well, how poor was that
-
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 134 times
well, how poor was that
a few additons needed without a doubt. very poor again
Re: well, how poor was that
Disappointing result but wasn't poor.
-
- Posts: 7443
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 2248 times
- Has Liked: 2161 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Give it a rest will ya?
Two silly errors cost two goals.
Who cares
Two silly errors cost two goals.
Who cares
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Should have killed that off well before they equalised.
-
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:57 am
- Been Liked: 895 times
- Has Liked: 134 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Who cares
i care even if you dont
i care even if you dont
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:21 am
- Been Liked: 60 times
- Has Liked: 259 times
- Location: Perth Australia
Re: well, how poor was that
Take off the rose tinted glasses, we were poor all through the game. Only one team wanted to win & it wasnt us.
Re: well, how poor was that
Long cost us. But cost us what ?
Re: well, how poor was that
Rubbish.ebby wrote:Take off the rose tinted glasses, we were poor all through the game. Only one team wanted to win & it wasnt us.
These 5 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Stalbansclaret Colburn_Claret MT03ALG Buxtonclaret
Re: well, how poor was that
Sign Mawson/Dawson n we will be fine, long done ok as a temp fill in but long term he is not good enough 4 the prem.. enjoy the summer lads!
This user liked this post: turfytopper
Re: well, how poor was that
I thought there were a few bright spells and some good play from us during the game. But for a couple of unusual defensive lapses, we’d have won that game.
Hendrick, JBG and Cork all had reasonable games and compared to last weekend, today was much better. Whatever the result today, it didnt matter.
What a season.
Hendrick, JBG and Cork all had reasonable games and compared to last weekend, today was much better. Whatever the result today, it didnt matter.
What a season.
These 5 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland Stalbansclaret gawthorpe_view Buxtonclaret longsidepies
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: well, how poor was that
As Dyche said when you have nothing to play for you lose that edge , we don't have the quality to win games in 1st gear we need To be at our best and once we had achieved all we could some of the players have switched off costing us games , what we have achieved is phenomenal for our club , let's enjoy this now then look forward to a new challenge
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:25 pm
- Been Liked: 313 times
- Has Liked: 285 times
Re: well, how poor was that
I thought we played some decent stuff. It was champagne football when you compare it to Huddersfield at home. Certainly need to create more but Dyche knows and I'm sure he'll address it this Summer. Who gives a crap about today's result. What a season
This user liked this post: simonclaret
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Good cast.ebby wrote:Take off the rose tinted glasses, we were poor all through the game. Only one team wanted to win & it wasnt us.
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace
-
- Posts: 30696
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11049 times
- Has Liked: 5658 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: well, how poor was that
first 30 mins we were crap cause we hoofed it, last 15 mins of the first half we played it on the deck, created chances and scored. Forgot to come out second half. Bournemouth wanted it more than us which is the only thing I find unforgivable.
Looking forward to a summer off
Looking forward to a summer off
These 2 users liked this post: claretgimmer ebby
Re: well, how poor was that
I wouldn't say poor? we bossed the game from start to Finnish, and 2 silly errors cost us. Some of the passing and reading of the game today was sublime, and looked every bit of a top 7 side. And FFS we have just had the best season in my time , and so must be a long time, so lighten up.
These 2 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland Juan Tanamera
Re: well, how poor was that
Unfortunate mistakes, but hardly poor. We are lacking in some areas, without a doubt. But I'm sure the Gaffer knows where we need to improve. Overall, a fantastic season.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Our season finished weeks ago. To come on here having a go at the manager and lads is simply pathetic. Can not believe the stick long has been given, he has had a great season and his our longest serving pro. OK Long screwed up today but what about Lowton?
