Josh Windass

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Josh Windass

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:10 pm

Few Rangers fans saying he is on his way to Burnley.
Left completely out of the match day squad today.

Literally no nothing about him, apart from he plays an attacking midfield position.

Steddyman
Posts: 2405
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Steddyman » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:13 pm

Accy Stanley boy.

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by SGr » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:14 pm

From what I’ve seen of him, he just simply isn’t Premier League quality.

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:21 pm

A player for the development squad. Not good enough top and bottom of it.

Steddyman
Posts: 2405
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:45 pm
Been Liked: 624 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Steddyman » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:22 pm

Careful boys, you'll find yourself on the Moaners 11.

Remember, we finished 7th and if Sean thinks he is good enough, then he is.
These 5 users liked this post: FactualFrank Slurpy whiffa mkmel cockneyclaret

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:25 pm

Already taking a key role in the moaners 11.

But windass hasn’t produced for Sevco in the TPL so how on earth is he good enough for the EPL? Would be better off going back to Accy to sit in the bench there.

mdd2
Posts: 6027
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1666 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by mdd2 » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:27 pm

If he went back to Accy he would not be on the bench. John C was unhappy when he left for Rangers

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by SGr » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:28 pm

mdd2 wrote:If he went back to Accy he would not be on the bench. John C was unhappy when he left for Rangers
Maybe he should. Probably closer to his level. :?

Steve1956
Posts: 17270
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6490 times
Has Liked: 2918 times
Location: Fife

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Steve1956 » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:29 pm

I think we would be better off signing his dad.

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3047
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 583 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:30 pm

Nowhere near good enough for our first team squad

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:30 pm

mdd2 wrote:If he went back to Accy he would not be on the bench. John C was unhappy when he left for Rangers
Accy are playing at a level higher now though. Also might have been something to do with the fee they received aswell.

Slurpy
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:37 pm
Been Liked: 72 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Slurpy » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:32 pm

I'd assume he would have to sign for stoke before we could get the deal done? Fingers crossed on this one!

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:36 pm

He’s also as thick as 2 short planks. He doesn’t like eggs but likes omelette apparently.

https://mobile.twitter.com/SoccerAM/sta ... 60/video/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2606 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by whiffa » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:38 pm

I'd take Chris Iwelumo back over Peter Crouch so any other signing possibilities are a blessing!

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by SGr » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:39 pm

Right_winger wrote:He’s also as thick as 2 short planks. He doesn’t like eggs but likes omelette apparently.

https://mobile.twitter.com/SoccerAM/sta ... 60/video/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That’s concerning, given how Dyche recruited Barton.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 11120
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1573 times
Has Liked: 360 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:40 pm

Still a young lad, probably gonna come in as a squad player if it happens.

dsr
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2269 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by dsr » Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:54 pm

whiffa wrote:I'd take Chris Iwelumo back over Peter Crouch so any other signing possibilities are a blessing!
Not a football expert, then? Are you here for the political threads?
This user liked this post: simonclaret

mkmel
Posts: 5765
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1271 times
Has Liked: 2250 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by mkmel » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:16 pm

Can you guys stop your moaning until we actually sign the lad?

That's if we do of course

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:19 pm

mkmel wrote:Can you guys stop your moaning until we actually sign the lad?

That's if we do of course
Why? Aren’t we entitled to
An opinion? ( formed with relative data/factual information)

agreenwood
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by agreenwood » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:20 pm

Another weird link.

Again, hopefully just papertalk.

Mattster
Posts: 1283
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:02 am
Been Liked: 353 times
Has Liked: 118 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Mattster » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:28 pm

Bagged 12 goals and 8 assists in the SPL playing all the way across the front (left wing, attacking mid, number 10, striker).

If we were being linked with Dembele for Celtic I reckon there'd be a lot of excitement, his record last season? 8 goals and 7 assists.

Doubt he'd be coming in as a starter but seems to me he'd be a quality option for depth across the attack.

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:29 pm

Mattster wrote:Bagged 12 goals and 8 assists in the SPL playing all the way across the front (left wing, attacking mid, number 10, striker).

If we were being linked with Dembele for Celtic I reckon there'd be a lot of excitement, his record last season? 8 goals and 7 assists.

