Tarkowski
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1447 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Tarkowski
3 excellent performances from 4 for Long has been a massive bonus but Tarks is the man.
I hope SD now realises he has the opportunity, if needed, to go 3 at the back.
I hope SD now realises he has the opportunity, if needed, to go 3 at the back.
This user liked this post: turfytopper
Re: Tarkowski
He'll start our best 11.
-
- Posts: 17246
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6485 times
- Has Liked: 2910 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Tarkowski
Not so sure PB Dyche is a stubborn man I think Long will start against Liverpool!
-
- Posts: 11498
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3181 times
- Has Liked: 1865 times
- Contact:
Re: Tarkowski
Firminho
Coutinho
Salah
Mane
4 reasons there that Tarks will be starting
Coutinho
Salah
Mane
4 reasons there that Tarks will be starting
This user liked this post: turfytopper
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:47 am
- Been Liked: 1087 times
- Has Liked: 996 times
Re: Tarkowski
How’s his hand coming along post minor surgery?
-
- Posts: 17246
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6485 times
- Has Liked: 2910 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Tarkowski
Tark's will be sub on New Year's Day, I think Dyche will be loyal to Long
-
- Posts: 7137
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3595 times
- Has Liked: 1028 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: Tarkowski
Dyche has shown himself to be very loyal to players who get into the 11, until a rick or some such to let the 'usual' choice back in.
Look at the likes of Bardsley, he is keeping Matty Lowton out - and Lowton did nothing wrong to deserve dropping before his injury. Bardsley has simply performed very well, and it would be harsh to drop him.
I would not be surprised to see Long start, but if I had to make the decision, I would be dropping Tarky back in for sure - he is vital to this team though we have done well in his absence.
Look at the likes of Bardsley, he is keeping Matty Lowton out - and Lowton did nothing wrong to deserve dropping before his injury. Bardsley has simply performed very well, and it would be harsh to drop him.
I would not be surprised to see Long start, but if I had to make the decision, I would be dropping Tarky back in for sure - he is vital to this team though we have done well in his absence.
-
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
- Been Liked: 746 times
- Has Liked: 927 times
Re: Tarkowski
An absolute no-brainer...back in.Steve1956 wrote:What do you think guys? Instant recall against Liverpool or will Dyche punish him with a spell on the bench for his stupidity against Brighton
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
I hope he doesn't. You don't suddenly change formations, which in that instance would be significant, when we're 7th in the table and doing well.piston broke wrote:I hope SD now realises he has the opportunity, if needed, to go 3 at the back.
If we were in the bottom 3, I could understand it.
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Tarkowski
If we were against Bournemouth or someone I'd keep him in. Liverpool are on fire though, bring him back in.
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1447 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Tarkowski
I'm not advocating changing the system, Frank. Just saying if we are chasing a game and want to go 3-5-2 the we know we have 3 capable CHs, who could comfortably do the job.FactualFrank wrote:I hope he doesn't. You don't suddenly change formations, which in that instance would be significant, when we're 7th in the table and doing well.
If we were in the bottom 3, I could understand it.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Tarkowski
Tarks will come in. We kept a clean sheet but viewing from half way in home end there were a couple of nervy moments from Long.
He played well enough but Tarks all day.
He played well enough but Tarks all day.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Tarkowski
Lowton wont get back in at this rate though. Bardsleys been class. He had a few words with Long today.
-
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:19 am
- Been Liked: 409 times
- Has Liked: 3421 times
- Location: Crawley West Sussex
Re: Tarkowski
I think both Lowton and Tarkowski will return Monday. It is a huge ask for players to play 3 games in just 7 days.
So given we can do some rotation without it impacting in the framework........
That is is Tarkowski is fit.
Going 3 at the back would be a fundamental change in the way we set up without the ball and with it.
So given we can do some rotation without it impacting in the framework........
That is is Tarkowski is fit.
Going 3 at the back would be a fundamental change in the way we set up without the ball and with it.
