Lanzini done by the FA

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
No Ney Never
Posts: 2643
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:31 pm
Been Liked: 895 times
Has Liked: 328 times

Lanzini done by the FA

Post by No Ney Never » Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:24 pm

For diving.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/42392410" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stproc
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 311 times
Location: Ribble Valley
Contact:

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Stproc » Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:32 pm

Good

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8050
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2416 times
Has Liked: 2115 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:38 pm

In this day and age, this decision could be made almost instantly.

There would then be NO penalty, NO goal and a cheating bar steward sent off for simulation.

That would help cure simulation, not a two match ban after the event when the damage has already been done.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18094
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3864 times
Has Liked: 2073 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Quickenthetempo » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:32 pm

Diving is worse than ever. Three examples of pure diving over the weekend. This, Ndidi who rightfully got sent off and that mosquito fella for Brighton.
The only way I think we will concede is through refs giving dodgy penalties against us.

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by UpTheBeehole » Mon Dec 18, 2017 2:34 pm

RalphCoatesComb wrote:In this day and age, this decision could be made almost instantly.

There would then be NO penalty, NO goal and a cheating bar steward sent off for simulation.

That would help cure simulation, not a two match ban after the event when the damage has already been done.
I agree with this.

If the dive is as bad as Lanzini's it should be a straight red.

For what it's worth I thought Lanzini's was a completely different kettle of fish to Niasse, which was soft as they come but didn't have anywhere near the same level of deception applied as Lanzini's.

Shore claret
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 267 times
Has Liked: 660 times
Location: Starbug

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Shore claret » Mon Dec 18, 2017 7:40 pm

Ref had a perfectly clear view, should never have been given in the first place ref should be demoted for the next round of matches.

HatfieldClaret
Posts: 2551
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:29 pm
Been Liked: 605 times
Has Liked: 346 times
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by HatfieldClaret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:36 am

Can't believe Lanzini is defending it.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:51 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:Diving is worse than ever. Three examples of pure diving over the weekend. This, Ndidi who rightfully got sent off and that mosquito fella for Brighton.
The only way I think we will concede is through refs giving dodgy penalties against us.
Mosquito :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

DCWat
Posts: 9334
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4143 times
Has Liked: 3606 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by DCWat » Tue Dec 19, 2017 12:58 am

Kamara and Wagner agreed it was a penalty on goals on sunday. Ridiculous!

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:18 am

if we weren't in the PL I wouldn't watch it - the cheating gets worse every week
This user liked this post: timshorts

skibum84
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 12:36 pm
Been Liked: 29 times
Has Liked: 8 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by skibum84 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:06 am

The acceptance by the media of diving is what annoys me most in all this. People have said, he could see the challenge coming so he had the right to go down to avoid the collision. Bullsh*t!!
This user liked this post: DCWat

jlup1980
Posts: 2177
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by jlup1980 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 8:38 am

There are layers of cheating / deceiving going on; from the players on the pitch to the FA panel in the background and the hoards of pundits scattered through the media.

Richarlison and Lanzini have rightly been charged for conning the referee. I still think the Niasse one was harsh as he was blocked off by Dann, but they deemed it cheating so he was banned too. Was the contact in any of these incidents particularly different to the contact made on Ramsey and Bernardo Silva for example? Ramsey backed into Tarky and threw himself on the floor. Bernardo Silva had his ankle clipped, and I think clipped is an overstatement given it took about 6 replays to decipher whether there was any contact at all, yet both of these players got away with the full theatricals that this new panel is meant to be stamping out. As ever the issue is the colour of the shirt and nothing more.

I've said on the Tarky thread that the Lukaku incident is no different yet he got away with it. There's no level playing field in the PL. Lukaku kicked out at a Brighton defender twice but it was deemed to be frustration not violent conduct. If there's ever been a clearer example of bending the rules to suit your needs I haven't seen it. The FA are a complete disgrace and it's getting worse by the week.
This user liked this post: Goodclaret

timshorts
Posts: 2546
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 413 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by timshorts » Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:53 pm

Has anyone else noticed that some teams (try Spurs for example), have started concentrating on diving just outside the box, where if you score from the free kick there can't be a retrospective punishment. That degree of comprehension hasn't reached Falmer yet, clearly.

