Sam vokes

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Sam vokes

Post by Reecey1987 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:16 am

Nixon says we are after 10 mill for vokes which is putting boro off

jedi_master
Posts: 7138
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3596 times
Has Liked: 1028 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Sam vokes

Post by jedi_master » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:18 am

In this market he is worth 12-15m in my eyes.

Stoke are asking for £15m for Mame Biram-Diouf for example (unbeliavably).

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:19 am

Imo he is priceless to us and if we flogged him we would be mental.
These 8 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin Chuckypad elwaclaret jlup1980 burnleymik KateR Dark Cloud Shappie

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Reecey1987 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:19 am

I would say 10 is a fair price with entering the last stage of his contract

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6954
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1487 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:20 am

:geek: No scoring Bamford went for £15m
Sam is an international Premier league goal scorer
£20m min our days of giving players away are long gone
But I want him to stay

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18064
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3862 times
Has Liked: 2072 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Quickenthetempo » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:20 am

We need Vokes.

All our strikers got injured last year at some point. We can't afford to lose him.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by martin_p » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:22 am

We’d have to bring a replacement in first surely? Ok he’s not getting in the starting eleven that often, but he’s first choice sub if we’re playing two up front.

Down_Rover
Posts: 1752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Manchester

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Down_Rover » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:22 am

That would only leave Barnes and (injury prone) Wood

randomclaret2
Posts: 6902
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by randomclaret2 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:24 am

This is where Crouchy comes into the equation.
This user liked this post: chekhov

ClaretTony
Posts: 67811
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32417 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Sam vokes

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:26 am

Woodleyclaret wrote:No scoring Bamford went for £15m
Bamford's record in the Championship:

Derby: 14 starts, 7 sub appearances, 8 goals
Boro: 55 starts, 22 sub appearances, 28 goals
This user liked this post: BackoffDave

Wile E Coyote
Posts: 8525
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
Been Liked: 2889 times
Has Liked: 1763 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Wile E Coyote » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:27 am

no point having a raft of top class keepers at one end, and nobody up front to score !! we need vokes !!!
This user liked this post: houseboy

kentonclaret
Posts: 6507
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 977 times
Has Liked: 204 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by kentonclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:27 am

If £10m is putting Boro off make it £15m just to be on the safe side. :P

We cannot afford to lose Sam Vokes.
These 3 users liked this post: Quickenthetempo PrecisionClaret lesxdp

jedi_master
Posts: 7138
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3596 times
Has Liked: 1028 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Sam vokes

Post by jedi_master » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:28 am

Vokes, Wells and Walters out.

Rodriguez, Vydra and Crouch in.

Surely not...

Goobs
Posts: 4402
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1465 times
Has Liked: 995 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Goobs » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:29 am

randomclaret2 wrote:This is where Crouchy comes into the equation.
if Crouch is the answer then I am worried about what questions we are asking :shock:

Goobs
Posts: 4402
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1465 times
Has Liked: 995 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Goobs » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:30 am

jedi_master wrote:Vokes, Wells and Walters out.

Rodriguez, Vydra and Crouch in.

Surely not...
If that was our transfer dealings along with Hart then I would be very happy. I'd be even happier if we didn't get Crouch and kept Vokes instead though.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by martin_p » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:31 am

ClaretTony wrote:Bamford's record in the Championship:

Derby: 14 starts, 7 sub appearances, 8 goals
Boro: 55 starts, 22 sub appearances, 28 goals
True, but the majority of those goals were in an 18 month purple patch in 2014 and 15. Think his records was fairly average at Boro last season.
This user liked this post: Woodleyclaret

Long Time Lurker
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 603 times
Has Liked: 420 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Long Time Lurker » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:33 am

Everyone can see how effective Sam is at putting the ball in the net from our corners.

What they tend to miss is how good he is at keeping the ball out of our net from oppositions corners.

Big Sam is an important part of our squad. That goal against Aberdeen was a cracker.

He is in the final year of his contract which puts a financial spin on things, but I hope he stays with us.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets KateR

Claretmatt4
Posts: 3946
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1049 times
Has Liked: 723 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Claretmatt4 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:37 am

Goobs wrote:if Crouch is the answer then I am worried about what questions we are asking :shock:
Excuse me, could you grab that crate of Stella off the top shelf? I can't quite reach.
This user liked this post: Goobs

chekhov
Posts: 2959
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 807 times
Has Liked: 1522 times
Location: France

Re: Sam vokes

Post by chekhov » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:42 am

Wile E Coyote wrote:no point having a raft of top class keepers at one end, and nobody up front to score !! we need vokes !!!
Although remember we can only play one goalie at a time.