This user liked this post: BFCmaj
Re: Tarkowski
Ben Mee came straight back in after 2 games out, which were both wins and clean sheets.
So I reckon Tarks will be back in.
So I reckon Tarks will be back in.
-
- Posts: 2527
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 878 times
- Has Liked: 271 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Tarkowski
Deffo Tarky back.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
A lot of people forget about player morale and player morale is linked to form. Somebody who is feeling great and playing at the top of their game can trump somebody who is normally better. It's not always about who is the better player.
If somebody is ruled out due to injury, such as Wood, Ward and Lowton, it's more difficult as it wasn't their fault to be out.
With Tarks, it's different. He did something foolish, he was banned for 3 games and the player who replaced him has done very well, so I would agree to putting Tarks on the bench and sticking with Long, for now.
If somebody is ruled out due to injury, such as Wood, Ward and Lowton, it's more difficult as it wasn't their fault to be out.
With Tarks, it's different. He did something foolish, he was banned for 3 games and the player who replaced him has done very well, so I would agree to putting Tarks on the bench and sticking with Long, for now.
Re: Tarkowski
Tarkowski straight back in if fully fit
Re: Tarkowski
See your point but the best players have to play and Tarks is better than LongFactualFrank wrote:A lot of people forget about player morale and player morale is linked to form. Somebody who is feeling great and playing at the top of their game can trump somebody who is normally better. It's not always about who is the better player.
If somebody is ruled out due to injury, such as Wood, Ward and Lowton, it's more difficult as it wasn't their fault to be out.
With Tarks, it's different. He did something foolish, he was banned for 3 games and the player who replaced him has done very well, so I would agree to putting Tarks on the bench and sticking with Long, for now.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
So you don't see my point as that's exactly what I'm saying isn't always the caseStayingup wrote:See your point but the best players have to play and Tarks is better than Long
It's most definitely not always a case of playing your best 11, every game. They're humans and they have form and have feelings. Long is playing very well - from what I heard, one of our better players today.
You shunt him out as soon as a player has come back from a 3 match ban, for something that was the player's own fault and you give out the message of, "It's ok if you get banned, you're position is safe, don't worry pal".
It's not as simple as picking your best 11. There's a lot more that goes into it than that. But like I say, the majority of fans just don't take that into consideration because we don't have to deal with or talk to the players.
Re: Tarkowski
We dont have to deal with or talk to the players so as you suggest we dont know those things to take them into account. Tarks has been in excellent form so presume his morale is high and certainly no reason to think otherwise.FactualFrank wrote:So you don't see my point as that's exactly what I'm saying isn't always the case
It's most definitely not always a case of playing your best 11, every game. They're humans and they have form and have feelings. Long is playing very well - from what I heard, one of our better players today.
You shunt him out as soon as a player has come back from a 3 match ban, for something that was the player's own fault and you give out the message of, "It's ok if you get banned, you're position is safe, don't worry pal".
It's not as simple as picking your best 11. There's a lot more that goes into it than that. But like I say, the majority of fans just don't take that into consideration because we don't have to deal with or talk to the players.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
Of course there's a reason to think otherwise - he's just been banned for 3 games. Why assume he'll be feeling great after being banned? If anything, we should presume he's feeling pretty crap - or go neutral and go off how well Long is playing.taio wrote:We dont have to deal with or talk to the players so as you suggest we dont know those things to take them into account. Tarks certainly has been in excellent form so presume his morale is high and certainly no reason to think otherwise.
Re: Tarkowski
If i was to presume anything it would be that he'll want to prove a point - thats the sort of thing SD instillsFactualFrank wrote:Of course there's a reason to think otherwise - he's just been banned for 3 games. Why assume he'll be feeling great after being banned? If anything, we should presume he's feeling pretty crap - or go neutral and go off how well Long is playing.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Tarkowski
But at the same time, we know that SD sticks with form players.
I guess it's a decision that won't come easy for SD. Removing a player who is playing well can't come easy. There's so many variables that goes into selecting a team, it's definitely not always a case of selecting the best 11 players.