I went to Switzerland about 30 years ago and took in a couple of games. Was quite bemused by the ridiculous diving, particularly in the second half and was glad I didn't have to watch that sh1te every week. OK, there was Vince Hilaire, Francis Lee, Peter Ward and others, but nothing by comparison to the present offering in the top flight. It's the same every week. If the banning of a few people doesn't do much (and it hasn't so far, judging from Saturdays offering), then:-
a) the rule has got to be extended to gaining an advantage by deception at any point on the pitch, not just the penalty area.
b) if a player is booked for diving, then the panel have to consider whether the yellow card should be upgraded to an automatic ban. That way, there is no criticism of the referee. The supplemental penalty would be out of his jurisdiction.
c) repeat offenders having increased bans
d) "deception" being deemed to include "attempted deception", and "exaggeration with intent to deceive".

If that means that certain players choose to go in Spain then good. They can F off. That'd be about the one thing (other than fishing) which Brexit might be good for.

frankinwales
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 86 times
Has Liked: 651 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by frankinwales » Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:24 pm

Interesting that Tim..........I had not noticed what you said about the spurs............I will be watching, cheers....


Up the Clarets........

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6975
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1489 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 2:45 pm

The best diver ever was Rodney Marsh ex City and QPR
We could manage a leap into the area from an outrageous distance..
In Leicesters promotion season Vardy got a good few dubious penalties .Currently we have a whole bunch at Arsenal totally willing to cheat and con refs
And done even mention ace conman Murray

ElectroClaret
Posts: 18002
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4073 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:01 pm

RalphCoatesComb wrote:In this day and age, this decision could be made almost instantly.
Some could.

On the other hand, re: theTarks/Ramsay incident, you may remember we were debating on here the refs decision to give a peno all weekend and beyond. And they often argue on MOTD about decisions.

Unless you just have the fourth official deciding.
And then half the fans would describe him as blind/stupid/biased/on the take because he came to a different decision than them.

Not that simple at all.

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

2 game ban!!

Post by CFS » Tue Dec 19, 2017 5:29 pm

Manuel lanzini for diving.

Croydon Claret
Posts: 4132
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:03 pm
Been Liked: 1159 times
Has Liked: 787 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Croydon Claret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 6:56 pm

Only the second Premier League player banned for diving.

That system is working really well then if only 2 players have committed an act of diving all season. Well done FA, you really stamped out that problem

Sarcasm mode off
This user liked this post: tim_noone

scouseclaret
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by scouseclaret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:12 pm

Why hasn’t Murray been done?

Croydon Claret
Posts: 4132
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:03 pm
Been Liked: 1159 times
Has Liked: 787 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Croydon Claret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:21 pm

scouseclaret wrote:Why hasn’t Murray been done?
Presumably because there was "contact"

They only look at those who dive over fresh air

NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by NRC » Tue Dec 19, 2017 7:42 pm

Croydon Claret wrote:Presumably because there was "contact"

They only look at those who dive over fresh air
So if you are amateurish in your attempt to conceal cheating you get done, but if you have the professional chops to shield it, it’s rewarded

Bloody marvelous

scouseclaret
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by scouseclaret » Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:09 pm

If there is any desire to sort this issue out, people need to stop hiding behind "contact" as a reason for not dong anything. If a player deliberately lifts his leg, hooks it round his opponent's and throws himself to the floor, it is cheating just as much as if he dives over fresh air. It's not "a tangle of legs", he doesn't "have a right to go down", he's cheating and should get a ban.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5792
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Tue Dec 19, 2017 10:11 pm

Has the Brighton player who dived near the end not been charged??

CoolClaret
Posts: 7450
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2254 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by CoolClaret » Wed Dec 20, 2017 12:20 am

Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:Has the Brighton player who dived near the end not been charged??
Only goes to review if a penalty is given, which is absolutely farcical. They've really ballsed this whole approach up.... Needs scrapping asap.

Foulthrow
Posts: 2283
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 1518 times

Re: Lanzini done by the FA

Post by Foulthrow » Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:57 am

Will Demarai Gray get done for his dive last night?

Post Reply