25 goals conceded...

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
scouseclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

25 goals conceded...

Post by scouseclaret » Sat Nov 03, 2018 7:22 pm

...in 11 games this season. Last season, it took us until the last game of February to concede that many.

A shocking and inexplicable deterioration.

Flat Stanley
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 60 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Flat Stanley » Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:34 pm

Mee been poor all season although played well today by all accounts. Tarks good most of season but poor last two games, playing with an injury all season and needs a break to get it sorted properly. Lowton poor most of the season but Bardsley starting ahead of him earlier on was not the answer. Taylor gradually improving but has taken time. Hart coming in may have upset the apple cart a bit. Gibson injured since arrival. Just a mess. Hopefully things will settle down. Midfield has offered little protection this season as well which to me is probably the biggest problem.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:09 pm

Do not come on here with your negative stats. You’ll be jumped upon and abused.

taio
Posts: 11620
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3240 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by taio » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:14 pm

scouseclaret wrote:...in 11 games this season. Last season, it took us until the last game of February to concede that many.

A shocking and inexplicable deterioration.
It's certainly a worry. Until we can start retaining the ball we will have a problem.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:16 pm

We didn’t retain the ball much last season......

Claretforever
Posts: 2935
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 508 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Claretforever » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:19 pm

I think we attacked sides more last season. Okay, today when we attacked we got punished, but that second half was far better than what we’ve served up recently, and if we show some intent then the opposition has to defend at times rather than camp in our half!

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by MACCA » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:22 pm

To be fair it's not as many as Fulham

We are playing against teams who have spent millions of pounds assembling their squads.

We had our best season for many a decade last season, it doesn't matter if we Conceeded 4 a game for the next 10 games, we've come very far in the last 6 years alone, never mind the dark days of the 80's and 90's.

In Dyche We Trust

HunterST_BFC
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 1402 times
Has Liked: 2692 times
Location: varied

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by HunterST_BFC » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:26 pm

Anyone else missing Arfield ?

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10309
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3337 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:35 pm

Anyone else missing an organised defence?
This user liked this post: HunterST_BFC

Joe14
Posts: 1184
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:43 pm
Been Liked: 252 times
Has Liked: 49 times
Location: Burnley

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Joe14 » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:38 pm

All the defences fault according to the masses. Hart on the other hand is suddenly a saint.
These 2 users liked this post: Bordeauxclaret HunterST_BFC

HunterST_BFC
Posts: 3656
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
Been Liked: 1402 times
Has Liked: 2692 times
Location: varied

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by HunterST_BFC » Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:01 pm

We signed Hart with good reason apparently after a calf strain to Heaton - as Hart would not take another loan.
SD clearly decided signing Hart was better than turning to other fit in house options.
(I wish had kept faith with what he had available at the time... even a younster)

Heaton was fit - a minor calf injury - yet deemed fit enough to sit on the bench two weeks later.
If this isn't going to p iss off Heaton and our other keepers and probably other players..... it is?

Buggering around with team selections in the Europ' L' - didn't help either imho.
Popes' injury had a massive effect in some thinking...
Panic.
Truth is we shopped bargain basement all summer in other areas on the pitch. etc etc etc

SD was left short in all the areas everyone knew about. Keeper just being bad luck.
SD hasn't got many option to change it really.

We are Burnley I know but surely we should have got better deals done over the summer.
This user liked this post: HiroshimaClaret

scouseclaret
Posts: 2601
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by scouseclaret » Sun Nov 04, 2018 12:25 am

MACCA wrote:To be fair it's not as many as Fulham

We are playing against teams who have spent millions of pounds assembling their squads.

We had our best season for many a decade last season, it doesn't matter if we Conceeded 4 a game for the next 10 games, we've come very far in the last 6 years alone, never mind the dark days of the 80's and 90's.

In Dyche We Trust
We’ve been playing against teams with billion-pound squads for most of the past five years without ever getting thumped - now all of a sudden we’re getting thumped on a regular basis. Not sure conceding less than Fulham makes it alright!

