Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
They're just dragging down the rest of the team.
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick has to go, yes, to partner Cork in the middle.
These 3 users liked this post: Pearcey MrClaretandBlue turfytopper
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Cork works his tail off every game, while Hendrick stands and watches.
-
- Posts: 13267
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5102 times
- Has Liked: 5172 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Let's bring in Ally Pickering and Mark Ford!
These 2 users liked this post: bfcjg Quicknick
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
It's called look and learn.ontario claret wrote:Cork works his tail off every game, while Hendrick stands and watches.
-
- Posts: 10974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5188 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Wind it in and stop licking Maple trees.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
B-o-T!! I thought you had some (maybe not a lot) idea of the game.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
"Look and learn". That's a good one, tim noone. Maybe on the training pitch, but not during a game.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick lools better coming from deep. He made a cpuple of lovely passes to open up Newcastle tonight but ia too often caught or outmuscled.
Could be good deeper in midfid witj jbg on the forward mod?
Could be good deeper in midfid witj jbg on the forward mod?
-
- Posts: 10974
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5188 times
- Has Liked: 804 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
It's funny because he (Hendrick) always starts in a 4-5-1/ 4-4-1-1 and yet when we stick another forward on and go 4-4-2, he is still usually on the pitch when that happens.ontario claret wrote:B-o-T!! I thought you had some (maybe not a lot) idea of the game.
David Jones syndrome.
-
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:14 pm
- Been Liked: 180 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Bardsley is solid but not multi-dimensional. Unlike others in the team he has one role and one role only. Like's the occasional steam roller of a mis-judged tackle but can't blame the lad for that. Remind me of Paul Cook
Hendrick is more of the Andre Gray syndrome. Play out of position, not naturally gifted there and you can tell he really dislikes it. He's generally the first sub you make when you want to chuck an attacker on (because he's not threatening enough throughout)
Hendrick is more of the Andre Gray syndrome. Play out of position, not naturally gifted there and you can tell he really dislikes it. He's generally the first sub you make when you want to chuck an attacker on (because he's not threatening enough throughout)
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Or cowan and ball.Rowls wrote:Let's bring in Ally Pickering and Mark Ford!
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Nobody talking about that chance he had where his shot went for a throw-in? He was literally under no pressure.
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Gotta be canon and ball for me!Bfcboyo wrote:Or cowan and ball.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:24 am
- Been Liked: 48 times
- Has Liked: 8 times
- Location: Barnoldswick
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick looked more comfortable when he was dropped deeper last 15. I'd like to see him start in CM on Saturday. Lennon and JBG out wide would give us pace for the counter.
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Can't argue with Bardsley but Hendrick isn't a number 10, it would be nice to see him play in his favoured position
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
But we did end up winning a throwing from it, seeing as it hit their player who was lying on the ground!KefkaClaret wrote:Nobody talking about that chance he had where his shot went for a throw-in? He was literally under no pressure.
These 4 users liked this post: ClaretKent Flat Stanley BOYSIE31 Goobs
-
- Posts: 8141
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3080 times
- Has Liked: 5056 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick is not a number 10, but when he does play deeper he looks as comfortable as Defour and Cork.
Bardsley started out in fine form, so well worth his place in the squad, but the last few performances suggest it's time to bring Lowton back.
I can understand the sentiment but it's a bit harsh to slag off either player.
Bardsley started out in fine form, so well worth his place in the squad, but the last few performances suggest it's time to bring Lowton back.
I can understand the sentiment but it's a bit harsh to slag off either player.
These 3 users liked this post: summitclaret lucs86 turfytopper
-
- Posts: 3889
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1216 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Have to say I agree with you OP
-
- Posts: 6974
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Bardsley has proved to be a shrewd addition.At times we have struggled with our right backs drifting off the wing exposing our defence.Bardsley is a rugged old school defender.No nonsense tackler who can make the odd error as he asserts himself on the opposition.However,he has worked hard for the team in games saving goals with last ditch clearances. Hendrick is a class player in the Carrick mould quietly growing into games and making telling contributions with the odd vital goal.He isnt flash and is very much like another ex Claret derided by many .Dave Jones who created the goal v QPR that put us where we are today.Both are vital team players that Sean sees as parts in our bigger picture.Oh and by the way we are back at 7th.
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
They have been dragging the team down, - Hendrick because he's being played out of his best position, and Bardsley because of form slip. Both are fixable. Let's start by bringing Matt.L. back.
-
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
- Been Liked: 228 times
- Has Liked: 137 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Funny I did not hear any complaints when he scored at Everton, some just have to blame someone & it’s Geoff at the moment. Watch the amount of work he gets through, good touch & links play well.
