2nd Goal

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
CombatClaret
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1825 times
Has Liked: 930 times

2nd Goal

Post by CombatClaret » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:44 pm

https://twitter.com/ManCityzens_com/sta ... 4715808768" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

BTSport say Sane dives, should be FK to us.
Ref puts whistle to lips, players start appealing.
Ball goes out of play.
Silva crosses out of play ball from an offside position.

:roll: :roll: :roll:
We were outclassed but what kind of officiating is this?!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:51 pm

Almost as bad as our defending. And the moment that killed the game.
This user liked this post: BOYSIE31

joey13
Posts: 7505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by joey13 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:51 pm

What kind of schoolboy defending was that
This user liked this post: BOYSIE31

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:53 pm

Replay I saw ball looks like it was in play. It may look out but all it needs to be still in play is the very edge of the ball to be over hanging the very edge of the byline. 99% of the ball can be over the line but still its in play (just look at corners nowadays to the naked eye the ball always looks outside the quadrant

Unless MOTD freeze frames it and gives us an angle like they do for the goal line decisions I dont think you can say either way. In the spirit of the game im sure the benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking team so fair goal and only ourselves to blame. Just thankful we've done it in a game we were gonna lose anyhow

Melbourneclaret
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:05 am
Been Liked: 44 times
Has Liked: 31 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Melbourneclaret » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:55 pm

Yeah but you play until the whistle. Why did they all stop???
This user liked this post: k90bfc

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:56 pm

Dedinitely out. But even so it was our own fault. and we were in the game at that point.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:56 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Replay I saw ball looks like it was in play.
The bods on Radio Lancs say they've seen the replay and it's completely out of play.

Spijed
Posts: 17122
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 2895 times
Has Liked: 1294 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Spijed » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:57 pm

Sane is a cheat anyway. Does it every match, with his diving and trying to get players booked.

The Guardiola will come out with the rubbish that his players need protection.
These 2 users liked this post: Spike MT03ALG

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:59 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:The bods on Radio Lancs say they've seen the replay and it's completely out of play.
I've seen the replay as well and it looks out if youre not thinking of it in the terms ive described. The replay doesnt show it side on or from directly above so you cannot say for sure.

Im 60-40 it was still in but it needs some proper analysis with the right freeze frames and camera angles

IanMcL
Posts: 30315
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6363 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by IanMcL » Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:59 pm

Melbourneclaret wrote:Yeah but you play until the whistle. Why did they all stop???
Because ref put whistle in his mouth to blow, then didn't.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:01 pm

IanMcL wrote:Because ref put whistle in his mouth to blow, then didn't.
Refs do this a lot and our players shouldn't be looking at the ref they should be looking at the ball. If this would have happened up the other end you would not be blaming the ref over the Man City defence

IanMcL
Posts: 30315
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6363 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by IanMcL » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:04 pm

But it didn't! Man City fans would do their job, if that was the case!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:10 pm

If we were through on goal we wouldnt (at least I hope we wouldnt) stop until the whistle went. It was shocking defending. But still doesnt excuse the shocking reffing and awful cheating!!! (again from City)
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

Goody1975
Posts: 2901
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 987 times
Has Liked: 264 times
Location: Burnley

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Goody1975 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:21 pm

As Silva is offside the ball being in or out of play is completely irrelevant.
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG Spike

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:21 pm

Game after game we are conceding goals from either crosses coming into our box because we are defending narrow and not getting out to shut the crosser down quickly enough or not getting out quickly enough to close the ball down at the edge of the box.

It's no coincidence that opposing teams are on a game to game basis playing the ball down the flanks and swinging cross after cross into our box.

How many have we conceded with either of those two issues mentioned above this season? 80%?

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:25 pm

Absolutely irrelevant that the referee put the whistle to his mouth. The players should be watching the ball and not the referee. It was amateur defending and was painful viewing. The ball didn't look to go out of play to me although I'd be interested to see a better replay. Likewise, I haven't seen a replay that shows that Sane dived but if he did then the referee should of course have stopped play and shown Sane a yellow card.

Edit - we lost our heads during that goal and in the aftermath and City duly punished us with a third goal when we were still all over the place. Shame, because up until then I thought we'd given a good account of ourselves.

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Reecey1987 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:29 pm

Rileybobs wrote:Absolutely irrelevant that the referee put the whistle to his mouth. The players should be watching the ball and not the referee. It was amateur defending and was painful viewing. The ball didn't look to go out of play to me although I'd be interested to see a better replay. Likewise, I haven't seen a replay that shows that Sane dived but if he did then the referee should of course have stopped play and shown Sane a yellow card.