Don’t get me wrong, this is not any sort of anti-Dyche thread. I’m just genuinely bemused by it.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

HiroshimaClaret
Posts: 3221
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 927 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by HiroshimaClaret » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:05 am

HunterST_BFC wrote:We signed Hart with good reason apparently after a calf strain to Heaton - as Hart would not take another loan.
SD clearly decided signing Hart was better than turning to other fit in house options.
(I wish had kept faith with what he had available at the time... even a younster)

Heaton was fit - a minor calf injury - yet deemed fit enough to sit on the bench two weeks later.
If this isn't going to p iss off Heaton and our other keepers and probably other players..... it is?

Buggering around with team selections in the Europ' L' - didn't help either imho.
Popes' injury had a massive effect in some thinking...
Panic.
Truth is we shopped bargain basement all summer in other areas on the pitch. etc etc etc

SD was left short in all the areas everyone knew about. Keeper just being bad luck.
SD hasn't got many option to change it really.

We are Burnley I know but surely we should have got better deals done over the summer.
Concur greatly but can`t with `SD was left short in all the areas`
I fear Dyche leaves himself short with his apparent need for a `certain type of player with the correct `ethic`.

Granny WeatherWax
Posts: 2785
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
Been Liked: 711 times
Has Liked: 88 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Granny WeatherWax » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:08 am

Correct

kaptin1
Posts: 1601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by kaptin1 » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:44 am

Historically, when being attacked, we always played with a very narrow back four (covering the width of the penalty area) with the two wide midfielders dropping into the full back positions to effectively make it a back six. This, with two/three midfielders sitting in front, made us very hard to break down.

Now, it seems to me that the wide midfielders don’t do this to the same extent meaning the back four is more spread out thus creating more gaps and isolating our full backs. Yesterday, Taylor and Mee coped reasonably well with this, but Tarkowski and Lowton were constantly exposed and all over the place.

The other problem is a complete lack of confidence on the ball. Players invariable taking the easy option, either a square ball or a back pass, and when it does go forward it tends to be hopeful long balls rather than incisive passes. Defour adds quality in this respect, but he can’t do it all on his own.

We need to get back to basics and being hard to beat. A few clean sheets will build confidence and then we can progress from there.

Playing a consistent first eleven would also help, instead of the constant chopping and changing. Personally, I think we need to drop Lennon (who is probably better suited to being an impact sub when players are tiring) and bring in Brady. We also need to get an extra man in midfield until things stabilise, so bringing in Hendrick. I’d also go with Wood up front ... yes he can seem like a passenger for a lot of the game, but he is probably more likely to nick a goal than any other player we have and his confidence isn’t going to rebuild if he is sat on the bench.

HiroshimaClaret
Posts: 3221
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 927 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by HiroshimaClaret » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:49 am

kaptin1 wrote:Historically, when being attacked, we always played with a very narrow back four (covering the width of the penalty area) with the two wide midfielders dropping into the full back positions to effectively make it a back six. This, with two/three midfielders sitting in front, made us very hard to break down.

Now, it seems to me that the wide midfielders don’t do this to the same extent meaning the back four is more spread out thus creating more gaps and isolating our full backs. Yesterday, Taylor and Mee coped reasonably well with this, but Tarkowski and Lowton were constantly exposed and all over the place.

The other problem is a complete lack of confidence on the ball. Players invariable taking the easy option, either a square ball or a back pass, and when it does go forward it tends to be hopeful long balls rather than incisive passes. Defour adds quality in this respect, but he can’t do it all on his own.

We need to get back to basics and being hard to beat. A few clean sheets will build confidence and then we can progress from there.

Playing a consistent first eleven would also help, instead of the constant chopping and changing. Personally, I think we need to drop Lennon (who is probably better suited to being an impact sub when players are tiring) and bring in Brady. We also need to get an extra man in midfield until things stabilise, so bringing in Hendrick. I’d also go with Wood up front ... yes he can seem like a passenger for a lot of the game, but he is probably more likely to nick a goal than any other player we have and his confidence isn’t going to rebuild if he is sat on the bench.
Hard to argue with that. Defour with 1 or 2 others in the midfield?

claretspice
Posts: 5724
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2829 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by claretspice » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:09 am

kaptin1 wrote:Historically, when being attacked, we always played with a very narrow back four (covering the width of the penalty area) with the two wide midfielders dropping into the full back positions to effectively make it a back six. This, with two/three midfielders sitting in front, made us very hard to break down.

