£8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
You might do your research and think you know them and their background but remember Grosicki ?
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1749 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Grosicki was a last-minute deadline day job. We’ve been after Clucas since last summer. Not the same at all.Blackrod wrote:You might do your research and think you know them and their background but remember Grosicki ?
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Other than he has upped his wage demandagreenwood wrote:You don’t track a player for a year without knowing what their wage demands are or what sort of personality they are.
Could well be off, but wages or personality don’t seem particularly likely causes.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
As said earlier, injury is the problem not wage demands
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Injury Didn’t stop us wasting £5 million on WellsGrumps wrote:As said earlier, injury is the problem not wage demands
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Perhaps it's not similarjoey13 wrote:Injury Didn’t stop us wasting £5 million on Wells
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Coz injuries and people are always the same.joey13 wrote:Injury Didn’t stop us wasting £5 million on Wells
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Or because it’s wagestaio wrote:Coz injuries and people are always the same.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Just a guess, but perhaps the medical people were confident Wells would recover, perhaps not as sure with clucas??
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Wells was out till Christmas, injuredGrumps wrote:Perhaps it's not similar
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Dunno. But was responding to your post comparing to Wells' injury.joey13 wrote:Or because it’s wages
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
No he wasn'tjoey13 wrote:Wells was out till Christmas, injured
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Nixon just tweeted Burnley put Clucas on hold as he’s not 100% ready to play.
Looks like he failed medical.
Looks like he failed medical.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Actually reading his tweet again and looks like it could be wage demands rather than injury.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
No it doesn't...Blyclaret wrote:Actually reading his tweet again and looks like it could be wage demands rather than injury.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Not 100% ready to play .....what does that suggest then ?
-
- Posts: 7172
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3603 times
- Has Liked: 1032 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
I took it to mean ready to play as in, ready to agree to the transfer.
Might be wrong, it tends to be how Nixon tweets though that.
Might be wrong, it tends to be how Nixon tweets though that.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Not fit, seeing how he hasn't trained much since his opBlyclaret wrote:Not 100% ready to play .....what does that suggest then ?
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Surely he's referring to fitness then.Blyclaret wrote:Not 100% ready to play .....what does that suggest then ?
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
That’s not enough to scupper deal .....eg Wells arriving post operation not fit enough to play but deal still went through.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Bit in the paper explains fully it's his knee
This user liked this post: jedi_master
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1749 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
He’s injured. Has been since May.
With the prospect of extra Europa load, maybe they are going to pursue other targets first.
We could do with another midfielder.
With the prospect of extra Europa load, maybe they are going to pursue other targets first.
We could do with another midfielder.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
If it's about fitness, unlike Wells, the medical may have picked something up of concern.Blyclaret wrote:That’s not enough to scupper deal .....eg Wells arriving post operation not fit enough to play but deal still went through.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
My apologies , first appearance 23/12/17taio wrote:No he wasn't
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Grumps any chance you add link to paper article ???
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
I doubt short term injuries would cause a player to fail a medical.
They tend to look for more serious issues. Remember the video about the one Walters had. They did A CT scan and all sorts of tests that took quite a few hours if I remember correctly.
They tend to look for more serious issues. Remember the video about the one Walters had. They did A CT scan and all sorts of tests that took quite a few hours if I remember correctly.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
On the bench against Newcastle in October. Irrelevant when his first appearance was. You said he was out injured until Christmas. He wasn't.joey13 wrote:My apologies , first appearance 23/12/17
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:56 am
- Been Liked: 200 times
- Has Liked: 703 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
If there has been a problem with his medical it could explain why Swansea are willing to offload him at nearly half of what they paid for him.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
No... It's in the paper, not online...Blyclaret wrote:Grumps any chance you add link to paper article ???
This user liked this post: brunlea99
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Beginning to make sense
Swansea agreeing a fee of 8 million having paid 15 million less than a year ago.
Swansea agreeing a fee of 8 million having paid 15 million less than a year ago.
-
- Posts: 2596
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
- Been Liked: 674 times
- Has Liked: 244 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Seen the tweet. Very strange.... surely we knew his fitness situation before we upped our interest as it hasn't only just happened.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Well donetaio wrote:On the bench against Newcastle in October. Irrelevant when his first appearance was. You said he was out injured until Christmas. He wasn't.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
So we have been chasing an injured player since May then decided to look for someone else with 4 days of the window left , sorry 4 days 8 hrs 20 minsagreenwood wrote:He’s injured. Has been since May.
With the prospect of extra Europa load, maybe they are going to pursue other targets first.
We could do with another midfielder.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Some people don't seem to understand the concept, timing and/or positive of medicals.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Fitness will not be the problem. "He is not fit but we will get him fit" Sean Dyche and so we sign him au Wells. More likely "I have assessed his injury, looked at the MR of his knee and I cannot be certain he doesn't need more surgery. If he does he will be out another 9 months" Alternative "I cannot be certain he will fully recover" Orthopaedic Surgeon specialising in knee surgery. So we do not sign him having looked at the plaque on the wall commemorating the signing of Joe Gallagher.
