West Brom

LBclaret · Post by **LBclaret** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:20 pm

Look doomed now, even if they weren’t before.

And, not that is matters, can’t mathematically catch us anymore.

Diesel · Post by **Diesel** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:23 pm

How the **** did they beat us at the Turf?

South West Claret. · Post by **South West Claret.** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:27 pm

Early season fluke perhaps.

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:28 pm

Going going boing.

ElectroClaret · Post by **ElectroClaret** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:29 pm

Pardew impressively proving his footballing credentials once more.

He must have turned cartwheels all the way home when he got that eight year contract
at Newcastle. Shoulda stuck with Pulis.

tim_noone · Post by **tim_noone** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:31 pm

They didn't want pullis though.

Bin Ont Turf · Post by **Bin Ont Turf** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:31 pm

Diesel wrote:How the **** did they beat us at the Turf?

Still hadn't settled into our 4-5-1/4-4-1-1 formation at home.

ElectroClaret · Post by **ElectroClaret** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:34 pm

tim_noone wrote:They didn't want pullis though.

Bet they've changed their minds now.

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:34 pm

It was a fluke TBH we battered them and they got a flukey break.

Diesel · Post by **Diesel** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:40 pm

Bin Ont Turf wrote:Still hadn't settled into our 4-5-1/4-4-1-1 formation at home.

bfcjg wrote:It was a fluke TBH we battered them and they got a flukey break.

Probably a bit of both.

I was in the Cricketfield that day and can still hear that 'we've got Kanu' song ringing in my ears.

tim_noone · Post by **tim_noone** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:43 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:Bet they've changed their minds now.

It's the old be careful what you wish for. On pardew I've no problems...but why he took on west brom I've no idea,crazy!! While not keen on mark Hughes I'd like him to keep Southampton up at west hams expense

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:46 pm

I was chatting to a couple of Baghies walking back to the train station and they couldn't understand how they won.

Spijed · Post by **Spijed** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:51 pm

tim_noone wrote:but why he took on west brom I've no idea,crazy!!

Knowing he'll get a couple of million in his pocket!

Stayingup · Post by **Stayingup** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:00 pm

Diesel wrote:How the **** did they beat us at the Turf?

Because that day we were sh!te.

bfcjg · Post by **bfcjg** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:06 pm

Stayingup wrote:Because that day we were sh!te.

Don't think so.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:13 pm

Stayingup wrote:Because that day we were sh!te.

No we weren't . Without checking I think we had about 20 shots, Mee missed a virtually open goal from 2 yards, Walters missed a golden opportunity to be an instant hero at the end, and we gifted them a goal with shocking defending from a long ball.
Also ....... WBA were top of the League!! (6 points out of 6 and no goals conceded!!) - they must have been looking forward to a good season under Pulis.
They've only picked up 14 since.

UpTheClaretsFCBK · Post by **UpTheClaretsFCBK** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:24 pm

Better team today for large parts apparently.

Won’t be an easy game at the Hawthorns.

Never is for us anyway. No matter how bad they are.

Stayingup · Post by **Stayingup** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:30 pm

[quote="nil_desperandum"]No we weren't . Without checking I think we had about 20 shots, Mee missed a virtually open goal from 2 yards, Walters missed a golden opportunity to be an instant hero at the end, and we gifted them a goal with shocking defending from a long ball.
Also ....... WBA were top of the League!! (6 points out of 6 and no goals conceded!!) - they must have been looking forward to a good season under Pulis.
They've only picked up 14 since.[/quote

We were bad for the goal . You said it yourself. Mix up between Ward and Mee and then Trakowski should have drifted Kanu - as he would have done now. We didn't score after having most of the play. Therefore you could say we were sh!te. Actually coming after the win at Chelsea it was a big let down

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:49 pm

Stayingup wrote:

Whatever your view of our performance against WBA, we were far worse in our next 3 home games, but picked up points in the 2 league games.
(Of course it was a big let down after Chelsea, that goes without saying).

UpTheClaretsFCBK · Post by **UpTheClaretsFCBK** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 10:12 pm

Stayingup wrote:

I remember thinking we were good for a draw in the WBA game, nothing more though.

We should’ve lost the Palace game, they had loads of chances.

nil_desperandum · Post by **nil_desperandum** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 10:46 pm

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:I remember thinking we were good for a draw in the WBA game, nothing more though.

We should’ve lost the Palace game, they had loads of chances.

Yep, and we were -arguably - worse against Hudds, (one of the most tedious games I've ever seen), and Leeds Utd, who also outplayed us for the most part.

martin_p · Post by **martin_p** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:15 pm

Jay Rod looking good again and has scored nine goals this season in a rubbish team. Will he be looking for a move to a Premier League club when they go down

Sidney1st · Post by **Sidney1st** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:16 pm

He will be looking to move to a club willing to pay his wages which were apparently £60-70k at Southampton, so can't imagine them being much less at WBA.

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:18 pm

tim_noone wrote:They didn't want pullis though.

Like Sheff weds fans didnt wat Carvahall. Plenty of teams didnt want Allardyce. Stoke fans didnt want Pulis. Saints fans didnt want Puel.

Thankfully we almost all want Dyche.

UpTheClaretsFCBK · Post by **UpTheClaretsFCBK** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:19 pm

Don’t get this obsession with Rodriguez.

He’s on at least 60k a week and he’s badly injury prone.

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:23 pm

Foster is a shocking goalkeeper. One excellent game to every five really poor ones.

Taking aside his clarets history, I’d take J Rod at Burnley next season. Looks to be over his injury set back. A very very good footballer.

tim_noone · Post by **tim_noone** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:23 pm

martin_p wrote:Jay Rod looking good again and has scored nine goals this season in a rubbish team. Will he be looking for a move to a Premier League club when they go down

Stanislas looking just as good if not better.... He used to play for us.this jay rod..and ings love in is getting tiresome.

tim_noone · Post by **tim_noone** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:24 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:Foster is a shocking goalkeeper. One excellent game to every five really poor ones.

Taking aside his clarets history, I’d take J Rod at Burnley next season. Looks to be over his injury set back. A very very good footballer.

Bordeauxclaret · Post by **Bordeauxclaret** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:29 pm

tim_noone wrote:

Good one????

martin_p · Post by **martin_p** » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:30 pm

tim_noone wrote:Stanislas looking just as good if not better.... He used to play for us.this jay rod..and ings love in is getting tiresome.

Well I’m not that bothered about Jay Rod to be honest. But it’s obvious why he gets mentioned more than any other ex-claret.

chipbutty · Post by **chipbutty** » Sun Mar 18, 2018 12:40 am

UpTheClaretsFCBK wrote:Don’t get this obsession with Rodriguez.

He’s on at least 60k a week and he’s badly injury prone.

Doesn`t that mean he is unlikely to get injured ie he is bad at getting injured?

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:03 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:Foster is a shocking goalkeeper. One excellent game to every five really poor ones.

Taking aside his clarets history, I’d take J Rod at Burnley next season. Looks to be over his injury set back. A very very good footballer.

nonsense

No way Foster has 1 good game in 5

Claretforever · Post by **Claretforever** » Sun Mar 18, 2018 6:16 am

Accuracy wasn’t there. We definitely dominated though.

West Brom

West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom

Re: West Brom