David Brooks

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18028
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3860 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

David Brooks

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:26 pm

How good was he today? Ran the game for Bournemouth for long periods. Cracking left foot on him. Very comfortable on the ball and can puck a pass. Only 21 as well.

Shame he chose Wales over England.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by RVclaret » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:34 pm

Thought he was outstanding and the second best player on the pitch behind Lennon.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:53 pm

Who?

basil6345789
Posts: 2713
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:22 pm
Been Liked: 482 times
Has Liked: 2292 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by basil6345789 » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:58 pm

He was class - reminded me of John White but quicker.

Longsidelenny
Posts: 607
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 6:55 pm
Been Liked: 125 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: David Brooks

Post by Longsidelenny » Sun Sep 23, 2018 12:15 am

I agree the best player on the pitch bye a country mile very good business from Eddie Howe once again

jdrobbo
Posts: 9293
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 4831 times
Has Liked: 947 times
Location: Leeds

Re: David Brooks

Post by jdrobbo » Sun Sep 23, 2018 12:16 am

Outstanding

Rileybobs
Posts: 16827
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6947 times
Has Liked: 1477 times
Location: Leeds

Re: David Brooks

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:29 am

He was very good but seemed to be given a free role, which is all well and good, but is also why it's not unusual for a Howe team to concede a lot of goals. We certainly couldn't afford that luxury.

JohnMac
Posts: 7210
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
Been Liked: 2378 times
Has Liked: 3801 times
Location: Padiham

Re: David Brooks

Post by JohnMac » Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:38 am

His powers of recovery after rolling around are almost super human.

Good young player though.
This user liked this post: Rumpelstiltskin

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:55 am

He was outstanding. The sort of player we should have been in for in the summer.

ashtonlongsider
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 494 times
Has Liked: 162 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by ashtonlongsider » Sun Sep 23, 2018 6:55 am

Yes he was excellent. He showed great potential at Sheff Utd and is maturing into a classy player. Also comes from the North West. The sort we should have certainly been looking at during the summer.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8494
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by jrgbfc » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:11 am

The likes of him and Maddison show there is still value to be had in the Championship. Unfortunately Dyche will always favour experience rather than youth.

taio
Posts: 11618
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3240 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by taio » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:16 am

jrgbfc wrote:The likes of him and Maddison show there is still value to be had in the Championship. Unfortunately Dyche will always favour experience rather than youth.
He does both.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8128
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3077 times
Has Liked: 5042 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: David Brooks

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:19 am

Very good player. First time I've seen him live and he didn't disappoint.

mickleoverclaret
Posts: 962
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
Been Liked: 397 times
Has Liked: 429 times
Location: Mickleover, Derby
Contact:

Re: David Brooks

Post by mickleoverclaret » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:25 am

Struggled for an end product I thought. Glided around the final third with impunity but didn't see too many killer passes and he didn't have a decent finish on him either. Recall a couple of times in the second half where he got to the edge of the box, had no idea what to do with it, and had to stop and pass it backwards. Certainly a player in there, though.

MRG
Posts: 1228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:13 am
Been Liked: 361 times
Has Liked: 154 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by MRG » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:28 am

jrgbfc wrote:The likes of him and Maddison show there is still value to be had in the Championship. Unfortunately Dyche will always favour experience rather than youth.
Look across a few of the threads at the top of this board and you will see that some fans are unwilling to give the younger replacement the opportunity to develop

claretspice
Posts: 5724
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2827 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by claretspice » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:47 am

Good player. In some respects, I'd have liked us to be in for him, but on the other hand, that might have unnecessarily stifled the opportunity for McNeil to develop and emerge.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18028
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3860 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:58 am

claretspice wrote:Good player. In some respects, I'd have liked us to be in for him, but on the other hand, that might have unnecessarily stifled the opportunity for McNeil to develop and emerge.
He's far more advanced than McNeil but he should be.

claretspice
Posts: 5724
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2827 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by claretspice » Sun Sep 23, 2018 12:15 pm

He certainly should be and quite probably is - but he's not a completely dissimilar looking type of player to McNeil (from the glimpses we've seen), and he's a player we'd have been signing with an eye on the future, so you can imagine he might well have restricted McNeil's opportunity to progress.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18028
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3860 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:15 pm

I don't think McNeil would of been in Dyche's plans to be fair. Injuries and a good pre season along with lack of signings have given him a chance which he has took with both hands.

