How come no Tarky post?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Claret82
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:15 am
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 42 times

How come no Tarky post?

Post by Claret82 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:46 am

Seems everyone is talking about the pen but not enough about how fantastic Tarky played on his debut.

Am I missing a post somewhere?

SalouClaret
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:54 pm
Been Liked: 340 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by SalouClaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:47 am

I wouldn't say he was fantastic. 6/10 performance.

Claret82
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:15 am
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Claret82 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:49 am

SalouClaret wrote:I wouldn't say he was fantastic. 6/10 performance.
wow that's harsh

1st game for England and didn't put a foot wrong for 99% of the game and some lovely passes at least a 7.5/10

what_no_pies
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by what_no_pies » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:49 am

He was excellent with the ball. Playing on the wrong side too. A cracking debut slightly tarnished by an iffy decision.

Claret82
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:15 am
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Claret82 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:54 am

You know what I'm raising it to 8.5/10

I thought he was excellent and he was the only one talking to his mascot as well, lovely guy.

SalouClaret
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 2:54 pm
Been Liked: 340 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by SalouClaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:59 am

I'm just looking at it without claret tinted specs on. Also seen 2 other articles giving him 6/10 including the bbc.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:59 am

Claret82 wrote:wow that's harsh

1st game for England and didn't put a foot wrong for 99% of the game and some lovely passes at least a 7.5/10
He put at least one foot wrong according to VAR and a German!

what_no_pies
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by what_no_pies » Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:03 am

Claret82 wrote:You know what I'm raising it to 8.5/10

I thought he was excellent and he was the only one talking to his mascot as well, lovely guy.
I noticed that too. He also appeared to be the one taking initiative and giving direction to his fellow defenders.

Claret82
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 8:15 am
Been Liked: 135 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Claret82 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 1:07 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:He put at least one foot wrong according to VAR and a German!
That's the 1%

dermotdermot
Posts: 3484
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:50 pm
Been Liked: 660 times
Has Liked: 205 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by dermotdermot » Wed Mar 28, 2018 3:07 am

He’s going to Russia.

ten bellies
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:53 pm
Been Liked: 237 times
Has Liked: 1283 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by ten bellies » Wed Mar 28, 2018 5:26 am

I see Laura Bassett rates Tarky's performance as a 5 on Sky's website. Mike's daughter clearly learnt a lot from her Dad.

Tribesmen
Posts: 5084
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1180 times
Has Liked: 635 times
Location: Tibet

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Tribesmen » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:20 am

Again the media will only look at one moment in the game .

But to be very fair how many pens has he given away this season , I would say he is up near the top unwanted league in the Prem .

Caernarfon_Claret
Posts: 5045
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
Been Liked: 1474 times
Has Liked: 634 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Caernarfon_Claret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:34 am

Notice they misread his comment about it never being a penalty. I read it as him saying tongue in cheek that whenever he gives away a penalty it never is in his eyes.

claretblue
Posts: 6418
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Been Liked: 1835 times
Has Liked: 962 times
Location: cloud 9 since Dyche appointed

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by claretblue » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:40 am

cricketfieldclarets wrote:He put at least one foot wrong according to VAR and a German!
should've had a Russian linesman! :D

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by MACCA » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:45 am

6 for me too
Got pulled out of position a couple of times, also gave the ball away trying a through ball ( didn't cost us, but can at this level )
But as debuts go at Wembley against the Italians, having only trained with the squad a week and playing on the "wrong side" I think he did ok.
The penalty will go against him, which is extremely harsh, as there were 3 of them around him, with not 1 actually putting a challenge in of any sort, however Tarky was dragged way over in the Walker role.

Least we can sing "you let your country down" every week now :lol: ;) ...........JOKE

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by SalisburyClaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:45 am

Think 7.5 is s reasonable score - his passing was excellent throughout, he defended well and did a lot of organising - all whilst out of position and in a system he's not used to

As for the 'penalty' - at least Southgate could see it wasn't a pen and he's the one that matters

Think he has a decent outside chance of going to Russia now. Shame Pope will have to rely on injuries now

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by The Enclosure » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:56 am

For his first cap a very mature and creditable performance... head and shoulders above Stones in my view.He should be played in his club position I reckon.
I think if he carries on playing as he has been for the remaining games he will make the squad.

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3547 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Sidney1st » Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:59 am

From what I saw of the first half he did well playing alongside a defender who wasn't having a great game.

We can't expect him to carry Stones aswell.

MrClaretandBlue
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:16 am
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 170 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by MrClaretandBlue » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:00 am

6 out of 10 is a fair score. He should be going to Russia, nothing spectacular but was solid enough at the back and made some good forward passes and only a couple of stray ones which will sit well with the way Southgate wants them to play. Stones looked like the debutant early on.

summitclaret
Posts: 3916
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 833 times
Has Liked: 1324 times
Location: burnley

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by summitclaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:06 am

I think he did well overall. He is a very confident lad and his passing is outstanding for a cb, although he takes risks. He is also a leader.

I feel that he should have been in the middle and Stones wider. Future England captain?

IanMcL
Posts: 30304
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6361 times
Has Liked: 8704 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by IanMcL » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:18 am

Tarks was fine in a very shaky back 3. Stones had to be the best footballing, worst ever defender and the pen was hanging on to the Italians arm after he lost possession in the pen area.

