Aaron Lennon no thanks

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6975
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:55 pm

I don't get the obsession some fans have with Aaron Lennon.Everton want Walcott and some people assume we want Lennon.
He has pace but little end product and an overhyped rep being ex Spurs.
Why do we not get Marc Pugh back he's developed into a useful player in the Prem
This user liked this post: bob-the-scutter

Rileybobs
Posts: 16897
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6965 times
Has Liked: 1484 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:58 pm

Lennon would be a great addition.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Lancasterclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:00 pm

Its gives us options we haven't got.
This user liked this post: Mansfield-Claret

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 468 times
Has Liked: 190 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by KefkaClaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:00 pm

Fair enough you don't rate Lennon, I can see the arguments.
Woodleyclaret wrote: Why do we not get Marc Pugh back he's developed into a useful player in the Prem


Jesus christ, difficult to put into words what I think of that suggestion.

lucs86
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 177 times
Has Liked: 631 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by lucs86 » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:13 pm

If we do sign him I'd love to be proven wrong but I've got zero enthusiasm about us signing Aaron Lennon. Can't see him working well in our team, don't think he's got enough to his game. I can see the appeal because we lack a bit of pace, but my impression is that he's pace and little else. Delighted to be wrong on this but I reckon he'd be a mixture of anonymous and frustrating in our side.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by arise_sir_charge » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:17 pm

He’d be a great signing.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by MACCA » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:26 pm

I'd like to see him here for several reasons.
Competition for places.
Pace.
An out ball
Also could free up a wifmde player to a play number 10 role
Bags of experience in this league

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by ablueclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:31 pm

MOD: POST REMOVED
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by claretspice » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:32 pm

If Dyche wants him, that's fine by me. Its easy to see what the logic of the signing is and when Dyche thinks he could bring us which would help elevate us to the next level.
These 2 users liked this post: burnley007 elwaclaret

lrac
Posts: 519
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:51 pm
Been Liked: 106 times
Has Liked: 283 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by lrac » Sun Jan 14, 2018 2:46 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:I don't get the obsession some fans have with Aaron Lennon.Everton want Walcott and some people assume we want Lennon.
He has pace but little end product and an overhyped rep being ex Spurs.
Why do we not get Marc Pugh back he's developed into a useful player in the Prem
Well this just shows how far we have come .great board and a great manager. GREAT club

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:12 pm

https://www.premierleague.com/players/2 ... nnon/stats" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Stats are pretty average really, for the money hes going to be on we should be looking elsewhere.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by tim_noone » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:37 pm

Spurs got the best of him...to late in the day now IMO.

MDWat
Posts: 2532
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
Been Liked: 879 times
Has Liked: 271 times
Location: Bradford
Contact:

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by MDWat » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:39 pm

30 years old, 250+ Prem appearances, pace to burn, loads of experience, fits the framework of the side.

People turning their nose up. Unbelievable.
These 2 users liked this post: bobinho ZizkovClaret

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:41 pm

£55k a week and his stats aren't what you'd call stellar considering that amount of appearances.

Pace to burn, great but we've had that before and if his end product isn't much better than what we've got why bother?

ClaretTony
Posts: 67895
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32545 times
Has Liked: 5279 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:47 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:I don't get the obsession some fans have with Aaron Lennon.Everton want Walcott and some people assume we want Lennon.
He has pace but little end product and an overhyped rep being ex Spurs.
Why do we not get Marc Pugh back he's developed into a useful player in the Prem
You are living in a different world to me if you are comparing Pugh with Lennon.
These 2 users liked this post: elwaclaret KB1882

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6975
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:05 pm

No Tony I just watch all sides and ignore the nonsense talked by the press .Marc Pugh have provided many assists for Bournemouth and would be a good squad player.Good replacement for Scott Arfield of he decides to leave.Aaron Lennon is inconsistent in his performances and is not what we need.Andre Gray had pace to burn but I for one was pleased when we sold him.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Diesel » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:20 pm

So you're now comparing him with Andre Gray!

Who next, Lloyd Honeyghan?

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6975
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1490 times
Has Liked: 1848 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:32 pm

It's the inconsistencies in his play is the comparison.The ability to run fast without outcome or control is not a particular asset in a footballer.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:34 pm

Sidney1st wrote:https://www.premierleague.com/players/2 ... nnon/stats

Stats are pretty average really, for the money hes going to be on we should be looking elsewhere.
Which stats are you specifically referring to? There'll be other PL wingers with comparable stats that I'd have here in a heartbeat.

Braindead
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 987 times
Has Liked: 1056 times
Location: Yavin 4

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Braindead » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:36 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:It's the inconsistencies in his play is the comparison.The ability to run fast without outcome or control is not a particular asset in a footballer.
370 Premier league appearances, 21 England caps and only 30 years old tends to suggest you are talking ********.