Edit - we lost our heads during that goal and in the aftermath and City duly punished us with a third goal when we were still all over the place. Shame, because up until then I thought we'd given a good account of ourselves.
Looks out of play to me
Attachments
IMG_20181020_172819.jpg
IMG_20181020_172819.jpg (70.92 KiB) Viewed 4979 times

deanothedino
Posts: 1507
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
Been Liked: 695 times
Has Liked: 297 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by deanothedino » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:30 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Replay I saw ball looks like it was in play. It may look out but all it needs to be still in play is the very edge of the ball to be over hanging the very edge of the byline. 99% of the ball can be over the line but still its in play (just look at corners nowadays to the naked eye the ball always looks outside the quadrant

Unless MOTD freeze frames it and gives us an angle like they do for the goal line decisions I dont think you can say either way. In the spirit of the game im sure the benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking team so fair goal and only ourselves to blame. Just thankful we've done it in a game we were gonna lose anyhow
This, from what I've seen the ball was definitely in play because the whole ball has to be out - not just the bit in contact with the grass.

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:31 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:Looks out of play to me
Sorry, but that angle is in no way conclusive.
This user liked this post: Spike

taio
Posts: 11620
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3240 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by taio » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:31 pm

Reecey1987 wrote:Looks out of play to me
can't tell from that angle if whole ball was out

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:32 pm

I actually thought Silva was miles offside before crossing the ball as the ball came off Sane when he was challenged

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Reecey1987 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:33 pm

Im sure somebody will find a better angle

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:37 pm

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:I actually thought Silva was miles offside before crossing the ball as the ball came off Sane when he was challenged
Thats the most contentious part of it all in my opinion. I've not seen a replay that has a wide enough view to show all the players in one shot but reckon that could be the bit the linesman really screwed up

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by SGr » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:39 pm

Nobody to blame but ourselves. Should be well aware you can’t rely on officials without VAR, dreadful defending

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1447 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by piston broke » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:41 pm

Stream I had it on showed view from behind the goalline. Looked more in than out but why was Cork in casting for the Easter play, cross scene? He was expecting the pen and he’s looking pleading to Moss.

Claretmatt4
Posts: 3946
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
Been Liked: 1049 times
Has Liked: 723 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Claretmatt4 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:42 pm

Course you can there's green under the ball so unless it was mid air (was it?) then it has to be fully overthe line

Rileybobs
Posts: 16844
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 6951 times
Has Liked: 1479 times
Location: Leeds

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Rileybobs » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:44 pm

Claretmatt4 wrote:Course you can there's green under the ball so unless it was mid air (was it?) then it has to be fully overthe line
Not true. The part of the ball that is in contact with the ground does not account for the entire circumference of the ball.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:44 pm

Out of play or not / offside or not / our players not playing to the whistle - all irrelevant.
The game should have been stopped and a free kick to us and Sane booked for diving - he’s a f’in disgrace is that cheating c-unt but will just carry on doing it as no reason for him to stop.
These 2 users liked this post: longsidepies MT03ALG

claretspice
Posts: 5724
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2829 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by claretspice » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:46 pm

I thought it was possibly out and probably offside. But Cork's reaction makes me think it was probably a pen too (he's protesting a but too much, too soon) and in any event the problem doesnt arise if either one of 6 outfield Burnley defenders does the basics, or if Hart doesnt needlessly take himself out of the game.

If ive a real gripe with the officials today, its for thr fsct Kompany wasn't sent off after 90 seconds. Hit Lennon with force, studs up, on the inside of the Knee. If its Mee on De Bruyne, Pep goes ballistic.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:55 pm

TVC15 wrote:Out of play or not / offside or not / our players not playing to the whistle - all irrelevant.
The game should have been stopped and a free kick to us and Sane booked for diving - he’s a f’in disgrace is that cheating c-unt but will just carry on doing it as no reason for him to stop.
Totally disagree, the way Sane goes down it doesnt look like a dive to me. Looks like he lost his footing or more likely got caught and lost his footing. Whether the contact was enough for a pen im not sure but you can go down without it being a foul or a dive

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:06 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Totally disagree, the way Sane goes down it doesnt look like a dive to me. Looks like he lost his footing or more likely got caught and lost his footing. Whether the contact was enough for a pen im not sure but you can go down without it being a foul or a dive
Aye cos Sane is such an honest player who never dives - he fully deserves your benefit of the doubt
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

Hibsclaret
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 1239 times
Has Liked: 491 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Hibsclaret » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:07 pm

TVC15 wrote:Aye cos Sane is such an honest player who never dives - he fully deserves your benefit of the doubt
Totally irrelevant as always

joey13
Posts: 7505
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1767 times
Has Liked: 1230 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by joey13 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:07 pm

Arguing over if the ball was out , we lost 5-0

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:13 pm

TVC15 wrote:Aye cos Sane is such an honest player who never dives - he fully deserves your benefit of the doubt
Im not giving him any benefit of the doubt im talking about the replay I have seen. The other bit of your post is just stupid

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:24 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Im not giving him any benefit of the doubt im talking about the replay I have seen. The other bit of your post is just stupid
Why is it stupid to call out a player who has been shown to clearly dive / cheat several times in his career.

Just because you think he did not dive does not mean you are correct.

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:29 pm

TVC15 wrote:Why is it stupid to call out a player who has been shown to clearly dive / cheat several times in his career.