DCWat
Posts: 9331
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4142 times
Has Liked: 3605 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by DCWat » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:44 am

Long Time Lurker wrote:Everyone can see how effective Sam is at putting the ball in the net from our corners.

What they tend to miss is how good he is at keeping the ball out of our net from oppositions corners.

Big Sam is an important part of our squad. That goal against Aberdeen was a cracker.

He is in the final year of his contract which puts a financial spin on things, but I hope he stays with us.
And contrast that to Wood’s headed ‘clearance’ against Aberdeen.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67811
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32417 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Sam vokes

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:47 am

martin_p wrote:True, but the majority of those goals were in an 18 month purple patch in 2014 and 15. Think his records was fairly average at Boro last season.
Far be it for me to promote Bamford, and I agree he had that purple patch at Derby & Boro. Last season he started 23, sub 16 and scored 11. 9 of those goals came in a run of 7 games in Feb & March.
This user liked this post: BackoffDave

beddie
Posts: 5211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1406 times
Has Liked: 518 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by beddie » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:51 am

If our valuation us met I can only think we already have another striker lined up, or that the fee for Vokes would allow us to increase our bid for Jay.

Silkyskills1
Posts: 5871
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
Been Liked: 1695 times
Has Liked: 2531 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Silkyskills1 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:52 am

Would Deeney be a possible replacement?

ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1726
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by ashtonlongsider » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:53 am

I'd be disappointed if Sam left as he's a vital part of our team. I'm sure he also wants to stay in the PL.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets COBBLE

Lord Beamish
Posts: 5001
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 3435 times
Has Liked: 2881 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Lord Beamish » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:55 am

I just would not be selling Sam Vokes.
These 5 users liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin Claretmatt4 cricketfieldclarets Quickenthetempo mkmel

Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Spijed » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:00 am

You'd think that if we are willing to let him go we definitely have someone else lined up.

martin_p
Posts: 10371
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:40 pm
Been Liked: 3765 times
Has Liked: 696 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by martin_p » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:04 am

beddie wrote:If our valuation us met I can only think we already have another striker lined up, or that the fee for Vokes would allow us to increase our bid for Jay.
I’d be shocked if the amount we offer for Rodriguez is dependent on selling a player!

Claretmatt4
Posts: 3946
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1049 times
Has Liked: 723 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Claretmatt4 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:04 am

I'd rather have Sam and £8m than Jay and I think Jay would be a really. Good signing.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67811
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32417 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Sam vokes

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:07 am

There may be nothing in it but if there is it could even be that Sam wants a move. He did only start 7 Premier League games last season.
These 2 users liked this post: randomclaret2 COBBLE

ewanrob
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:52 am
Been Liked: 361 times
Has Liked: 98 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by ewanrob » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:12 am

Really hope the big fella doesn't move, purely my opinion but a bigger threat than Wood.
This user liked this post: KateR

Murger
Posts: 4246
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1243 times
Has Liked: 845 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Murger » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:13 am

Tell Boro to feck off.
This user liked this post: martin_p

Paranoid
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:25 am
Been Liked: 47 times
Has Liked: 198 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Paranoid » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:15 am

Obviously don't want to see Sam leave, however with only a year left on his contract (and no sign of us renewing? unless I have missed something) and the fact I am sure he wants (and fitness wise needs) to be playing regularly can understand if he moved elsewhere, as mentioned above hopefully we have identified a replacement? but please not Peter Crouch!

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1390
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 236 times
Has Liked: 441 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by alwaysaclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:16 am

Absolute disaster to get rid of Sam imo, gives so much to the team, only reason his goals per game ratio isn't better is because he doesn't get enough game time.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Hibsclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:22 am

ClaretTony wrote:There may be nothing in it but if there is it could even be that Sam wants a move. He did only start 7 Premier League games last season.
If I was Sam that would be my view. This guy is a proven international and he may not end up playing enough games throughout his career.

He is fortunate or unfortunate, depending on how you look at it, that he is now at a top half prem team. This is in no small part due to him and yet bringing in top players now means he may play even less...at least there may be more games this year to keep the fringe players happy.

Tbh he was a bit harshly dropped after an early game last season (given the performance at Chelsea)...but he always seems to have a great attitude and that’s why it would be great if he stays
Last edited by Hibsclaret on Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

mkmel
Posts: 5763
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1270 times
Has Liked: 2247 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by mkmel » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:24 am

If Sam Goes then surely we would be looking for 2 new strikers to compete with Wood and Barnes

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Sam vokes

Post by houseboy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:26 am

jedi_master wrote:Vokes, Wells and Walters out.

Rodriguez, Vydra and Crouch in.

Surely not...
Wouldn't want to lose big Sam but Wells and Walter (sound like a comedy duo) could go tomorrow for me. What have either done for the first team?

