ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:49 am

FA turn down Watford appeal

http://www.uptheclarets.com/marvin-zeeg ... ard-stands" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

summitclaret
Posts: 3922
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 1331 times
Location: burnley

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by summitclaret » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:51 am

Agree with every world you have written Tony.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 9:55 am

If anyone from Everton has been studying his behaviour in these last few days they should be sighing with relief.

CleggHall
Posts: 3281
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
Been Liked: 843 times
Has Liked: 1050 times
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by CleggHall » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:00 am

Well said, couldn't agree more.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Lowbankclaret » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:01 am

It was a red card, agreed with the decision all along.

But you have to say some of our own fans thought it wasn't, not sure how but they did.

Tackles like that need to be stamped out.

what_no_pies
Posts: 1302
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by what_no_pies » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:03 am

Silva has come over like a classless expletive on more than one occasion recently.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Blackrod » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:07 am

The players behaviour is often a reflection of the manager. Ours play honestly and behave respectfully and there's don't. The negative aspect of foreign imports to the PL.

JohnMac
Posts: 7217
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2379 times
Has Liked: 3807 times
Location: Padiham

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by JohnMac » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:08 am

Common sense prevails.

Marco Silva was just disappointed to have let KRBFC down in front of his own fans :lol:
These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st evensteadiereddie

vinrogue
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by vinrogue » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:13 am

Arsh Arsh Arsh and now even Arsher. Silva is fast gaining cockwomble status in my eyes. Correct outcome and perhaps a word in his ear from the FA wouldn't go amiss.

Ashingtonclaret46
Posts: 3784
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
Been Liked: 1831 times
Has Liked: 2633 times
Location: Ashington, Northumberland

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Ashingtonclaret46 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:34 am

Let's be honest, he is a big fan of Jose, therefore, no surprise that he went off on one.
He could well be using the Jose technique of diversionary tactics because, since beating Arsenal on 14 October, which saw them go fourth in the table, Watford have only won 2 (Newcastle and West Ham) of their last 8 matches.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:34 am

what_no_pies wrote:Silva has come over like a classless expletive on more than one occasion recently.
I'm not sure how that compares with a classy expletive, but I agree with you. :D

RocketLawnChair
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 835 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by RocketLawnChair » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:44 am

Jeepers Creepers,, Mason Zaha and Richarlison all on the same pitch. That could finish Watford 9 Palace 8 all penalties with Benteke missing his !!
This user liked this post: ClaretTony

ClaretLoup
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:35 pm
Been Liked: 539 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Retirement Home in Suffolk

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretLoup » Tue Dec 12, 2017 10:52 am

Wright and Mills explained how it all works on R5 as according to them it is all about winning. The players continually chirp away at the ref and question his decision making to put doubts in his mind so that when a 50/50 comes up, supposedly, they get the benefit. The manager's do the same after the game, it deflects from their mistakes and continually puts the officials under pressure when they referee future games. I don't think that Silva is in the systematic bracket like Allardyce, Wenger or the worst exponent Warnock.

Silva's outburst is a bit more perplexing he is claiming Watford are being victimised because they are a small club because in a different game, the Manc Derby, the ref did not send six men off. What it all goes to show is that there is a very subtle difference between refs being consistent in one match to both sides and all the refs being consistent across every game.

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5899
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1771 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by claptrappers_union » Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:11 am

Both feet off the ground, and not in control - what is there to argue.

I remember when Lafferty was banned for more games after it was deemed 'frivolous'. There was a case to argue there, as I remember his heel rolling over the top of the ball and he took the Arsenal players shin.

ecc
Posts: 4275
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1437 times
Has Liked: 1285 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ecc » Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:23 am

"Both feet off the ground, and not in control - what is there to argue."

Exactly claptrappers-union. I can't find a link showing it but when watching it live (on TV) I had the impression he might have slipped slightly which, if he did, would have altered his "challenge". Otherwise, it's a red every time. Just like Gary Cahill in the first game of the season.

