Their keeper

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:50 pm

Have we tested him once?

Defour top class. The rest very disappointing.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:51 pm

Vokes should rightly be gutted not to feature at some stage.

Ooogeorgeorgeoghani
Posts: 934
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
Been Liked: 212 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by Ooogeorgeorgeoghani » Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:43 pm

The only change we could have made late on was vokes for wood should have been done in 80th

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:11 pm

Agreex

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30696
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11049 times
Has Liked: 5658 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Their keeper

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:14 pm

he saved one from Brady other than that did he touch the ball ?

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:15 pm

That was a passback.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10974
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5188 times
Has Liked: 804 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Their keeper

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:17 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:he saved one from Brady other than that did he touch the ball ?
The amount of times Huddersfield passed back to him would suggest that he touched it lots and lots of times.

mickleoverclaret
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 398 times
Has Liked: 432 times
Location: Mickleover, Derby
Contact:

Re: Their keeper

Post by mickleoverclaret » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:31 pm

Think he went for a brew on the hour

Steve1956
Posts: 17266
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6490 times
Has Liked: 2916 times
Location: Fife

Re: Their keeper

Post by Steve1956 » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:34 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Have we tested him once?

Defour top class. The rest very disappointing.
Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by tim_noone » Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:38 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.
Agreed.
This user liked this post: Steve1956

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30696
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11049 times
Has Liked: 5658 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Their keeper

Post by Vegas Claret » Sat Sep 23, 2017 10:10 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:The amount of times Huddersfield passed back to him would suggest that he touched it lots and lots of times.
That doesn't count BOT :lol: ;)

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:53 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.
Motd just proved he had nothing at all to do

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17987
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4073 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by ElectroClaret » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:14 am

Could have strung a hammock between the posts.

Gotta be better in the box.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by TVC15 » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:16 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Motd just proved he had nothing at all to do
MoTD proved nothing - we had 2 shots on target and they showed neither. Wood also missed a great chance which they did show.

Their centre back also did an excellent piece of defending in cutting out Ward`s cross from the byline where our player would have had an open net tap in.

I`m not saying that we played well and we should be creating a lot more chances than we did. But Huddersfield did not create any better chances than us - just because M0TD decides to show a couple of their shots the saves were very easy for Pope.

The game was very even - Huddersfield were very organised and their defence were excellent. We were also well organised and our defence were not bad either. This is the same Huddersfield side that despite drawing with Leicester dominated them and created lots more chances than they did against us.

Lets not get carried away with yesterday - all that happened was that 2 teams cancelled each other out.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:37 pm

TVC15 wrote:MoTD proved nothing - we had 2 shots on target and they showed neither. Wood also missed a great chance which they did show.

Their centre back also did an excellent piece of defending in cutting out Ward`s cross from the byline where our player would have had an open net tap in.

I`m not saying that we played well and we should be creating a lot more chances than we did. But Huddersfield did not create any better chances than us - just because M0TD decides to show a couple of their shots the saves were very easy for Pope.

The game was very even - Huddersfield were very organised and their defence were excellent. We were also well organised and our defence were not bad either. This is the same Huddersfield side that despite drawing with Leicester dominated them and created lots more chances than they did against us.

Lets not get carried away with yesterday - all that happened was that 2 teams cancelled each other out.
It did. It proved we didnt test him.

bfcjg
Posts: 13339
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5080 times
Has Liked: 6886 times

Re: Their keeper

Post by bfcjg » Sun Sep 24, 2017 2:25 pm

He was tested not enough but tested. They did to us what we do to bigger teams when we play away. Not sure though in the bigger picture how the main growth area for Prem football which is the middle and far east would want to subscribe to watch the likes of yesterday's game which was in essence two teams desperate to avoid defeat.

Post Reply