Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
BurnleyPaul
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 158 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by BurnleyPaul » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:34 am

Simple enough question.

Ben wants away to a PL club in order to push for an England spot in the World Cup squad
West Brom seem to be looking elsewhere now
M'boro want £25m for him
We need another CB urgently

With the way prices are going it's actually seeming cheap right now! Or am I being delusional here?

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3547 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:37 am

WBA could be £25 million richer soon if Evans goes to City.

I'd certainly have a look at Gibson.

colne-claret
Posts: 990
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:54 pm
Been Liked: 294 times
Has Liked: 30 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by colne-claret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:38 am

He'd be a cracking signing. I just can't see Dyche wanting to pay so much for a defender.

jojomk1
Posts: 4804
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:20 am
Been Liked: 842 times
Has Liked: 577 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by jojomk1 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:00 am

We won't pay the fee
And we won't pay the wages he will want
Gibson, Dawson, Shawcross are all way out of our league (literally) :(
Last edited by jojomk1 on Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 10:02 am

Surely he'll be off to WBA once City spent the GDP of a small african country on Evans.

lucs86
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 631 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by lucs86 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:27 am

I wouldn't want us spending that much on a CB, it's way beyond what we need. £10M ceiling on CB, even that's over the top. Go silly with fees getting 1st/2nd choice midfielders and forwards over the line, that's where it's needed.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by tiger76 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:37 am

Sidney1st wrote:WBA could be £25 million richer soon if Evans goes to City.

I'd certainly have a look at Gibson.
Staggering wages Evans is on and i thought WBA were one of the more sensible clubs.

Manchester City are ready to offer West Brom £22m for their 29-year-old captain Jonny Evans after having an £18m bid rejected. City are prepared to almost double the Northern Ireland defender's £75,000 a week wages. If Dawson is anywhere near those wages forget him,Gibson fits all the criteria young English knows the Premier League, Can't see Burnley paying silly money for a CB though, plus i guess high wage demands.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by scouseclaret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:02 pm

Silly money?

Suppose Keane had signed a new deal with us. Would we not be over the moon about that even though the cost to us would have effectively been £25m? If we could get Gibson - a player equally highly rated by many - for what we got for Keane, and for the wages we were offering Keane on a new contract, I would view that as decent business.

Lot of "ifs" in there, but I don't think we should be put off by spending £25m on a defender, given that we've just sold one for that
This user liked this post: Sidney1st

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1447 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by piston broke » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:32 pm

Gibson would be an excellent signing but as we look at the cheaper end what about Michael Dawson? Has been a good player and would be superb as cover for Tarks or Mee.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3547 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:38 pm

There's alwasy some funny comments on here with transfers.

People rightly want the going rate when it comes to selling our players but don't want us to pay the going rate to replace them with players of suppposed equal quality.

No Ney Never
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by No Ney Never » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:43 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Silly money?

Suppose Keane had signed a new deal with us. Would we not be over the moon about that even though the cost to us would have effectively been £25m? If we could get Gibson - a player equally highly rated by many - for what we got for Keane, and for the wages we were offering Keane on a new contract, I would view that as decent business.

Lot of "ifs" in there, but I don't think we should be put off by spending £25m on a defender, given that we've just sold one for that
Is the Burnley model so mature that rather than pay 10m for a defender and turn him into a 25m player, we go straight in at 25m for a replacement? I'm not so sure we're quite there yet. You could also argue that given how valuations have sord this summer, we may have been a bit premature in agreeing the fee that we did for Keano.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Wokingclaret
Posts: 2085
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 297 times
Has Liked: 777 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Wokingclaret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 12:56 pm

No Chance

northernpowerhouse
Posts: 405
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 87 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by northernpowerhouse » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:29 pm

Isn't he a left-sided centre back? Mee's not going anywhere so not sure if he's what we need.

dsr
Posts: 15206
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4569 times
Has Liked: 2259 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by dsr » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:34 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Silly money?

Suppose Keane had signed a new deal with us. Would we not be over the moon about that even though the cost to us would have effectively been £25m? If we could get Gibson - a player equally highly rated by many - for what we got for Keane, and for the wages we were offering Keane on a new contract, I would view that as decent business.

