Robertson
-
- Posts: 3550
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
- Been Liked: 656 times
- Has Liked: 2898 times
Robertson
How did we let that one get away? Another example of a lack of ambition at boardroom level?
This user liked this post: joey13
Re: Robertson
Correct
Re: Robertson
Hull manager, nothing to do with Burnley.
-
- Posts: 18087
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 3863 times
- Has Liked: 2073 times
Re: Robertson
Charlie Taylor would look a world beater in this attacking Liverpool team.
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Robertson
Yeh wonder why he wouldn’t sign for us when he knew Liverpool were also interested. So puzzling.
These 16 users liked this post: cockneyclaret Shore claret Burnley Ace JohnDearyMe Colburn_Claret jtv Stalbansclaret nil_desperandum evensteadiereddie Braindead Holtyclaret Quicknick Juan Tanamera JohnMac bfcjg mickleoverclaret
Re: Robertson
Quite odd using that to criticise the Board for what ought to be blatently obvious reasons.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Robertson
Not the time to be fishing. Far too cold.Burnley Ace wrote:How did we let that one get away? Another example of a lack of ambition at boardroom level?
This user liked this post: Burnley Ace
Re: Robertson
We could have signed him long before Liverpool were interested but hey you keep happy clappingSteve-Harpers-perm wrote:Yeh wonder why he wouldn’t sign for us when he knew Liverpool were also interested. So puzzling.
This user liked this post: cockneyclaret
Re: Robertson
I was under the impression fee and terms agreed but the hull manager pulled the plug on the deal. Then again if you had the choice between Liverpool and Burnley who would you choose? That won't make an interesting thread on here as there's no stick to beat the club with.
Re: Robertson
Liverpool weren’t looking to sign him in Jan 2017 he signed for them in July 2017NL Claret wrote:I was under the impression fee and terms agreed but the hull manager pulled the plug on the deal. Then again if you had the choice between Liverpool and Burnley who would you choose? That won't make an interesting thread on here as there's no stick to beat the club with.
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Robertson
You know this for a fact? Lucky you being privy to players transfer talks.joey13 wrote:We could have signed him long before Liverpool were interested but hey you keep happy clapping
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32528 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Robertson
We didn't. Hull wouldn't sell him because they were in the relegation battle. Simple as that. And then Liverpool came in and we had no chance.Burnley Ace wrote:How did we let that one get away? Another example of a lack of ambition at boardroom level?
These 2 users liked this post: cockneyclaret FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: Robertson
You know this for a fact? Lucky you being privy to players transfer talks.joey13 wrote:We could have signed him long before Liverpool were interested but hey you keep happy clapping
Re: Robertson
You are correct, in Jan 2017 Liverpool weren't looking to sign and the other line to include is that Hull weren't looking to sell him to Burnley as confirmed by CT. I think at the time Robertson was disappointed the deal fell through and the experts on here or CM were saying he wasn't good enough.joey13 wrote:Liverpool weren’t looking to sign him in Jan 2017 he signed for them in July 2017
Like I said, no stick on this one.
-
- Posts: 67869
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32528 times
- Has Liked: 5276 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Robertson
Here you are
http://www.uptheclarets.com/robertson-w ... he-clarets" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.uptheclarets.com/robertson-w ... he-clarets" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These 2 users liked this post: FactualFrank NL Claret
-
- Posts: 10323
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3340 times
- Has Liked: 1959 times
Re: Robertson
Were we not linked with him in the following window as well?
Before Liverpool came in for him?
Before Liverpool came in for him?
-
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1699 times
- Has Liked: 790 times
Re: Robertson
.......and wasn't Coleman of Everton not on trial with us. Imagine him and Robertson as our two full backs
-
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1465 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Robertson
Do you think that Adam fancied Eve? What if Eve could not conceive, and he'd had to breed with with Steve, we'd all be gay.
Re: Robertson
Some on here are trying to find out if Dyche or the board are at fault for this.Goobs wrote:Do you think that Adam fancied Eve? What if Eve could not conceive, and he'd had to breed with with Steve, we'd all be gay.