Commy
Posts: 2530
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 467 times
Has Liked: 43 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Commy » Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:28 am

ClaretLoup wrote:Wright and Mills explained how it all works on R5 as according to them it is all about winning. The players continually chirp away at the ref and question his decision making to put doubts in his mind so that when a 50/50 comes up, supposedly, they get the benefit. The manager's do the same after the game, it deflects from their mistakes and continually puts the officials under pressure when they referee future games. I don't think that Silva is in the systematic bracket like Allardyce, Wenger or the worst exponent Warnock.

Silva's outburst is a bit more perplexing he is claiming Watford are being victimised because they are a small club because in a different game, the Manc Derby, the ref did not send six men off. What it all goes to show is that there is a very subtle difference between refs being consistent in one match to both sides and all the refs being consistent across every game.
But aren't they the big club when they play us? :D

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:55 am

claptrappers_union wrote:Both feet off the ground, and not in control - what is there to argue.

I remember when Lafferty was banned for more games after it was deemed 'frivolous'. There was a case to argue there, as I remember his heel rolling over the top of the ball and he took the Arsenal players shin.
Lafferty didn't have a game added, we didn't even appeal it. He got a four match ban for the Arsenal red card because it was his second red card of the season. So he served a total of seven games over the season.

Rowls
Posts: 13267
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5172 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Rowls » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:00 pm

claptrappers_union wrote:I remember when Lafferty was banned for more games after it was deemed 'frivolous'. There was a case to argue there, as I remember his heel rolling over the top of the ball and he took the Arsenal players shin.
Not sure if was Lafferty. Think it may have been Gudjohnsson for a stamp against PNE who was given the extra game for a frivolous appeal.

The referee that game was appalling - he refused a handball on the goalline in the opening minutes because he didn't have the nerve to reduce them to 10 men so early.

We ended up losing the game and having Gudjohnsson sent off.

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5899
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1771 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by claptrappers_union » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:27 pm

Rowls wrote:Not sure if was Lafferty. Think it may have been Gudjohnsson for a stamp against PNE who was given the extra game for a frivolous appeal.

The referee that game was appalling - he refused a handball on the goalline in the opening minutes because he didn't have the nerve to reduce them to 10 men so early.

We ended up losing the game and having Gudjohnsson sent off.
I think thats what I'm probably getting mixed up with then... As CT correctly pointed out too. I remembered it being more than 3 games and remember a frivolous verdict but I misremembered and thought was because of the appeal. It was Gudjohnsson who received an extra game ban for that Preston sending off.

Can you remember who the 'appalling' referee was by the way?
Last edited by claptrappers_union on Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Rowls
Posts: 13267
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5172 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Rowls » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:31 pm

Seems so long ago now.

I remember the Lafferty one seeming especially harsh.

We all know the rule now. Back then it was something new. You used to have to demonstrate an obvious malicious intent to get a straight red for a challenge. These days, it's enough to demonstrate a "lack of control". Whether we agree with the new wording, we all know it nowadays.

Except for Silva, apparently.

JohnMcGreal
Posts: 2233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:37 am
Been Liked: 1355 times
Has Liked: 440 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by JohnMcGreal » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:34 pm

Rowls wrote:Not sure if was Lafferty. Think it may have been Gudjohnsson for a stamp against PNE who was given the extra game for a frivolous appeal.

The referee that game was appalling - he refused a handball on the goalline in the opening minutes because he didn't have the nerve to reduce them to 10 men so early.

We ended up losing the game and having Gudjohnsson sent off.
Wasn't it Lee Mason who refereed that game?

Rowls
Posts: 13267
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5172 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Rowls » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:42 pm

JohnMcGreal wrote:Wasn't it Lee Mason who refereed that game?
Think it might have been.

