Ings to Palace
-
- Posts: 3172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1749 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Ings to Palace
Looks to be a done deal.
Fee could rise as high as £24m.
Fee could rise as high as £24m.
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 723 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Unbelievable price given his injury history and lack of game time recently.
I'd be nowhere near him at that price. Liverpool must be p!ssing themselves.
I'd be nowhere near him at that price. Liverpool must be p!ssing themselves.
Re: Ings to Palace
25 % profit to us ?
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 688 times
- Has Liked: 133 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Wow. On the face of it £24 million is nuts, but it depends a lot on how much of that £24 million is up front and how much is dependent on appearances and goals. If he essentially has to prove his worth before it's realised in Liverpool's pocket then it might not be as crazy as it sounds.
I also expect Zaha to go for a massively inflated fee in this market, so perhaps a deal is done there that they've incorporated into their spend on Ings?
I also expect Zaha to go for a massively inflated fee in this market, so perhaps a deal is done there that they've incorporated into their spend on Ings?
Re: Ings to Palace
I imagine the fee is nowhere near £24 million unless he proves himself, in which case they'll be happy to pay it.
-
- Posts: 67881
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Ings to Palace
Yep, its 20% on anything above £6.5 million.Jel wrote:25 % profit to us ?
These 4 users liked this post: tim_noone Quicknick whiffa mybloodisclaret
-
- Posts: 4916
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 334 times
- Location: Halifax
Re: Ings to Palace
So presuming £24,000,000 is the correct fee and if the full amount is based depending on the possible goals/appearance add ons, should see £4,375,000 to Burnley.ClaretTony wrote:Yep, 25% on anything above £6.5 million.
-
- Posts: 10327
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3341 times
- Has Liked: 1962 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Suspect it’ll take us a long time, if ever, to get that amount.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 19 times
- Has Liked: 137 times
Re: Ings to Palace
So that'll disappear into your dry powder store never to be seen again?claretburns wrote:So presuming £24,000,000 is the correct fee and if the full amount is based depending on the possible goals/appearance add ons, should see £4,375,000 to Burnley.
Re: Ings to Palace
The dry powder store was infiltrated a few days ago. Some suspect foul play (Yes you Mr Garlick). However Im not one to tell porkies or gossip. But what I will say is that this good fortune (The Ings money) will be the rebirth of “The Dry Powder Facility”BackoffDave wrote:So that'll disappear into your dry powder store never to be seen again?
This user liked this post: BackoffDave
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:18 am
- Been Liked: 19 times
- Has Liked: 137 times
Re: Ings to Palace
hahaDyched wrote:The dry powder store was infiltrated a few days ago. Some suspect foul play (Yes you Mr Garlick). However Im not one to tell porkies or gossip. But what I will say is that this good fortune (The Ings money) will be the rebirth of “The Dry Powder Facility”
-
- Posts: 17108
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:12 pm
- Been Liked: 4384 times
- Has Liked: 15117 times
Re: Ings to Palace
It took long enough to get the first amount of the tight scousers.Bordeauxclaret wrote:Suspect it’ll take us a long time, if ever, to get that amount.
-
- Posts: 67881
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32530 times
- Has Liked: 5277 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Ings to Palace
We got £6.5m rising to £8m from the tribunal but we won't have got a penny of that extra £1.5 million. Therefore we'll get 25% of anything above that £6.5m figure.claretburns wrote:So presuming £24,000,000 is the correct fee and if the full amount is based depending on the possible goals/appearance add ons, should see £4,375,000 to Burnley.
-
- Posts: 10914
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5560 times
- Has Liked: 208 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Yes, if he plays 950 games, scores 500 goals and wins 75 England caps, we'll be billing Liverpool for over £4m. Kerching!claretburns wrote:So presuming £24,000,000 is the correct fee and if the full amount is based depending on the possible goals/appearance add ons, should see £4,375,000 to Burnley.
-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2918 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Ings to Palace
Good luck Danny ...all the best lad.
Re: Ings to Palace
It sounds a lot of money but how much will Wells and Walters end up costing us assuming we're stuck with them for the duration of their contracts?
Re: Ings to Palace
Deals like this simply aren't sustainable. The bubble will burst eventually. Palace will end up paying Liverpool near £90m for Ings, Benteke and Sahko. Astonishing. I'd rather keep our powder dry!!
-
- Posts: 4388
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1826 times
- Has Liked: 930 times
Re: Ings to Palace
If he can stay fit he can do a job. Zaha is still not their No9 and has been playing on the wing during preseason with Sørloth up front, pop Ings up there instead even just to pull defenders around to give Zaha space and score the odd tap in.
Re: Ings to Palace
Wow !jlup1980 wrote:Deals like this simply aren't sustainable. The bubble will burst eventually. Palace will end up paying Liverpool near £90m for Ings, Benteke and Sahko. Astonishing. I'd rather keep our powder dry!!
Benteke - how many did he score last season ?
Sahko - how many games did he play last season ?
Ings - how many times has he played on last 3 years ?
Nearly £100m in transfer fees - and I doubt any of them are on less than £4m a year.
And we have fans who bang on every day about Wells and Walters ; or Juke and Sordell.
Total transfer value for all 4 - less than the total profit we will end up making on Danny Ings !!
This user liked this post: CombatClaret
Re: Ings to Palace
isn't the fee that the Palace crackpots are rumoured to be able to pay "only" £20m with £4m add ons
A Palace fan I know says in the press etc down there they wanted him on a loan deal with a view to a permanent transfer.