-
- Posts: 4402
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1465 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: Robertson
Aye and some on here just want to bitch whine and moan without any clue what they are talking about or having any facts about the subject they are talking about.NL Claret wrote:Some on here are trying to find out if Dyche or the board are at fault for this.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
Re: Robertson
Just read the papers it’s really not that difficultSteve-Harpers-perm wrote:You know this for a fact? Lucky you being privy to players transfer talks.
-
- Posts: 10168
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4188 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: Robertson
Fine line between thick / stupid and naive
-
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 445 times
- Has Liked: 187 times
- Location: Manchester
Re: Robertson
Signing players is not like going into a shop and buying a bag of carrots
Re: Robertson
Rumours at the time were that Silva had said he'd quit if Robertson was sold in that January window.
-
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:58 am
- Been Liked: 2325 times
- Has Liked: 2696 times
- Location: Isles of Scilly
Re: Robertson
unless you were buying Leon Cort.Down_Rover wrote:Signing players is not like going into a shop and buying a bag of carrots
Re: Robertson
Last season Ward was playing brilliantly at times so would we have been much better off had we signed Robertson?
No guarantee.
No guarantee.
-
- Posts: 13262
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
- Been Liked: 5101 times
- Has Liked: 5168 times
- Location: Montpellier, France
Re: Robertson
I think that may have been as far back as when Cotterill was in charge. IIRC he was injured during his trial period and consequently had to go back to Ireland.warksclaret wrote:.......and wasn't Coleman of Everton not on trial with us. Imagine him and Robertson as our two full backs
Sometimes fate plays a part in these matters.
Re: Robertson
Ben Mee was also playing brilliantly at times but whilst there are still no guarantees I reckon we would be better off is we had signed Van Dyke !!Spijed wrote:Last season Ward was playing brilliantly at times so would we have been much better off had we signed Robertson?
No guarantee.
To answer your question seriously yes I doubt very much we would have finished higher than 7th with Robertson but we would have been a better team. As for this season if he was in our team now my guess would be that we would have more points....and looking for a new left back in January as one of the big teams sign him for £40m !
All immaterial - not sure the club did a lot wrong. Players choice to not join us and looks like he made a fantastic decision !!
Re: Robertson
I said we should sign him. He was light years ahead of Brady and still is. Many, many light years ahead of Taylor.NL Claret wrote:You are correct, in Jan 2017 Liverpool weren't looking to sign and the other line to include is that Hull weren't looking to sell him to Burnley as confirmed by CT. I think at the time Robertson was disappointed the deal fell through and the experts on here or CM were saying he wasn't good enough.
Like I said, no stick on this one.
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:51 pm
- Been Liked: 27 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Robertson
I know haha, same with that shaqiri...board out!!!!!!Steve-Harpers-perm wrote:Yeh wonder why he wouldn’t sign for us when he knew Liverpool were also interested. So puzzling.
Re: Robertson
You haven’t read the thread have you !Longsidejono wrote:I know haha, same with that shaqiri...board out!!!!!!
It’s much better if you do before making the same wrong comment as a previous poster
-
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 11:51 pm
- Been Liked: 27 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Robertson
No your right I didn't the point of a board is about opinions on a subject if it's the same as someone else's then fair enough they obviously have a great mind like me, if you read hundreds of comments before you comment then it's a boring lifejoey13 wrote:You haven’t read the thread have you !
It’s much better if you do before making the same wrong comment as a previous poster
Re: Robertson
Best we just have OP’s then and not threadsLongsidejono wrote:No your right I didn't the point of a board is about opinions on a subject if it's the same as someone else's then fair enough they obviously have a great mind like me, if you read hundreds of comments before you comment then it's a boring life
Re: Robertson
Yes we would as Robertson was and is an infinitely better footballer. Absolute guarantee barring injury.Spijed wrote:Last season Ward was playing brilliantly at times so would we have been much better off had we signed Robertson?
No guarantee.
