Walters fee agreed

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Hipper
Posts: 5710
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1177 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Hipper » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:28 pm

I like this signing. We need these sort of players - steady Premier League types coming from steady Premier teams - to build a stronger team.

We were talking about Charlie Adam last season - he's another I'd like to see here. Craig Dawson... I see nothing wrong with going with these sorts of players for the next two or three years as we try to find our feet. Imagine how our lesser experienced players like Brady and Hendrick can learn from them.
These 3 users liked this post: tim_noone nil_desperandum BertiesBeehole

Guller Bull
Posts: 2568
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
Been Liked: 785 times
Has Liked: 1011 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Guller Bull » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:29 pm

Will be really happy with this if it goes through!

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3016
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 833 times
Has Liked: 1631 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:30 pm

Excellent signing
These 2 users liked this post: Mad_tony_c BertiesBeehole

BFC88
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 34 times
Has Liked: 18 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by BFC88 » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:31 pm

I can't believe anybody could be disappointed with this signing, for the fee mentioned I think it's a great deal. Walters has a lot of premier league experience and he's still better than what a lot of people think. Decent business this. Hope we go in for the double swoop with Charlie Adam

Rileybobs
Posts: 16853
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:32 pm

Hipper wrote:I like this signing. We need these sort of players - steady Premier League types coming from steady Premier teams - to build a stronger team.

We were talking about Charlie Adam last season - he's another I'd like to see here. Craig Dawson... I see nothing wrong with going with these sorts of players for the next two or three years as we try to find our feet. Imagine how our lesser experienced players like Brady and Hendrick can learn from them.
Agree entirely. I'd take Adam and Dawson in a heart beat. These unfashionable British and Irish players with boring names, safe hair cuts and no tattoos tend to go under the radar.
This user liked this post: what_no_pies

lrac
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by lrac » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:35 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Agree entirely. I'd take Adam and Dawson in a heart beat. These unfashionable British and Irish players with boring names, safe hair cuts and no tattoos tend to go under the radar.
Trips did ok . :)

Rileybobs
Posts: 16853
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:36 pm

lrac wrote:Trips did ok . :)
Trippier has at least one full sleeve and a surname that can be pronounced in a French accent. He's destined for the very top.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by tim_noone » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:37 pm

KefkaClaret wrote:So we've swapped from Boyd and Arfield to Walters and Arfield. Good to see us keeping with the hoof ball style.
Remember how far we have travelled.we needed a leader on the pitch...he's a perfect fit IMO .

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by ElectroClaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:38 pm

BFC88 wrote:I can't believe anybody could be disappointed with this signing.....
You haven't been coming on here very long, have you? :D :D
This user liked this post: what_no_pies

claretbob
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:22 am
Been Liked: 141 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by claretbob » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:39 pm

He looked pretty good a month ago scoring a belter against Austria and scored a decent effort against us last season. It's impossible for us to look further than next season and 17th place and any Burnley fan who thinks otherwise is deluded.As such Jonathan Walters looks a cracking signing in the mould of a Joey Barton or Kevin Ball and it's telling that Stoke fans seem genuinely sad to see him leave. He's not just an Irish international he's also a scouser so ticks the northern box as well!
These 5 users liked this post: tim_noone vinrogue northeastclaret BertiesBeehole Quicknick

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10238 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by evensteadiereddie » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:41 pm

I'll never forget his part in the FA Cup semi-final demolition job on Bolton. Anything near that will do me.

Dublin7Claret
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 12:19 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 133 times
Location: Dublin 7

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Dublin7Claret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:42 pm

It's a yes from me

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1430
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 165 times
Location: York

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Sutton-Claret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:42 pm

His middle name is Ronald........

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by tim_noone » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:43 pm

jrgbfc wrote:Do we really need another ageing, hard working scrapper?
At this moment in time...yes.

TsarBomba
Posts: 1631
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 292 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by TsarBomba » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:43 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Dyche's prioritising of fitness and running ability (if that's what you believe) has taken us to our highest finish in god knows how long. So yes, it might only get us so far, but that's further than we've been in my lifetime.