Now, it seems to me that the wide midfielders don’t do this to the same extent meaning the back four is more spread out thus creating more gaps and isolating our full backs. Yesterday, Taylor and Mee coped reasonably well with this, but Tarkowski and Lowton were constantly exposed and all over the place.

The other problem is a complete lack of confidence on the ball. Players invariable taking the easy option, either a square ball or a back pass, and when it does go forward it tends to be hopeful long balls rather than incisive passes. Defour adds quality in this respect, but he can’t do it all on his own.

We need to get back to basics and being hard to beat. A few clean sheets will build confidence and then we can progress from there.

Playing a consistent first eleven would also help, instead of the constant chopping and changing. Personally, I think we need to drop Lennon (who is probably better suited to being an impact sub when players are tiring) and bring in Brady. We also need to get an extra man in midfield until things stabilise, so bringing in Hendrick. I’d also go with Wood up front ... yes he can seem like a passenger for a lot of the game, but he is probably more likely to nick a goal than any other player we have and his confidence isn’t going to rebuild if he is sat on the bench.
I'm not sure if I completely agree with the view that the wide midfielders are necessarily the problem. JBG and Lennon are both very diligent defensively (as is Brady when he plays), although I do think Lennon occasionally switches off (understandably; he's spent the majority of his career in successful teams who spend a lot less time defending) and I don't think any of them are as good tactically as Boyd and Arfield were - its not just a question of tracking back to double up with the full back, its knowing when to step in and supplement the central midfield too.

But there's no question there's a general problem with larger spaces between players defensively. I'd actually hold our central midfield responsible for this to a large extent - we don't look to me as coherent in there, and that's causing us problems with and without the ball. In the last 3 games, we've had Defour back - which I think was being seen as a panacea, but whilst in time he'll come good, at the minute he's still getting back to the pace of the Premier League and without the ball in particular that is being exposed.

To me, its a combination of factors - a bit of form, the odd injury, both of which have generally hit confidence, perhaps the distraction of Europe and a general come-down from the success of last season, plus a bit of a change in personnel, especially in midfield, which we haven't quite adapted to. I think the other big aspect is the lack of outballs and the ability to take the pressure of ourselves this season - whether due to pace in the channels, or quality on the ball, or players good at buying time with their back to goal (Arfield, Barnes).

The good news is that we seem fairly potent going forwards. I imagine this will be a tough week of hard graft on the training pitch, doing lots and lots of defensive drilling. The players and management will be hurting, we can guarantee that much.

Burnley1989
Posts: 7389
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
Been Liked: 2293 times
Has Liked: 2166 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Burnley1989 » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:15 am

Joe14 wrote:All the defences fault according to the masses. Hart on the other hand is suddenly a saint.

How many goals has Hart been at fault for?

Mala591
Posts: 1889
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:02 pm
Been Liked: 684 times
Has Liked: 429 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Mala591 » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:36 am

I agree that far too many gaps in central midfield is the most urgent problem at the moment. SD has:

Cork, Defour, Hendrick, Westwood and possibly McNeil and a solution might be to try three players in central midfield in a 4-1-4-1 lineup with a holding player in front of the back four e.g.

-----Cork
Defour Hendrick

----Westwood
Defour-----Cork

---Defour
Cork---McNeil

Personally I quite like the last option suggested.

Over to you claretspice for your comments.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 8128
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3078 times
Has Liked: 5042 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by Colburn_Claret » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:41 am

Its never one thing, always a combination of many things.

I can still remember Dyches first game, after conceding so many goals under Eddie Howe, and the thing that stood out from the very first minute, was that you could put a set square across the pitch and the back 4 were in a perfect line. The 4 across the middle when we lost the ball were in a perfect line also.
That morphed into the full backs pulling in narrower as we fell back and the wingers replacing them as the acting fullbacks. It worked because we were so organised at it, we left the opposition few options, no matter how much possession they had. We had players covering the shots to the inside of the post, giving them the free option of shooting straight at the keeper from outside the area.

Where has it gone wrong... all over the place. The back line is often caught out of shape, mainly because we give the ball away in the wrong area of the pitch. We knock the ball long and lose it in their half, we have time to set up the defence. When we fanny about with the ball along the back line and get caught, we are knackered. We all want to see possession football, and passing it along the back is part of that, but the lack of nous in our players to understand that there is a time to play the pass, and then there is a time to put it in row Z is amazing, especially at the level we are.

