Retro Ban For Tarks?
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Did not see it,
-
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 927 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Certainly should be. If that was on one of our players we`d be baying for blood.
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Hello, Arsene.Lowbankclaret wrote:Did not see it,
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Wouldn't surprise me. I thought he lost his composure in the first half for a while
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
- Been Liked: 157 times
- Has Liked: 121 times
- Location: Edinburgh
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
SSSsssssshhhhhh!
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Didnt see an elbow. But the penalty was an inevitible mistake. Stupidity.
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2491 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Not like Tarks to get upset,it must have riled him a touch.. No doubt Linwanker and Co will highlight it tonight ..
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
He just explained it on Sky , I believe him
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
This user liked this post: Masham Ale
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Anyone who should be reprimanded should be knockheart. The way he went down for arfields booking hitting the floor rolling round, then as soon as arfields booked hes up on his feet.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
-
- Posts: 6576
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1233 times
- Has Liked: 56 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Thought he came across well.
Needs to learn strikers are cheats and will go down with touched with a feather on their nuts.
Was turning away from him when his elbow was near his tummy. Was going to go down as it was a two feather touch.
Mard arsed git
Needs to learn strikers are cheats and will go down with touched with a feather on their nuts.
Was turning away from him when his elbow was near his tummy. Was going to go down as it was a two feather touch.
Mard arsed git
-
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
- Been Liked: 691 times
- Has Liked: 362 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
How on earth could Tarks have avoided giving the penalty away? Murray just legged himself up. Tarks stayed up and jockeyed himcricketfieldclarets wrote:Didnt see an elbow. But the penalty was an inevitible mistake. Stupidity.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Fair enough if thats the case. But from my view at the other end i said to my mate dont go near him, dont go near him, hes gonna go down... and he did!Roosterbooster wrote:How on earth could Tarks have avoided giving the penalty away? Murray just legged himself up. Tarks stayed up and jockeyed him
Stand to be corrected on the decision but from where i was i just knew ehat was coming. Defour got away with one just before.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
- Been Liked: 662 times
- Has Liked: 1220 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Murray put his leg in a totally unnatural position in order to make contact with tarks.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Fair enough if thats the case. But from my view at the other end i said to my mate dont go near him, dont go near him, hes gonna go down... and he did!
Stand to be corrected on the decision but from where i was i just knew ehat was coming. Defour got away with one just before.
This user liked this post: Foulthrow
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
neither are pens, first isn't even a debate, second Murray puts his leg up to make contact - glad the **** missed it - cheatcricketfieldclarets wrote:Fair enough if thats the case. But from my view at the other end i said to my mate dont go near him, dont go near him, hes gonna go down... and he did!
Stand to be corrected on the decision but from where i was i just knew ehat was coming. Defour got away with one just before.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Should be Murray who gets the ban.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
No-one in the ground, either Burnley or Albion,saw this elbow to the best of my knowledge. They were far more upset at Pope’s timewasting at every goal kick.
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Arfield didn't receive a caution. Taylor and Barnes were the only two Clarets to be cautioned.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Anyone who should be reprimanded should be knockheart. The way he went down for arfields booking hitting the floor rolling round, then as soon as arfields booked hes up on his feet.
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:10 pm
- Been Liked: 66 times
- Has Liked: 47 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
He lost his cool. I think he’ll get a ban. You can’t get away with that these days. Oh well at least he’ll get Christmas off
-
- Posts: 3484
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
- Been Liked: 660 times
- Has Liked: 205 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
A fairly innocuous incident if you ask me. It hardly looked like anything at all.
-
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 770 times
- Has Liked: 10055 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
It's tough guys like Murray you need alongside when the going gets tough.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
He’ll probably get a ban coz the ref didn’t see it. Kane and Ali will both be playing on Saturday because the ref got it badly wrong. Not sure why that’s fair?
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 99 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I'd be surprised if he doesn't get a ban for that. Stupid thing to do, I thought we didn't do childish stuff like that at Burnley. No matter what has happened previously you set it aside and get on with it, two wrongs don't make a right. Now we may very well be without our best centre half for 2 very tough games.
Last edited by thelaughingclaret on Sat Dec 16, 2017 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
tarks needs some lessons on the dark arts, he's good, but naive. costly.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 17935
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4068 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Tarks rightly took umbrage to Murray’s blatant cheating to win the penalty and gave him a good old fashioned dig in the ribs in return. Personally I’m all for a bit of that and would like to see more of it in the modern game.