Not a bad problem to have though! We're pretty blessed 2 levels deep in most positions.
I guess it's a decision that won't come easy for SD. Removing a player who is playing well can't come easy. There's so many variables that goes into selecting a team, it's definitely not always a case of selecting the best 11 players.
Not a bad problem to have though! We're pretty blessed 2 levels deep in most positions.
Re: Tarkowski
Think theres a reasonable chance he will play Long.FactualFrank wrote:But at the same time, we know that SD sticks with form players.
I guess it's a decision that won't come easy for SD. Removing a player who is playing well can't come easy. There's so many variables that goes into selecting a team, it's definitely not always a case of selecting the best 11 players.
Not a bad problem to have though! We're pretty blessed 2 levels deep in most positions.
-
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: Tarkowski
One of our best players so straight back in.
Re: Tarkowski
Tarks is pretty obviously the better player if both are on form. That said, a few iffy decisions had crept into his play before getting too involved with Murray. Playing consistently at this level obviously takes it out of you and maybe the ban came at a good time. Just hope
Santa came with a new contract
Santa came with a new contract
-
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1696 times
- Has Liked: 789 times
Re: Tarkowski
Lets not forget we are playing Liverpool (not unlike Spurs as oppposition). SD will tell Long he has been great and Long will appreciate that Tarks is starting, and be grateful for having been picked during Tark's suspension.. His chance will cone again
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Tarkowski
How well did Long play against Spurs?
I think there were quite a few who felt he was nowhere near up to it after that game.
(It's only a week ago).
I think there were quite a few who felt he was nowhere near up to it after that game.
(It's only a week ago).
Re: Tarkowski
If he's fit then Tarkowski surely gets the nod. He's a better player and we are playing against one of the best attacks in the league.
-
- Posts: 8129
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3079 times
- Has Liked: 5043 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Tarkowski
Kevin Long has been brilliant, but Tarks has to come back in.
It will be nice to see if Tarks has learnt the lesson of not giving these diving bastards the opportunity to con the ref. It's as much a part of learning the game as any other area.
It will be nice to see if Tarks has learnt the lesson of not giving these diving bastards the opportunity to con the ref. It's as much a part of learning the game as any other area.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: Tarkowski
Tarks must come back in for me.
Kevin has been brilliant. Tarks gets infront of him because of he is far better on the ball, he gives us more going forward with his long range passes, and the way he carries the ball forward from defence
Kevin has been brilliant. Tarks gets infront of him because of he is far better on the ball, he gives us more going forward with his long range passes, and the way he carries the ball forward from defence
Re: Tarkowski
Tarky for me. That little bit more experience and understanding could make all the difference.
Re: Tarkowski
Tarkowski and Lowton in for me.
Re: Tarkowski
If for no other reason than "fitness" we should consider changes given games on 23rd, 26th, 30th and 1st-4 games in 10days to be 5 games in 15 by the FA Cup 3rd round. That intensity killed us off in March/April 1962
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: Tarkowski
He put mee straight back in the team . He will do the same with tarkowski . Has previous posters have said he his one of our better players
-
- Posts: 5724
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2829 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: Tarkowski
Fully expect that Talks will start. Long has done Ok, but Tarkowski is clearly the better player. Dyche is often loyal to players, but let's not overstate this - he's put both Hendrick and Mee straight back in this season when their replacements have done quite well, presumably because Dyche's priority is getting our strongest eleven on the pitch.
Lowton/Bardsley is a little different- they're pretty closely matched.
Lowton/Bardsley is a little different- they're pretty closely matched.
Re: Tarkowski
In the games prior to the ban Tarky had given 2 silly penalties away. Neither dirty but both nieve. Then the retro ban, which I'm sure was afters from the penalty.
Long I think for all his lack of top game time is probably more mature as a player.
Keep Tarks on the bench for me, Long is fine.
Long I think for all his lack of top game time is probably more mature as a player.
Keep Tarks on the bench for me, Long is fine.