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4529
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2594 times
Has Liked: 760 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:30 am

i'd sell wood over vokes.
These 2 users liked this post: alwaysaclaret KateR

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Sam vokes

Post by houseboy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:35 am

ClaretTony wrote:There may be nothing in it but if there is it could even be that Sam wants a move. He did only start 7 Premier League games last season.
My thinking entirely and I was going to post the same until I saw this. Sam is an international with plenty of PL experience and although not the greatest at this level he can score, especially when he comes on as sub, he rattles them. It is distinctly possible that he doesn't want to spend another season sitting on the bench, even in the PL, and if he went to a Championship club he would be worth millions to them at that level as he has proved. Maybe he has had a word with Sean and maybe they don't want to lose him but won't stand in his way. And don't forget there are a number of Championship clubs who would pay him more than we do.

The Enclosure
Posts: 4486
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
Been Liked: 990 times
Has Liked: 3266 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sam vokes

Post by The Enclosure » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:35 am

Sam is going nowhere or I will be having a quiet word with Mr Garlick. :D

agreenwood
Posts: 3145
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1739 times
Has Liked: 271 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by agreenwood » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:37 am

Vydra and Jay in for Vokes and Wells would be ok.

I like Vokes though and Vydra doesn’t replace what he brings to the team.

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by LoveCurryPies » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:39 am

quoonbeatz wrote:i'd sell wood over vokes.
If Wood had had an injury free season, he would most likely have scored 18-20 goals. Player stats show Wood scores are far higher.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:41 am

Hibsclaret wrote:If I was Sam that would be my view. This guy is a proven international and he may not end up playing enough games throughout his career.

He is fortunate or unfortunate, depending on how you look at it, that he is now at a top half prem team. This is in no small part due to him and yet bringing in top players now means he may play even less...at least there may be more games this year to keep the fringe players happy.

Tbh he was a bit harshly dropped after an early game last season (given the performance at Chelsea)...but he always seems to have a great attitude and that’s why it would be great if he stays
Absolutely spot on.

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Hibsclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:42 am

LoveCurryPies wrote:If Wood had had an injury free season, he would most likely have scored 18-20 goals. Player stats show Wood scores are far higher.
They are very different types of players and both are needed in the squad. If we are getting anyone in it should be Wells/Walters making way if possible.
This user liked this post: LoveCurryPies

houseboy
Posts: 7065
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
Been Liked: 2238 times
Has Liked: 1617 times
Location: Baxenden

Re: Sam vokes

Post by houseboy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:43 am

quoonbeatz wrote:i'd sell wood over vokes.
Can't say I agree with that one mate. An injury free Wood is much better.

Cubanclaret
Posts: 1113
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:35 am
Been Liked: 286 times
Has Liked: 139 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Cubanclaret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:44 am

I'd be very disappointed to see Vokes go.
I do think he's undervalued generally, possibly the best bench option we've ever had in my time watching Burnley.
And over the course of the season in the PL - that's worth £10M in itself.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8131
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3079 times
Has Liked: 5044 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Colburn_Claret » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:44 am

I'd definitely keep Sam. It's a shame he only gets cameo roles for us, but he never lets us down.
On the other hand, if he is after more games, and thinks he needs to leave to find them, then we shouldn't stand in his way, he's earned the opportunity.
I would still want a replacement through the door first, before I let him go.
Maybe a deal could be struck with WBA, a partnership of Vokes and Gayle could come off in the championship.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4529
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2594 times
Has Liked: 760 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:45 am

LoveCurryPies wrote:If Wood had had an injury free season, he would most likely have scored 18-20 goals. Player stats show Wood scores are far higher.
its unlikely he'd have got 18-20. lukaku only got 16.

pointless projecting what could have happened because he didn't have an injury free season and has already had problems in pre-season.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 2590
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 673 times
Has Liked: 244 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Jakubs Tash » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:47 am

Vokes needs to play games. I don't want to see him go but wouldn't be surprised if he did...and £10m is a snip in this market.

If Vokes does go, we need 2 in....

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4529
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2594 times
Has Liked: 760 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by quoonbeatz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:49 am

houseboy wrote:Can't say I agree with that one mate. An injury free Wood is much better.
he definitely isn't much better. they're different types of player.

i'd rather keep both tbh.

Hendrickxz
Posts: 614
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:14 pm
Been Liked: 200 times
Has Liked: 44 times

Re: Sam vokes

Post by Hendrickxz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:50 am

Probably me being dense as usual but how does this spin out? I assume he is travelling to Istanbul today. The deadline is 5pm Thursday and we have a game at 7pm over yonder. So is he going, is he staying behind, might he have to fly back to Teeside Flight Tracker style. Like I say, probably me missing something obvious.. :?: .. ;)

Post Reply