players, in some ways it has the feel of a relegated side trying to cling onto its stars.
Keane wanting away was understandable but Boyd?, and we know the futures of several other players rests in the balance.
My feeling is that SD believed he had take this club as far as he could, and he could sense the signs of disintegration from within. Now he has the task of renewing the squad and with it of course comes the opportunity to re-jig his framework.
We may be about to see more of a revolution than some think.
There do appear problems with retention of players, in some ways it has the feel of a relegated side trying to cling onto its stars.
Keane wanting away was understandable but Boyd?, and we know the futures of several other players rests in the balance.
My feeling is that SD believed he had take this club as far as he could, and he could sense the signs of disintegration from within. Now he has the task of renewing the squad and with it of course comes the opportunity to re-jig his framework.
We may be about to see more of a revolution than some think.
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
- Been Liked: 1693 times
- Has Liked: 193 times
- Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
ablueclaret wrote:Of course SD will come out and say he's never wanted a move away but the available evidence suggests otherwise, after successfully negotiating Premier League waters last year it was his opportunity to get a more prestigious job, but it has not happened.
There do appear problems with retention of players, in some ways it has the feel of a relegated side trying to cling onto its stars.
Keane wanting away was understandable but Boyd?, and we know the futures of several other players rests in the balance.
My feeling is that SD believed he had take this club as far as he could, and he could sense the signs of disintegration from within. Now he has the task of renewing the squad and with it of course comes the opportunity to re-jig his framework.
We may be about to see more of a revolution than some think.
With you being allowed to see things nobody else can with all matters at the club, what evidence have you he wanted to move away ? If you back this claim up with a bit of truth it would help everyone who can't see what you can.
If on the other hand your evidence is your feeling then you are being more stupid than normal with your negative ********
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
You know you've reached the bottom when KRBFC posts on your thread and his comments seem reasoned and well articulated.
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
What is this evidence, and where is it available?ablueclaret wrote:Of course SD will come out and say he's never wanted a move away but the available evidence suggests otherwise.
-
- Posts: 67864
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32526 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
My feeling is that you are either a complete idiot or just on the wind up. Either way you are upsetting several members of this message board which I will not allow to continue.ablueclaret wrote:My feeling is that SD believed he had take this club as far as he could
These 3 users liked this post: Spijed evensteadiereddie fidelcastro
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 791 times
- Has Liked: 1016 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Another one on the ignore list!
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Such sensitive souls
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:25 pm
- Been Liked: 132 times
- Has Liked: 84 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
You reallly have no idea what your babbling on about do you, where is the 'available evidence' you speak of?, where was this opportunity to get a more pretigious job Crystal Palace where is the evidence they even approached the club to speak to him let alone him actually wanting to speak to them? Problems in player retention wtf are you on about Keane to Everton on a reported 100k a week 5 yr contract like we can compete with that or an ageing Boyd leaving at the end of his contract when if we are to improve (and that is the name of the game) we need better neither were interested in signing a new contract with us and thus we had no choice but to let them leave. Disintegration from within? evidence.ablueclaret wrote:Of course SD will come out and say he's never wanted a move away but the available evidence suggests otherwise, after successfully negotiating Premier League waters last year it was his opportunity to get a more prestigious job, but it has not happened.
There do appear problems with retention of players, in some ways it has the feel of a relegated side trying to cling onto its stars.
Keane wanting away was understandable but Boyd?, and we know the futures of several other players rests in the balance.
My feeling is that SD believed he had take this club as far as he could, and he could sense the signs of disintegration from within. Now he has the task of renewing the squad and with it of course comes the opportunity to re-jig his framework.
We may be about to see more of a revolution than some think.
if you want to do nothing but whine and moan about a club falling apart from within can I suggest you p1ss off 12 miles down the road or maybe take a trip up the M61 to Horwich you will have plenty to moan about then.
These 3 users liked this post: Goodclaret Juan Tanamera elwaclaret
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Not sensitive souls - people are just sick of your repetitive bullshite and attempts to disrupt this messageboard. You're not a supporter so you should just **** off elsewhere.
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Ablue has gone from fishing with a Greenwell's Glory to using a Mills' Bomb.