Tarks adding was accurate. Yes it was a pen on the replay...eventually - if the ref spots it and asks....which he didn't. Accidental. 7/10.
Last edited by IanMcL on Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:46 am, edited 2 times in total.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:20 am

Did well, a 7/10 to be honest.

But its the penalty decision that people will remember sadly

He's probably done himself no harm at all about going to Russia, but with Walker impressing in both games there are a limited amount of centre half slots available and I'm not sure he's going to go.

ŽižkovClaret
Posts: 7032
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 2166 times
Has Liked: 3097 times
Location: Praha
Contact:

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by ŽižkovClaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:40 am

Very nice passes, and he certainly could go as a reasonable option to also cover the DMC slot with his range of passing

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Lord Beamish » Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:40 am

I think that, overall he did well. If that game had not had VAR, I doubt that the Pen would’ve been given, so I think he can count himself a little unlucky. He didn’t look out of place in the team and, providing his form stays where it is and he remains injury free, he could well be on the plane to Russia.

jlup1980
Posts: 2172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 856 times
Has Liked: 529 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by jlup1980 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:00 am

Without VAR intervention he'd be getting 7's and 8's in the media. Unfortunately the penalty has dropped him to a 6 with most and even a 5 from Sky Sports (which is incredibly harsh!). I thought he did very well and he can count himself very unlucky, especially as Stones got away with a more blatant penalty in the first half! I have a feeling it could cost him his place in Russia. A big shame for him if it does.

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1447 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by piston broke » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am

7 from me. His passing was crisp and accurate apart from the one very poor pass, where he tried to thread the needle and was intercepted in a dangerous position. More than made up for by the peach he fed through to Lingard. On a number of occasions he was the first man back covering when Stones and Walker got caught on the ball. None of Italy's chances, in open play were down to him and the pen is a 50/50 call but not for me.

ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by ashtonlongsider » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:19 am

I thought Tarky had a very sound debut. I'd sooner see him playing on the right side of a back three but he looked very comfortable and composed. I think he did enough to show he belongs at this level.

bob-the-scutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 420 times
Has Liked: 995 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by bob-the-scutter » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:44 am

What I found baffling was the eventual penalty decision. He gave a goal kick but the Italians wanted a corner, (not one of them asked for a penalty) so he obliged. Nothing from the linesman and all of a sudden he wants to check the video.
Very strange indeed.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

Goodclaret
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
Been Liked: 543 times
Has Liked: 1512 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Goodclaret » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:48 am

ashtonlongsider wrote:I'd sooner see him playing on the right side of a back three but he looked very comfortable and composed.
I agree ashton. The thing is to accommodate Walker in a back 3 Southgate is forced to play him on the right of the 3 which then pushes Tarks to the left. You're then left with two players out of their natural position which, at international level, seems a wee bit strange to me.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3449
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:50 am

"Nothing spectacular "

To my mind Tarkowski played one spectacular throughball to Vardy 1st half which Vardy should have done better with, which at 1st the commentating team got wrong and attributed the pass to Stones, that is until they saw the replay

Hipper
Posts: 5707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1176 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Hipper » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:57 am

I agree he had a sound debut but he wasn't really tested by the Italians. He had no-one specifically to mark and he wasn't pressurised too much when he was on the ball.

I discount the penalty as that couldn't be helped but he gave the ball away poorly a couple of times, although he also made an excellent pass for the first Vardy chance.

Overall I don't think he is yet up to international standard as far as ball playing is concerned. I reckon he would be exposed if he was put under more pressure.

karatekid
Posts: 3139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by karatekid » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:02 am

bob-the-scutter wrote:What I found baffling was the eventual penalty decision. He gave a goal kick but the Italians wanted a corner, (not one of them asked for a penalty) so he obliged. Nothing from the linesman and all of a sudden he wants to check the video.
Very strange indeed.
I think it was the '3rd umpire' that brought it to his attention through his earpiece and asked him to review it.

ecc
Posts: 4230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1407 times
Has Liked: 1278 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by ecc » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:36 am

I only saw the first-half.

Thought he did pretty well all things considered. He can't be blamed for Immobile being all alone with Italy's only chance in the first 45. He was the nearest to the player who crossed and it was up to Walker or Stones to mark Immobile but they hadn't a clue where he was.

He's not used to playing in a back three which didn't make things easy for him.

His distribution was pretty good. I suspect Southgate told him to keep it simple.

Southgate's no prat and neither is he a kneejerker so I doubt very much that the penalty will be an issue.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67714
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32372 times
Has Liked: 5270 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:38 am

karatekid wrote:I think it was the '3rd umpire' that brought it to his attention through his earpiece and asked him to review it.
That's him - I think there is going to be some real fun with VAR in the World Cup
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

Foshiznik
Posts: 2538
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 722 times
Has Liked: 2025 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by Foshiznik » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:40 am

I am more surprised how much praise Walker has been getting. his lapses in defence gave away two clear opportunities for the italians and it was on his side that the penalty was given. I was shocked when they mentioned him as the potential MoM in commentary.

aggi
Posts: 8809
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
Been Liked: 2114 times

Re: How come no Tarky post?

Post by aggi » Wed Mar 28, 2018 11:52 am

I suspect the first choice will be Walker, Stones and Maguire with Dier able to drop back. Gomez, Jones, Tarkowski and possibly Keane or Cahill (if they can get playing with any kind of quality again) are probably looking at one, maybe two, places between them. Gomez seems to be the favourite so it may come down to how many places are up for grabs.

Post Reply