ARTICLE: Four wins in four at home for under-18s

[ClaretTony]

Burnley v Barnsley youth report

See link
http://www.uptheclarets.com/four-wins-i ... -under-18s" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Buxtonclaret]

Cheers for the report.

Where's Cadamarteri ?

[ClaretTony]

Cheers for the report.

Where's Cadamarteri ?

No idea where he was but he wasn't there yesterday

[IanMcL]

Good to see progress at the young levels.

Your commitment to watching and reporting the matches is to be commended.

It keeps us in touch at all levels.

[Rowls]

Rowls is grateful for the updates whoever they come from.

[ClaretTony]

Don't worry, someone is behaving like a spoilt child because he had a post removed when he called someone a buffoon

[ClaretTony]

Your commitment to watching and reporting the matches is to be commended

It's something I've done for years, long before I was reporting on any games Ian. Always enjoyed going to youth, reserve or whatever games when I can get to them.

[Jeremy_Bentham]

Don't worry, someone is behaving like a spoilt child because he had a post removed when he called someone a buffoon

. hadn’t called anyone anything until his original post was removed simply stating the update - he doesn’t understand why that one was taken down when it was simply informing people of Fowler’s progress?

[ClaretTony]

. hadn’t called anyone anything until his original post was removed simply stating the update - he doesn’t understand why that one was taken down when it was simply informing people of Fowler’s progress?

And ClaretTony doesn't understand why . continues with this ridiculous way of posting and making unnecessary comments. ClaretTony is sick to the back teeth of troublesome posters. Shame Jeremy-Bentham chooses to continue to post this way and shame he continues to ruin threads.

[Jeremy_Bentham]

And ClaretTony doesn't understand why . continues with this ridiculous way of posting and making unnecessary comments. ClaretTony is sick to the back teeth of troublesome posters.

. fails to understand what was unnecessary or troublesome about stating Fowler had scored a brace for Padiham on a topic that was titled something along the signs of ‘Fowler Signs For Padiham’.

[Bordeauxclaret]

Perhaps it would just be easier to advise why the post was removed?

[IanMcL]

IanMcL is pleased that the very young U18s have won their last 4 home matches.

[ClaretTony]

Perhaps it would just be easier to advise why the post was removed?

My word, it got you a like from djemba_djemba. The original post was removed because of the comments accompanying it. Shame you and another poster choose to join in when you don't seem to have a clue what's happened.

[ClaretTony]

. fails to understand what was unnecessary or troublesome about stating Fowler had scored a brace for Padiham on a topic that was titled something along the signs of ‘Fowler Signs For Padiham’.

Does . fail to understand? I know you don't because you know exactly what you posted originally. Try reading the personal abuse post.

[Bordeauxclaret]

The post this morning only stated he’d scored twice. It didn’t even mention anyone else though?

[ClaretTony]

The post this morning only stated he’d scored twice. It didn’t even mention anyone else though?

Did it really or is that what you saw after the first one had been removed? It's all well and good having a go at me but I know what was removed initially. To be honest, I'm sick to the back teeth of it and others joining in like this just makes it worse.

[Jeremy_Bentham]

Does . fail to understand? I know you don't because you know exactly what you posted originally. Try reading the personal abuse post.

. did not abuse anybody in the post he put up this morning at around 10:00.

He simply said that Fowler had scored a couple of goals for Padiham. He fails to see abuse there - has he hurt the feelings of the Litherland goalkeeper who Fowler scored against?

He knows that other people read the post and they will have seen there was no personal abuse or malice in his post. He feels ClaretTony is just embarrassing himself now.

[Bordeauxclaret]

The original post had no abuse.

If posts later contained abuse I can fully understand those being deleted.

[ClaretTony]

The original post had no abuse.

Then in that case you didn't see the original post.

[Bordeauxclaret]

Then in that case you didn't see the original post.

I did.

[Jeremy_Bentham]

The original post had no abuse.

If posts later contained abuse I can fully understand those being deleted.

. did use the word ‘buffoon’ in a later post when asking why his original, non-abusive post was removed.

[ClaretTony]

I did.

I can confirm you 100% didn't. I'm assuming the one you saw related to Fowler having scored twice for Padiham on an entirely different thread.

[Bordeauxclaret]

I’ll leave you to it now but the original post didn’t mention anyone else apart from the player.

[ClaretTony]

. did use the word ‘buffoon’ in a later post when asking why his original, non-abusive post was removed.

and . as a liar.

[ClaretTony]

I’ll leave you to it now but the original post didn’t mention anyone else apart from the player.

You did not see the original post then, that is 100% certain.

[Aclaret]

Have I just tuned into a kiddies show !
To me to you.