Wolves vs Spurs
-
- Posts: 8369
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2977 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
Wolves vs Spurs
Wolves just scored their second penalty to pull it back to 2-3 with
quarter of an hour to go.
quarter of an hour to go.
-
- Posts: 8023
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2819 times
- Has Liked: 503 times
- Location: Earth
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Good
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2018 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 261 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Wolves should be 6th. No excuses at all.
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Imagine if Wolves could finish, build up play and chance creation is excellent.
If they’d put 6 past I wouldn’t have been able to complain.
If they’d put 6 past I wouldn’t have been able to complain.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Easy. They'll just spend £100 million in January. You do not need any skill at all when you have the money. They could save money on sacking the manager and employing Postman Pat. They'd still be fully expected to finish AT LEAST 7th.SGr wrote:Imagine if Wolves could finish, build up play and chance creation is excellent.
If they’d put 6 past I wouldn’t have been able to complain.
-
- Posts: 2787
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 3:20 pm
- Been Liked: 711 times
- Has Liked: 88 times
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
FactualFrank wrote:Easy. They'll just spend £100 million in January. You do not need any skill at all when you have the money. They could save money on sacking the manager and employing Postman Pat. They'd still be fully expected to finish AT LEAST 7th.
Fulham
This user liked this post: DomBFC1882
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Incredible amount of bitterness I sense in this post. Not true either, you need skill to spend money wisely at any level. Wolves didnt pay a single transfer fee we couldn’t have afforded this year, unlike Fulham who are below us and spent more than them.FactualFrank wrote:Easy. They'll just spend £100 million in January. You do not need any skill at all when you have the money. They could save money on sacking the manager and employing Postman Pat. They'd still be fully expected to finish AT LEAST 7th.
Fact is, they’ve gone for players with pace, energy and technical ability. It’s the profile of the players that impresses me the most.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
In your opinion. Which I disagree with.SGr wrote:Incredible amount of bitterness I sense in this post. Not true either
Don't worry, I think the same about them. How they are as low as they are in beyond me. How is that actually possible?Granny WeatherWax wrote:Fulham
Both Fulham and Wolves should be battling for the top 6 and running them close.
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 232 times
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
FactualFrank wrote:
Both Fulham and Wolves should be battling for the top 6 and running them close.
Why?
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Nice try. Not falling for that one.duncandisorderly wrote:Why?
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 232 times
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
It's not a trick, I'm interested.FactualFrank wrote:Nice try. Not falling for that one.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
For all the talk about Wolves coasting the Premier League,they have now lost three on the bounce and have Arsenal at the Emirates next.
Another assist for Tripps yesterday good to see.
Another assist for Tripps yesterday good to see.
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
It helps when you have a leading football agent as the board's bedfellow I guess.SGr wrote: Wolves didnt pay a single transfer fee we couldn’t have afforded this year.
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
Absolutely. But then Forest have attempted the same this year and haven’t come close to Wolves’ level. Scouting is everything.jtv wrote:It helps when you have a leading football agent as the board's bedfellow I guess.
-
- Posts: 6141
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2635 times
- Has Liked: 6464 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
What Wolves have is agent power to get good deals for players and the club, it’s not so much about how much they spend it’s more the perception that they have an advantage by who they have involved in running the club.
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
The Kieran Trippier cross was beautiful.
As good as the goal.
As good as the goal.
Re: Wolves vs Spurs
It was a great cross for sure.IanMcL wrote:The Kieran Trippier cross was beautiful.
As good as the goal.
But trying to nutmeg the wolves player cost them a penalty and nearly cost them 2 poInts.
Tripps also at fault last week for the City goal.
His creative play going forward more than makes up for his defensive faults but have noticed that Gary Neville has been quick to point the finger at him in his commentary - jealous that Tripps got more adulation for England in 3 weeks of World Cup than Gaz did for 10 years playing for England !!
This user liked this post: IanMcL