Ugliest cars

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:55 pm

Yea, my mate bought unusual fast cars the fuego being one.
His alfetta was a real shed but stupid fast, went to the chippy at dinner once, the throttle cable had snapped and being operated with mole grips through the dashboard.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sun Dec 17, 2017 5:56 pm

I have just been researching some of the cars I have talked about, the Silvia Dohc was a limited edition of 50. **** I should have kept that car, be worth a fortune now.

Shore claret
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 267 times
Has Liked: 660 times
Location: Starbug

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Shore claret » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:26 pm

Surprised no one has mentioned the lada riva

NickBFC
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:33 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 291 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by NickBFC » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:26 pm

IanMcL wrote:Any 4x4 on the road, where weather and road conditions do not warrant it.
What if you require a 4x4 throughout the year to drive in fields etc?...

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:31 pm

Shore claret wrote:Surprised no one has mentioned the lada riva
Did you not read the thread???

IanMcL
Posts: 30413
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6389 times
Has Liked: 8738 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by IanMcL » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:36 pm

NickBFC wrote:What if you require a 4x4 throughout the year to drive in fields etc?...
I think the statement is clear.

4x4 are ideal for fields. They can be beautiful in fields!

Morrisminor
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 8:25 pm
Been Liked: 17 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Morrisminor » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:40 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:I agree.
My step dad was Minor nut. I had two Minors, once had the front suspension come away and was grinding away on the stub axle until it came to a stop.
The Minor was ok but it was the brakes, they were never just good enough.
If you grease the grease nipples at service intervals then suspension parts will last longer than any modern car. Also if you service your own brakes they are good enough to lock the wheels in agressive braking. There is also the option of fitting a brake servo unit to bring it up to modern day standard LOL :D

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Lord Beamish » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:42 pm

Speaking of cars now rare, not necessarily ugly, I wonder how many of the ridiculously mental Lotus Carltons there are left on the road.
My bet is that with their stupidly powerful engines, rear wheel drive, and no traction control, most of them ended their days backwards in hedges and dry stone walls.

NickBFC
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:33 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 291 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by NickBFC » Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:59 pm

IanMcL wrote:I think the statement is clear.

4x4 are ideal for fields. They can be beautiful in fields!
But you need to drive them on the road come rain or sunshine to get to those fields too ;) I agree though, the pinnacle off-roading for most is mounting the curb on the school run.
This user liked this post: IanMcL

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Lowbankclaret » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:30 pm

Lord Beamish wrote:Speaking of cars now rare, not necessarily ugly, I wonder how many of the ridiculously mental Lotus Carltons there are left on the road.
My bet is that with their stupidly powerful engines, rear wheel drive, and no traction control, most of them ended their days backwards in hedges and dry stone walls.
Was that the car you had to do a track day before you could take ownership of it. New of course, secondhand no one had any control.

There were some mental cars back then.

cosworth powered Mercs and Fords.

Some Jap missiles.

Not forgetting the Audi Quattro which I always wanted.

Oh and the Metro 6r4, saw two on the road, now that was a beast.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by LoveCurryPies » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:46 pm

Fiat Multipla.

Never looked good even at launch. I suspect the person who designed it had buck teeth, thick glasses, a broken nose, bald head and dandruff. It was their revenge on mankind.
Last edited by LoveCurryPies on Sun Dec 17, 2017 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

No Ney Never
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by No Ney Never » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:48 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:NNN!
The Riva was Russia's reincarnation of the Fiat 124 on which it was based. Fiat sold several old cars designs that were then built by other countries.
Due to this the best modification to the Riva was to fit a 2 litre fiat twin cam engine, a seriously scary car that created.

There were other scary cars, I owned a Nissan Silvia 2 litre Dohc homologation car. From a standing start at Manchester/Rossendale road lights it could hit 130 mph going up the hill. The 1.8 turbo version I owned later could manage about 105.

The MG montego Turbo, scary as hell. Torque steer on that baby could put you in a ditch.

Then there were Lancias, you could get turbo boost kits so you had a dial on the dash, one twist a 175 bhp car became a 250 bhp monster
Ah Lancia, that brings back memories of watching the Lancia Delta doing the business back in the 80's in the RAC rally, great car.

No Ney Never
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by No Ney Never » Sun Dec 17, 2017 7:54 pm

Sproggy wrote:Nissan Cube

https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/nis ... s-exterior" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Yep, that's the one. As it travels along everybody points and laughs.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Blackrod » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:33 am

LoveCurryPies wrote:Fiat Multipla.

Never looked good even at launch. I suspect the person who designed it had buck teeth, thick glasses, a broken nose, bald head and dandruff. It was their revenge on mankind.
I didn't know you could get dandruff in you are bald.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by Blackrod » Mon Dec 18, 2017 9:37 am

IanMcL wrote:I think the statement is clear.

4x4 are ideal for fields. They can be beautiful in fields!
I have one as one of my cars. I live in a hilly area and it drives straight through snow and ice when my other slides around. Can't see the issue. I think you are referring to owners in v flat urban areas doing school runs. Many of these vehicles are not actually 4x4s but 2 wheel drive 4x4 look a likes. If you are putting kids and equipment in the ride height is ideal.

IanMcL
Posts: 30413
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6389 times
Has Liked: 8738 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by IanMcL » Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:12 pm

Again i just refer to my original post which relates to road and weather conditions.

paulus the woodgnome
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:26 pm
Been Liked: 258 times
Has Liked: 260 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by paulus the woodgnome » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:09 pm

Blackrod wrote:I didn't know you could get dandruff in you are bald.
It must have been a Friar Tuck job.

paulus the woodgnome
Posts: 1144
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:26 pm
Been Liked: 258 times
Has Liked: 260 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by paulus the woodgnome » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:12 pm

Or maybe the dandruff was on a different part of his or her body?

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by FactualFrank » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:15 pm

LoveCurryPies wrote:Fiat Multipla.

Never looked good even at launch. I suspect the person who designed it had buck teeth, thick glasses, a broken nose, bald head and dandruff. It was their revenge on mankind.
Good shout. Surprised it's not yet been mentioned.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by LoveCurryPies » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:18 pm

FactualFrank wrote:Good shout. Surprised it's not yet been mentioned.
It was like a car designed by a committee of one eyed accountants. :lol:

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by FactualFrank » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:18 pm

LoveCurryPies wrote:It was like a car designed by a committee of one eyed accountants. :lol:
I was kidding - see post #2 you absolute animal :D

yorkyclaret
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:55 pm
Been Liked: 246 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by yorkyclaret » Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:56 pm

The original Multipla is a nice looking car, when you work out which way it is going. https://imgur.com/a/Qe9uc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ayrshireclaret83
Posts: 794
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:02 am
Been Liked: 225 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: Ugliest cars

Post by ayrshireclaret83 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:50 am

Anything French

Post Reply