Walters fee agreed
Re: Walters fee agreed
I like this signing. We need these sort of players - steady Premier League types coming from steady Premier teams - to build a stronger team.
We were talking about Charlie Adam last season - he's another I'd like to see here. Craig Dawson... I see nothing wrong with going with these sorts of players for the next two or three years as we try to find our feet. Imagine how our lesser experienced players like Brady and Hendrick can learn from them.
We were talking about Charlie Adam last season - he's another I'd like to see here. Craig Dawson... I see nothing wrong with going with these sorts of players for the next two or three years as we try to find our feet. Imagine how our lesser experienced players like Brady and Hendrick can learn from them.
These 3 users liked this post: tim_noone nil_desperandum BertiesBeehole
-
- Posts: 2568
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 pm
- Been Liked: 785 times
- Has Liked: 1011 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Will be really happy with this if it goes through!
-
- Posts: 3016
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
- Been Liked: 833 times
- Has Liked: 1631 times
- Location: Lincoln
Re: Walters fee agreed
I can't believe anybody could be disappointed with this signing, for the fee mentioned I think it's a great deal. Walters has a lot of premier league experience and he's still better than what a lot of people think. Decent business this. Hope we go in for the double swoop with Charlie Adam
-
- Posts: 16853
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Walters fee agreed
Agree entirely. I'd take Adam and Dawson in a heart beat. These unfashionable British and Irish players with boring names, safe hair cuts and no tattoos tend to go under the radar.Hipper wrote:I like this signing. We need these sort of players - steady Premier League types coming from steady Premier teams - to build a stronger team.
We were talking about Charlie Adam last season - he's another I'd like to see here. Craig Dawson... I see nothing wrong with going with these sorts of players for the next two or three years as we try to find our feet. Imagine how our lesser experienced players like Brady and Hendrick can learn from them.
This user liked this post: what_no_pies
Re: Walters fee agreed
Trips did ok .Rileybobs wrote:Agree entirely. I'd take Adam and Dawson in a heart beat. These unfashionable British and Irish players with boring names, safe hair cuts and no tattoos tend to go under the radar.
-
- Posts: 16853
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Walters fee agreed
Trippier has at least one full sleeve and a surname that can be pronounced in a French accent. He's destined for the very top.lrac wrote:Trips did ok .
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Remember how far we have travelled.we needed a leader on the pitch...he's a perfect fit IMO .KefkaClaret wrote:So we've swapped from Boyd and Arfield to Walters and Arfield. Good to see us keeping with the hoof ball style.
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
You haven't been coming on here very long, have you?BFC88 wrote:I can't believe anybody could be disappointed with this signing.....
This user liked this post: what_no_pies
Re: Walters fee agreed
He looked pretty good a month ago scoring a belter against Austria and scored a decent effort against us last season. It's impossible for us to look further than next season and 17th place and any Burnley fan who thinks otherwise is deluded.As such Jonathan Walters looks a cracking signing in the mould of a Joey Barton or Kevin Ball and it's telling that Stoke fans seem genuinely sad to see him leave. He's not just an Irish international he's also a scouser so ticks the northern box as well!
These 5 users liked this post: tim_noone vinrogue northeastclaret BertiesBeehole Quicknick
-
- Posts: 9600
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3148 times
- Has Liked: 10238 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Walters fee agreed
I'll never forget his part in the FA Cup semi-final demolition job on Bolton. Anything near that will do me.
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 12:19 pm
- Been Liked: 65 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
- Location: Dublin 7
Re: Walters fee agreed
It's a yes from me
-
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
- Been Liked: 378 times
- Has Liked: 165 times
- Location: York
Re: Walters fee agreed
His middle name is Ronald........
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
At this moment in time...yes.jrgbfc wrote:Do we really need another ageing, hard working scrapper?