KRBFC
Posts: 18135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3804 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by KRBFC » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:45 pm

Lennon would be a great signing if he's anything like the player he used to be, I haven't seen him do much in a while so I don't know how his body's coping and if he's still capable but you would hope the club would have an idea.

Stockbrokerbelt
Posts: 557
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
Been Liked: 229 times
Has Liked: 137 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Stockbrokerbelt » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:48 pm

Mark Pugh, Bournemouth squad player, jesus good job your not the manager.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:48 pm

taio wrote:Which stats are you specifically referring to? There'll be other PL wingers with comparable stats that I'd have here in a heartbeat.
Overall, he's not the stellar player people on here are making him out to be.

He's ok, but not really head and shoulders above many over his career.

He's got pace, great, but he's just alright after that.

He might need to kick start his career again, but he'd easily be our highest paid player and I can't see what would justify that.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Diesel » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:52 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Overall, he's not the stellar player people on here are making him out to be.
Who?

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:55 pm

Diesel wrote:Who?
He's been mentioned a few times in the past and there's always a number of people who get overly excited about signing him and believe he's an excellent player when his stats would suggest he's ok but that's about it.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:57 pm

Sidney1st wrote:He's been mentioned a few times in the past and there's always a number of people who get overly excited about signing him and believe he's an excellent player when his stats would suggest he's ok but that's about it.
Which stats though because it seems that's what you were using to reach your conclusion?

Would also suggest he wouldn't be earning £55k a week here.

JohnMac
Posts: 7217
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2379 times
Has Liked: 3807 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by JohnMac » Sun Jan 14, 2018 4:59 pm

His pace is what we lack.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:01 pm

:lol:
taio wrote:Which stats though because it seems that's what you were using to reach your conclusion?

Would also suggest he wouldn't be earning £55k a week here.
You could always have a look on the link I provided at his overall PL stats, it might help this conversation...
They're the only stats I've posted and if you look his pass completion rate and assist rates aren't that high.

He's on £55k a week at Everton it's rumoured so we'd have to pay either all or a big wedge of those wages and I'd struggle to see why he's worth that money as it stands.

I have the same arguments on here about Defoe when people get all excited about him...

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Diesel » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:02 pm

Sidney1st wrote:He's been mentioned a few times in the past and there's always a number of people who get overly excited about signing him and believe he's an excellent player when his stats would suggest he's ok but that's about it.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.urba ... a&amp=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not seen him been described as this.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:04 pm

Diesel wrote:https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.urba ... a&amp=true

Not seen him been described as this.
Try this spelling

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stellar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:15 pm

Sidney1st wrote::lol:

You could always have a look on the link I provided at his overall PL stats, it might help this conversation...
They're the only stats I've posted and if you look his pass completion rate and assist rates aren't that high.

He's on £55k a week at Everton it's rumoured so we'd have to pay either all or a big wedge of those wages and I'd struggle to see why he's worth that money as it stands.

I have the same arguments on here about Defoe when people get all excited about him...
There are a range of stats so I was wondering which ones you were using to form your view. I can't see pass completion rate on the stats you posted but could be overlooking. But in any case there are more important ones for this type of winger. Anyhow his key stats will be comparable with other players that we'd never be able to sign but, if we could, would be very good signings. You are looking at his stats in meaningless isolation.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Diesel » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:15 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Try this spelling

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stellar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Okay, I've not seen anyone quote this:

Dude, that Lennon is ******* stellar.

elwaclaret
Posts: 8996
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:57 am
Been Liked: 2013 times
Has Liked: 2913 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by elwaclaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:23 pm

I'm not arrogant enough to believe if he was tearing up trees he'd be a realistic target for us. I have enough faith in our backroom team to get him doing the things that made the big clubs want him when it came out he was available from Spurs.

Not surprised by the names popping up against the move, file under some fans would turn their noses up at Bale because of his age and lack of recent game time. Last time I looked we were still Burnley.... and Stan thought we expected to be Barcelona THEN God hepl him if he was here now!

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:42 pm

Diesel wrote:Okay, I've not seen anyone quote this:

Dude, that Lennon is ******* stellar.
Ah so you're being pedantic and want to see use of the actual word stellar?
My bad, I didn't think you'd want the actual word.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:45 pm

taio wrote:There are a range of stats so I was wondering which ones you were using to form your view. I can't see pass completion rate on the stats you posted but could be overlooking. But in any case there are more important ones for this type of winger. Anyhow his key stats will be comparable with other players that we'd never be able to sign but, if we could, would be very good signings. You are looking at his stats in meaningless isolation.
My error ref passes.
Look at cross completion of 24% out of 925.

So he pings a lot of crosses but they don't get to their intended target that often over the course of a season.
How is he going to be an improvement on someone like Joey B or a fit Brady?
It would've been easier to keep Boyd if we wanted a runner.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:53 pm

Sidney1st wrote:My error ref passes.
Look at cross completion of 24% out of 925.