-
- Posts: 10310
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3337 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Stupid. I suspect he’s got Christmas off.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Yeah, but if he was going to do that he should have made sure he cracked his rib!scouseclaret wrote:Tarks rightly took umbrage to Murray’s blatant cheating to win the penalty and gave him a good old fashioned dig in the ribs in return. Personally I’m all for a bit of that and would like to see more of it in the modern game.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
He'll be out for a couple of games, silly boy. The penalty was very soft though so I understand if he wanted to give Murray a reason to go down! Will be a big loss for us.
Dyche is right saying their lad should be done for diving as well though. That was a disgrace.
Dyche is right saying their lad should be done for diving as well though. That was a disgrace.
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Sorry I assumed from Murray’s writhing on the ground in agony routine, he had.(cracked his rib)
This user liked this post: MG70
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
The penalty wasn’t soft , it was blatant cheating and an obviously incorrect decision.jlup1980 wrote:He'll be out for a couple of games, silly boy. The penalty was very soft though so I understand if he wanted to give Murray a reason to go down! Will be a big loss for us.
Dyche is right saying their lad should be done for diving as well though. That was a disgrace.
Why do we continue to use euphemisms like”soft” and “contact” and “had a right to go down” to cover up diving?
These 2 users liked this post: Foulthrow Anonymous
-
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
- Been Liked: 699 times
- Has Liked: 4021 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I agree with everything you said Scouse. The FA panel want to judge that incident in context; as in MURREY IS A CHEATscouseclaret wrote:The penalty wasn’t soft , it was blatant cheating and an obviously incorrect decision.
Why do we continue to use euphemisms like”soft” and “contact” and “had a right to go down” to cover up diving?
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:52 am
- Been Liked: 42 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I was doing the same- saw it coming and Tarks is still learning not to get too tight. As brilliant as he has been, he still defends a little too "physically", given all of the diving that goes on. Easy to say from the armchair, I know.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Fair enough if thats the case. But from my view at the other end i said to my mate dont go near him, dont go near him, hes gonna go down... and he did!
Stand to be corrected on the decision but from where i was i just knew ehat was coming. Defour got away with one just before.
I have the benefit of seeing 8 replays on NBC as I watch each game- absolute cheating from Murray, pushing his leg back and hooking it between Tarks'.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I imagine "Subscribe to Sky Sports Premier League from just £18 a month" has something to do with the nomenclature to which pundits subscribe, subconscious or otherwise. There's a brand to protect. It's all nonsense, obviously. Who would pay £8bn to watch the world's premier divers? Gotta' keep the sport respectable, like.scouseclaret wrote:The penalty wasn’t soft , it was blatant cheating and an obviously incorrect decision.
Why do we continue to use euphemisms like”soft” and “contact” and “had a right to go down” to cover up diving?
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 988 times
- Has Liked: 1660 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
The elbow is not excused by the cheating for the penalty.
He should be banned, I hope he is not, but I think he will be.
Undermines sour progress and discipline, idiot!
He should be banned, I hope he is not, but I think he will be.
Undermines sour progress and discipline, idiot!
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
The penalty was blatant cheating, the standard of refereeing has nosedived over the last few years. I think the recent obsession with stamping out diving has made the referees look even more clueless. The Tark incident is stupidity and deserves a ban, its no surprise most on here don't think so yet would be the first ones crying if it was the other way around.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
hope nothing comes of it but he definitely deserves a ban and a big one for what he did, shocking behaviour.
Murray did initiate contact which to me is a dive but he sucked tarks in.
Doesn't cover up the fact like the last two victories did that we are struggling creatively without brady
Murray did initiate contact which to me is a dive but he sucked tarks in.
Doesn't cover up the fact like the last two victories did that we are struggling creatively without brady
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
A comparison was already made on another thread but seems unfair he'll get banned and Alli and Kane won't.
No doubt he deserves a ban, but a sly dig to the ribs isn't exactly going to end a career. The other 2 were shocking tackles and potentially could have ended a season, possibly even a career.
No doubt he deserves a ban, but a sly dig to the ribs isn't exactly going to end a career. The other 2 were shocking tackles and potentially could have ended a season, possibly even a career.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
What Murray did was worse than a dive. Blatant cheating putting his legs between Tarks to make it look like a trip.