Re: Robertson
January 2017 was unfortunate but I would like to know what happened early in summer. I’m aware Liverpool eventually signed him but there was plenty of news about us still trying. Zero guarantee even early on personal terms would’ve been agreed given bigger interest, but it sounded to me like we couldn’t even agree a fee even with Hull having a fire sale.
Not that that surprises me in the slightest mind.
Not that that surprises me in the slightest mind.
Re: Robertson
Why did it sound like that to you?SGr wrote:January 2017 was unfortunate but I would like to know what happened early in summer. I’m aware Liverpool eventually signed him but there was plenty of news about us still trying. Zero guarantee even early on personal terms would’ve been agreed given bigger interest, but it sounded to me like we couldn’t even agree a fee even with Hull having a fire sale.
Not that that surprises me in the slightest mind.
I will put a different way for you to try and get you away from the "it must be the board's fault " mentality.
Players have agents who will be wise to other interest. If there was interest from Liverpool, it sounds to me like there was, who is the agent and player going to choose?
Re: Robertson
I quite clearly stressed that there was zero guarantee of us signing him had we agreed a fee. Learn to read.NL Claret wrote:Why did it sound like that to you?
I will put a different way for you to try and get you away from the "it must be the board's fault " mentality.
Players have agents who will be wise to other interest. If there was interest from Liverpool, it sounds to me like there was, who is the agent and player going to choose?
Regarding your question, because there were further reports of us attempting to agree a fee, from sources such as Nixon (who like it or not, is reliable). Plus Boden put his usual “wide of the mark” story out which normally means the opposite. That’s what gave me that impression, and as I implied, it wouldn’t surprise me.
Re: Robertson
SGr wrote:I quite clearly stressed that there was zero guarantee of us signing him had we agreed a fee. Learn to read.
Regarding your question, because there were further reports of us attempting to agree a fee, from sources such as Nixon (who like it or not, is reliable). Plus Boden put his usual “wide of the mark” story out which normally means the opposite. That’s what gave me that impression, and as I implied, it wouldn’t surprise me.
Not interested in hearsay or rumour. As I've said earlier there is no stick to beat the club with on Robertson.
Who would you sign for if you had the choice? Liverpool or Burnley?
Off to learn how to read.
Re: Robertson
NL Claret wrote:Not interested in hearsay or rumour. As I've said earlier there is no stick to beat the club with on Robertson.
Who would you sign for if you had the choice? Liverpool or Burnley?
Off to learn how to read.
And once again, I never said he’d have chosen to join us, merely that I believe we were trying to sign him nonetheless. Don’t see what the point of commenting on transfer talk is if you’re not interested in rumours mind
Re: Robertson
I don't see the point in having cheap digs at the board without having any facts. That's just me I guess.SGr wrote:And once again, I never said he’d have chosen to join us, merely that I believe we were trying to sign him nonetheless. Don’t see what the point of commenting on transfer talk is if you’re not interested in rumours mind
Re: Robertson
Maybe if the board made an half arsed attempt at bringing in some decent signings in the summer nobody would be making digs at the board.NL Claret wrote:I don't see the point in having cheap digs at the board without having any facts. That's just me I guess.
Just a thought
Now the players are taking a leaf out of the boards book and not bothering about trying to do the basics in a game
Just another thought
Re: Robertson
I’ll stop having cheap digs at the board when the board stops having *cheap* digs at transfer targetsNL Claret wrote:I don't see the point in having cheap digs at the board without having any facts. That's just me I guess.
Re: Robertson
Start a thread " cheap digs at the board " rather than using one about a player that we almost once signed and due to circumstances beyond our control we didn't and now he plays for Liverpool.
Re: Robertson
Nah thanks, think the people on here would rather talk about Tommy Robinson than our boardNL Claret wrote:Start a thread " cheap digs at the board " rather than using one about a player that we almost once signed and due to circumstances beyond our control we didn't and now he plays for Liverpool.
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: Robertson
You'd be better off banging your head against a wallNL Claret wrote:Why did it sound like that to you?
I will put a different way for you to try and get you away from the "it must be the board's fault " mentality.