These 3 users liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland martin_p tim_noone
Re: well, how poor was that
Shows how much we are missing Mee
Long is a 4th choice CB, Tarks cannot play on left hand side
Tip tap in central midfield with neither able to put in a ball winning tackle or win a header
No real quality up front (Wells almost went into the top of the Jimmy Mac with his effort)
Ward back to his best and really creates good chances with JBG (another star performer)
Long is a 4th choice CB, Tarks cannot play on left hand side
Tip tap in central midfield with neither able to put in a ball winning tackle or win a header
No real quality up front (Wells almost went into the top of the Jimmy Mac with his effort)
Ward back to his best and really creates good chances with JBG (another star performer)
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:12 am
- Been Liked: 20 times
- Has Liked: 47 times
Re: well, how poor was that
It wasn't that bad. It feels worse because of Long's mistake causing us to lose the game. Some nice saves from Pope, Hendrick had some nice movement and passing. Cork & Westy solid as per. Nothing on the game for either side so it lacked tempo.. already on the beach to coin a phrase, and you can't blame them, it's been a fantastic season. Cheer up, the sun is shining.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
-
- Posts: 19394
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
- Been Liked: 3157 times
- Has Liked: 481 times
Re: well, how poor was that
The 2 things that annoy me from the last 2 games are
we could have finished the season with a positive goal record
the long 40+ game record of not losing after having led at half time has now ended as a result of not being on it
we could have finished the season with a positive goal record
the long 40+ game record of not losing after having led at half time has now ended as a result of not being on it
-
- Posts: 4443
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1161 times
- Has Liked: 1298 times
Re: well, how poor was that
I thought we played well enough to win the game, very in Burnley like errors in defence cost us. But do what, we still finish in 7th place, something I am still trying to get my head around.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1600 times
- Has Liked: 679 times
Re: well, how poor was that
The final result was disappointing. The game had been a mixed bag....
moments when we looked good and times when they were stronger. But what a season!
Today’s result will be mostly forgotten in a couple of days but we’ve so much to look forward to.
moments when we looked good and times when they were stronger. But what a season!
Today’s result will be mostly forgotten in a couple of days but we’ve so much to look forward to.
-
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3181 times
Re: well, how poor was that
How did Nakhi Wells do? Isn't today, on as sub around 80 mins, one of his longer "run outs?"
PS: I originally read the subject as "Wells, how poor...."
UTC
PS: I originally read the subject as "Wells, how poor...."
UTC
-
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1665 times
- Has Liked: 2976 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Really wasn't that poor at all and I thought we were particularly good in the first part of the second half . Maybe I'm bonkers but the reporter on radio 5 after the game seemed to think similarly and that we deserved to win Anyway I am really just wondering what on God's claret and blue earth can be the mentality of a Burnley supporter who is moved to start a thread with this title at this time !!!
These 3 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Wo Didi longsidepies
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Start of the second half we were well on top a couple of really good opportunities to kill the game off but lacked any cutting edge up front , woods was poor apart from his goal but we really struggle without him and Barnes, think we need to splash the cash on a striker , our poor spell after Xmas coincided with woods injury shows this , is jay rid the answer ?
-
- Posts: 17986
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4072 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Take a look at who the OP is and you'll have your answer.Stalbansclaret wrote:...Anyway I am really just wondering what on God's claret and blue earth can be the mentality of a Burnley supporter who is moved to start a thread with this title at this time !!!
-
- Posts: 8137
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3080 times
- Has Liked: 5049 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: well, how poor was that
First 30 mins we were slow off the mark, as usual. The rest of the game we dominated, apart from a few break always.
The main problem, which we've had before, is despite the domination we never worked Bergovic at all. Too many passes when sometimes one would do.
As for the goals we conceded, **** happens. They were 2 gifts, but don't represent our season at all.
An awful lot of players out and nothing to play for but pride. We did try hard, but the nous today was missing.
The main problem, which we've had before, is despite the domination we never worked Bergovic at all. Too many passes when sometimes one would do.
As for the goals we conceded, **** happens. They were 2 gifts, but don't represent our season at all.
An awful lot of players out and nothing to play for but pride. We did try hard, but the nous today was missing.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Wood offers virtually nothing apart from goals, it took Vokes to come on for us to win the first header. To carry on like this he needs to be a 25 goal a season striker.Ooogeorgeorgeoghani wrote:Start of the second half we were well on top a couple of really good opportunities to kill the game off but lacked any cutting edge up front , woods was poor apart from his goal but we really struggle without him and Barnes, think we need to splash the cash on a striker , our poor spell after Xmas coincided with woods injury shows this , is jay rid the answer ?
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: well, how poor was that
You need to open your eyes then. No surprise to me that as soon as we had Vokes up front alone we struggle to p8sh onwards. Vokes is too immobile and allows defenc es to push out more.Quickenthetempo wrote:Wood offers virtually nothing apart from goals, it took Vokes to come on for us to win the first header. To carry on like this he needs to be a 25 goal a season striker.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: well, how poor was that
You are entitled to your opinion as is anyone but Wood doesn't even attempt to jump for most headers.BabylonClaret wrote:You need to open your eyes then. No surprise to me that as soon as we had Vokes up front alone we struggle to p8sh onwards. Vokes is too immobile and allows defenc es to push out more.