Lot of "ifs" in there, but I don't think we should be put off by spending £25m on a defender, given that we've just sold one for that
Not equally highly rated by all that many. Keane has England caps, and IMO will be getting many more of them starting from the next international match; I don't remember hearing many claims that Gibson should get them instead.

lucs86
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 631 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by lucs86 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:39 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Silly money?

Suppose Keane had signed a new deal with us. Would we not be over the moon about that even though the cost to us would have effectively been £25m? If we could get Gibson - a player equally highly rated by many - for what we got for Keane, and for the wages we were offering Keane on a new contract, I would view that as decent business.

Lot of "ifs" in there, but I don't think we should be put off by spending £25m on a defender, given that we've just sold one for that
I think I know what you're getting at but Keane signing a new deal with us isn't the same as him costing us £25M, so lets spend £25M on a defender. We don't have anything like the spending power of other clubs in this division, we need to buy as smart as we can. The way we play, the protection we give our defenders, makes competent defenders look like good defenders. The Keane money buys us a competent replacement at CB and midfielder who can make us more of a threat going forward. Not smart for a club in our position to spend £25M on a defender.

iluva64
Posts: 740
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm
Been Liked: 189 times
Has Liked: 130 times
Location: York

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by iluva64 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 1:41 pm

I am surprised no one has taken him from Boro already.

He's already knocking on the England door with Keane but without PL experience he's not going to make it.

Isn't he related to Gibson the chairman? His wage demands may be beyond us

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by tiger76 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:46 pm

West Brom might go back in, if Evans goes to Man City they seem the only club to have a concrete interest so far. I suspect wages would be an issue more then a potential transfer fee from a burnley viewpoint.

clarethomer
Posts: 3118
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
Been Liked: 944 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by clarethomer » Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:56 pm

Every day of the week would i spend that money on him.

Would look at a 4 year deal and min release clause also.

Very solid defender, fits the british/Irish mould we have in the main. Still time to develop and the way money is going on tv deals, likely to see a nice return on him.

Keane with a couple of years on his contract would have been worth 35-40m imo.

Goobs
Posts: 4399
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1462 times
Has Liked: 995 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Goobs » Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:56 pm

iluva64 wrote:I am surprised no one has taken him from Boro already.

He's already knocking on the England door with Keane but without PL experience he's not going to make it.

Isn't he related to Gibson the chairman? His wage demands may be beyond us
His Nephew I think.

Good defender and highly rated but would probably prefer us to be looking at a loan for someone like Chambers or Holding if available. wouldn't want us to spend all the Keane money on Gibson who will likely be on a fair wage at Boro.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by scouseclaret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:15 pm

lucs86 wrote:I think I know what you're getting at but Keane signing a new deal with us isn't the same as him costing us £25M, so lets spend £25M on a defender. We don't have anything like the spending power of other clubs in this division, we need to buy as smart as we can. The way we play, the protection we give our defenders, makes competent defenders look like good defenders. The Keane money buys us a competent replacement at CB and midfielder who can make us more of a threat going forward. Not smart for a club in our position to spend £25M on a defender.
Why not? If we had re-signed Keane we would have a top class centre half, but £25m less in the bank, and many thousands of very happy Burnley fans. We spend the £25m Gibson and we are in exactly the same position. People will argue the toss over whether Gibson is as good, but as I recall last season he was vying for the England nod alongside Keane but got injured around the time Keane was called up.

Also the market is moving - predictably - very quickly. I agree with the poster above who said we sold Keane too quickly.

1963Claret
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat May 13, 2017 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 69 times
Has Liked: 168 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by 1963Claret » Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:16 pm

We should. But we won't.

Estonhills
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2016 2:30 pm
Been Liked: 19 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Estonhills » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:19 pm

iluva64 wrote:I am surprised no one has taken him from Boro already.

He's already knocking on the England door with Keane but without PL experience he's not going to make it.