3/10 for subtlety, 8/10 for effectiveness.
3/10 for subtlety, 8/10 for effectiveness.
These 2 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie elwaclaret
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I say it as I see it, we have had an unsettling 2 months with as yet nothing positive on the horizon.
Yes the dust appears to be settling and I'd expect some incomings before long but if we lose Gray, Keane, Boyd, Barton and Defour. that will be the sort of loss one would have expected if we had been relegated.
SD has a huge task ahead because it's last years players who are the ones this season will largely depend on because as we know from last season few incoming players ever get up to speed in their first year to fit into his framework.
That's why I'm hinting the framework will have to change.
Yes the dust appears to be settling and I'd expect some incomings before long but if we lose Gray, Keane, Boyd, Barton and Defour. that will be the sort of loss one would have expected if we had been relegated.
SD has a huge task ahead because it's last years players who are the ones this season will largely depend on because as we know from last season few incoming players ever get up to speed in their first year to fit into his framework.
That's why I'm hinting the framework will have to change.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
As you can see from my Corbyn thread I do not tow the party line. I am a Labour member but I fight the corner of radical pragmatism, I have followed Burnley for over 60 years but I'm not a SD sychophant.
You don't have to read what I put, ignore it if it is so irrelevant.
I think you know there is more than a grain of truth in it, and that is what goads you.
You don't have to read what I put, ignore it if it is so irrelevant.
I think you know there is more than a grain of truth in it, and that is what goads you.
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
- Been Liked: 1693 times
- Has Liked: 193 times
- Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
You are neglecting your allotment
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Our transfer inactivity is more likely down to agents than Dyche. They'll be touting players to all who'll listen and I'm fairly sure Burnley won't be the number one destination for many. We will continue to do the things we've done well over the past few years by keeping our cards close to our chests and getting the right type of players over the line. No point signing players chasing money, we need committed players and Dyche is good at finding the right ones. Have faith man!!
This user liked this post: Down_Rover
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
This has nothing to do with faith, we may well yet get some good signings in but whether they will be up to speed in time is beginning to be the question.
It's the leavers that concern me more, the want aways and misfits.
A clubs success is largely based on the season before, it appears as if we are going to lose several key members that made success possible, and the belief that newcomers will fill those gaps is not born out by recent reality.
Last season I was disappointed we didn't get in the top 10, unlike many doubters on here I believed with the defence we had we could afford to be bolder and that that would have paid off.
There are supporters who are happy with anything and then there are those who think more is achievable some fall into one camp some into another.
It's the leavers that concern me more, the want aways and misfits.
A clubs success is largely based on the season before, it appears as if we are going to lose several key members that made success possible, and the belief that newcomers will fill those gaps is not born out by recent reality.
Last season I was disappointed we didn't get in the top 10, unlike many doubters on here I believed with the defence we had we could afford to be bolder and that that would have paid off.
There are supporters who are happy with anything and then there are those who think more is achievable some fall into one camp some into another.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
My three allotments are doing fine claretdom, any Claret visiting Lacock Abbey is welcome to visit, just look out for the three most productive ones.
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2017 8:25 pm
- Been Liked: 132 times
- Has Liked: 84 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I'm not surprised they are doing well with all the sh1t you seem to have to fertilize them with.ablueclaret wrote:My three allotments are doing fine claretdom, any Claret visiting Lacock Abbey is welcome to visit, just look out for the three most productive ones.
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
So Ablueclaret spends loads of time fertilizing his allotments?
The plot thickens.
The plot thickens.
These 3 users liked this post: Goodclaret Rileybobs DCWat
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Nettles and comfrey the answer to all life's little tribulations.
-
- Posts: 7172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3603 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Getting really bored of this fantastic forum getting clogged up with the trolling bullshit of ablueclaret and Saxoman. They add nothing to the conversation, it's always the same posts delivered in various different methods with the sole intention of winding people up.
These 2 users liked this post: Andingle Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
There are a few more threads Jedi, I think you protest too much.
-
- Posts: 17978
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4071 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Will a combination of nettles and comfrey get rid of you?
Because you're OUR tribulation.