A Palace fan I know says in the press etc down there they wanted him on a loan deal with a view to a permanent transfer.
Re: Ings to Palace
Absolutely. I sound like a broken record saying we should be careful and prudent but deals like these blow my mind. Rumour has it Palace are also paying this Meyer kid £170k a week. I what world can we compete with that? We shouldn't even try. £8m looks a decent price for Clucas - certainly better value than many have paid this summer.TVC15 wrote:Wow !
Benteke - how many did he score last season ?
Sahko - how many games did he play last season ?
Ings - how many times has he played on last 3 years ?
Nearly £100m in transfer fees - and I doubt any of them are on less than £4m a year.
And we have fans who bang on every day about Wells and Walters ; or Juke and Sordell.
Total transfer value for all 4 - less than the total profit we will end up making on Danny Ings !!
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Ings to Palace
to be fair if I was allowed to pick the team, those three would be starters. I'd have Ings off Benteke any day of the week in front of Wood/Barnes FFSTVC15 wrote:Wow !
Benteke - how many did he score last season ?
Sahko - how many games did he play last season ?
Ings - how many times has he played on last 3 years ?
Nearly £100m in transfer fees - and I doubt any of them are on less than £4m a year.
And we have fans who bang on every day about Wells and Walters ; or Juke and Sordell.
Total transfer value for all 4 - less than the total profit we will end up making on Danny Ings !!
Re: Ings to Palace
Benteke would never ever be good enough either physically or mentally for us to risk paying good money for him
Re: Ings to Palace
Things have just got stupid, especially in London. Can't wait till the bubble bursts.
-
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5209 times
- Has Liked: 921 times
Re: Ings to Palace
I reckon this must be a panic buy after missing out on their main target Vinnie Steels!!!
Re: Ings to Palace
I very nearly spat my lunch out loud laughing at that!Dyched wrote:Ive got to be worth at least £7m
This user liked this post: Darnhill Claret
Re: Ings to Palace
By my calculation if you were manager we would be about £35m worse off in transfer fees, £8m a year worse off in wages, and £25m worse off in Sky prize money as we will have been relegated last year with our 2 strikers managing total goals in the season of about 3 !!!NRC wrote:to be fair if I was allowed to pick the team, those three would be starters. I'd have Ings off Benteke any day of the week in front of Wood/Barnes FFS
Re: Ings to Palace
Oh and I forgot about £30m spent on Sahko to spend most of the season out injured !
Re: Ings to Palace
To cheap? Thanks matewhiffa wrote:I very nearly spat my lunch out loud laughing at that!
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Benteke has scored 18 league goals in 66 PL appearances for Palace.NRC wrote:to be fair if I was allowed to pick the team, those three would be starters. I'd have Ings off Benteke any day of the week in front of Wood/Barnes FFS
Wood got 10 in 24 last season and he was injured for a decent chunk of it.
I can't imagine why you'd prefer Benteke over Wood.
This user liked this post: Cubanclaret
Re: Ings to Palace
I saw Benteke quite a lot on TV for Palace last season. I noticed only one really good game and that was in their surprising comprehensive 3-0 win at Leicester. For the first twenty minutes he was his usual waste of space self but then he scored. After that he worked hard, both tackling back and being an attacking threat.
He can do it but that was the only time I've seen it.
He can do it but that was the only time I've seen it.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Ings to Palace
Saw rumours about Zaha a couple of days ago,apparently he is available for a cost-price 45 million,in the current market that's looks low,but again he has had injury issues.willsclarets wrote:Wow. On the face of it £24 million is nuts, but it depends a lot on how much of that £24 million is up front and how much is dependent on appearances and goals. If he essentially has to prove his worth before it's realised in Liverpool's pocket then it might not be as crazy as it sounds.
I also expect Zaha to go for a massively inflated fee in this market, so perhaps a deal is done there that they've incorporated into their spend on Ings?
20% Add on for Ings
IF Danny boy leaves Liverpool today.The LET is saying Burnley will receive 20% of any profit made by Liverpool. I assume its profit not fee.Every little helps
-
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 5:00 am
- Been Liked: 553 times
- Has Liked: 131 times
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
Do we have to pay 20% of anything below what we sold him for??
-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2918 times
- Location: Fife
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
It's looking like Liverpool & Ings are stook with each other..#thegrassisntalwaysgreener
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
We've not done bad have we with some of the players we've sold. I'm sure the players will be happier now they're are on money, but the likes of Gray, Ings and Keane have not exactly done better since leaving.
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
Bit of a strange one. If Liverpool genuinely wanted to get rid why did they slap that hugely over inflated price tag on him?
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
You can't blame the lad for wanting to take his chance at a massive club like Liverpool. He has just been unlucky with injuries during his career and that is not his fault. He obviously just wants to play football , thats why he wants away from anfield. He could just sit around picking up a good wage but he wants to play.
-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2918 times
- Location: Fife
Re: 20% Add on for Ings
Because they are deluded,or maybe skint..I dunno.martin_p wrote:Bit of a strange one. If Liverpool genuinely wanted to get rid why did they slap that hugely over inflated price tag on him?
-
- Posts: 4151
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 698 times
- Has Liked: 607 times
- Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.
Re: Ings to Palace
He could always let his contract run down and leave for free
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 3:54 pm
- Been Liked: 21 times
Re: Ings to Palace
Joe Hart for free then
Re: Ings to Palace
20%Jel wrote:25 % profit to us ?