Doubt he'd be coming in as a starter but seems to me he'd be a quality option for depth across the attack.
Clearly haven’t seen him play then.

Taking stats from the SPL is like taking stats from League 1/2

levraiclaret
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:40 am
Been Liked: 428 times
Has Liked: 1483 times
Location: Leicestershire
Contact:

Re: Josh Windass

Post by levraiclaret » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:34 pm

Steddyman wrote:Careful boys, you'll find yourself on the Moaners 11.

Remember, we finished 7th and if Sean thinks he is good enough, then he is.
One more for the Prick list

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by taio » Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:35 pm

Right_winger wrote:Clearly haven’t seen him play then.

Taking stats from the SPL is like taking stats from League 1/2
You clearly haven't seen him play if you don't think he's good enough to get in Stanley's side.

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2606 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by whiffa » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:00 am

dsr wrote:Not a football expert, then? Are you here for the political threads?
What about that statement doesn't detemine me as a football expert?

Crouch is not a player we need in our squad.

CFS
Posts: 1848
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 231 times
Has Liked: 113 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by CFS » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:02 am

Lots of energy as for quality I really don't know.

dsr
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2269 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by dsr » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:04 am

whiffa wrote:What about that statement doesn't detemine me as a football expert?

Crouch is not a player we need in our squad.
Thinking that Iwelumo would be a better signing than Crouch. Crouch is a better player by far, partly because he hasn't retired and Iwelumo has. A football expert would know that.

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2606 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by whiffa » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:08 am

dsr wrote:Thinking that Iwelumo would be a better signing than Crouch. Crouch is a better player by far, partly because he hasn't retired and Iwelumo has. A football expert would know that.
I wouldn't say he was any better a player - nor was I obviously suggesting we sign Iwelumo. Your comment was basically an insult to me, rather than explaining why you think Crouch would be a good signing.

We have Wood and Vokes as two target men, put Barnes in a similar role at times - why would we need another target man?

My original post was supporting the signing of young Windass as a player in a possession that may be beneficial to the squad, whereas a further target man wouldn't be a priority.

Discuss football as an "expert", not as an ignorant so and so. This is a forum, not the playground... or somewhere people need to prove their intellect to have an opinion.

dsr
Posts: 15238
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4578 times
Has Liked: 2269 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by dsr » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:24 am

whiffa wrote:I wouldn't say he was any better a player - nor was I obviously suggesting we sign Iwelumo. Your comment was basically an insult to me, rather than explaining why you think Crouch would be a good signing.

We have Wood and Vokes as two target men, put Barnes in a similar role at times - why would we need another target man?

My original post was supporting the signing of young Windass as a player in a possession that may be beneficial to the squad, whereas a further target man wouldn't be a priority.

Discuss football as an "expert", not as an ignorant so and so. This is a forum, not the playground... or somewhere people need to prove their intellect to have an opinion.
I wasn't saying Crouch would be a good signing - just that he would be a better signing than Iwelumo. You wouldn't find anyone in professional football that thinks Iwelumo would contribute to a Premier League team next season; Crouch scored 5 goals last season, mostly off the bench, and may still have something left.

Why would we need another target man? We quite possibly wouldn't. If Wood, Vokes and Barnes all stay fit, then Crouch may not get on. Are Wood, Vokes and Barnes going to stay fit? Not easy to say.

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2606 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by whiffa » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:28 am

dsr wrote:I wasn't saying Crouch would be a good signing - just that he would be a better signing than Iwelumo. You wouldn't find anyone in professional football that thinks Iwelumo would contribute to a Premier League team next season; Crouch scored 5 goals last season, mostly off the bench, and may still have something left.

Why would we need another target man? We quite possibly wouldn't. If Wood, Vokes and Barnes all stay fit, then Crouch may not get on. Are Wood, Vokes and Barnes going to stay fit? Not easy to say.
A valid response, thank you. For me, there has to be bigger priorities. You talk of goals off the bench, didn't Sam Vokes do the exact same thing last season? Would Crouch as a player and a personality add to the squad, absolutely. Is he what we need at this moment in time? I don't think so.