Because you're OUR tribulation.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
"Fertilising his allotments"
A metaphor for rubbing cream on your farmer Giles ?
A metaphor for rubbing cream on your farmer Giles ?
-
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Ablue, it's the way you write headlines that sound negative or critical of the club that really upsets us.
Yes, several key players are leaving but you know what....given the funds from their sales and the existing bank balance, the Club and Sean have a real opportunity to bring in some first class players.
Sean, the recruitment team and the management aren't sat in their allotment deckchairs. Have more faith! Why should you trust them? Simply look at the last few years and all that has been achieved.
Yes, several key players are leaving but you know what....given the funds from their sales and the existing bank balance, the Club and Sean have a real opportunity to bring in some first class players.
Sean, the recruitment team and the management aren't sat in their allotment deckchairs. Have more faith! Why should you trust them? Simply look at the last few years and all that has been achieved.
-
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:07 pm
- Been Liked: 781 times
- Has Liked: 1435 times
- Location: Mostly Europe
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Noablueclaret wrote:It all appears very downbeat at present, the footballing equivalent of the Marie Celeste.
-
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:13 am
- Been Liked: 164 times
- Has Liked: 33 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I'm going to defend Ablue here.
The thread title aims to propose a question for discussion but others have jumped in first with the usual responses of him to "go away" and "stop" posting, halting what could be an interesting discussion.
Ablue's negative conjecture annoys me a little too, but sometimes other are too quick to try and shoot him down. He opened a discussion with an interesting question and the question should be met with better responses than the ones he immediately received.
Ablue, in response to you OP, I don't think our transfer inactivity is down to an unsettled manager. This isn't to say that Dyche didn't consider the prospect of becoming the Palace boss, he comes across as the type of character that would look at a potential opportunity of advancing his career (he has said as much himself previously with remarks like "I wont be here forever"), but I also don't think he would let it get in the way of his current job. He comes across far to professional for that.
I don't think we are being inactive in the transfer market though. There's a difference between inactive and invisible activity. As a club we have always kept our cards close to our chest and let little out of the bag. Taylor seems to be in that bag and as frustrating as the waiting is, it's just how we do our business. There will be other deals and targets being progressed, we & the wider media will only find out when someone's agent blabs to their media mate who want to be seen as a transfer know it all on twitter
The thread title aims to propose a question for discussion but others have jumped in first with the usual responses of him to "go away" and "stop" posting, halting what could be an interesting discussion.
Ablue's negative conjecture annoys me a little too, but sometimes other are too quick to try and shoot him down. He opened a discussion with an interesting question and the question should be met with better responses than the ones he immediately received.
Ablue, in response to you OP, I don't think our transfer inactivity is down to an unsettled manager. This isn't to say that Dyche didn't consider the prospect of becoming the Palace boss, he comes across as the type of character that would look at a potential opportunity of advancing his career (he has said as much himself previously with remarks like "I wont be here forever"), but I also don't think he would let it get in the way of his current job. He comes across far to professional for that.
I don't think we are being inactive in the transfer market though. There's a difference between inactive and invisible activity. As a club we have always kept our cards close to our chest and let little out of the bag. Taylor seems to be in that bag and as frustrating as the waiting is, it's just how we do our business. There will be other deals and targets being progressed, we & the wider media will only find out when someone's agent blabs to their media mate who want to be seen as a transfer know it all on twitter
Last edited by Sleeping Cat on Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
These 2 users liked this post: Turfytop elwaclaret
-
- Posts: 5001
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3435 times
- Has Liked: 2881 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Common error to call it 'Marie Celeste'. It's was actually the 'Mary Celeste'.
-
- Posts: 67864
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32526 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
That sums up how it works todaySleeping Cat wrote:There will be other deals and targets being progressed, we & the wider media will only find out when someone's agent blabs to their media mate who want to be seen as a transfer know it all on twitter
-
- Posts: 6967
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1847 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Boro bought early last year and bought dross.I would sooner we bought nobody than waste money like we did on Juke and Sordell.We've got lots of time yet and the journos have to provide stories hence the loads of non starters with been linked with
-
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1217 times
- Has Liked: 7188 times
- Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Taylor should be signing soon. What's the big sweat?
