ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:20 am
- Been Liked: 130 times
- Has Liked: 352 times
Taylor Fee Agreed
http://www.uptheclarets.com/burnley-agree-taylor-fee" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
No need for a tribunal
See link
http://www.uptheclarets.com/burnley-agree-taylor-fee" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
See link
http://www.uptheclarets.com/burnley-agree-taylor-fee" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Taylor Fee Agreed
Great news.
Should be able to budget a bit better now we know all the potential outgoings.
Should be able to budget a bit better now we know all the potential outgoings.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 835 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Undisclosed?! How unusual
Good to have that sorted I guess
Good to have that sorted I guess
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
£5m tops.
-
- Posts: 7356
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Undisclosed, but that won't stop people claiming to be "in the know" about what the fee was, as well as how much he's on, how much we've spent in total this summer, and how much is still available to spend this window and beyond.
We are so fortunate to have such well informed people on this forum.
We are so fortunate to have such well informed people on this forum.
-
- Posts: 7356
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Unless you're being flippant, how do you know this?cutsy123 wrote:4.3 mill it was
Twitter?
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
10% sell on clause too
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Quite often when the speculation starts about a fee, you get the two extremes like we did with Gray from Brentford. We paid under £6m but the reports were £9m. The truth was, because Luton exposed it, was that we paid under £6 million for him at the time but add ons such as winning promotion and staying up has taken it up to just over £9m.fidelcastro wrote:Undisclosed, but that won't stop people claiming to be "in the know" about what the fee was, as well as how much he's on, how much we've spent in total this summer, and how much is still available to spend this window and beyond.
We are so fortunate to have such well informed people on this forum.
I'm not in the know by the way
-
- Posts: 7356
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2219 times
- Has Liked: 2210 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Only 9 million for Gray?
It was at least 10 million according to some of the experts on here. Still, what's a million in this day and age... chicken feed
It was at least 10 million according to some of the experts on here. Still, what's a million in this day and age... chicken feed
-
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
- Been Liked: 378 times
- Has Liked: 165 times
- Location: York
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
I love the words 'agree' and 'fee' within the same sentence.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
What was the fee then Tony?
-
- Posts: 19395
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
certainly is Fidel with Real Madrid rumoured to be spending £160m on a 18 year old)fidelcastro wrote: Still, what's a million in this day and age... chicken feed
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/201 ... -possibly/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
what could possibly go wrog with the game
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
-
- Posts: 8140
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3080 times
- Has Liked: 5053 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Good news to get it resolved early.
The Danny Ings saga was longer than waiting for a new series of GOT.
The Danny Ings saga was longer than waiting for a new series of GOT.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
So you keep saying.fidelcastro wrote:Undisclosed, but that won't stop people claiming to be "in the know" about what the fee was, as well as how much he's on, how much we've spent in total this summer, and how much is still available to spend this window and beyond.
We are so fortunate to have such well informed people on this forum.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
So we paid out £9M for Gray then? Doesn't sound too extreme.ClaretTony wrote:Quite often when the speculation starts about a fee, you get the two extremes like we did with Gray from Brentford. We paid under £6m but the reports were £9m. The truth was, because Luton exposed it, was that we paid under £6 million for him at the time but add ons such as winning promotion and staying up has taken it up to just over £9m.
I'm not in the know by the way
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
- Been Liked: 1157 times
- Has Liked: 496 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
In almost every case the fee which gets reported, the headline fee, is the higher one. The bleatings of Burnley fans when the Gray fee was reported as £9m did my head in. It was childish.ClaretTony wrote:Quite often when the speculation starts about a fee, you get the two extremes like we did with Gray from Brentford. We paid under £6m but the reports were £9m. The truth was, because Luton exposed it, was that we paid under £6 million for him at the time but add ons such as winning promotion and staying up has taken it up to just over £9m.
I'm not in the know by the way
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 192 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
- Location: Nottingham
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Confirmed next Monday?cutsy123 wrote:4.3 mill it was
-
- Posts: 30699
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
I've also heard it was 4.3million. Cutsy123 was my source
This user liked this post: Goddy
-
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:38 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
6,999,999.99 approx has been reported
-
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
- Been Liked: 1693 times
- Has Liked: 193 times
- Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Radio Leeds understands between 6 and 7m although just putting Leeds and understands in a sentence seems far fetched.
These 2 users liked this post: lesxdp what_no_pies
-
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
The YEP also saying "it's understood" that the fee is between 6-7 million.
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
The fee gets released on monday
-
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 2105 times
- Has Liked: 416 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
It's about 5mil with some sign on % apparently.
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
The fee was under £6m and would have stayed at that had we not both gone up and stayed up. I imagine we've had to pay a few clubs this summer having stayed up.UpTheBeehole wrote:In almost every case the fee which gets reported, the headline fee, is the higher one. The bleatings of Burnley fans when the Gray fee was reported as £9m did my head in. It was childish.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Leeds end quoting £6 rising to £7m whilst Burnley quoting £5m Probably £5.5 with add-ons breaking the £6m and heading to £7m if all goes well. Fair for both sides and they get their money now.
-
- Posts: 3047
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
- Been Liked: 956 times
- Has Liked: 583 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Very big lad. Shocked at how well built he is. He sure is a unit. Think tonights performance shows Ward has the shirt still. Impressive as he was there were a few times where he didnt seem to know his place within the framework, whether not overlapping or picking up the apare man at throw ins. Very good going forward. Will say it now ...... England cap in 2 years
This user liked this post: what_no_pies
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Very impressed by him tonight and deceptively quick. Ward will have a real fight on his hands. Thought Jack Cork oozed class throughout. Scarcely wasted a ball and it's certainly good to see him back.
This user liked this post: what_no_pies
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Great to read those comments about two new signings tonight.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
Yes i suspect most of our deals have add-ons if we stay up, very sensible way to do business, of course the monopoly money people on here won't appreciate this is added to any outgoings and has to be budgeted for.ClaretTony wrote:The fee was under £6m and would have stayed at that had we not both gone up and stayed up. I imagine we've had to pay a few clubs this summer having stayed up.
Re: ARTICLE: Burnley agree Taylor fee
This post started off ok but quickly turned really bizarreUpTheBeehole wrote:In almost every case the fee which gets reported, the headline fee, is the higher one. The bleatings of Burnley fans when the Gray fee was reported as £9m did my head in. It was childish.