I wasn't trying to hijack the Windass thread by talking about Crouch as there are other threads for that, I was responding to posters above who are criticising the lad for us potentially trying to sign him. I was saying he would be a much better target than Crouch and we should give the lad a chance.

claret59
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:10 pm
Been Liked: 138 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by claret59 » Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:29 am

Josh Windass is a good player and will always score a few goals. He would be a decent signing.

claretspice
Posts: 5726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2833 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by claretspice » Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:42 am

Its an odd link given hes not set the world alight in Scotland, and at 24 hes hardly the youngest.

But we need credible back up out wide. If Windass is lined up for that, so be it.

kendaldave
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:40 pm
Been Liked: 45 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Josh Windass

Post by kendaldave » Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:30 am

According to the Scottish Sun:
"The forward was outstanding for the Light Blues last season – scoring 18 goals in 41 appearances – despite managerial chaos which saw Pedro Caixinha and Graeme Murty sacked.
Last month the former Accrington Stanley man backed dad Dean’s claim that he has a £3million release clause in his Ibrox deal".

I expect the reporter has seen him in action a lot more than those people quick to write him off on here...

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: Josh Windass

Post by tiger76 » Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:39 am

Windass has pace that's for sure,and that's what people are crying out for,so if Brady is unavailable for much of the first half of the season,at 3 million this would be a no-brainer,don't know about wages but would guess we can afford them surely,if not then we are in dire straits.

arise_sir_charge
Posts: 3233
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:36 am
Been Liked: 1768 times
Has Liked: 41 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by arise_sir_charge » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:16 pm

whiffa wrote:
I wouldn't say he was any better a player - nor was I obviously suggesting we sign Iwelumo. Your comment was basically an insult to me, rather than explaining why you think Crouch would be a good signing.

We have Wood and Vokes as two target men, put Barnes in a similar role at times - why would we need another target man?

My original post was supporting the signing of young Windass as a player in a possession that may be beneficial to the squad, whereas a further target man wouldn't be a priority.

Discuss football as an "expert", not as an ignorant so and so. This is a forum, not the playground... or somewhere people need to prove their intellect to have an opinion.
Can I just clarify, are you saying that Peter Crouch is no better of a player than Chris Iwelumo?

This being Peter Crouch that has scored 100 Premier League Goals and 22 international goals? So more Premier League and International goals than goals Iwelumo actually scored throughout his entire football career........An interesting view is that,

Hipper
Posts: 5721
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 1178 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Hipper » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:56 pm

Right_winger wrote:He’s also as thick as 2 short planks. He doesn’t like eggs but likes omelette apparently.

https://mobile.twitter.com/SoccerAM/sta ... 60/video/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I don't like milk but I like porridge with milk.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:38 pm

kendaldave wrote:According to the Scottish Sun:
"The forward was outstanding for the Light Blues last season – scoring 18 goals in 41 appearances – despite managerial chaos which saw Pedro Caixinha and Graeme Murty sacked.
Last month the former Accrington Stanley man backed dad Dean’s claim that he has a £3million release clause in his Ibrox deal".

I expect the reporter has seen him in action a lot more than those people quick to write him off on here...
With 2 fit wingers and a decent player like windass available at £3m not a bad option.

However its making failing to secure Arfield on another contract look even more bizarre. A player who wouldnt have cost us a transfer fee or big wages, flexible in positions and one who knows our club, our system and expectations inside out.

mkmel
Posts: 5765
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1271 times
Has Liked: 2250 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by mkmel » Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:47 pm

I would imagine that the lure of playing in his homeland and being close to family played a big part in him moving to Rangers

And playing regularly as opposed to a bit part with us

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by Right_winger » Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:03 pm

Let’s just be clear, Arfield is a much better player than Josh Windass

FCBurnley
Posts: 9852
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2000 times
Has Liked: 1148 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:08 pm

Have the board forgotten we got promoted ? Another for the no thanks list

whiffa
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 1:58 pm
Been Liked: 515 times
Has Liked: 2606 times

Re: Josh Windass

Post by whiffa » Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:39 pm

arise_sir_charge wrote:Can I just clarify, are you saying that Peter Crouch is no better of a player than Chris Iwelumo?

This being Peter Crouch that has scored 100 Premier League Goals and 22 international goals? So more Premier League and International goals than goals Iwelumo actually scored throughout his entire football career........An interesting view is that,
No I was making a sarcastic point that a target man is not what we need, when we already have 2 or arguably 3.

Post Reply