Re: Walters fee agreed
There's a difference between being fit, and then being able to put in the type of shift Boyd or Marney can put in.Rileybobs wrote:Dyche's prioritising of fitness and running ability (if that's what you believe) has taken us to our highest finish in god knows how long. So yes, it might only get us so far, but that's further than we've been in my lifetime.
Also, I don't see the issue with benching a player who was not physically fit enough to compete for 90 minutes. As you put it, a semi professional team should be fit as a minimum requirement. Defour didn't meet that minimum requirement.
If course, we also need to add some more creative ability into the side, and I'm sure we will but naturally these players are harder to find and harder to sign - as such we're likely to be waiting a little further into the transfer window before we sign them.
I entirely disagree that Walters doesn't have a wider range of talents than we currently have. I'd say he probably has a wider range of talents than the vast majority of our current squad.
Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgium national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.
Defour will never be able to run upwards of 10k a game. He is not that sort of player. He has never been asked to do that in his career, he's now late twenties, and playing in the most physical league in the world.
It's lunacy to bench players because they can't compete for 90 minutes. By doing this, you completely overlook what other qualities they have.
There are few players that can compete for 90 minutes, every game. I don't want a team that just competes for 90 minutes. Is David Silva benched because he can't compete for 90 minutes? No, he is brought on, or off, when the circumstances dictate.
It's a squad game. Different players, for different occasions, either starting or coming on as a sub to affect the game in their own way. Dyche hasn't learned how to do this yet, and would rather a player, as you put it, that competes for 90 minutes, which will only get us so far.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Walters fee agreed
True I CAN believe it actually.ElectroClaret wrote:You haven't been coming on here very long, have you?
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: Walters fee agreed
A great signing. A Stokie mate of mine is really sorry to see him go and said he thought, despite the nay Sayers on here, that he would do really well for us. For once I agreed with him.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
I remain deeply unimpressed, the antithesis of the type of signing we need.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
tim_noone wrote:Remember how far we have travelled.we needed a leader on the pitch...he's a perfect fit IMO .
Whilst I agree we need a leader I feel if we start with Arfield and Walters we will have the same problems we had with Boyd and Arfield.
-
- Posts: 16853
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Walters fee agreed
How can there only be a few players who can compete for 90 minutes when we had 8 players who did that every game last season?TsarBomba wrote:There's a difference between being fit, and then being able to put in the type of shift Boyd or Marney can put in.
Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgian national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.
Defour will never be able to run upwards of 10k a game. He is not that sort of player. He has never been asked to do that in his career, he's now late twenties, and playing in the most physical league in the world.
It's lunacy to bench players because they can't compete for 90 minutes. By doing this, you completely overlook what other qualities they have.
There are few players that can compete for 90 minutes, every game. I don't want a team that just competes for 90 minutes. Is David Silva benched because he can't compete for 90 minutes? No, he is brought on, or off, when the circumstances dictate.
It's a squad game. Different players, for different occasions, either starting or coming on as a sub to affect the game in their own way. Dyche hasn't learned how to do this yet, and would rather a player, as you put it, that competes for 90 minutes, which will only get us so far.
And comparing the situation with Man City and David Silva is ridiculous. Mainly because they will always have the lion's share of possession and also because they're so good they can generally afford to utilise luxury players.
Having said that if David Silva was a Burnley player I'm certain that Dyche would accommodate him. Unfortunately Steven Defour isn't David Silva.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.
Re: Walters fee agreed
Pointless, pointless signing. Would be even worse if we now stopped pursuing Assombalonga, a striker who actually scored goals.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:47 am
- Been Liked: 177 times
- Has Liked: 51 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
dermotdermot wrote:
Obviously has some form.
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Walters fee agreed
Striker who plays across the front...so something different to what we have.
The signing doesn't thrill me, but i can understand it.
The signing doesn't thrill me, but i can understand it.
-
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
- Been Liked: 402 times
- Has Liked: 81 times
- Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man
Re: Walters fee agreed
Your ignorance says it all:ablueclaret wrote:34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.
