High definition Vs Standard Definition

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Rightfoot
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:35 pm
Been Liked: 113 times
Has Liked: 74 times

High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by Rightfoot » Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:46 pm

Are the Broadcasters making the quality of Standard definition worse to promote there HD package, iv just turned over from the Community shield game on BT HD to Sky Sports SD ( To see if Leeds were losing yet ) and the sky channel is absolutely terrible quality,

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by South West Claret. » Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:52 pm

If you can see OK in SD why bother paying for the HD?

Rightfoot
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:35 pm
Been Liked: 113 times
Has Liked: 74 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by Rightfoot » Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:57 pm

Its possibly worse quality than some of the streaming sites available

cutsy123
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 351 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by cutsy123 » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:00 pm

Good job all our streams are in HD then

kaptin1
Posts: 1601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by kaptin1 » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:02 pm

Can depend on your broadband speed. I used to have Sky on SD and the picture quality was awful until I upgraded to faster fibre and then it was fine. Admittedly not as good as HD, but perfectly watchable.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by South West Claret. » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:04 pm

Rightfoot wrote:Its possibly worse quality than some of the streaming sites available
Really? mines fine have you tried playing with cables at the back to make sure all is connected?

When we did have picture problems it was the fixing from the TV cable to the arial the fitter said it's a common fault.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:08 pm

Rightfoot wrote:Are the Broadcasters making the quality of Standard definition worse to promote there HD package, iv just turned over from the Community shield game on BT HD to Sky Sports SD ( To see if Leeds were losing yet ) and the sky channel is absolutely terrible quality,
This started several years ago. So yes, they have.

Hozz
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:16 pm
Been Liked: 84 times
Has Liked: 43 times
Location: West Sussex

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by Hozz » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:11 pm

What size screen did you watch it on?

karatekid
Posts: 3143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by karatekid » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:13 pm

Sky have offered me the full sports package in HD for £17 pm over 18 months. Is it a good deal?

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:15 pm

karatekid wrote:Sky have offered me the full sports package in HD for £17 pm over 18 months. Is it a good deal?
Nope. HD should now be no extra, with Ultra HD the additional cost.

karatekid
Posts: 3143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by karatekid » Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:17 pm

£15 for the sports and £2 for the HD even though I already have a HD package on my current subscription. He said the sports HD wouldn't be included in it.

ClaretJimmy
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:12 am
Been Liked: 20 times
Has Liked: 47 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by ClaretJimmy » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:16 pm

All games are filmed on HD cameras now, so any SD is just compressed and descaled HD images, coupled with the fact were all used to HD and even 4K.

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1771 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by claptrappers_union » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:18 pm

I refuse to PAY for HD... the broadcasters are taking the **** when HD is now industry standard.
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank joey13

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:21 pm

HD is what used to be SD in terms of default. Like Claptrappers says, they are taking the Michael. And Sky need to sort their lives out and start the channel guide with HD. Why would anybody prefer to watch BBC1 SD when they have the option of HD?

Damo
Posts: 4505
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
Been Liked: 1777 times
Has Liked: 2761 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by Damo » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:24 pm

I can imagine it matters if you spend an arm and a leg and lots of time in front of your tv.
I doubt it will ever matter to me

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by FactualFrank » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:24 pm

Damo wrote:I can imagine it matters if you spend an arm and a leg and lots of time in front of your tv.
I doubt it will ever matter to me
No arms?

Damo
Posts: 4505
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:04 pm
Been Liked: 1777 times
Has Liked: 2761 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by Damo » Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:27 pm

FactualFrank wrote:No arms?
1 arm and 1 leg

cutsy123
Posts: 4683
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 351 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by cutsy123 » Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:36 pm

karatekid wrote:Sky have offered me the full sports package in HD for £17 pm over 18 months. Is it a good deal?
Save a 5th of that by streaming in HD

karatekid
Posts: 3143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by karatekid » Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:25 pm

BBC can't even show the regional news in HD. Pathetic.

agreenwood
Posts: 3172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1750 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by agreenwood » Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:30 pm

In answer to the OP, I’m almost certain they are.

claptrappers_union
Posts: 5900
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1771 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: The Banana Stand

Re: High definition Vs Standard Definition

Post by claptrappers_union » Mon Aug 06, 2018 11:42 am

karatekid wrote:BBC can't even show the regional news in HD. Pathetic.
Whats weird, is that its recorded in HD.
This user liked this post: agreenwood

Post Reply