-
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 400 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
7th in the Premier league and we have two players who 'have to go'.
Let's leave it to Sean shall we mate. We are 7th in the Premier league with him making the decisions. 7TH IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE.
Let's leave it to Sean shall we mate. We are 7th in the Premier league with him making the decisions. 7TH IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE.
These 6 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Lord Beamish SussexDon1inIreland Chip Harrison longsidepies levraiclaret
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
I don't know if the above is a joke, but Everton away was in October I think, and his name is Jeff...
I thought they both were excellent again tonight, the great off the ball work often goes unnoticed.
I think there is an agenda here, with people who obviously don't watch the game and are weirdos. Just watch what they do when not in possession, football isn't all about what you do with the ball, there's the ugly stuff that needs doing too.
Will no doubt be a close call again in the ratings and MOTM votes.
I thought they both were excellent again tonight, the great off the ball work often goes unnoticed.
I think there is an agenda here, with people who obviously don't watch the game and are weirdos. Just watch what they do when not in possession, football isn't all about what you do with the ball, there's the ugly stuff that needs doing too.
Will no doubt be a close call again in the ratings and MOTM votes.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 835 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick isn't as good in the middle of midfield as Cork or Defour but he is better than Westwood especially playing the Defour type role. When Hendrick got suspended/injured last season we certainly missed him in centre midfield that's for certain.
Dyche likes him and has squeezed him to a system that isn't his natural game. I do think next to Cork though he would be quite effective and also I think Westwood and Cork are just to similar. If Cork was injured and Defour fit id say get Westwood in but its the other way round so id put Hendrick back in his natural position.
Dyche likes him and has squeezed him to a system that isn't his natural game. I do think next to Cork though he would be quite effective and also I think Westwood and Cork are just to similar. If Cork was injured and Defour fit id say get Westwood in but its the other way round so id put Hendrick back in his natural position.
This user liked this post: Colburn_Claret
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
I thought the shot going for a throwing off their injured player was hilarious.
These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st lucs86
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Colburn_Claret wrote:Hendrick is not a number 10, but when he does play deeper he looks as comfortable as Defour and Cork.
Bardsley started out in fine form, so well worth his place in the squad, but the last few performances suggest it's time to bring Lowton back.
I can understand the sentiment but it's a bit harsh to slag off either player.
"Hendrick is not a number 10, but when he does play deeper he looks as comfortable as Defour and Cork."
Jeff tinted glasses there I think.
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick seems a real confidence player to me, particularly the way he can drive the team forward with powerful runs when he's on form. That's just the problem at the moment - confidence.
Twice last night Lennon played him in, once in the box which he passed straight back to Lennon, outside the box, instead of either shooting or looking for someone in the six yard area. The other we all know about where Lennon passed to him on the edge of the box and his shot went for a throw in. After that, Jeff seemed to just want rid of the ball as soon as he got it, often passing straight back to the player he had received it from.
The injury to Defour gives us the opportunity to keep Hendrick in the side but allow JBG the opportunity in the hole behind a striker. I know it's one game but when he played his last game for Charlton against us, he dominated the position and was a good shout for MOM. Having also seen how much Lennon and Nkoudou are keen to track back as well as get forward, I think we could have a real attacking side for once, whilst retaining the defensive framework.
Bardsley, however, was utter gash last night and has unfortunately been slipping in form after a bright start. Definitely time for Lowton to come back IMO.
Twice last night Lennon played him in, once in the box which he passed straight back to Lennon, outside the box, instead of either shooting or looking for someone in the six yard area. The other we all know about where Lennon passed to him on the edge of the box and his shot went for a throw in. After that, Jeff seemed to just want rid of the ball as soon as he got it, often passing straight back to the player he had received it from.
The injury to Defour gives us the opportunity to keep Hendrick in the side but allow JBG the opportunity in the hole behind a striker. I know it's one game but when he played his last game for Charlton against us, he dominated the position and was a good shout for MOM. Having also seen how much Lennon and Nkoudou are keen to track back as well as get forward, I think we could have a real attacking side for once, whilst retaining the defensive framework.
Bardsley, however, was utter gash last night and has unfortunately been slipping in form after a bright start. Definitely time for Lowton to come back IMO.
These 2 users liked this post: HiroshimaClaret Colburn_Claret
-
- Posts: 16891
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6962 times
- Has Liked: 1483 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
I didn’t. I thought it was one of the best chances of the match and he wasted it dreadfully. He also wasted a similar cut back by Lennon where he bottled the first time shot. There’s a good player in there but we’re not seeing it at the minute and we need more support for Barnes if we’re to start turning this poor run of results around.Walt wrote:I thought the shot going for a throwing off their injured player was hilarious.
