No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Spijed » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:00 pm

Very strange that the ref didn't even consult it.

burnmark
Posts: 2475
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
Been Liked: 602 times
Has Liked: 477 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by burnmark » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:04 pm

He did according to the commentary. Wasn’t classed as a clear and obvious mistake supposedly.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by welsbyswife » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:09 pm

Even if he had done it doesn't stop the debate. Jermaine Jenas is trotting out the "It's a penalty, there's contact" b*ll*cks as usual but I think he deliberately made contact and was already falling over at that point anyway so no penalty. The VAR thing won't alter the debate about what is or isn't a pen.
These 3 users liked this post: JohnMac Juan Tanamera Rowls

JohnMac
Posts: 7211
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2378 times
Has Liked: 3804 times
Location: Padiham

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by JohnMac » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:10 pm

He had both feet off the ground before any contact was made a d what contact there was didn't warrant a penalty.

Jenas is a muppet!
These 4 users liked this post: Quickenthetempo Rowls jetblackcat dpinsussex

evensteadiereddie
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
Been Liked: 3148 times
Has Liked: 10238 times
Location: Staffordshire

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by evensteadiereddie » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:10 pm

No need, the ref had a great view of Willian hurdling the defender's leg and then suddenly deciding to fall.
I think one important consequence of this VAR malarkey is that it will actually give the refs more confidence to follow their instincts and not, as is often suspected, be a little wary of what some big-name manager might have to say after a game and duck out of making what might appear to be a controversial decision.
The sooner it comes in for all PL matches, the better.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

JohnMac
Posts: 7211
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2378 times
Has Liked: 3804 times
Location: Padiham

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by JohnMac » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:14 pm

VAR should be used as evidence to bin off the likes of Jenas trotting out the same old bile.

It's our licence fee being wasted on this one dimensional prune.
This user liked this post: BFCmaj

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by welsbyswife » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:15 pm

Unfortunately I think you will find the opposite Eddie lad. Those reviewing will be in the Jenas camp more often than not. Just listen to shearer and dublin now saying it's a shambles. Ex players talk nonsense.
These 2 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera jetblackcat

Juan Tanamera
Posts: 2162
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 770 times
Has Liked: 10059 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Juan Tanamera » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:17 pm

Shearer saying it's a shambles.
Why, because it didn't agree with how he saw It?

Joe Buck
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:22 pm
Been Liked: 80 times
Has Liked: 22 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Joe Buck » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:20 pm

One of the clowns said something like “The defender left his leg there for Willian to make contact “ they’re idiots
These 2 users liked this post: Rowls BFCmaj

Flat Stanley
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 60 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Flat Stanley » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:23 pm

Clear penalty for me agree with pundits. Even if you don't think a penalty it's ridiculous it wasn't even reviewed fully by VAR

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:23 pm

I thought it was a nailed on penalty, shocking decision.

aggi
Posts: 8831
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2117 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by aggi » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:27 pm

I didn't think it was a penalty at all, already diving before the contact was made. The difficulty in getting a consensus shows part of the problem.

I thought everything was reviewed, the ref doesn't have to review it themselves, the video official will just be in their ear anyway.
This user liked this post: BFCmaj

Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Spijed » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:30 pm

aggi wrote:I thought everything was reviewed, the ref doesn't have to review it themselves, the video official will just be in their ear anyway.
Didn't the ref signal for it to be used last night for the offside?

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by tim_noone » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:30 pm

Stopped watching a lot of the English games now on TV it's a pantomime about the pundits views on there own performance in front of the camera.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by welsbyswife » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:31 pm

Fair play to this ref! Top lad.
These 5 users liked this post: BFCmaj Dazzler dpinsussex Juan Tanamera evensteadiereddie

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6576
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Lowbankclaret » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:31 pm

Flat Stanley wrote:Clear penalty for me agree with pundits. Even if you don't think a penalty it's ridiculous it wasn't even reviewed fully by VAR
So if your arm is in the air an you walk into it, your claiming it’s assault.

The worlds gone mad and you sir are part of the problem

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:33 pm

Ref is having an excellent game. Maybe players who have ‘every right to go down’ may think twice about doing so with this ref in charge.
These 6 users liked this post: burnmark BFCmaj welsbyswife Juan Tanamera Quickenthetempo PaintYorkClaretnBlue

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:34 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:So if your arm is in the air an you walk into it, your claiming it’s assault.

The worlds gone mad and you sir are part of the problem
The lad dived into a tackle, got nowhere near the ball and hit Willian's leg, how it's not a penalty I have no idea, the foul is obvious.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by welsbyswife » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:34 pm

Jenas's latest "he is well within his rights to go down". What on earth does that mean? It means he has "gone down", or deliberately fallen over when the contact itself wasn't enough to make him fall over of itself. That used to be called cheating but now he is "within his rights" apparently. Absolute tosh.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

Joe Buck
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:22 pm
Been Liked: 80 times
Has Liked: 22 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Joe Buck » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:34 pm

Just shows that this system is going to cause as many debates as before. The one on Willian was never a pen. He made contact with the defender, think it has to be the other way round for a pen
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Spijed » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:34 pm

martin_p wrote:Ref is having an excellent game. Maybe players who have ‘every right to go down’ may think twice about doing so with this ref in charge.
But Morata being touched on his shoulder was far more of a penalty than the one against us for Arsenal.