1) he's 33
2) he's not a 'striker' (in the Andre Gray sense) at all - but if you get all your PL knowledge from Panini sticker albums and Wikipedia then fair enough I suppose
3) No we're in the Premier League - same as he has been for the last seven years
Last edited by Selby Claret on Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: Holtyclaret BertiesBeehole Quicknick
-
- Posts: 7340
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2218 times
- Has Liked: 2207 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Nothing like giving players a chance, is there?ablueclaret wrote:34 year old striker says it all, are we back in the Championship or planning for it.
-
- Posts: 1036
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:24 pm
- Been Liked: 402 times
- Has Liked: 81 times
- Location: On a galloping horse with a blind man
Re: Walters fee agreed
Walters seems to have grown a 'Voldemort' style second rear-facing head with an uncanny resemblance to Boydy......!Working_Class_Zero wrote:
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
Re: Walters fee agreed
And out of those 8, how many were the back 5?Rileybobs wrote:How can there only be a few players who can compete for 90 minutes when we had 8 players who did that every game last season?
And comparing the situation with Man City and David Silva is ridiculous. Mainly because they will always have the lion's share of possession and also because they're so good they can generally afford to utilise luxury players.
Having said that if David Silva was a Burnley player I'm certain that Dyche would accommodate him. Unfortunately Steven Defour isn't David Silva.
Yes, there are few players that can compete for 90 minutes in the PL. That's properly competing, not just staying on the field for the 90 every game, and looking shot by the final whistle.
Edit- How many late goals did we concede last year? In both halves? I would say quite a few. At times, our midfield was completely non existent at the end of games. Players like Barton may have been on for 90 minutes, but certainly weren't 'competing'.
Last edited by TsarBomba on Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1825 times
- Has Liked: 930 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
When was the last time Defour actually played for Belgium? Honest question.TsarBomba wrote:Defour is fit. He's getting picked for the Belgium national team for gods sake. There is absolutely no chance Martinez, with the breadth of talent at his disposal, would pick Defour if he didn't think he was fit.
The last game I can find him being involved in was in November 2016 in Belgium's 8-1 win over Estonia where Defour was an unsued sub.
I can find 44mins in the 2014 world cup.
Re: Walters fee agreed
Steady, if unspectacular signing. Good experience, works hard and certainly fits our 'framework'. At this stage we need to obviously cement our place at this level for the longer term - this sort of player represents a much smaller gamble than a high profile foreign signing and should hopefully give us a better chance of staying up again. The club needs to build slowly but surely so I *get* this signing.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
I didn't see any problems and don't foresee any this time around. Burnley is a job in progress. I trust sd and the board to get it right.KefkaClaret wrote:Whilst I agree we need a leader I feel if we start with Arfield and Walters we will have the same problems we had with Boyd and Arfield.
-
- Posts: 3235
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
- Been Liked: 1110 times
- Has Liked: 802 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
blueclaret please go somewhere else.
your constant negativity, whatever we do, gets me down...I read a post and I think...I know who that is - I look across and yes it's you.
- constantly critical, rarely spotting the positives and all from a viewpoint of never actually going to Turf Moor...in the circumstances, all things considered in 2017 - WE ARE DOING REALLY WELL.
- why don't you see that?
your constant negativity, whatever we do, gets me down...I read a post and I think...I know who that is - I look across and yes it's you.
- constantly critical, rarely spotting the positives and all from a viewpoint of never actually going to Turf Moor...in the circumstances, all things considered in 2017 - WE ARE DOING REALLY WELL.
- why don't you see that?
These 3 users liked this post: Holtyclaret Quicknick holdyourfire
-
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm
- Been Liked: 189 times
- Has Liked: 130 times
- Location: York
Re: Walters fee agreed
Anyone got a thread to confirm we have done a deal?
I can't find one
I can't find one
Re: Walters fee agreed
Grafter and a Dyche type player. Has looked good in the PL when I have seen him play. A no brainer at that fee.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Walters fee agreed
If we signed Messi the moaners on here would complain.