Had a friend in the away end who texted me to confirm it was the clearest handball on the goal line he had seen NOT given. It must've been only about 2 minutes in.

I can still remember the ref sprinting off to the corner flag like he was possessed by Usain Bolt in an attempt to avoid facing up to it. That was what was really problematic about it - we all know he saw it. It wasn't that he missed the incident or that his view was obstructed. He saw it plain as daylight and decided to cop out of making the correct decision.

Call me bitter but it still rankles to this day.

Rowls
Posts: 13267
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5172 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Rowls » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:43 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 134187.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It was Lee Mason.

When the opposition manager acknowledges they're on the end of a "lucky" decision you know the ref got it badly wrong.

Rowls
Posts: 13267
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5102 times
Has Liked: 5172 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Rowls » Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:47 pm

Another report on that match:

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/ne ... rth_End_3/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

NottsClaret
Posts: 3604
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2625 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by NottsClaret » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:07 pm

Rowls wrote:
Call me bitter but it still rankles to this day.
Too right. I can handle an incompetent ref, and half expect the subconscious 'big club' bias - it's part and parcel of the Prem.

But he completely bottled the most obvious penalty / sending off you'll ever see there. Can't believe he's still reffing (badly), it feels like a lifetime ago.
This user liked this post: Rowls

ClaretTony
Posts: 67879
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32530 times
Has Liked: 5277 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:43 pm

It was the Joey Gudjonsson red that we appealed and got an extra game for.

Back to the Watford red last Saturday, apologies for quality of pic and if it has already been posted. I saw this on SSN this morning and shows quite clearly that he is out of control with both feet off the ground.
Watford red.jpg
Watford red.jpg (134.69 KiB) Viewed 2510 times

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30705
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:03 pm

the FA must have stopped doing the frivolous appeal extra game ban because I see no justification for not adding one to this appeal

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3456
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 3:27 pm

The people saying it shouldn't have been a sending off on Saturday are probably the same people who thought that Arsenals penalty was a stonewaller recently.

There's some proper mouthbreathers on here :D

houseboy
Posts: 7066
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2240 times
Has Liked: 1618 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by houseboy » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:56 pm

They looked at it on the day on MOTD. It wasn't a 'dangerous' tackle in the overall sense (I've seen a lot worse) but it WAS a two footed tackle and as such is a red card. I don't know what the 'harsh harsh harsh' bit was about. These days a two footed tackle is a red card and the ref had no choice.
It certainly wasn't as harsh as the penalty against us when we played the cheating gunners.

ClaretPope
Posts: 874
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:14 pm
Been Liked: 79 times
Has Liked: 437 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by ClaretPope » Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:58 pm

Any reaction from the well balanced Marco Silva?

BFCmaj
Posts: 976
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:38 pm
Been Liked: 391 times
Has Liked: 2107 times
Location: Rossendale

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by BFCmaj » Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:04 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:Tackles like that need to be stamped out.
And stamping also needs to be tackled.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5876
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2534 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Silkyskills1 » Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:13 pm

BFCmaj wrote:And stamping also needs to be tackled.
Hopefully tackling isn't stamped out!!
This user liked this post: BFCmaj

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by SalisburyClaret » Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:15 pm

The real surprise is that the FA got something right - suppose it had to happen sometime

boatshed bill
Posts: 15258
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6758 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by boatshed bill » Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:23 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:The real surprise is that the FA got something right - suppose it had to happen sometime
I'm glad they backed their employee.
OK, some may have thought the sending off was a bit harsh, but imagine what the game could have turned into had he not stamped his authority on it.

Giftonsnoidea
Posts: 1360
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 248 times

Re: ARTICLE: Marvin Zeegelaar red card stands

Post by Giftonsnoidea » Tue Dec 12, 2017 7:14 pm

It was a bad challenge but I must say Defour is very good at the continental way of looking like he was massively taken out. How many players has he got sent off for us, these other teams should do their homework. :lol:

Post Reply