Dazzler
Posts: 4421
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 2332 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Dazzler » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:35 pm

welsbyswife wrote:Fair play to this ref! Top lad.
They might be onto the cheats at long last.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 5335
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 1644 times
Has Liked: 400 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:35 pm

Interesting that the officials thought neither the Willian nor the Morata one were worthy of a VAR overrule, but the pundits did. I assume that the officials were right.

Given that they seemed identical to the Alli and Ramsey penalties against us, which the pundits also said were pens, it does make me wonder if they were indeed pens at all. I suspect the VAR Ref would say neither were, as neither had enough contact to bring the player down, just like today.

CombatClaret
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1825 times
Has Liked: 930 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by CombatClaret » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:37 pm

The Morata incident is a clear example of 'going down' 'there was contact', the point of contact with the opponent is not the point from which the player's body is effected.
The shoulder is not pulled, Morata feels hands on his shoulders and brings his own legs out from under him.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank Dark Cloud

burnmark
Posts: 2475
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
Been Liked: 602 times
Has Liked: 477 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by burnmark » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:37 pm

Excellent decision. Hopefully a sign of things to come but I doubt it.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30629
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11035 times
Has Liked: 5648 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:38 pm

I think the ref has been refreshingly superb, not fallen for any of the cheating Chelsea bullshit
These 7 users liked this post: BFCmaj Juan Tanamera BertiesBeehole Quickenthetempo PaintYorkClaretnBlue Caballo Putneyclaret

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:38 pm

Spijed wrote:But Morata being touched on his shoulder was far more of a penalty than the one against us for Arsenal.
Which shouldn’t have been a penalty either.

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by dpinsussex » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:38 pm

For me 1st one a dive good decision. 2nd one penalty. Var required

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:39 pm

CombatClaret wrote:The Morata incident is a clear example of 'going down' 'there was contact', the point of contact with the opponent is not the point from which the player's body is effected.
The shoulder is not pulled, Morata feels hands on his shoulders and brings his own legs out from under him.
Yep. His body drops unnaturally because he dropped like a hotpot.

welsbyswife
Posts: 1058
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:50 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 280 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by welsbyswife » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:39 pm

Dazzler wrote:They might be onto the cheats at long last.
I'm dead against VAR but if it could be used to stamp out the diving and to get away from the idea that something is a penalty because "there is contact" I might change my mind. Need more refs like him.

Carport
Posts: 577
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:24 am
Been Liked: 180 times
Has Liked: 47 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Carport » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:40 pm

No way a penalty. Willian is diving looking to contact the defender’s leg. Bit like the Delle Ali one at the Turf.

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:41 pm

The Morata one was never a penalty, the Willian one is a stone waller, apparently you have to break a players leg to concede a penalty though.

Flat Stanley
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 60 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Flat Stanley » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:45 pm

Willian one nothing like Ali. He was running at full pace and had no need to go down. To me he was trying to get passed the defender. Defender nowhere near the ball and caught him. If we didn't get that I would be seething

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:47 pm

Carport wrote:No way a penalty. Willian is diving looking to contact the defender’s leg. Bit like the Delle Ali one at the Turf.
Exactly. The irony is that if he hadn’t decided to throw himself to the floor he’d have tripped over the defenders leg and got a penalty anyway.

Juan Tanamera
Posts: 2162
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 770 times
Has Liked: 10059 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Juan Tanamera » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:49 pm

KRBFC wrote:The Morata one was never a penalty, the Willian one is a stone waller, apparently you have to break a players leg to concede a penalty though.
Absolute tosh!
Willian clearly dropped his foot to ensure contact, the Norwich player was nowhere near touching him until he did that.
And your leg breaking comment just about sums you up.
These 2 users liked this post: BFCmaj evensteadiereddie

Dejavu
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 10:41 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 36 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Dejavu » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:55 pm

The referee was spot on with both decisions. No contact before Willian's blatant dive. Morata also was a blatant dive. Well done referee and long may it continue.
I don't know what agenda Shearer and the rest have but it is beginning to really make me wanna turn my back on football. Apart from Burnley obviously.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3862 times
Has Liked: 2072 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Quickenthetempo » Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:59 pm

Brilliant ref display and standing up to the abuse from Morata with the 2nd yellow card deserves applause.

Wish more refs performed like this.
This user liked this post: TVC15

dsr
Posts: 15225
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4576 times
Has Liked: 2264 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by dsr » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:00 pm

The thing about the Willan one is that the defender's leg was there first. It's all very well to say "there was contact" but there is nothing in the rules to say that if two players touch, it's the defender's fault. It was pretty clear that although Willan touched the defender with only one foot, both of his feet failed to land properly. Was that because the touch on the Norwich player's leg was so very violent that he couldn't possibly stay on his feet? Or was it because he didn't want to stay on his feet, so he dived?

