Their keeper
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Their keeper
Have we tested him once?
Defour top class. The rest very disappointing.
Defour top class. The rest very disappointing.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Their keeper
Vokes should rightly be gutted not to feature at some stage.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Their keeper
The only change we could have made late on was vokes for wood should have been done in 80th
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Their keeper
Agreex
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Their keeper
he saved one from Brady other than that did he touch the ball ?
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Their keeper
That was a passback.
-
- Posts: 10974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5188 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Their keeper
The amount of times Huddersfield passed back to him would suggest that he touched it lots and lots of times.Vegas Claret wrote:he saved one from Brady other than that did he touch the ball ?
-
- Posts: 971
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
- Been Liked: 398 times
- Has Liked: 432 times
- Location: Mickleover, Derby
- Contact:
Re: Their keeper
Think he went for a brew on the hour
-
- Posts: 17266
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2916 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Their keeper
Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Have we tested him once?
Defour top class. The rest very disappointing.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Their keeper
Agreed.Steve1956 wrote:Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Their keeper
That doesn't count BOTBin Ont Turf wrote:The amount of times Huddersfield passed back to him would suggest that he touched it lots and lots of times.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Their keeper
Motd just proved he had nothing at all to doSteve1956 wrote:Apparently he had more to do than Pope,but I didn't see it,no we never tested him...once twice and certainly not three times.
-
- Posts: 17987
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4073 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Their keeper
Could have strung a hammock between the posts.
Gotta be better in the box.
Gotta be better in the box.
Re: Their keeper
MoTD proved nothing - we had 2 shots on target and they showed neither. Wood also missed a great chance which they did show.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Motd just proved he had nothing at all to do
Their centre back also did an excellent piece of defending in cutting out Ward`s cross from the byline where our player would have had an open net tap in.
I`m not saying that we played well and we should be creating a lot more chances than we did. But Huddersfield did not create any better chances than us - just because M0TD decides to show a couple of their shots the saves were very easy for Pope.
The game was very even - Huddersfield were very organised and their defence were excellent. We were also well organised and our defence were not bad either. This is the same Huddersfield side that despite drawing with Leicester dominated them and created lots more chances than they did against us.
Lets not get carried away with yesterday - all that happened was that 2 teams cancelled each other out.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Their keeper
It did. It proved we didnt test him.TVC15 wrote:MoTD proved nothing - we had 2 shots on target and they showed neither. Wood also missed a great chance which they did show.
Their centre back also did an excellent piece of defending in cutting out Ward`s cross from the byline where our player would have had an open net tap in.
I`m not saying that we played well and we should be creating a lot more chances than we did. But Huddersfield did not create any better chances than us - just because M0TD decides to show a couple of their shots the saves were very easy for Pope.
The game was very even - Huddersfield were very organised and their defence were excellent. We were also well organised and our defence were not bad either. This is the same Huddersfield side that despite drawing with Leicester dominated them and created lots more chances than they did against us.
Lets not get carried away with yesterday - all that happened was that 2 teams cancelled each other out.
Re: Their keeper
He was tested not enough but tested. They did to us what we do to bigger teams when we play away. Not sure though in the bigger picture how the main growth area for Prem football which is the middle and far east would want to subscribe to watch the likes of yesterday's game which was in essence two teams desperate to avoid defeat.