Also, I don't see the issue with benching a player who was not physically fit enough to compete for 90 minutes. As you put it, a semi professional team should be fit as a minimum requirement. Defour didn't meet that minimum requirement.

If course, we also need to add some more creative ability into the side, and I'm sure we will but naturally these players are harder to find and harder to sign - as such we're likely to be waiting a little further into the transfer window before we sign them.

I entirely disagree that Walters doesn't have a wider range of talents than we currently have. I'd say he probably has a wider range of talents than the vast majority of our current squad.
There's a difference between being fit, and then being able to put in the type of shift Boyd or Marney can put in.

Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgium national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.

Defour will never be able to run upwards of 10k a game. He is not that sort of player. He has never been asked to do that in his career, he's now late twenties, and playing in the most physical league in the world.

It's lunacy to bench players because they can't compete for 90 minutes. By doing this, you completely overlook what other qualities they have.

There are few players that can compete for 90 minutes, every game. I don't want a team that just competes for 90 minutes. Is David Silva benched because he can't compete for 90 minutes? No, he is brought on, or off, when the circumstances dictate.

It's a squad game. Different players, for different occasions, either starting or coming on as a sub to affect the game in their own way. Dyche hasn't learned how to do this yet, and would rather a player, as you put it, that competes for 90 minutes, which will only get us so far.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

BFC88
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 34 times
Has Liked: 18 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by BFC88 » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:43 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:You haven't been coming on here very long, have you? :D :D
True :lol: I CAN believe it actually.

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by BennyD » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:45 pm

A great signing. A Stokie mate of mine is really sorry to see him go and said he thought, despite the nay Sayers on here, that he would do really well for us. For once I agreed with him.

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by ablueclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:47 pm

I remain deeply unimpressed, the antithesis of the type of signing we need.

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 468 times
Has Liked: 190 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by KefkaClaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:48 pm

tim_noone wrote:Remember how far we have travelled.we needed a leader on the pitch...he's a perfect fit IMO .

Whilst I agree we need a leader I feel if we start with Arfield and Walters we will have the same problems we had with Boyd and Arfield.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16853
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Rileybobs » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:49 pm

TsarBomba wrote:There's a difference between being fit, and then being able to put in the type of shift Boyd or Marney can put in.

Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgian national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.

Defour will never be able to run upwards of 10k a game. He is not that sort of player. He has never been asked to do that in his career, he's now late twenties, and playing in the most physical league in the world.

It's lunacy to bench players because they can't compete for 90 minutes. By doing this, you completely overlook what other qualities they have.

There are few players that can compete for 90 minutes, every game. I don't want a team that just competes for 90 minutes. Is David Silva benched because he can't compete for 90 minutes? No, he is brought on, or off, when the circumstances dictate.

It's a squad game. Different players, for different occasions, either starting or coming on as a sub to affect the game in their own way. Dyche hasn't learned how to do this yet, and would rather a player, as you put it, that competes for 90 minutes, which will only get us so far.
How can there only be a few players who can compete for 90 minutes when we had 8 players who did that every game last season?

And comparing the situation with Man City and David Silva is ridiculous. Mainly because they will always have the lion's share of possession and also because they're so good they can generally afford to utilise luxury players.

Having said that if David Silva was a Burnley player I'm certain that Dyche would accommodate him. Unfortunately Steven Defour isn't David Silva.

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by ablueclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:53 pm

34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by SGr » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:53 pm

Pointless, pointless signing. Would be even worse if we now stopped pursuing Assombalonga, a striker who actually scored goals.

Working_Class_Zero
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:47 am
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 51 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Working_Class_Zero » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:56 pm

dermotdermot wrote:Image

Obviously has some form.
article-urn-publicid-ap.org-9bc2c7977e514b4e84d9032526483163-5FCe2AgzNK593c9efecd690b0575-739_634x453.jpg
article-urn-publicid-ap.org-9bc2c7977e514b4e84d9032526483163-5FCe2AgzNK593c9efecd690b0575-739_634x453.jpg (254.89 KiB) Viewed 3739 times

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Sidney1st » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:57 pm

Striker who plays across the front...so something different to what we have.