So he pings a lot of crosses but they don't get to their intended target that often over the course of a season.
How is he going to be an improvement on someone like Joey B or a fit Brady?
It would've been easier to keep Boyd if we wanted a runner.
24% is decent enough. Random comparison on this particular stat...David Silva 27%, Antonio Valencia 26%, Victor Moses 20%, Eden Hazard 18%. As are his other key stats for a winger eg goals and assists.
Sidney1st wrote:Well that was a great game to watch.

Some really good football on show and Ox could well be an ideal replacement for Coutinho.
Ox 21% :D

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:59 pm

His percentage is over a longer period, plus Hazard only turns up for half a season if he's getting on with the manager :lol:.

I just personally don't think he's worth signing, I'd rather go out and find someone younger and hungrier to succeed who can develop with the club.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:59 pm

Ox hasn't played much either.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:01 pm

Sidney1st wrote:His percentage is over a longer period, plus Hazard only turns up for half a season if he's getting on with the manager :lol:.
Irrelevant. If anything I would expect stats to reduce over a long period. You do understand how percentages work dont you?
This user liked this post: Walton

boatshed bill
Posts: 15260
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6759 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:03 pm

Sidney1st wrote:My error ref passes.
Look at cross completion of 24% out of 925.

So he pings a lot of crosses but they don't get to their intended target that often over the course of a season.
How is he going to be an improvement on someone like Joey B or a fit Brady?
It would've been easier to keep Boyd if we wanted a runner.
Or his intended target gets beaten to the ball?
these stats mean very little.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:09 pm

taio wrote:Irrelevant. If anything I would expect stats to reduce over a long period. You do understand how percentages work dont you?
Yes thanks.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:10 pm

boatshed bill wrote:Or his intended target gets beaten to the ball?
these stats mean very little.
On this forum they'd mean everything if his crosses weren't getting to the strikers.

beddie
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1408 times
Has Liked: 520 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by beddie » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:17 pm

I think he would be a good edition to the squad. I also think he would not only benefit from our tight knit squad but a Dyche arm round the shoulder could be just what's required to get him playing well.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:28 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Yes thanks.
Thought it was worth checking because just this week someone on here was stuggling to understand basic figures on a political thread from what I can recall seeing.
This user liked this post: Walton

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:29 pm

taio wrote:Thought it was worth checking because just this week someone on here was stuggling to understand basic figures on a political thread from what I can recall seeing.
Maybe, maybe not but someone else broke that one down and took it to pieces quite well from what I recall.

Like I said, Lennon isn't as good as people seem to think he is and they have the same issue with Defoe.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:38 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Maybe, maybe not but someone else broke that one down and took it to pieces quite well from what I recall.

Like I said, Lennon isn't as good as people seem to think he is and they have the same issue with Defoe.
You mean you don't THINK he's as good as some people think he is. I havent really seen anyone say he would be a 'stellar' signing, just that he could be a very good and different option for us. You hardly supported your view well with your attempt at analysing his stats. As for as Defoe, he's the 7th highest PL goal scorer of all time, so I'll say no more on that.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Sidney1st » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:45 pm

Ah another who wants the word stellar....

Yeah fine, it's my opinion and I don't think he's all that.

Defoe has been playing in the PL for a long time now, but before Sunderland when he hit a purple patch he hit about 9 goals a season, sometimes a few more but that was it.
Strangely he was at Spurs the same time as Lennon was with his meh cross conversion percentage.

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by taio » Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:49 pm

Sidney1st wrote:Ah another who wants the word stellar....

Yeah fine, it's my opinion and I don't think he's all that.

Defoe has been playing in the PL for a long time now, but before Sunderland when he hit a purple patch he hit about 9 goals a season, sometimes a few more but that was it.
Strangely he was at Spurs the same time as Lennon was with his meh cross conversion percentage.
Your view about his cross conversion % is clueless though to be fair, as demonstrated

Walton
Posts: 1988
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Been Liked: 792 times
Has Liked: 242 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by Walton » Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:35 pm

Sidney was struggling with percentages the other day too.

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1377
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 499 times

Re: Aaron Lennon no thanks

Post by EarbyClaret » Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:06 pm

If he was delivering consistently at Everton then there wouldn't be a link - if there's anything in this would it be a loan or a permanent deal?

We're seriously lacking pace, so for that alone he would be a great asset.

We've hit a bit of a brick wall as far as this season is concerned. A little like last season teams have worked us out and we don't look nearly as effective as we did in October/November. We need to give the opposition something different to think about. However hard we work we are predictable.

Provided we used Lennon and N'Koudou effectively we could play higher up the pitch. As has been pointed out above it would also mean Arfield or JBG could play the no. 10 role behind one of the strikers.

We have to think of different ways to be creative without Brady.

Post Reply