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick always looks class when played in his favoured position
-
- Posts: 8141
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3080 times
- Has Liked: 5056 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Not Jeff tinted glasses. I've been complaining about the performances of Hendrick for months. It's just a fact that when he plays deeper, as he did for large spells against Utd, he looks a lot better player.3putt wrote:"Hendrick is not a number 10, but when he does play deeper he looks as comfortable as Defour and Cork."
Jeff tinted glasses there I think.
As for comfortable as Defour and Cork, Cork hasn't looked comfortable since before Christmas.
-
- Posts: 4474
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1160 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Someone comparing Hendrick to Michael Carrick
Hendrick’s not a bad player at all and he is indeed played a bit out of position , but has never o
Hendrick’s not a bad player at all and he is indeed played a bit out of position , but has never o
-
- Posts: 4474
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1160 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Looked better than a good champ player for me
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
There was times during the game that he was behind both Cork and Westwood which was bizarre1914tyrone wrote:Hendrick looked more comfortable when he was dropped deeper last 15. I'd like to see him start in CM on Saturday. Lennon and JBG out wide would give us pace for the counter.
-
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2254 times
- Has Liked: 2166 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Jeff is a box to box midfielder and would compliment Cork or Westwood well.
He was pivotal in our survival last season by being a ball carried out of defence/on the counter and added much needed height/physical presence to the team.
Hopefully with the Defour injury he is put back into his natural position and we will see Jeff return to his best.
He was pivotal in our survival last season by being a ball carried out of defence/on the counter and added much needed height/physical presence to the team.
Hopefully with the Defour injury he is put back into his natural position and we will see Jeff return to his best.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Hendrick is a liability
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
My preference would be to chuck Vokes up top, drop Barnes into AMF and Hendrick into CMF in place of Westwood, get Lennon (or GK) on the right at the expense of Scotty Arfield and Johann on the left. Lowton in for Bardsley (surely his time is up now, did manfully at first but his performances are really tailing off and think he's a penalty waiting to happen v City). At least then when we go long we'd at least we'd have 2 players that could scrap for those headers and 2 pacy wingers who could collect knock downs or whip some balls in from the byline. Won't happen though.
*This isn't meant as a criticism of Dyche, just what I'd like to see.
*This isn't meant as a criticism of Dyche, just what I'd like to see.
-
- Posts: 4403
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Personally would like to see Arfield brought in for Hendrick as last time he played there he looked very dangerous.
Surely time to bring Lowton back now. He was playing superbly before his injury and Bardsley started well but has looked a red card waiting to happen for the last few games now.
Surely time to bring Lowton back now. He was playing superbly before his injury and Bardsley started well but has looked a red card waiting to happen for the last few games now.
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:14 am
- Been Liked: 1155 times
- Has Liked: 1068 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
No drop Hendrick for a midfield of 4-5-1 (Dyche's Team)RVclaret wrote:Hendrick has to go, yes, to partner Cork in the middle.
Nkoudou - Cork - Westwood - Lennon
---------Gudmundsson---------
He need's a rest, its not working for him at the moment.
Also we need to drop Bardsley, bring back Lowton
My team with the players we have fit at the moment against Man City would be
----------------Pope
-Lowton - -Long - -Mee --Taylor
Nkoudou - Cork - Gudmundsson - Lennon
-------Barnes ------Vokes
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Interesting reading, a fit Lowton and a fit Ward would both start ahead of Bardsley and Taylor. A game of opinions and Hendrick given our options at the moment is a starter for me too, accepting that he is not on the greatest run of form but all that can change on Saturday.
-
- Posts: 4403
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
I don't get why so many are so eager to get GKN into the team as personally I haven't seen enough from him yet to convince me that he is that good and certainly not better than JBG.
JBG has been playing really well out wide and so I would leave him there and play Arfield off Barnes with Lennon on the left.
Hendrick or Westwood alongside Cork would be fine. Personally would probably play Hendrick although that may be harsh on Westwood as he hasn't done anything wrong to warrant being dropped again.
Leaves GKN and Vokes on the bench if you need to change things up top as well.
JBG has been playing really well out wide and so I would leave him there and play Arfield off Barnes with Lennon on the left.
Hendrick or Westwood alongside Cork would be fine. Personally would probably play Hendrick although that may be harsh on Westwood as he hasn't done anything wrong to warrant being dropped again.
Leaves GKN and Vokes on the bench if you need to change things up top as well.
