Cities first goal
Re: Cities first goal
The gap between City and the rest of the league is so big now two banks of four is the only way to play them.
So to allow City to show their class the only way they can break up play is by giving referees variations of how they determine situations.
This forces the other team to change the way they play and and City turn on the style.This makes the premier league look entertaining to the rest of the world
The FA CUP was on its arse a couple of years ago after the authorities decided it wasn't lucrative
Now they're biggin it up again.The final will become a top 6 final for years to come helped by the same refereeing desicions
So to allow City to show their class the only way they can break up play is by giving referees variations of how they determine situations.
This forces the other team to change the way they play and and City turn on the style.This makes the premier league look entertaining to the rest of the world
The FA CUP was on its arse a couple of years ago after the authorities decided it wasn't lucrative
Now they're biggin it up again.The final will become a top 6 final for years to come helped by the same refereeing desicions
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 833 times
Re: Cities first goal
They got the little advantages all afternoon from the ref and officials but unfortunately you expect that.
At one point in the first half Guardiola was some 25 yards outside his technical area nobody said a ******* word to him.
They made it 2-1 straight from the Kick off Vokes goes clean through onside City caught square the Lino couldn’t get his flag up quick enough.
The game had gone but the 4th goal Barnes goes down far too easily in the City half no foul IMO. Would City have been given a free kick for that, you bet your granny they would.
At one point in the first half Guardiola was some 25 yards outside his technical area nobody said a ******* word to him.
They made it 2-1 straight from the Kick off Vokes goes clean through onside City caught square the Lino couldn’t get his flag up quick enough.
The game had gone but the 4th goal Barnes goes down far too easily in the City half no foul IMO. Would City have been given a free kick for that, you bet your granny they would.
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:42 am
- Been Liked: 120 times
- Has Liked: 355 times
Rawwe: Cities first goal
Law 5 Referees
Clearly states that the referee is obliged to ....
indicates the restart of the match after it has been stopped.
That is usually by the use of the whistle or using the forward momentum of his arms.
By not indicating his permission to restart the game theoretically the ball was not in play.
Clearly states that the referee is obliged to ....
indicates the restart of the match after it has been stopped.
That is usually by the use of the whistle or using the forward momentum of his arms.
By not indicating his permission to restart the game theoretically the ball was not in play.
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:42 am
- Been Liked: 120 times
- Has Liked: 355 times
Rawwe: Cities first goal
Law 5 Referees
Clearly states that the referee is obliged to ....
indicates the restart of the match after it has been stopped.
That is usually by the use of the whistle or using the forward momentum of his arms.
By not indicating his permission to restart the game theoretically the ball was not in play.
Clearly states that the referee is obliged to ....
indicates the restart of the match after it has been stopped.
That is usually by the use of the whistle or using the forward momentum of his arms.
By not indicating his permission to restart the game theoretically the ball was not in play.
Re: Cities first goal
I think it’s quite remarkable that we’ve got so far in this thread without somebody picking up on the OP’s terrible grammar.
It’s City’s First Goal.
It’s City’s First Goal.
-
- Posts: 3453
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1032 times
- Has Liked: 2039 times
Re: Cities first goal
Graham Scott was the ref v Lincoln last season too. He was about as useful as t!ts on a fish then as well.
That's all you need to know
That's all you need to know
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Cities first goal
Bfc crazy and I both spotted this. I eish i got a picture. It wqs literally about 40 yards when we saw him.RocketLawnChair wrote:They got the little advantages all afternoon from the ref and officials but unfortunately you expect that.
At one point in the first half Guardiola was some 25 yards outside his technical area nobody said a ******* word to him.
They made it 2-1 straight from the Kick off Vokes goes clean through onside City caught square the Lino couldn’t get his flag up quick enough.
The game had gone but the 4th goal Barnes goes down far too easily in the City half no foul IMO. Would City have been given a free kick for that, you bet your granny they would.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Cities first goal
Thought it was that simpleton.THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Graham Scott was the ref v Lincoln last season too. He was about as useful as t!ts on a fish then as well.
That's all you need to know
-
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: Cities first goal
ArnoldBenson wrote:Interestingly, considering the OP's user name, my favourite goal of this type was Inchy Heath and Rooster some years ago against Preston. So quickly taken that no defenders got back between them and the goal.
I remember that one but was having trouble putting it into words. Great refereeing.
Thank You.
-
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: Cities first goal
Having seen it now I think although it's a perfectly legitimate goal because they caught us completely cold it looks like a weird goal and I can see why some think it shouldn't have stood, but as has been said we scored a very similar goal in the mid to late 1990s.
Kurt Russell
Kurt Russell
-
- Posts: 3453
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1032 times
- Has Liked: 2039 times
Re: Cities first goal
Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Having seen it now I think although it's a perfectly legitimate goal because they caught us completely cold it looks like a weird goal and I can see why some think it shouldn't have stood, but as has been said we scored a very similar goal in the mid to late 1990s.
Kurt Russell
A fine actor but alas never wore the famous Claret And Blue
These 3 users liked this post: NRC Caernarfon_Claret Dark Cloud
Re: Cities first goal
We do lack concentration at times, yesterday being a prime example. Who was marking Aguero, on two occasions ?
No complaints from me although I didn't think it was a free kck in the first place.
No complaints from me although I didn't think it was a free kck in the first place.
-
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: Cities first goal
Kevin Russell
-
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: Cities first goal
I was thinking of Kurt Nogan and Kevin Russell's "Love Child".THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:A fine actor but alas never wore the famous Claret And Blue
-
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 98 times
Re: Cities first goal
60 odd replies and nobody has acknowledged that we were petulant in chipping the ball away from City players as they initially tried to set the free kick (think it was Westwood) then he was guilty of not retreating in a timely fashion. I don't like it but as we also switched off I believe we got exactly what we deserved. Added to that late Liverpool goal where we also went to sleep it'll be a valuable lesson for us.
-
- Posts: 4955
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1007 times
- Has Liked: 725 times
Re: Cities first goal
Westwood was only doing what every player does to us. The problem is he negated his marking duties as a result.
It was probably his mistake in the end, but still very harsh on us that the ref didn't pull back play. I still think he would have if we did that.
It was probably his mistake in the end, but still very harsh on us that the ref didn't pull back play. I still think he would have if we did that.