Probably time to move on if this is the situation
Probably time to move on if this is the situation
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1749 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
I’m sure it’s not like that. Perhaps he’s had a set-back or it’s taking longer than expected to heal. Swansea initially said 12 weeks if you look at the previously linked article from early May. If he’s still not training, clearly things aren’t going to plan.joey13 wrote:So we have been chasing an injured player since May then decided to look for someone else with 4 days of the window left , sorry 4 days 8 hrs 20 mins
-
- Posts: 4388
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1826 times
- Has Liked: 930 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
He isn't our player & Swansea obviously trying to keep it quiet. How we're we supposed to know the extent on an injury before performing our own medical?Jakubs Tash wrote:Seen the tweet. Very strange.... surely we knew his fitness situation before we upped our interest as it hasn't only just happened.
Same as when people say we should have known players don't want to move. You have to ask them first, this is what negotiations are for.
-
- Posts: 3169
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
- Been Liked: 1749 times
- Has Liked: 273 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Or maybe it’s just a case of us reassessing in light of us being a step closer to the Europa League groups (and Defour being injured still) and seeing if there’s a better alternative to go straight into the reckoning to help the squad.mdd2 wrote:Fitness will not be the problem. "He is not fit but we will get him fit" Sean Dyche and so we sign him au Wells. More likely "I have assessed his injury, looked at the MR of his knee and I cannot be certain he doesn't need more surgery. If he does he will be out another 9 months" Alternative "I cannot be certain he will fully recover" Orthopaedic Surgeon specialising in knee surgery. So we do not sign him having looked at the plaque on the wall commemorating the signing of Joe Gallagher.
Probably time to move on if this is the situation
-
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
- Been Liked: 217 times
- Has Liked: 97 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Fulham have shown late intrestjoey13 wrote:So we have been chasing an injured player since May then decided to look for someone else with 4 days of the window left , sorry 4 days 8 hrs 20 mins
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:52 pm
- Been Liked: 148 times
- Has Liked: 23 times
- Location: Leyland
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
maybe our concern about Defour has increased since we started pursuing the deal. And we now need a signing to be ready to play immediately.
Maybe the medical for clucas has shown a more serious injury than we’d expected.
Maybe we’ve got other irons in the fire which we’re confident we can pull off which allows us to put clucas on hold as we don’t feel any other clubs will come in for him in the short term.
Maybe the medical for clucas has shown a more serious injury than we’d expected.
Maybe we’ve got other irons in the fire which we’re confident we can pull off which allows us to put clucas on hold as we don’t feel any other clubs will come in for him in the short term.
This user liked this post: agreenwood
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Hopefully we haven’t wasted too much time on what appeared a largely uninspiring signing. We need another midfielder as we simply cannot assume that Defour will feature regularly, as history would certainly suggest otherwise.
I’d like to think we have another target lined up. Tick tock.
I’d like to think we have another target lined up. Tick tock.
-
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 349 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
If Swansea were trying sell us a dud in Clucas to buy Woods from Brentford why don't we just cut out the middleman and get Woods ourselves?! Younger, more potential, presumably lower wage demands, a more exciting signing all round and with our Brentford loyalty card we only need to sign one more player from them to get a free one!
These 5 users liked this post: boatshed bill box_of_frogs lesxdp Belfast_Claret Buxtonclaret
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
- Been Liked: 294 times
- Has Liked: 92 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Because we don’t generally do younger players ? Clucas more experience, worker, fits the framework ? Uninspiring ? undoubtedly, but no arguing it’s proved effective if a little difficult to watch at times.FeedTheArf wrote:If Swansea were trying sell us a dud in Clucas to buy Woods from Brentford why don't we just cut out the middleman and get Woods ourselves?! Younger, more potential, presumably lower wage demands, a more exciting signing all round and with our Brentford loyalty card we only need to sign one more player from them to get a free one!
-
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1695 times
- Has Liked: 2534 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Whether or not we have other irons in the fire( which I doubt) we surely don't need another crocked player to add to what we already have.Father Jack wrote:maybe our concern about Defour has increased since we started pursuing the deal. And we now need a signing to be ready to play immediately.
Maybe the medical for clucas has shown a more serious injury than we’d expected.
Maybe we’ve got other irons in the fire which we’re confident we can pull off which allows us to put clucas on hold as we don’t feel any other clubs will come in for him in the short term.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Worrying. Dyche’s net of 4 players drops to 3.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Jay Rod won't be coming so make that two and one of those is a keeper. It would be disappointing if we end up with just a one outfield player who is a back up CB from this transfer window.Granny WeatherWax wrote:Worrying. Dyche’s net of 4 players drops to 3.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
I still think we will get JRod
-
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 349 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Yet the younger players we’ve got (early to mid 20s, not development squad fodder) have actually been our most successful. Keane, Tarks, Pope, Gray.SkiptonClaret wrote:Because we don’t generally do younger players ? Clucas more experience, worker, fits the framework ? Uninspiring ? undoubtedly, but no arguing it’s proved effective if a little difficult to watch at times.
The fabled “framework” can be taught, look at Defour. Let’s face it a player needs to be down to one leg before Dyche changes the XI so it’s not like they’re going to come straight into the side so whoever comes in is going to spend a long time on the training pitch learning the framework!
The more I read from his current and previous managers the more I think he’d be a great fit for the group. Micky Mellon managed his at Shrewsbury and said "he's the first player on the training pitch and the last off. He's a terrific kid and has some unbelievable ability".
Definitely appears to be a solid personality, whereas there are question marks over Clucas.
Re: £8m bid for Clucas in - Nixon
Must admit that I wouldn’t be overly disappointed if this move didn’t materialise. The biggest concern being, can we find someone else suitable, quickly enough.