Re: well, how poor was that
But he's still managed to score 10 in 24 matches - which is still very good going at this level for a team outside the top six.Quickenthetempo wrote:You are entitled to your opinion as is anyone but Wood doesn't even attempt to jump for most headers.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: well, how poor was that
But definitely not poor. Bad result because our centre backs were all at sea today. But midfield played well and must have been a bit of a headache to decide who to pull for Wells.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: well, how poor was that
That's why I said he offers nothing but goals. Not a bad record to have but he offers no more that I can see. Shame but we probably need to buy again.Spijed wrote:But he's still managed to score 10 in 24 matches - which is still very good going at this level for a team outside the top six.
-
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:28 pm
- Been Liked: 283 times
- Has Liked: 225 times
Re: well, how poor was that
I’m more of a reader of this site these days than a poster and after stupid threads like this after the most magnificent season we have had in decades resulting in European football at the Turf next season - I will stay that way. But I logged on to say what a pathetic thing to write after what was a fantastic celebration of the season today.
The OP must clearly be “perfect”
The OP must clearly be “perfect”
These 2 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Wo Didi
Re: well, how poor was that
Replace Wood?Quickenthetempo wrote:That's why I said he offers nothing but goals. Not a bad record to have but he offers no more that I can see. Shame but we probably need to buy again.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: well, how poor was that
YeahSpijed wrote:Replace Wood?
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: well, how poor was that
Whilst disappointing to lose today,there needs to be a look at our season overall,i thought we would finish lower mid-table 12-15th say,similar to Bournemouth,Newcastle et al,so yes we do need to strengthen,but hopefully the long-term injuries won't bite as hard next year.And the lure of European footy may entice players we wouldn't attract otherwise.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Its no coincidence that without him in the side we dont win anywhere near as much.Quickenthetempo wrote:That's why I said he offers nothing but goals. Not a bad record to have but he offers no more that I can see. Shame but we probably need to buy again.
His movement is good. He gets in goal scoring positions and he worries defences. Theres a reason Sam is 3rd choice and we saw it again today.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: well, how poor was that
We have had a great season but he started a thread on today, which could of been extended up until after the Leicester game truth be told.Cooperclaret wrote:I’m more of a reader of this site these days than a poster and after stupid threads like this after the most magnificent season we have had in decades resulting in European football at the Turf next season - I will stay that way. But I logged on to say what a pathetic thing to write after what was a fantastic celebration of the season today.
The OP must clearly be “perfect”
This user liked this post: ebby
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Replace Wood?? Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
We were well on top until he went off injured. We need to replace Sam really.
We were well on top until he went off injured. We need to replace Sam really.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: well, how poor was that
Our two cup-finals were Everton and Leicester at t'turf,we won both and exerted a lot of physical and mental energy doing so,it's natural that once we were virtually assured of 7th performances dipped slightly at this level that 1-2% can make a difference.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 5726
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 2833 times
- Has Liked: 141 times
Re: well, how poor was that
I didn't think it was that poor to be honest. I thought after the first 10-15 minutes, we dominated the first half, and until about 70 minutes we had the best of the second half too. We did so playing some good, progressive football, getting men into positive positions ahead of the ball and showing good attacking intent.
If we're being critical, we probably lacked a bit of quality in our final pass, and arguably didn't back up our better approach play by getting enough men into the box to get the final touch. We probably lacked the penetrating, forward passing that Brady and Defour offer us and which we've been unable to replace whilst they've been out (by the way, that we've got so many excellent results without our two best playmakers is remarkable in itself).
But "tee to green", we were pretty good and we got the ball down and played more than we have in most games since Defour got injured. Obviously, the other flaw today was that we conceded two bad goals, and perhaps there were some lulls in the game when we might have played with a bit more urgency to move the ball.
But this is nitpicking. We narrowly lost quite an entertaining, end of season game in a bit of a party atmospher, and it was actually a pretty good showcase for the way in which Dyche has tried to evolve us into a more fluid system this season, and where we might go with that next season - and I like what I see. And at the end of it, we're still 7th - seventh - in the Premier League, and in Europe. I quite enjoyed my day out if I'm honest.
If we're being critical, we probably lacked a bit of quality in our final pass, and arguably didn't back up our better approach play by getting enough men into the box to get the final touch. We probably lacked the penetrating, forward passing that Brady and Defour offer us and which we've been unable to replace whilst they've been out (by the way, that we've got so many excellent results without our two best playmakers is remarkable in itself).