Just because you think he did not dive does not mean you are correct.
So you'd be happy for refs to give decisions against Barnes just cos he dives and cheats a lot? Id rather decisions were made on the actual events and not on peoples opinion of someones character but if you dont then fair enough we just have to disagree

morpheus2
Posts: 1577
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 761 times
Has Liked: 1850 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by morpheus2 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 6:56 pm

Looks like our defenders claim they heard the whistle blow to me.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Burnley1989 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:01 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:Replay I saw ball looks like it was in play. It may look out but all it needs to be still in play is the very edge of the ball to be over hanging the very edge of the byline. 99% of the ball can be over the line but still its in play (just look at corners nowadays to the naked eye the ball always looks outside the quadrant

Unless MOTD freeze frames it and gives us an angle like they do for the goal line decisions I dont think you can say either way. In the spirit of the game im sure the benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking team so fair goal and only ourselves to blame. Just thankful we've done it in a game we were gonna lose anyhow

Ffs hahaha I’m glad you’ve said that as I now understand why you post so much shite

Down_Rover
Posts: 1752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
Been Liked: 445 times
Has Liked: 187 times
Location: Manchester

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Down_Rover » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:06 pm

morpheus2 wrote:Looks like our defenders claim they heard the whistle blow to me.
I was very close. I thought the ref blew his whistle. He pointed to what I initially thought was the spot but now I think he gave a goal kick, thinking the ball was out of play

Looked like it didn’t cross the line to me but I thought he blew and I thought Silva was offside

And it killed the game. We were hanging in with occasional attacks that threatened
This user liked this post: MT03ALG

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:47 pm

Devils_Advocate wrote:So you'd be happy for refs to give decisions against Barnes just cos he dives and cheats a lot? Id rather decisions were made on the actual events and not on peoples opinion of someones character but if you dont then fair enough we just have to disagree
Stop talking sh-it and trying to be clever. I never said that.
I think he dived today - just like he has dived and cheated many times before. Is that ok with you ?

T-it

Devils_Advocate
Posts: 12366
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
Been Liked: 5209 times
Has Liked: 921 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Devils_Advocate » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:52 pm

TVC15 wrote:Stop talking sh-it and trying to be clever. I never said that.
I think he dived today - just like he has dived and cheated many times before. Is that ok with you ?

T-it
Yes thats fine and I think he didnt. It was you who made stuff up about me giving him the benefit of the doubt and bringing his reputation as a cheat into the discussion.
You think he dived and as I originally said based on what ive seen I dont think he did. You could have just left it at that in the first place

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:02 pm

If I want to bring in his reputation as a cheat into the discussion I will - for someone who posts so much f’in sh-ite on this board you are hardly in a position to tell people what they should post.

The guy is a cheat and he should have been sent off when he had a tantrum and swiped out at Lowton - that should have been his second booking.

As for bringing Barnes into the debate and calling him a diver and a cheat as you have done - when as he ever dived and tried to get a penalty. When has he actually ever dived outside the area ?
Feel free to post the footage to substantiate why you are slagging off one of the players for the team you support
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

Spike
Posts: 2701
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 597 times
Has Liked: 1237 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Spike » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:12 pm

If you gave the folk of Shameless countless millions they would still be ****. City are the same amazing players countless brass but still cheat.

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:12 pm

Well there you go chaps

That critical 2nd goal was a diving, offside, out of play goal that could have been stopped at any point in those three instances, but wasnt
Last edited by THEWELLERNUT70 on Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
These 3 users liked this post: ElectroClaret MT03ALG SussexDon1inIreland

IanMcL
Posts: 30315
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6363 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by IanMcL » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:19 pm

Yes those in denial earlier, insisting on blaming our lads, should bow their heads and be quiet for a day.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

Tall Paul
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by Tall Paul » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:30 pm

Just seen it again. Joke of a goal that killed off any chance we had of getting anything from the game.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by TVC15 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:30 pm

Wish they would have analysed Sane’s dive more. Why did he go down like that if he was not caught ?
I am assuming he was not caught as they would have shown that and said it should have been a penalty - kind of justifying the second mistake (or just rewards etc)

Pretty fair analysis on MOTD and not even a debate as to whether the goal should have stood or not - they all agreed it should not.
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland

THEWELLERNUT70
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:13 pm
Been Liked: 1032 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by THEWELLERNUT70 » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:32 pm

How asleep was the linesman (Hart said in the linesmans apology ) to have missed Silva going off the pitch and coming back on 5 yards offside and the ball being half a yard out of play
This user liked this post: Spike

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17935
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4068 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Oct 20, 2018 11:49 pm

IanMcL wrote:Yes those in denial earlier, insisting on blaming our lads, should bow their heads and be quiet for a day.
But, of course, they won't be.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67804
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32409 times
Has Liked: 5273 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: 2nd Goal

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:46 am

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:How asleep was the linesman (Hart said in the linesmans apology ) to have missed Silva going off the pitch and coming back on 5 yards offside and the ball being half a yard out of play
It is as bad a decision as I've seen from an assistant all season because it really isn't close. And if he really has told Joe Hart that he's switched off, that's absolutely ridiculous. And in any case, the game should have been stopped for the dive.
These 3 users liked this post: TVC15 longsidepies SussexDon1inIreland

Post Reply