-
- Posts: 3089
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
- Been Liked: 1185 times
- Has Liked: 418 times
- Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Granted he's only had a couple of cameos but last night he looked especially tidy (both attacking and defensive) including the opportunity which he created from the wing, with which Hendrick eventually hit the injured player near the touchline, with a shot.Goobs wrote:I don't get why so many are so eager to get GKN into the team as personally I haven't seen enough from him yet to convince me that he is that good and certainly not better than JBG.
I certainly wouldnt advocate dropping JBG in his favour, something along the lines of the following would be great:
Pope
Lowton Long Mee Taylor (Ward if fit)
Lennon Cork Hendrick Nkoudou
JBG
Barnes
This user liked this post: expoultryboy
-
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:51 am
- Been Liked: 153 times
- Has Liked: 180 times
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
“I thought they both were excellent again tonight, the great off the ball work often goes unnoticed.
I think there is an agenda here, with people who obviously don't watch the game and are weirdos. Just watch what they do when not in possession, football isn't all about what you do with the ball, there's the ugly stuff that needs doing too.”
Totally agree with that statement. Both played well and put some real graft in. Lowton had the advantage of having Brady helping out ( who is a big miss) but Bardsley has done a lot better than a lot of people give him credit for.
I think there is an agenda here, with people who obviously don't watch the game and are weirdos. Just watch what they do when not in possession, football isn't all about what you do with the ball, there's the ugly stuff that needs doing too.”
Totally agree with that statement. Both played well and put some real graft in. Lowton had the advantage of having Brady helping out ( who is a big miss) but Bardsley has done a lot better than a lot of people give him credit for.
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Every burnley supporter knows where Hendrick should be playing. Unfortunately stubborn I won't change dyche doesn't
-
- Posts: 9600
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3148 times
- Has Liked: 10254 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
I think Bardsley's been great and until a few weeks ago would have kept him where he was, but he's had a few sub-par performances now, last night being one where he created more problems than he solved. So I'd have Lowton back in at the weekend, thankfully Sane is injured so it's not quite the massive 'back in at the deep' that it would have been.
Hendrick's doing fine, he's just struggling a bit with a few aspects of the really demanding role he's been given. I don't think we've anyone who'd do much better in that role, but if we can give Lennon a start (and I think we can after his contribution last night), then at least Arfield could have a go and he how he compares. That then would let Hendrick drop deeper alongside Cork.
I reckon our strongest, and most adaptable 11 (with players that can switch positions in phases) at the moment would be 4411: Pope; Taylor Mee Long Lowton; Lennon Cork Hendrick JBG; Arfield; Barnes.
Might as well change a bit from last night, City's a freebie.
Hendrick's doing fine, he's just struggling a bit with a few aspects of the really demanding role he's been given. I don't think we've anyone who'd do much better in that role, but if we can give Lennon a start (and I think we can after his contribution last night), then at least Arfield could have a go and he how he compares. That then would let Hendrick drop deeper alongside Cork.
I reckon our strongest, and most adaptable 11 (with players that can switch positions in phases) at the moment would be 4411: Pope; Taylor Mee Long Lowton; Lennon Cork Hendrick JBG; Arfield; Barnes.
Might as well change a bit from last night, City's a freebie.
-
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
- Been Liked: 599 times
- Has Liked: 171 times
- Contact:
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
It's a bit early to be hitting the meths, isn't it?AGENT_CLARET wrote:
My team with the players we have fit at the moment against Man City would be
----------------Pope
-Lowton - -Long - -Mee --Taylor
Nkoudou - Cork - Gudmundsson - Lennon
-------Barnes ------Vokes
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Thats a FM "last ten minutes attack like mad to get a goal" formation there isn't it?
-
- Posts: 4403
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 997 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
MY only issues with the above would be that JBG has been great out wide and wouldn't want us to change him when doing so well. The other issue is it doesn't leave us any options from the bench if it isn't working other than 442 as arfield isn't likely to turn a game around whereas extra pace that GKN could do against tired legs.Darthlaw wrote:Granted he's only had a couple of cameos but last night he looked especially tidy (both attacking and defensive) including the opportunity which he created from the wing, with which Hendrick eventually hit the injured player near the touchline, with a shot.
I certainly wouldnt advocate dropping JBG in his favour, something along the lines of the following would be great:
Pope
Lowton Long Mee Taylor (Ward if fit)
Lennon Cork Hendrick Nkoudou
JBG
Barnes
-
- Posts: 67880
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Bardsley and Hendrick Have to Go
Did you actually watch last night? What a shocking thread but yet more agenda comments on Hendrick who was far better than most of the midfield players behind him.ontario claret wrote:They're just dragging down the rest of the team.
This user liked this post: PhiladelphiaChris