Some people must lead miserable lives.
Some people must lead miserable lives.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Definate framework signing. I'd like to see us stretch ourselves a little now, younger players, realisable longer term assets. But, yes, we need one or two Walters "types" as well.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Who's the daddy??Working_Class_Zero wrote:
Re: Walters fee agreed
Started in the qualifier against Gibraltar I think in October last year.CombatClaret wrote:When was the last time Defour actually played for Belgium? Honest question.
The last game I can find him being involved in was in November 2016 in Belgium's 8-1 win over Estonia where Defour was an unsued sub.
I can find 44mins in the 2014 world cup.
Granted, I wouldn't expect a call up now he hasn't played much, but he was in the Belgium squad when in the starting 11 at Burnley.
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
He doesn't want to, Hampstead.hampsteadclaret wrote:blueclaret please go somewhere else.
your constant negativity, whatever we do, gets me down...I read a post and I think...I know who that is - I look across and yes it's you.
- constantly critical, rarely spotting the positives and all from a viewpoint of never actually going to Turf Moor...in the circumstances, all things considered in 2017 - WE ARE DOING REALLY WELL.
- why don't you see that?
-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 917 times
- Location: The Park
Re: Walters fee agreed
Cannot believe a lot of the posts regarding Walters. He wilk bring experience and quality to an area we fell short in last time around.
Sometimes its as irritating reading posts from our own on here, as it is reading nonsensical crap from Rovers on the LT site.
Sometimes its as irritating reading posts from our own on here, as it is reading nonsensical crap from Rovers on the LT site.
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
there is no link whatsoever between criticising a footballer and "leading miserable lives" doesn't even make any sense. and science has proved it.The Enclosure wrote:If we signed Messi the moaners on here would complain.
Some people must lead miserable lives.
Re: Walters fee agreed
I'm confused.TsarBomba wrote:Started in the qualifier against Gibraltar I think in October last year.
Granted, I wouldn't expect a call up now he hasn't played much, but he was in the Belgium squad when in the starting 11 at Burnley.
You said Defour was fit enough to play for us and cited him playing for Belgium as evidence of that, yet now you're saying he's not getting picked for Belgium because he's not been playing in our team. Are you sure the reason he's not getting picked for either Belgium or us isn't because he's not fit enough?
-
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3338 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
ablueclaret wrote:I remain deeply unimpressed, the antithesis of the type of signing we need.
Great news again. Ablue gets the vast majority of his predictions wrong so on that basis alone it's a good signing, never mind his 5,6,7 years in a Premier League team.
This user liked this post: Rowls
-
- Posts: 3043
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Good signing. Will fit in. Expect the bigger signings later on in window. Very good value and in my eyes a no lose situation, wealth of experience.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weakerCleveleys_claret wrote:Good signing. Will fit in. Expect the bigger signings later on in window. Very good value and in my eyes a no lose situation, wealth of experience.
-
- Posts: 10314
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3338 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Season starts Saturday as well.Reecey1987 wrote:Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weaker
-
- Posts: 1771
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 917 times
- Location: The Park
Re: Walters fee agreed
We are only a few days into the bloody transfer window. Did you expect to have all our deals settled by now?Reecey1987 wrote:Were in danger of starting the season a lot weaker than we finished it . If gray goes before we have a replacement we will be even weaker
I give in. I'll be back in August.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
Re: Walters fee agreed
This signing will be the equivalent of Joey Barton in the championship winning season. Inspirational. UTC.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:32 pm
- Been Liked: 310 times
- Has Liked: 199 times
Re: Walters fee agreed
Excellent signing if it comes off.
Can't understand why some are moaning.
Can't understand why some are moaning.
This user liked this post: Mayoclaret
Re: Walters fee agreed
I certainly feel more comfortable and at ease facing Chelsea in a months time with the likes of Walters playing for us.
This user liked this post: Holtyclaret