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Saxoman wrote:Saxo, Blackburn rovers fan, likes this.
Blackburn fans!?
Are there any left!?
"I'll only go back on Ewood when Steve Keane goes"
He's gone lads. You can dig that old crown paints shirt out from the mid 90s out, from the back of the wardrobe.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2636 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Don't fret Roger the Cabin Boy.ablueclaret wrote:It all appears very downbeat at present, the footballing equivalent of the Marie Celeste.
Things are going to get interesting, as the Goodship Dyche takes to the footballing high seas.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I was only joking, people are getting really upset now, so I'll stop.RingoMcCartney wrote:Blackburn fans!?
Are there any left!?
"I'll only go back on Ewood when Steve Keane goes"
He's gone lads. You can dig that old crown paints shirt out from the mid 90s out, from the back of the wardrobe.
-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
The thing is. The window has only been open four days. The boys aren't even training yet! Garlick said patience and I'd rather wait (impatiently) for signings than just throw a net out and catch who you can!
It's not how you start, it's how you finish and I have a sneaky feeling we'll do better than some/most think this season come May.
It's not how you start, it's how you finish and I have a sneaky feeling we'll do better than some/most think this season come May.
-
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 10:24 am
- Been Liked: 238 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Simply. O.P. Really?!
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I'm disgusted that we never signed Valdes or Negredo...oh...hang on...
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
We will see over the next few weeks just how settled the club is.
I fancy SD wanted a change of scenery.
The thing about signing players is that they have to feel they have a future at the club, and that the club has a good future, and that is bound up with the manager. When there is uncertainty about the manager's future it necessarily affects recruitment.
Hopefully in 6 weeks time we will see as Mr Garlick put it a stronger squad, it will be an interesting period.
I fancy SD wanted a change of scenery.
The thing about signing players is that they have to feel they have a future at the club, and that the club has a good future, and that is bound up with the manager. When there is uncertainty about the manager's future it necessarily affects recruitment.
Hopefully in 6 weeks time we will see as Mr Garlick put it a stronger squad, it will be an interesting period.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
You said there was evidence available, now it's just a "fancy".ablueclaret wrote:We will see over the next few weeks just how settled the club is.
I fancy SD wanted a change of scenery.
I fancy you haven't got a clue.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I said the available evidence suggested he fancied the Palace job ie he wanted a move.
The other evidence is that several players appear to want out, as to whether they will all go we will have to wait and see.
The other evidence I offer is the fact that it usually takes nearly a season for recruited players to fit into SD's framework so we have to look at what is left from last years squad to do the business.
The other evidence is that several players appear to want out, as to whether they will all go we will have to wait and see.
The other evidence I offer is the fact that it usually takes nearly a season for recruited players to fit into SD's framework so we have to look at what is left from last years squad to do the business.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
You still haven't told us what this evidence is.
-
- Posts: 7353
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
He doesn't have any.Tall Paul wrote:You still haven't told us what this evidence is.
The reason why he doesn't have any is because he's a belmtard!
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
What available evidence?ablueclaret wrote:I said the available evidence suggested he fancied the Palace job ie he wanted a move.
The other evidence is that several players appear to want out, as to whether they will all go we will have to wait and see.
The other evidence I offer is the fact that it usually takes nearly a season for recruited players to fit into SD's framework so we have to look at what is left from last years squad to do the business.
Keane was always going to go. Defour wouldn't be a surprise, Boyd wasn't a surprise (I can see what he wanted a longer option), Gray - who knows. We have always been a club that will sell our best players and always will be, it doesn't mean that there is an issue. Just reading Keane's comments suggests the opposite.
You know full well the reaction you are trying to provoke with your posts, if you don't you're stupid, but I genuinely don't think that to be the case. The only conclusion can be that you're deliberately trying to wind people up.
You do raise valid points in your posts - if only you could decide to present them in a more balanced and less provocative way. How anyone can fail to accept and acknowledge the positives at our club at the moment is beyond belief.
Give it a try Ablue, change your approach (not necessarily your view) you might find the messageboard experience to be much more enjoyable.