Cleveleys_claret
Posts: 3043
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 am
Been Liked: 956 times
Has Liked: 583 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Cleveleys_claret » Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:18 pm

Longsidelenny wrote:I agree the best player on the pitch bye a country mile very good business from Eddie Howe once again
Yeah just like Jordan Ibe

jlup1980
Posts: 2172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 856 times
Has Liked: 529 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by jlup1980 » Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:33 pm

Looks a good player but he needs to stop throwing himself on the floor. There were a couple of blatant dives from him yesterday and the referee fell for them. Other than that I thought he s excellent.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 18028
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 3860 times
Has Liked: 2068 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Quickenthetempo » Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:45 pm

jlup1980 wrote:Looks a good player but he needs to stop throwing himself on the floor. There were a couple of blatant dives from him yesterday and the referee fell for them. Other than that I thought he s excellent.
You mean like Barnes?

Or is it alright if he wins them for your club?
Last edited by Quickenthetempo on Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

jlup1980
Posts: 2172
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 856 times
Has Liked: 529 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by jlup1980 » Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:48 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:You mean like Bares?

Or is it alright if he wins them for your club?
No, it's embarrassing when he does it as well. I actually thought of Barnes when Brooks threw himself to the deck for the second time at the weekend. It was as obvious and blatant as Ashley makes them sometimes. I'm surprised the officials don't do more to stamp it out completely.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo

kaptin1
Posts: 1601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by kaptin1 » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:44 am

jrgbfc wrote:The likes of him and Maddison show there is still value to be had in the Championship. Unfortunately Dyche will always favour experience rather than youth.
Maddison cost Leicester £20m. He looks to be a good signing but with no Premier League experience before this season I’m not sure I would describe him as value. Brooks cost Bournemouth £11.5m, which looks far more reasonable.

dsr
Posts: 15206
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4569 times
Has Liked: 2259 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by dsr » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:43 am

jlup1980 wrote:No, it's embarrassing when he does it as well. I actually thought of Barnes when Brooks threw himself to the deck for the second time at the weekend. It was as obvious and blatant as Ashley makes them sometimes. I'm surprised the officials don't do more to stamp it out completely.
Officials encourage diving. 9 times out of then when there is slight contact, and the player throws himself down, the ref gives a free kick. 9 times out of 10 when there is clear pushing but the player stays on his feet, the ref does not give a free kick. One of the worst examples on Saturday, early in the match, Lowton and the Bournemouth man (may have been Brooks) ran shoulder to shoulder towards the ball on the touchline. The Bournemouth man kicked the ball out of play and knelt down and got a free kick. Why? Because two players touched and one chose to fall over. The referee gave the free kick as a reward for deliberately falling over. Refs do it a lot - it's FA policy that they should reward players who fall over with free kicks, unless they are sure there was no foul.

RingoMcCartney
Posts: 10318
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 2798 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by RingoMcCartney » Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:45 am

Reminded me of a younger Bryan Robson.

jrgbfc
Posts: 8494
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 10:30 pm
Been Liked: 2106 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by jrgbfc » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:22 pm

kaptin1 wrote:Maddison cost Leicester £20m. He looks to be a good signing but with no Premier League experience before this season I’m not sure I would describe him as value. Brooks cost Bournemouth £11.5m, which looks far more reasonable.
I'd say 20 million for an excellent young English player is good value. What will Wells and Walters have cost us by the time we manage to get shut?

chekhov
Posts: 2956
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 807 times
Has Liked: 1522 times
Location: France

Re: David Brooks

Post by chekhov » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:29 pm

jrgbfc wrote:I'd say 20 million for an excellent young English player is good value.
Easier to say that, now he has played a few games at a higher level, than when he was playing for Norwich in the 2nd tier. Hindsight is a great thing!
Other thing to bear in mind is that he may be flattering to deceive. Give him a full season in the premier league, then it might be possible to say, yes, he is value for money.
This user liked this post: kaptin1

Quicknick
Posts: 5638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7174 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: David Brooks

Post by Quicknick » Mon Sep 24, 2018 5:27 pm

basil6345789 wrote:He was class - reminded me of John White but quicker.
John White who got struck by lightning?

Dom
Posts: 801
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:36 pm
Been Liked: 327 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: David Brooks

Post by Dom » Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:48 am

Thought he was a bit of a tool. Talented, yes, but went down far too easily.
He also couldn't be arsed tracking Lennon for the 4th goal, went a bit schoolboy and tried chasing the ball rather than go with Lennon, which made Lennon's job of squaring the ball that bit easier.

Post Reply