But "tee to green", we were pretty good and we got the ball down and played more than we have in most games since Defour got injured. Obviously, the other flaw today was that we conceded two bad goals, and perhaps there were some lulls in the game when we might have played with a bit more urgency to move the ball.
But this is nitpicking. We narrowly lost quite an entertaining, end of season game in a bit of a party atmospher, and it was actually a pretty good showcase for the way in which Dyche has tried to evolve us into a more fluid system this season, and where we might go with that next season - and I like what I see. And at the end of it, we're still 7th - seventh - in the Premier League, and in Europe. I quite enjoyed my day out if I'm honest.
These 4 users liked this post: simonclaret Rileybobs longsidepies IndigoLake
Re: well, how poor was that
Really?Quickenthetempo wrote:Yeah
You are talking about spending £40-50 million then, not £18 million on a player.
Btw, how many strikers at this level offer more than just score goals? Harry Kane, Mo Salah perhaps? and how many assists have they got? Very few I'd imagine.
-
- Posts: 1543
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:41 pm
- Been Liked: 468 times
- Has Liked: 333 times
- Location: Malabo, EG/Chester
- Contact:
Re: well, how poor was that
We weren't poor today but a couple of "schoolboy" errors cost us the match. That's why next season we will still be in a relegation battle from day one, exactly the same as we were this season. Whilst one or two Clarets have European glasses on it doesn't change the facts that this is one hell of a tough league where there is very little to choose between all teams below the top six.
Hard work got us where we are right now and it's the only way we will stay there.
Hard work got us where we are right now and it's the only way we will stay there.
-
- Posts: 5045
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1475 times
- Has Liked: 634 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Bournemouth the only team outside the top six to score more than one goal against us in a league game this season.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 6968
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1489 times
- Has Liked: 1848 times
Re: well, how poor was that
One striker at home and constant back passing which led eventually to us gifted a very poor side the points.
The lad from the youth team deserved a half game not just 3 mins.Lennon was poor again.and GK didnt even get a run out in his last game for us
Sorry great season or not I was expecting a great game with us easy winners.Especially after the gutless game v Arsenal
The lad from the youth team deserved a half game not just 3 mins.Lennon was poor again.and GK didnt even get a run out in his last game for us
Sorry great season or not I was expecting a great game with us easy winners.Especially after the gutless game v Arsenal
This user liked this post: ebby
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: well, how poor was that
Burnley fans showed real class today. Letting the Bournemouth players take the plaudits from their fans AND applauding them off the pitch.never seen that before!Caernarfon_Claret wrote:Bournemouth the only team outside the top six to score more than one goal against us in a league game this season.
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 2889 times
- Has Liked: 1763 times
Re: well, how poor was that
call me deluded, but aren't goals quite important in football ?Quickenthetempo wrote:Wood offers virtually nothing apart from goals, it took Vokes to come on for us to win the first header. To carry on like this he needs to be a 25 goal a season striker.
Re: well, how poor was that
Sorry but you are speaking utter sh-ite.Woodleyclaret wrote:One striker at home and constant back passing which led eventually to us gifted a very poor side the points.
The lad from the youth team deserved a half game not just 3 mins.Lennon was poor again.and GK didnt even get a run out in his last game for us
Sorry great season or not I was expecting a great game with us easy winners.Especially after the gutless game v Arsenal
Firstly why were you expecting us to be easy winners ? We had literally nothing to play for whereas Bournemouth could have a positional swing today which could have cost or earned them a few million.
Secondly why would a lad who has never even made the bench before deserve 45 mins. Have you even ever seen him play before ? Do you not think that the manager put him on the bench simply as a reward for a very good season in the u23`s ?
And thirdly, we more than matched Bournemouth today. Up until Wood getting injured we were by far the better team in the second half. The first half was a non event really and a bit like a pre season friendly (for both teams).
Have a bit of perspective - words like "gutless" are ridiculous and show a complete lack of understanding of the context of where we are with nothing to play for and the job done in a brilliant season.
These 6 users liked this post: Steve-Harpers-perm Wo Didi Goodclaret Top Claret Braindead IndigoLake
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: well, how poor was that
‘I was expecting a great game with us easy winners’Woodleyclaret wrote:One striker at home and constant back passing which led eventually to us gifted a very poor side the points.
The lad from the youth team deserved a half game not just 3 mins.Lennon was poor again.and GK didnt even get a run out in his last game for us
Sorry great season or not I was expecting a great game with us easy winners.Especially after the gutless game v Arsenal
Right in that sentence lies your problem!