Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley Ban?
Is it possible for Bardsley to be retroactively banned or not, given his booking?
-
- Posts: 18058
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3862 times
- Has Liked: 2070 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Depends what is in the referees report I guess.
He couldn't complain if he was sent off.
He couldn't complain if he was sent off.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
If he were booked for the challenge on Radford after the ball went dead then he could still be given a red for his actions afterwards but if the yellow was for his reaction to Radford then he is in the clear.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
I would hope the referee has covered all bases in his awarding of a yellow, with the matter at an end.
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1049 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Whatever, Bardsley is a lucky boy and needs to wind it in, a slow learner.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley is just slow! Manure had one attack and he was trotting back from their penalty area whilst they were in our box! Last time I saw that was Mears vrs City.CleggHall wrote:Whatever, Bardsley is a lucky boy and needs to wind it in, a slow learner.
-
- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2238 times
- Has Liked: 1617 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Bardsley Ban?
If he got banned would that be a blessing in disguise? At least then Sean couldn't pick him.
This user liked this post: deanothedino
-
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
- Been Liked: 1047 times
- Has Liked: 1187 times
- Location: Reading
Re: Bardsley Ban?
No he can't. Referee saw the incident and cautioned him for his part in the incident. There is no way he can go back and say he never saw anything as that would ask the question so why did you caution?
Rest easy fellow clarets
Rest easy fellow clarets
-
- Posts: 67785
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32406 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Pathetic - absolutely pathetic commenthouseboy wrote:If he got banned would that be a blessing in disguise? At least then Sean couldn't pick him.
These 8 users liked this post: nil_desperandum claret wizard Burnley Ace evensteadiereddie holdyourfire Colburn_Claret KlyBfc Burnley1989
-
- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2238 times
- Has Liked: 1617 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Bardsley Ban?
No it isn't. It's my honest opinion dressed up in a little humour. I personally don't rate him very highly. That's all.ClaretTony wrote:Pathetic - absolutely pathetic comment
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Serious question.houseboy wrote:No it isn't. It's my honest opinion dressed up in a little humour. I personally don't rate him very highly. That's all.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bairdnil_desperandum wrote:Serious question.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
Mears
How is this relevant?
-
- Posts: 67785
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32406 times
- Has Liked: 5273 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Totally agree with that and, as you rightly say, Lowton is currently out of form as is Ward on the other side.nil_desperandum wrote:Serious question.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Peter Noblenil_desperandum wrote:Serious question.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
-
- Posts: 2542
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 608 times
- Has Liked: 310 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Have I missed something? Why’s it a pathetic comment to say that you prefer a different right back to Dyche?ClaretTony wrote:Pathetic - absolutely pathetic comment
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Baird only played 7 games in a loan spell. He would have been one of our better fullbacks, but I'm not sure his PL record matches Bardsley's.Claretto wrote:Baird
Mears
How is this relevant?
Mears will divide opinion I would imagine, but defensively he was not as strong as Bardsley.
It's relevant because the poster I was responding to was arguing how poor Bardsley is.
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Bardsley Ban?
He didn't say that though in his original comment, did he?Winstonswhite wrote:Have I missed something? Why’s it a pathetic comment to say that you prefer a different right back to Dyche?
This user liked this post: Burnley1989
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Bardsley Ban?
From the reports I've read online he was booked for overly aggressive behaviour towards Rashford which did not include the kick out - IF those reports are correct then he could still be banned for the kick as that was before the aggressive behaviour when they both stood head to head.dpinsussex wrote:No he can't. Referee saw the incident and cautioned him for his part in the incident. There is no way he can go back and say he never saw anything as that would ask the question so why did you caution?
Rest easy fellow clarets
Re: Bardsley Ban?
However, it has to be within a certain time scale. If he's not charged in next day or so that will be the end of the matter.Vegas Claret wrote:From the reports I've read online he was booked for overly aggressive behaviour towards Rashford which did not include the kick out - IF those reports are correct then he could still be banned for the kick as that was before the aggressive behaviour when they both stood head to head.
-
- Posts: 30627
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11034 times
- Has Liked: 5645 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Bardsley Ban?
yeah agree, I was just stating that the reports I have read (right or wrong) were saying he could still be bannedSpijed wrote:However, it has to be within a certain time scale. If he's not charged in next day or so that will be the end of the matter.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Problem with Bardsley is he is surrounded by a lot of nothingness at the moment, find it hard to believe anyone can have a go at him. Collectively we are absolute dross at the moment, some players need quality around them to flourish...we don't have that.
For the 1st time yesterday, I actually picked up on a lot of negativity over SD.... a lot saying he's clearly reached a point in his managerial career where he's not sure what to do next. Why would you not Go with 2 battering rams that are Barnes & Vokes to start the match, against a Manu back line that are shown to be brittle.
For the 1st time yesterday, I actually picked up on a lot of negativity over SD.... a lot saying he's clearly reached a point in his managerial career where he's not sure what to do next. Why would you not Go with 2 battering rams that are Barnes & Vokes to start the match, against a Manu back line that are shown to be brittle.
