Better than 1973/74?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
gtclaret
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Better than 1973/74?

Post by gtclaret » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:18 pm

Two points for a win in those days.We finished 6th with 46.We currently have 38 points using the same system. We need 4 wins from the last five games to catch them.Come on Burnley.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10970
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5185 times
Has Liked: 804 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:24 pm

Never compare Burnley teams, especially when there's a 40 odd year gap in between.

Just think yourself lucky.

gawthorpe_view
Posts: 5093
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
Been Liked: 1357 times
Has Liked: 2937 times
Location: 'Turf

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by gawthorpe_view » Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:03 pm

In 73/74 they also had the run to the FA cup semi final to cope with.
Plus some other Mickey Mouse tin pot crappy trophy to distract them.

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1827 times
Has Liked: 3964 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by nil_desperandum » Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:08 pm

gtclaret wrote:Two points for a win in those days.We finished 6th with 46.We currently have 38 points using the same system. We need 4 wins from the last five games to catch them.Come on Burnley.
But that's not really a fair comparison, since we played 42 LEAGUE games in that season and got 46 points.
We will only play 38 this season.

gtclaret
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by gtclaret » Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:33 pm

nil_desperandum wrote:But that's not really a fair comparison, since we played 42 LEAGUE games in that season and got 46 points.
We will only play 38 this season.
I know, I am just having a bit of fun.
I am 61 years old, and consider this to be the best season I can remember

tim_noone
Posts: 17108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 4384 times
Has Liked: 15117 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by tim_noone » Sun Apr 15, 2018 12:38 am

gtclaret wrote:I know, I am just having a bit of fun.
I am 61 years old, and consider this to be the best season I can remember
We've had a fantastic 10 years.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Apr 15, 2018 1:19 am

tim_noone wrote:We've had a fantastic 10 years.
Make that 30.
This user liked this post: Dazzler

Rowls
Posts: 13249
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5096 times
Has Liked: 5162 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Rowls » Sun Apr 15, 2018 1:30 am

Better, no.

A bigger achievement given the gulf in finances between us and "the rest" - YES.

Cajun
Posts: 451
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:19 am
Been Liked: 243 times
Has Liked: 335 times
Location: USA

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Cajun » Sun Apr 15, 2018 1:51 am

The 3 seasons of 72-73, 73-74, and 74-75 were just superb. A team of flair and ingenuity and being then in my mid-teens they were my absolute heroes. As Rowls says, big difference in the finances now, the Big 6 of that time in the 70s (Utd, Spurs, Arsenal, Lpool, Everton, Leeds) were not as massively separated from the rest as the Big 6 are now. I loved watching the silky football of those 70s years with Casp and Dobbo at the core, but the achievement nowadays - when we can't match the very top clubs for individual skill and thus have to find a way to win that suits us - has been truely amazing.
When those hopeful "Team of the 70s" years rapidly faded into the dark days of the 80s, I and my Claret mates could never conceive of returning to the top end of the top division - maybe a steady 2nd-tier at best for the most optimistic of us. For me, being of the same generation as the OP, this season has been one of stunning achievement, building on the first objective of staying up last year. I savour it, I enjoy it, I commit it to memory, I watch the games up here in tandem with my son 330 miles away in Philly sharing texts during the games - and you can't imagine how much I wish I could be at the Turf for matches nowadays as I was for hundreds of games years ago.
These are special days to be a Claret - just as those three 70s seasons were. :)
These 4 users liked this post: Claret&Green piston broke Siddo Loyalclaret

Claret&Green
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:02 pm
Been Liked: 53 times
Has Liked: 24 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Claret&Green » Sun Apr 15, 2018 6:20 am

Cajun wrote:The 3 seasons of 72-73, 73-74, and 74-75 were just superb. A team of flair and ingenuity and being then in my mid-teens they were my absolute heroes. As Rowls says, big difference in the finances now, the Big 6 of that time in the 70s (Utd, Spurs, Arsenal, Lpool, Everton, Leeds) were not as massively separated from the rest as the Big 6 are now. I loved watching the silky football of those 70s years with Casp and Dobbo at the core, but the achievement nowadays - when we can't match the very top clubs for individual skill and thus have to find a way to win that suits us - has been truely amazing.
When those hopeful "Team of the 70s" years rapidly faded into the dark days of the 80s, I and my Claret mates could never conceive of returning to the top end of the top division - maybe a steady 2nd-tier at best for the most optimistic of us. For me, being of the same generation as the OP, this season has been one of stunning achievement, building on the first objective of staying up last year. I savour it, I enjoy it, I commit it to memory, I watch the games up here in tandem with my son 330 miles away in Philly sharing texts during the games - and you can't imagine how much I wish I could be at the Turf for matches nowadays as I was for hundreds of games years ago.
These are special days to be a Claret - just as those three 70s seasons were. :)
I concur with everything you say, those three seasons were my introduction to football as 6,7,8 yr old.

Tribesmen
Posts: 5086
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1180 times
Has Liked: 637 times
Location: Tibet

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Tribesmen » Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:31 am

Cajun wrote:The 3 seasons of 72-73, 73-74, and 74-75 were just superb. A team of flair and ingenuity and being then in my mid-teens they were my absolute heroes. As Rowls says, big difference in the finances now, the Big 6 of that time in the 70s (Utd, Spurs, Arsenal, Lpool, Everton, Leeds) were not as massively separated from the rest as the Big 6 are now. I loved watching the silky football of those 70s years with Casp and Dobbo at the core, but the achievement nowadays - when we can't match the very top clubs for individual skill and thus have to find a way to win that suits us - has been truely amazing.
When those hopeful "Team of the 70s" years rapidly faded into the dark days of the 80s, I and my Claret mates could never conceive of returning to the top end of the top division - maybe a steady 2nd-tier at best for the most optimistic of us. For me, being of the same generation as the OP, this season has been one of stunning achievement, building on the first objective of staying up last year. I savour it, I enjoy it, I commit it to memory, I watch the games up here in tandem with my son 330 miles away in Philly sharing texts during the games - and you can't imagine how much I wish I could be at the Turf for matches nowadays as I was for hundreds of games years ago.
These are special days to be a Claret - just as those three 70s seasons were. :)
Wow from the heart I must say . Always hard when watching from afar that's for sure .
I still will side with the team from the 70s at the moment as this is only season two really that we have done well , now what happens in the future we will soon find out heading into Europe would swing it maybe .

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by piston broke » Sun Apr 15, 2018 7:40 am

Two totally different styles of football but I just wish we hadn't had to sell Dobo, James, Nulty followed by Flynn and Hankin.
The thing that both squads have is their bond. They played and looked like mates and so does this side. I love it.

gtclaret
Posts: 1350
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 339 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by gtclaret » Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:08 am

The other difference was that there was no freedom of contract, hence no agents, we were able to complete with wages providing we had one big sale a year. Certainly not the case now
When I said the best season, I was talking relatively

Claretforever
Posts: 2935
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 509 times

Re: Better than 1973/74?

Post by Claretforever » Sun Apr 15, 2018 11:24 am

In 1973/74 season we achieved 1.476 points per game.

In 2017/18 season we are achieving 1.576 points per game.

You could argue we are already ahead of them, and we are playing some very good football too, but as above it’s tough to compare sides.

Post Reply