The signing doesn't thrill me, but i can understand it.

Selby Claret
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
Been Liked: 402 times
Has Liked: 81 times
Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Selby Claret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:57 pm

ablueclaret wrote:34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.
Your ignorance says it all:

1) he's 33
2) he's not a 'striker' (in the Andre Gray sense) at all - but if you get all your PL knowledge from Panini sticker albums and Wikipedia then fair enough I suppose
3) No we're in the Premier League - same as he has been for the last seven years
Last edited by Selby Claret on Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: Holtyclaret BertiesBeehole Quicknick

fidelcastro
Posts: 7340
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2218 times
Has Liked: 2207 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by fidelcastro » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:58 pm

ablueclaret wrote:34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.
Nothing like giving players a chance, is there? :roll:

Selby Claret
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
Been Liked: 402 times
Has Liked: 81 times
Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Selby Claret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:01 pm

Working_Class_Zero wrote:
article-urn-publicid-ap.org-9bc2c7977e514b4e84d9032526483163-5FCe2AgzNK593c9efecd690b0575-739_634x453.jpg
Walters seems to have grown a 'Voldemort' style second rear-facing head with an uncanny resemblance to Boydy......!
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

TsarBomba
Posts: 1631
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 292 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by TsarBomba » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:03 pm

Rileybobs wrote:How can there only be a few players who can compete for 90 minutes when we had 8 players who did that every game last season?

And comparing the situation with Man City and David Silva is ridiculous. Mainly because they will always have the lion's share of possession and also because they're so good they can generally afford to utilise luxury players.

Having said that if David Silva was a Burnley player I'm certain that Dyche would accommodate him. Unfortunately Steven Defour isn't David Silva.
And out of those 8, how many were the back 5?

Yes, there are few players that can compete for 90 minutes in the PL. That's properly competing, not just staying on the field for the 90 every game, and looking shot by the final whistle.

Edit- How many late goals did we concede last year? In both halves? I would say quite a few. At times, our midfield was completely non existent at the end of games. Players like Barton may have been on for 90 minutes, but certainly weren't 'competing'.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1825 times
Has Liked: 930 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by CombatClaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:03 pm

TsarBomba wrote:Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgium national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.
When was the last time Defour actually played for Belgium? Honest question.
The last game I can find him being involved in was in November 2016 in Belgium's 8-1 win over Estonia where Defour was an unsued sub.

I can find 44mins in the 2014 world cup.

NickBFC
Posts: 1730
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:33 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 291 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by NickBFC » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:05 pm

Steady, if unspectacular signing. Good experience, works hard and certainly fits our 'framework'. At this stage we need to obviously cement our place at this level for the longer term - this sort of player represents a much smaller gamble than a high profile foreign signing and should hopefully give us a better chance of staying up again. The club needs to build slowly but surely so I *get* this signing.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by tim_noone » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:10 pm

KefkaClaret wrote:Whilst I agree we need a leader I feel if we start with Arfield and Walters we will have the same problems we had with Boyd and Arfield.
I didn't see any problems and don't foresee any this time around. Burnley is a job in progress. I trust sd and the board to get it right.

hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by hampsteadclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:11 pm

blueclaret please go somewhere else.
your constant negativity, whatever we do, gets me down...I read a post and I think...I know who that is - I look across and yes it's you.

- constantly critical, rarely spotting the positives and all from a viewpoint of never actually going to Turf Moor...in the circumstances, all things considered in 2017 - WE ARE DOING REALLY WELL.

- why don't you see that?
These 3 users liked this post: Holtyclaret Quicknick holdyourfire

iluva64
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm
Been Liked: 189 times
Has Liked: 130 times
Location: York

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by iluva64 » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:12 pm

Anyone got a thread to confirm we have done a deal?

