Scott Arfield

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10310
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3337 times
Has Liked: 1954 times

Scott Arfield

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:02 pm

Interesting challenge on the Hearts keeper today.

Fretters
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:56 am
Been Liked: 1045 times
Has Liked: 549 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Fretters » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:45 pm

https://twitter.com/ByTheMinSPFL/status ... 78754?s=08" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What is he thinking?!

Vino blanco
Posts: 5363
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1978 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Vino blanco » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:48 pm

That was normal and legal in Nat Lofthouse's day.

CoolClaret
Posts: 7380
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 2235 times
Has Liked: 2135 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:53 pm

The keeper wasn't in control of the ball, he had a right to go for it.

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by MACCA » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:58 pm

Fretters wrote:https://twitter.com/ByTheMinSPFL/status ... 78754?s=08

What is he thinking?!
He clearly wasn't... and they were wining too, so hardly necessary either

Not sure on the outcome card or result wise, but certainly a challenge that ends up costing your team points.

mdd2
Posts: 6022
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 1665 times
Has Liked: 701 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by mdd2 » Sun Dec 02, 2018 2:59 pm

Is Dunne injured? Not in line up today for Hearts

thelaughingclaret
Posts: 900
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:23 pm
Been Liked: 291 times
Has Liked: 99 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by thelaughingclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 3:03 pm

Ball was on the ground, therefore he’s intitiled to go for it. It’s a foul but nothing more. Certainly not a red card.

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 832 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by IndigoLake » Sun Dec 02, 2018 3:06 pm

Far too hesitant. Should have gone in with conviction.
These 4 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets Buxtonclaret Quicknick Leisure

wilks_bfc
Posts: 11498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3181 times
Has Liked: 1865 times
Contact:

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by wilks_bfc » Sun Dec 02, 2018 3:14 pm

MACCA wrote:He clearly wasn't... and they were wining too, so hardly necessary either

Not sure on the outcome card or result wise, but certainly a challenge that ends up costing your team points.

Red card but Rangers still won 2-1

Roosterbooster
Posts: 2592
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 6:22 pm
Been Liked: 691 times
Has Liked: 362 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Roosterbooster » Sun Dec 02, 2018 3:32 pm

Why is that a red card?? I’m not sure it can be classed as dangerous. The ball was there to be won. It’s bad luck on the keepers end, but I’d say that’s an honest challenge. The ball was free. Arfield went for it. The keeper grabbed the ball just before the actual challenge. Just unlucky

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:07 pm

Exactly what we are missing.
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller

Buxtonclaret
Posts: 16727
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 3766 times
Has Liked: 7557 times
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Buxtonclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:09 pm

IndigoLake wrote:Far too hesitant. Should have gone in with conviction.

Naughty! :lol:
This user liked this post: IndigoLake

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 832 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by IndigoLake » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Buxtonclaret wrote:Naughty! :lol:
Couldn't help myself :D
This user liked this post: Buxtonclaret

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:40 pm

If Jimmy Dunne is not on every week starting he should be re- called.He can sit on our first team bench and get a few minutes each week at a better level

Quicknick
Posts: 5640
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1217 times
Has Liked: 7178 times
Location: Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Quicknick » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:41 pm

Buy him back.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 6952
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1486 times
Has Liked: 1847 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Woodleyclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:42 pm

Scott Arfield was never a Premier League player far too hesitant and dithery.The lower league up North is his true level.

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by dpinsussex » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:43 pm

Speed of "tackle", out of control, endangering the safety of his opponent.

All 3 yes. Red card all day long

EK Claret
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2018 4:00 pm
Been Liked: 18 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by EK Claret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:53 pm

Jimmy Dunne out for 6-8 weeks ankle injury, a loss for the Mighty Jam Tarts

boatshed bill
Posts: 15232
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3156 times
Has Liked: 6743 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by boatshed bill » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:55 pm

EK Claret wrote:Jimmy Dunne out for 6-8 weeks ankle injury, a loss for the Mighty Jam Tarts
Is that why they've slipped down lately?

kentonclaret
Posts: 6505
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 977 times
Has Liked: 204 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by kentonclaret » Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:42 pm

Hearts have failed to score a goal since a knee injury suffered by main striker Steven Naismith playing against Celtic in October.

Expected back mid December when results should start picking up.

Stayingup
Posts: 5602
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 8:02 pm
Been Liked: 921 times
Has Liked: 2751 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Stayingup » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:11 pm

I think we should get him back. But he wont come. We didn't offer a long enough contract to him. Unlike we did to Sam

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by bfccrazy » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:14 pm

THAT IS AN APPALING TACKLE !!!

He needs to have a word with some of the team mates he left behind here and they’ll put him straight on how to properly back out of a challenge and not challenge for a ball.

NickBFC
Posts: 1729
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:33 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 290 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by NickBFC » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:20 pm

Definite red card for me. It's dangerous, end of - ball there to be won or not. Could have easily ended up a Petr Cech like injury.

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by bfccrazy » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:29 pm

NickBFC wrote:Definite red card for me. It's dangerous, end of - ball there to be won or not. Could have easily ended up a Petr Cech like injury.
What about when keepers run into a group of played and punch for a ball away - should that also be banned?

(I’m genuinely curious as this for me is a similar situation for a player as the ball is on the ground and there to be won)

TheFamilyCat
Posts: 10899
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
Been Liked: 5553 times
Has Liked: 208 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by TheFamilyCat » Sun Dec 02, 2018 6:33 pm

bfccrazy wrote:What about when keepers run into a group of played and punch for a ball away - should that also be banned?