-
- Posts: 7211
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2378 times
- Has Liked: 3804 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley is more than adequate as a full back but he's never going to 'bomb on' and fire crosses into the box especially when the speed merchant in front of him is incapable of doing it. We need a bit of fire and brimstone in the side as the majority of our players are a bit too 'goody two shoes' and gullible.
This user liked this post: The Enclosure
-
- Posts: 9902
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
- Been Liked: 2350 times
- Has Liked: 3178 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
It may be, in part, because Mourinho had already changed his backline - and brought in Fellaini - from the brittle one he'd played before...ewanrob wrote:Problem with Bardsley is he is surrounded by a lot of nothingness at the moment, find it hard to believe anyone can have a go at him. Collectively we are absolute dross at the moment, some players need quality around them to flourish...we don't have that.
For the 1st time yesterday, I actually picked up on a lot of negativity over SD.... a lot saying he's clearly reached a point in his managerial career where he's not sure what to do next. Why would you not Go with 2 battering rams that are Barnes & Vokes to start the match, against a Manu back line that are shown to be brittle.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
I get what you say, but he is fundamentally a midfielder who doesn't seem to be able to get a game... and is usually brought on a last resort up front. For pity's sake, why not bully them with the 2 best players we have that can do that.
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Bardsley Ban?
At half time yesterday we had committed one foul ---that was by Bardsley who himself had been upended twice by Sanchez --we were far too nice to them.JohnMac wrote:Bardsley is more than adequate as a full back but he's never going to 'bomb on' and fire crosses into the box especially when the speed merchant in front of him is incapable of doing it. We need a bit of fire and brimstone in the side as the majority of our players are a bit too 'goody two shoes' and gullible.
This user liked this post: JohnMac
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 695 times
- Has Liked: 297 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
I know, how dare he display a sense of humour.ClaretTony wrote:Pathetic - absolutely pathetic comment
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 843 times
- Has Liked: 1049 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Aye get stuck in Ashington as in days of yore!Ashingtonclaret46 wrote:At half time yesterday we had committed one foul ---that was by Bardsley who himself had been upended twice by Sanchez --we were far too nice to them.
Bring back the Bedlington terrier, Colin Blant, Bomber Harris and Andy Lochhead I say.
These 2 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 JohnMac
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Problem with that Clegg is that, in these modern times, we would be down to 7 men before we knew it. Players must not endanger their opponent, must not use excessive force (whatever that is), must not be careless, must not be reckless etc. ad nauseam because they can be cautioned or dismissed.CleggHall wrote:Aye get stuck in Ashington as in days of yore!
Bring back the Bedlington terrier, Colin Blant, Bomber Harris and Andy Lochhead I say.
The game is losing its way, however, it is what the modern fan wants to see. He wants pretty passing etc., etc. but does not want to see a good, hard tackle because his hero may be injured.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Lad by me yesterday spent the whole game berating Bardsley. He repeated a few times he was the worst player that had ever played for Burnley, I eventually got fed up and pointed out he can’t have watched us for very long if he’s the worst....
Equally baffling was his instance that it was Bardsleys fault that Luke Shaw was getting the ball unmarked stood on the touch line.... aye a right back should mark their left back and leave Sanchez all alone.
I know the game is about opinions but the need of fans to hammer our players and a portion blame to individuals (almost always the same names) when it’s clear we are struggling as collective baffles me.
Equally baffling was his instance that it was Bardsleys fault that Luke Shaw was getting the ball unmarked stood on the touch line.... aye a right back should mark their left back and leave Sanchez all alone.
I know the game is about opinions but the need of fans to hammer our players and a portion blame to individuals (almost always the same names) when it’s clear we are struggling as collective baffles me.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Surely Lee Dixon and Brian laws must be on a par with trippernil_desperandum wrote:Serious question.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
This user liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 15232
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6743 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley was very lucky.
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Nowhere near as lucky as Kenedy was when playing at Cardiff or Harry Arter in the same game.boatshed bill wrote:Bardsley was very lucky.
This user liked this post: Silkyskills1
-
- Posts: 15232
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3156 times
- Has Liked: 6743 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Didn't see those two, but Bardsley went right through Rashford in that challenge which led to the incident, and pushed his head towards Rashford's forehead.Ashingtonclaret46 wrote:Nowhere near as lucky as Kenedy was when playing at Cardiff or Harry Arter in the same game.
Having said that I kind of liked him for it.
-
- Posts: 10310
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3337 times
- Has Liked: 1954 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Trippier is a far better Manager than Laws.taffy wrote:Surely Lee Dixon and Brian laws must be on a par with tripper
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:15 am
- Been Liked: 1829 times
- Has Liked: 2623 times
- Location: Ashington, Northumberland
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Just probably reminding Rashford what a proper tackle was like after he threw himself to the ground at the slightest touch from Lennon to get the penalty.boatshed bill wrote:Didn't see those two, but Bardsley went right through Rashford in that challenge which led to the incident, and pushed his head towards Rashford's forehead.