There is a school of thought, which Jenas and Shearer subscribe to, that if a forward can find a defender to fall over, he deserves the penalty. It spoils the game.
This user liked this post: welsbyswife

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:05 pm

Juan Tanamera wrote:Absolute tosh!
Willian clearly dropped his foot to ensure contact, the Norwich player was nowhere near touching him until he did that.
And your leg breaking comment just about sums you up.
So it wasn't a penalty because Willian was off balance before he got fouled? Willian was falling over his own feet before he got caught, still a foul.

So if a player jumps out the way of a leg breaker tackle, it's not a foul.... interesting because there were no complaints on here when Defour jumped out of the way of Zeegelaars challenge.
Last edited by KRBFC on Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Wexford_Claret
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 4:40 pm
Been Liked: 430 times
Has Liked: 384 times
Location: Wexford and Manchester

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Wexford_Claret » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:06 pm

Some of you really need to read up on your Human Rights:

‘Any human being has the right to theatrically hurtle themselves to the ground, in the event of being within half a foot of another human being.’

Basic lads.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by TVC15 » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:07 pm

VAR seems a bit of a mess at the moment. The refs don't seem clear when to use it.
I did not like to see that cheating t-wat Morata making the TV screen sign to the ref after his first dive only minutes after he came on the pitch. Players should be told not to call for it from the referee or they will be booked - it's just like when they wave a card to the referee.
I agree the referee was excellent tonight but there seems to me more pressures and scrutiny on the referees at the moment than I can remember for a long time.
The quotes of what Wenger recently said to a referee after a game (Dean ?) were an absolute disgrace. They deserved an extremely long ban and I'd go as far as deducting points from Arsenal. You cannot accuse a referee like Wenger did.

Dazzler
Posts: 4421
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:10 am
Been Liked: 881 times
Has Liked: 2332 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by Dazzler » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:08 pm

The Willian 'shout' I thought was a penalty straight away.I was surprised the ref didn't give it.
After all the close up replays I still see it as a pen.

Even with VAR,what might seem like a valid penalty claim may still be seen as dives by the 'adjudicators'.but with that,I do think we will eventually see a significant reduction of players diving.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:15 pm

KRBFC wrote:So it wasn't a penalty because Willian was off balance before he got fouled? Willian was falling over his own feet before he got caught, still a foul.
So you admit the defender didn’t bring him down then. So not a foul then.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:25 pm

martin_p wrote:So you admit the defender didn’t bring him down then. So not a foul then.
He was off balance before the defender jumped in, the defender then brought him down.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:34 pm

KRBFC wrote:He was off balance before the defender jumped in, the defender then brought him down.
You said Willian fell over his own feet. Did Willian trip himself or did the defender trip him, make your mind up! You can’t trip a man already falling over.

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:38 pm

martin_p wrote:You said Willian fell over his own feet. Did Willian trip himself or did the defender trip him, make your mind up! You can’t trip a man already falling over.
Wrong, I said Willian was FALLING over his own feet, that doesn't mean he fell over his own feet because it's possible without the contact from the defender, Willian could've regained balance and stayed upright. When you are falling, it's possible to regain your balance, when you've fell there's no going back.

You absolutely can trip a man who's off balance and give him no chance of recovering. It's a clear foul IMO I don't understand how people think it's not because ''Willian was already off balance''

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:42 pm

KRBFC wrote:Willian could've regained balance and stayed upright.
Yeah, there’s no doubt that Willian was trying to stay on his feet. That’s what modern footballers do.

I suspect that having made contact with his own foot Willian was thinking he had every right to go down.

KRBFC
Posts: 18104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3800 times
Has Liked: 1071 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by KRBFC » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:48 pm

martin_p wrote:Yeah, there’s no doubt that Willian was trying to stay on his feet. That’s what modern footballers do.

I suspect that having made contact with his own foot Willian was thinking he had every right to go down.
I don't know if Willian was going to go down or looking for a penalty but it shouldn't change the outcome. He was fouled and shouldn't not receive a penalty because he was off balance BEFORE getting fouled. I don't know if you've actually watched the decision but where did Willian trip himself? the defender slid in, made contact and tripped him up.

burnleytom
Posts: 206
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:03 pm
Been Liked: 16 times
Location: Sutton

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by burnleytom » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:53 pm

welsbyswife wrote:Fair play to this ref! Top lad.
Same star struck ref who let City take their free kick quickly without consulting him.

However, I very much appreciated what he did tonight. Well done.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: No VAR for the Chelsea non pen

Post by martin_p » Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:54 pm

KRBFC wrote:I don't know if Willian was going to go down or looking for a penalty but it shouldn't change the outcome. He was fouled and shouldn't not receive a penalty because he was off balance BEFORE getting fouled. I don't know if you've actually watched the decision but where did Willian trip himself? the defender slid in, made contact and tripped him up.
Well if he had the referee would have given a penalty wouldn’t he. Willian saw the leg and fell into it, simple as. As I’ve said above, the irony is if he hadn’t thrown himself into the leg he’d have been tripped by it anyway. But he was trying to ‘make sure’ by throwing himself at the leg anyway.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

Post Reply