The second part is why are we getting caught in possession, and that lies in the fact we are so poor at showing for the ball. Our wide men tend to be static and therefore easily marked. The front man/men are similar static. If the opposition outnumber us in the middle we have no options going forward. You can see, especially watching the better teams, that players are never stood still, even if its just to move your marker around, and the best balls aren't played to the man, they are played into space for the man to run onto. We do have players that can play the pass, but not always the players to read the pass. That works the other way round as well because some of our players can't see the pass into space when it's on.

We have had glimpses over the last two seasons that we can "put it together", and when we do we look brilliant, but it is far too rare. Injuries and team changes haven't helped this season. Defensively we need to get back to basics, really back to basics. With Defour and Brady back and Hendrick and JBG we have players that can knock the ball around, but they need to stay fit, and play every minute until they start to play as a unit. Only then will we see if we have a team good enough to stay up.

karatekid
Posts: 3139
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 1108 times
Has Liked: 318 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by karatekid » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:46 am

Makes me laugh when people talk about the poor transfer window and buying players from lower leagues then we pine over players like Boyd and Arfield.
We need progression not regression or stagnation. ( and no, they are not Italian players ) ;)

claretspice
Posts: 5724
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 2829 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: 25 goals conceded...

Post by claretspice » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:48 am

Colburn_Claret wrote:Its never one thing, always a combination of many things.

I can still remember Dyches first game, after conceding so many goals under Eddie Howe, and the thing that stood out from the very first minute, was that you could put a set square across the pitch and the back 4 were in a perfect line. The 4 across the middle when we lost the ball were in a perfect line also.
That morphed into the full backs pulling in narrower as we fell back and the wingers replacing them as the acting fullbacks. It worked because we were so organised at it, we left the opposition few options, no matter how much possession they had. We had players covering the shots to the inside of the post, giving them the free option of shooting straight at the keeper from outside the area.

Where has it gone wrong... all over the place. The back line is often caught out of shape, mainly because we give the ball away in the wrong area of the pitch. We knock the ball long and lose it in their half, we have time to set up the defence. When we fanny about with the ball along the back line and get caught, we are knackered. We all want to see possession football, and passing it along the back is part of that, but the lack of nous in our players to understand that there is a time to play the pass, and then there is a time to put it in row Z is amazing, especially at the level we are.

The second part is why are we getting caught in possession, and that lies in the fact we are so poor at showing for the ball. Our wide men tend to be static and therefore easily marked. The front man/men are similar static. If the opposition outnumber us in the middle we have no options going forward. You can see, especially watching the better teams, that players are never stood still, even if its just to move your marker around, and the best balls aren't played to the man, they are played into space for the man to run onto. We do have players that can play the pass, but not always the players to read the pass. That works the other way round as well because some of our players can't see the pass into space when it's on.

We have had glimpses over the last two seasons that we can "put it together", and when we do we look brilliant, but it is far too rare. Injuries and team changes haven't helped this season. Defensively we need to get back to basics, really back to basics. With Defour and Brady back and Hendrick and JBG we have players that can knock the ball around, but they need to stay fit, and play every minute until they start to play as a unit. Only then will we see if we have a team good enough to stay up.
I think that's a pretty bang on summary. A lot of our problem derives from the fact that when we successfully deal with opponent's attack, we're struggling to do anything next. Going back to Dyche's first two Burnley teams, we often had Ings and then Gray running the channels and giving us a bit of an outlet into wide areas. Wood gave us that a bit last season too. Defour and Cork at their best gave us another avenue, by being good at holding onto the ball in midfield areas. Arfield and to a lesser extent Boyd were also good at keeping the ball under pressure and protecting it.

Certainly against Chelsea, we didn't have that - Vokes is a fine target man and I'm a hgue fan, but he's pretty static and at his best getting the ball and linking the game quickly, which requires support. He's not good at holding the ball for long periods with his back to goal (Barnes is better, and it might get him a gig next Saturday). Brady wasn't match sharp and JBG is OK at holding the ball, but no better. The midfield and the rest of the team was pretty one paced, so we weren't set up to absorb the game for long periods because we couldn't get a breather.

Post Reply