This user liked this post: elwaclaret
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
No, it's evidence of the machinations of a conveyor belt of talent which, if our club continues to be run as well as it is, will hopefully long continue.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
It seems pretty obvious why we are a bit slower than some in transfer windows. The players we want to bring in are good players who might be able to get a move to a more established and affluent Premier League club. Hence they are waiting to see what offers come in before making a commitment to Burnley.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
I find this messageboard quite enjoyable as it is.
Of course I give my threads titles that provoke a conversation, that's the purpose of messageboards.
Of course none of us know absolutely that SD wanted away but the fact he never challenged the debate suggests he did. Luckily for him Palace in the end didn't want him it would have been an unhappy marriage, perhaps he himself realised that.
For a number of reasons we look like losing some important team players, Flanagan Boyd Keane and Barton already gone, and talk of Defour and Gray, that is half a side.
My fancy and it is but a fancy is that SD knew this was coming and decided he would prefer to get out rather than rebuild, but now that option has gone I expect him to set about the business of bringing fresh blood in.
In some ways his failure to get the Palace job has also closed down his chances on others, it now looks more likely that he and the club will have their futures intertwined for several more years, not something I relish but obviously something attractive to most on here.
Of course I give my threads titles that provoke a conversation, that's the purpose of messageboards.
Of course none of us know absolutely that SD wanted away but the fact he never challenged the debate suggests he did. Luckily for him Palace in the end didn't want him it would have been an unhappy marriage, perhaps he himself realised that.
For a number of reasons we look like losing some important team players, Flanagan Boyd Keane and Barton already gone, and talk of Defour and Gray, that is half a side.
My fancy and it is but a fancy is that SD knew this was coming and decided he would prefer to get out rather than rebuild, but now that option has gone I expect him to set about the business of bringing fresh blood in.
In some ways his failure to get the Palace job has also closed down his chances on others, it now looks more likely that he and the club will have their futures intertwined for several more years, not something I relish but obviously something attractive to most on here.
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 pm
- Been Liked: 50 times
- Has Liked: 22 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
To be fair the amount of abuse OP takes from some people. If thrown against other members of the board would not just be ignored.
I also think that while I certainly do not agree with half of what he puts. The reason it strikes a nerve with so many people is becasue there is sometimes a glimpse of truth in there that they do not want to see.
I also think that while I certainly do not agree with half of what he puts. The reason it strikes a nerve with so many people is becasue there is sometimes a glimpse of truth in there that they do not want to see.
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
Provoking conversation is fine, it's the provoking to cause frustration that actually hinders the former.ablueclaret wrote:I find this messageboard quite enjoyable as it is.
Of course I give my threads titles that provoke a conversation, that's the purpose of messageboards.
Of course none of us know absolutely that SD wanted away but the fact he never challenged the debate suggests he did. Luckily for him Palace in the end didn't want him it would have been an unhappy marriage, perhaps he himself realised that.
For a number of reasons we look like losing some important team players, Flanagan Boyd Keane and Barton already gone, and talk of Defour and Gray, that is half a side.
My fancy and it is but a fancy is that SD knew this was coming and decided he would prefer to get out rather than rebuild, but now that option has gone I expect him to set about the business of bringing fresh blood in.
In some ways his failure to get the Palace job has also closed down his chances on others, it now looks more likely that he and the club will have their futures intertwined for several more years, not something I relish but obviously something attractive to most on here.
I've said for a while that I think Dyche needs to show that he can progress his style and adapt a more. At the same time though, there has to be a realisation of where we are at.
Presently I see us as a Stoke when they first stayed up. Not pleasing on the eye but effective. If we can emulate them by gradually introducing more football in to our play, I will be delighted.
I also think that doing so will bring those opportunities to move upwards to a bigger club, to Dyche.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Is our transfer inactivity down to an unsettled manager?
DCWat I fancy you worry too much about some on here, they actually revel in having someone to insult, and that's fine by me, better me than their loved one's.
Mind you some could do with a little bit of that Mr Zen that Corbyn is supposed to have found. Poser.
Mind you some could do with a little bit of that Mr Zen that Corbyn is supposed to have found. Poser.