Isn't he related to Gibson the chairman? His wage demands may be beyond us
Gibson is expected to stay at us Boro. West Brom have bid 20m and had that turned down. Pulls has said it will be very difficult to get him away from Middlesbrough. Rumours are he will only leave for a top 6 club and for closer to 30m. We have have a net spend around 3 million so far this season, spent around 43m and sold 40m of players so are not in need of the cash. He is Captain of his hometown club which his uncle owns, which is a pretty unique situation. Also has 4 years left on his contract. If someone pays daft money and he does go the emergence of 19 year old Dael Fry who has partnered Gibson the last 2 games and also played 3 games for the ENGLAND U20 World Cup winning team might lighten the blow.

Skybet odds below.

Ben Gibson Loan deals do count
Man City 4/1
West Brom 11/2
Southampton 7/1
Tottenham 20/1
Leicester 22/1
Liverpool 22/1
Everton 25/1
Chelsea 28/1
Arsenal 33/1
Newcastle 33/1
Stoke 33/1
To Stay at Middlesbrough (Does not include returning on loan following a permanent deal elsewhere) 4/7

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by tiger76 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:42 pm

Having 4 years on his contract puts Boro in a strong bargaining position should anyone come calling,the only viable option on that list to pay silly money is probably Man City, and they could fund the wages also, but they seem to be shopping elsewhere this summer,Boro could easily keep hold of Gibson and if they bounce back he would command an even larger fee,can't see him moving in this window.

Commy
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 464 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Commy » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:47 pm

Gibson is definitely better than Keane so must be worth at least 30 mil.

Well that's what Middlesbrough fans kept saying.

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by tiger76 » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:53 pm

Commy wrote:Gibson is definitely better than Keane so must be worth at least 30 mil.

Well that's what Middlesbrough fans kept saying.
They can play hard ball over any fee, because he has a long-term contract,Keane sadly didn't,so we had to be realistic about his value,in the circumstances we probably got as much as we could.

Commy
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 464 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Commy » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:06 am

tiger76 wrote:They can play hard ball over any fee, because he has a long-term contract,Keane sadly didn't,so we had to be realistic about his value,in the circumstances we probably got as much as we could.
It was sarcasm. I could have put 60 mil.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17928
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1852 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:13 am

Jesus, no.

Completely overpriced for what he is.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18033
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3860 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:29 am

Estonhills wrote:Gibson is expected to stay at us Boro. West Brom have bid 20m and had that turned down. Pulls has said it will be very difficult to get him away from Middlesbrough. Rumours are he will only leave for a top 6 club and for closer to 30m. We have have a net spend around 3 million so far this season, spent around 43m and sold 40m of players so are not in need of the cash. He is Captain of his hometown club which his uncle owns, which is a pretty unique situation. Also has 4 years left on his contract. If someone pays daft money and he does go the emergence of 19 year old Dael Fry who has partnered Gibson the last 2 games and also played 3 games for the ENGLAND U20 World Cup winning team might lighten the blow.

Skybet odds below.

Ben Gibson Loan deals do count
Man City 4/1
West Brom 11/2
Southampton 7/1
Tottenham 20/1
Leicester 22/1
Liverpool 22/1
Everton 25/1
Chelsea 28/1
Arsenal 33/1
Newcastle 33/1
Stoke 33/1
To Stay at Middlesbrough (Does not include returning on loan following a permanent deal elsewhere) 4/7
As a football fan I hope he stays with you. As a Burnley fan I would sign him for a limit of 20m as I do like him. Staying at Boro could ruin his England chances though. Tough call for the lad.

superdimitri
Posts: 4955
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
Been Liked: 1007 times
Has Liked: 725 times

Re: Ben Gibson- should we/shouldn't we?

Post by superdimitri » Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:06 am

There are still Middlesbrough fans? I thought they gave up after last season?

How can you pay so much yet get relegated.

...and then the following year charge more than 20m for a failed premier league centre back when we sold Keane for 25m.

Same age, but seemingly worth the same despite having less games and premier league experience behind him?

I hope borough fall and get sanctioned for ffp. Disgraceful how a team can spend so much yet the next season after relegation ask so much for a player.

Post Reply