Having said that I kind of liked him for it.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Sorry. I'd forgotten about Brian Laws. He would indeed rank above Bardsley. So that's three that we've come up with.taffy wrote:Surely Lee Dixon and Brian laws must be on a par with tripper
I don't think you can count Lee Dixon, as he never really got established in the Burnley first XI. [4 appearances in 2 seasons before he was released].
This user liked this post: Wokingclaret
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Whatever people think about Brian Laws as a manager, as a player he was a very good one, certainly good enough to play for Brian Clough at the highest level.
Taken from Wiki: Clough's first words to his new signing were "I've never seen you play, son, I'm going on the recommendation of Ronnie Fenton. So if you're crap, Ronnie signed you. If you're good, I signed you."
Taken from Wiki: Clough's first words to his new signing were "I've never seen you play, son, I'm going on the recommendation of Ronnie Fenton. So if you're crap, Ronnie signed you. If you're good, I signed you."
This user liked this post: nil_desperandum
-
- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:43 pm
- Been Liked: 2238 times
- Has Liked: 1617 times
- Location: Baxenden
Re: Bardsley Ban?
You've kind of answered my question for me really. I'll agree that Bardsley has been good as a PL player and given that over the last 40 odd years we haven't been in the top flight it's always difficult to gauge. But in the here and now he always seems too slow and clumsy and he is not really a PL standard player now. Of course others may well disagree. I think an 'off-form' Lowton is still, better.nil_desperandum wrote:Serious question.
Since Keith Newton, how many right backs have we had who have been better than Bardsley?
I can only really think of Trippier and Lowton, (who's out of form).
(We have had some decent right backs in that time but very few who have played at Premier League level)
Re: Bardsley Ban?
I don’t think you should be banned for liking stuff from the 1970sClaretto wrote:Is it possible for Bardsley to be retroactively banned or not, given his booking?
-
- Posts: 5330
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1643 times
- Has Liked: 400 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley reminded me of Ball against Dunn / Rovers (you know, the 'Claret Flash' that hurtled across the screen for those watching on TV).
Partly he was getting Rashford back for the soft penalty when his foot was slightly stood on. Partly he recognised we needed to shake something up to have a chance to get a draw, like Ball probably did. It was savviness and a little bit of brutality.
Partly he was getting Rashford back for the soft penalty when his foot was slightly stood on. Partly he recognised we needed to shake something up to have a chance to get a draw, like Ball probably did. It was savviness and a little bit of brutality.
-
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 11:16 am
- Been Liked: 126 times
- Has Liked: 328 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Keith Newton played left back for us, so no comparison with previous and current right backs.
-
- Posts: 16844
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 6951 times
- Has Liked: 1479 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Bardsley Ban?
I don’t like Bardsley’s rashness, but sometimes when your team is being walked over without any resistance you need someone to stand up and put a boot in. Bardsley was lucky to stay on the pitch but his action gave us a numerical advantage and seemed to get the crowd fired up.
Marney used to do it and Mee often does, although bullying Lukaku is a difficult task. There didn’t seem like many leaders on the pitch on a Sunday.
Marney used to do it and Mee often does, although bullying Lukaku is a difficult task. There didn’t seem like many leaders on the pitch on a Sunday.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
He played left and right back for Burnley.Chip Harrison wrote:Keith Newton played left back for us, so no comparison with previous and current right backs.
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Yes. He played the majority of his career at right back, memorably for England in Mexico (1970), but he did play quite a number of games at left back for us, because he could.TVC15 wrote:He played left and right back for Burnley.
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Lee Dixon
-
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 am
- Been Liked: 990 times
- Has Liked: 3266 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Best PAIR of full backs I saw playing for us was Angus and Elder.
These 2 users liked this post: nil_desperandum Ashingtonclaret46
-
- Posts: 7310
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1827 times
- Has Liked: 3964 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Already covered that - only made 4 1st team appearances for us over 2 years before being released and went to Chester City, so his record for us can't really be compared with the others.Rammy1968 wrote:Lee Dixon
It was 6 years after he joined Burnley before he finally found success at Arsenal, having been at Chester, Bury and Stoke en-route.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:11 pm
- Been Liked: 12 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Bardsley Ban?
Bardsley was lucky to stay on the pitch. But I don't mind a bit of aggression. Better than than being bullied like we were on other parts of the pitch.
Bardsley has his limitations but his number one priority is defence and he did OK. If everyone had played with a bit more aggression and intensity it helps break down opposition attacking plays and put a bit more pressure on their decision making.
At the end of the day Man U played well and got their tactics right.
Bardsley has his limitations but his number one priority is defence and he did OK. If everyone had played with a bit more aggression and intensity it helps break down opposition attacking plays and put a bit more pressure on their decision making.
At the end of the day Man U played well and got their tactics right.