The elbow was stupid by Tarks, especially inside the penalty area but I don't believe it was that hard and Murray going down like a sack of spuds was just milking it to try and win another penalty. Murray missing the penalty was the highlight of the match for me. It's called just desserts
The elbow was stupid by Tarks, especially inside the penalty area but I don't believe it was that hard and Murray going down like a sack of spuds was just milking it to try and win another penalty. Murray missing the penalty was the highlight of the match for me. It's called just desserts
-
- Posts: 984
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 11:20 am
- Been Liked: 263 times
- Has Liked: 90 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
That elbow wasn't deliberate, he was just trying to get some leverage to spin away, Murray was too tight to him and got in the way. Dropping like a sack of spuds over "contact". Shocking. Too many people on here wanting our own player banned.
-
- Posts: 2601
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Surely that’s a good reason for Sky to want it stamped out???Spiral wrote:I imagine "Subscribe to Sky Sports Premier League from just £18 a month" has something to do with the nomenclature to which pundits subscribe, subconscious or otherwise. There's a brand to protect. It's all nonsense, obviously. Who would pay £8bn to watch the world's premier divers? Gotta' keep the sport respectable, like.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I've seen it on TV and to say it wasn't deliberate......
I hope our club do the right thing and fine Tarkowski for his stupid elbowing, perhaps even dropping him for one game to bring the point home. It's irrelevant what went before. That sort of behaviour is completely unacceptable for someone in a Burnley shirt.
I hope our club do the right thing and fine Tarkowski for his stupid elbowing, perhaps even dropping him for one game to bring the point home. It's irrelevant what went before. That sort of behaviour is completely unacceptable for someone in a Burnley shirt.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Dropping him for it would be ridiculous.Hipper wrote:I've seen it on TV and to say it wasn't deliberate......
I hope our club do the right thing and fine Tarkowski for his stupid elbowing, perhaps even dropping him for one game to bring the point home. It's irrelevant what went before. That sort of behaviour is completely unacceptable for someone in a Burnley shirt.
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
"deserves a ban and a big one for what he did, shocking behaviour"bumba wrote:hope nothing comes of it but he definitely deserves a ban and a big one for what he did, shocking behaviour.
Murray did initiate contact which to me is a dive but he sucked tarks in.
Doesn't cover up the fact like the last two victories did that we are struggling creatively without brady
Assume that's a really poor fishing attempt.
Tarks clearly still annoyed at Murray's blatant cheating decided to take a bit of retribution. Just not sneaky enough with it and may well get a retrospective ban. But a big one and shocking behaviour? Please...............
-
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 45 times
- Has Liked: 36 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Tarkowski said in his interview that Murray is a good actor and , although it is not the description I would use for him , he is correct . Murray was obstructing Tarks and trying to push him in the opposite direction , Tarks was doing what he could to get away and gave a gentle dig. The penalty was blatant cheating and the offside is also very dubious for me , after the last few games I am still waiting for the roundabouts to even these big decisions out.
-
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2829 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
I suspect that sort of thing happens tens of times a game but if someone goes down like Murray did and the cameras pick it up, you are certainly at risk of a ban. Far from guaranteed - will depend for a start on whether the ref saw it, irrespective of the fact he may have deemed it less of a foul than it actually was.
Bit daft from Tarks. He didn't need to do it and he seems to have let his emotions from the penalty get the better of him.
Bit daft from Tarks. He didn't need to do it and he seems to have let his emotions from the penalty get the better of him.
-
- Posts: 2551
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:29 pm
- Been Liked: 605 times
- Has Liked: 346 times
- Location: Hertfordshire
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
Tarks should be jailed for GBH; an horrendous violent attack on an innocent passer-by. That elbow must have caused some serious damage for a man of great integrity such as Murray to be laid flat out and nearly require treatment. Football has become such a dangerous game; what if Tarks had had a knife ? FFS, can only imagine what is being said on the BHA forum.
I'm not advocating a return to Sounessesque 'tackles', but is this not being blown out of all proportion ?
I'm not advocating a return to Sounessesque 'tackles', but is this not being blown out of all proportion ?
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:25 pm
- Been Liked: 22 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: Retro Ban For Tarks?
There was nothing in it. Ridiculous if he gets a ban for that.