I can't find one

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Blackrod » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:13 pm

Grafter and a Dyche type player. Has looked good in the PL when I have seen him play. A no brainer at that fee.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by The Enclosure » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:14 pm

If we signed Messi the moaners on here would complain.
Some people must lead miserable lives.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1375
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 92 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by SkiptonClaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:14 pm

Definate framework signing. I'd like to see us stretch ourselves a little now, younger players, realisable longer term assets. But, yes, we need one or two Walters "types" as well.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by tim_noone » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:14 pm

Working_Class_Zero wrote:
article-urn-publicid-ap.org-9bc2c7977e514b4e84d9032526483163-5FCe2AgzNK593c9efecd690b0575-739_634x453.jpg
Who's the daddy??

TsarBomba
Posts: 1631
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 1142 times
Has Liked: 292 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by TsarBomba » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:16 pm

CombatClaret wrote:When was the last time Defour actually played for Belgium? Honest question.
The last game I can find him being involved in was in November 2016 in Belgium's 8-1 win over Estonia where Defour was an unsued sub.

I can find 44mins in the 2014 world cup.
Started in the qualifier against Gibraltar I think in October last year.

Granted, I wouldn't expect a call up now he hasn't played much, but he was in the Belgium squad when in the starting 11 at Burnley.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by ElectroClaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:17 pm

hampsteadclaret wrote:blueclaret please go somewhere else.
your constant negativity, whatever we do, gets me down...I read a post and I think...I know who that is - I look across and yes it's you.

- constantly critical, rarely spotting the positives and all from a viewpoint of never actually going to Turf Moor...in the circumstances, all things considered in 2017 - WE ARE DOING REALLY WELL.

- why don't you see that?
He doesn't want to, Hampstead.

Zom Zom
Posts: 1771
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 917 times
Location: The Park

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Zom Zom » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:25 pm

Cannot believe a lot of the posts regarding Walters. He wilk bring experience and quality to an area we fell short in last time around.

Sometimes its as irritating reading posts from our own on here, as it is reading nonsensical crap from Rovers on the LT site.

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Wile E Coyote » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:25 pm

The Enclosure wrote:If we signed Messi the moaners on here would complain.
Some people must lead miserable lives.
there is no link whatsoever between criticising a footballer and "leading miserable lives" doesn't even make any sense. and science has proved it.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Tall Paul » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:27 pm

TsarBomba wrote:Started in the qualifier against Gibraltar I think in October last year.

Granted, I wouldn't expect a call up now he hasn't played much, but he was in the Belgium squad when in the starting 11 at Burnley.
I'm confused.

You said Defour was fit enough to play for us and cited him playing for Belgium as evidence of that, yet now you're saying he's not getting picked for Belgium because he's not been playing in our team. Are you sure the reason he's not getting picked for either Belgium or us isn't because he's not fit enough?

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10314
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3338 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:27 pm

ablueclaret wrote:I remain deeply unimpressed, the antithesis of the type of signing we need.

Great news again. Ablue gets the vast majority of his predictions wrong so on that basis alone it's a good signing, never mind his 5,6,7 years in a Premier League team.
This user liked this post: Rowls

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 583 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:28 pm

Good signing. Will fit in. Expect the bigger signings later on in window. Very good value and in my eyes a no lose situation, wealth of experience.

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Reecey1987 » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:32 pm

Cleveleys_claret wrote:Good signing. Will fit in. Expect the bigger signings later on in window. Very good value and in my eyes a no lose situation, wealth of experience.
Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weaker

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10314
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3338 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:40 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weaker
Season starts Saturday as well.

Zom Zom
Posts: 1771
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
Been Liked: 688 times
Has Liked: 917 times
Location: The Park

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by Zom Zom » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:41 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weaker
We are only a few days into the bloody transfer window. Did you expect to have all our deals settled by now?

I give in. I'll be back in August.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure

karatekid
Posts: 3139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by karatekid » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:41 pm

This signing will be the equivalent of Joey Barton in the championship winning season. Inspirational. UTC.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

northeastclaret
Posts: 873
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
Been Liked: 310 times
Has Liked: 199 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by northeastclaret » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:49 pm

Excellent signing if it comes off.

Can't understand why some are moaning.
This user liked this post: Mayoclaret

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Walters fee agreed

Post by CFS » Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:57 pm

I certainly feel more comfortable and at ease facing Chelsea in a months time with the likes of Walters playing for us.
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret

Post Reply