(I’m genuinely curious as this for me is a similar situation for a player as the ball is on the ground and there to be won)
Good question. Has there ever been a penalty given when a keeper has tried to punch the ball, missed it and right-hooked an opposition player?

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:20 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:Good question. Has there ever been a penalty given when a keeper has tried to punch the ball, missed it and right-hooked an opposition player?
Joe Hart should have given us one against WHU last season.

NickBFC
Posts: 1729
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:33 am
Been Liked: 394 times
Has Liked: 290 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by NickBFC » Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:23 pm

bfccrazy wrote:What about when keepers run into a group of played and punch for a ball away - should that also be banned?

(I’m genuinely curious as this for me is a similar situation for a player as the ball is on the ground and there to be won)
The ball was there to be won, but you can't jump in like Arfield did particularly near someone's head. If a keeper makes a clean punch which isn't dangerous then no issues. Doesn't need banning, otherwise you could ban tackles full stop. If a keeper did punch a player then I assume they would be carded? bit like an overhead kick for example, if it's too high/near a player's face then it's a free kick and possible card?

bfccrazy
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 2103 times
Has Liked: 416 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by bfccrazy » Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:23 pm

NickBFC wrote:The ball was there to be won, but you can't jump in like Arfield did particularly near someone's head. If a keeper makes a clean punch which isn't dangerous then no issues. Doesn't need banning, otherwise you could ban tackles full stop. If a keeper did punch a player then I assume they would be carded? bit like an overhead kick for example, if it's too high/near a player's face then it's a free kick and possible card?
Think we’ve all seen a keeper rush in and clean out a player or 2 in the name of clearing the ball and there is usually just a drop ball from wherever the punch lands. No card is produced as keepers have this air of protection around them in that scenario. Like when a player jumps with a keeper to head a high ball and the keeper gets a free kick.

It’s a very grey area and the Arfield challenge was nasty but if that was Arfield on the line facing the other way trying to defend a player running in to score would it be as bad a tackle or brave defending even though he’d clatter into an attacker.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by South West Claret. » Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:37 pm

Fretters wrote:https://twitter.com/ByTheMinSPFL/status ... 78754?s=08

What is he thinking?!
Clicked on your link and the page doesn't exist..help?

Pstotto
Posts: 6224
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:11 pm
Been Liked: 1024 times
Has Liked: 763 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Pstotto » Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:32 am

I think we should have given him another contract. I think his sale could be one of the reasons for our failure this season.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets piston broke

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:52 am

Pstotto wrote:I think we should have given him another contract. I think his sale could be one of the reasons for our failure this season.
agree 100%

BOYSIE31
Posts: 2357
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:46 pm
Been Liked: 264 times
Has Liked: 1112 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by BOYSIE31 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:10 pm

Awfull challenge

Im_not_Robbie_Blake
Posts: 1865
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 383 times
Has Liked: 234 times
Location: Skipton

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Im_not_Robbie_Blake » Mon Dec 03, 2018 12:46 pm

Here it is

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAsYyXFNg2E" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Leisure
Posts: 18573
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:47 pm
Been Liked: 3787 times
Has Liked: 12479 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Leisure » Mon Dec 03, 2018 1:38 pm

Definitely a red.

IanMcL
Posts: 30312
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6362 times
Has Liked: 8705 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by IanMcL » Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:25 pm

He is playing really well for the Gers.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2559
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 953 times
Has Liked: 167 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Belgianclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:10 pm

Goalie made a meal of it ;)

South West Claret.
Posts: 5642
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 766 times
Has Liked: 499 times
Location: Devon

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by South West Claret. » Mon Dec 03, 2018 7:09 pm

Im_not_Robbie_Blake wrote:Here it is

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAsYyXFNg2E" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks INRB, the only person to be given a red card should have been that over excited excuse for a commentator who ever he was.

The ball was in play - the player was entitled to go for it because the ball was in play - the ball went over the line it was a goal, book the goalkeeper for making a meal of the other player's successful attempt to get the ball over the line... and that's it end of list.

dsr
Posts: 15222
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4573 times
Has Liked: 2263 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by dsr » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:32 pm

In the modern game, if you make a genuine attempt to get the ball with a full blooded sliding challenge, but you get there half a second or so late and slide full welly into the man instead, it's a sending off. you could argue that it shouldn't be, if you like, but you'd be arguing that most of the straight reds we have seen in the last 10 years shouldn't have been red cards. The fact that he kicked the head of a goalkeeper who was holding the ball, rather than the ankle of an outfield player who had kicked the ball five yards up the field, is irrelevant.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15232
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3156 times
Has Liked: 6743 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:37 pm

Belgianclaret wrote:Goalie made a meal of it ;)

:D :D :D :D

boyyanno
Posts: 1636
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 513 times
Has Liked: 117 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by boyyanno » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:39 pm

He did pull his legs back as he slid in but the momentum took him right through.

I'd class it as dangerous so a red is fair but when you've made the decision to go for it and the ball is there to be won there's not much you can do.

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 614 times
Has Liked: 680 times

Re: Scott Arfield

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:42 pm

Be happy to see Cork, Lennon, Brady,Westwood, Defour,Mee, Lowton, Wood show the same kind of committent to the cause this season
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Post Reply