So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ElectroClaret
Posts: 18007
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4074 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by ElectroClaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:30 pm

People made their views clear at the time, but I only ask because Andy Payton on R/Lancs on Saturday (speaking at the Stanley game) was vehement in his insistence that we should have paid West Brom what they were asking, saying how even at the age of 29 we'd have still got three seasons out of him and might now be glad of his goals.

Personally, because of the poor service the forwards are currently receiving, I don't think he'd have made that much of a difference.

Should we have gone the extra millions?

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1448 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by piston broke » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:32 pm

Yes and West Brom have a £100m chance at season end so won’t be giving him away.

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Right_winger » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:35 pm

Yes because Jay rod can play the Hendrick role perfectly and has a bit of pace about him too. Not only that being a local Lad he’d give that bit extra

It’s sad that the club sold him despite him not wanting to go. Anything for that piece of silver for our board

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:38 pm

Right_winger wrote:Yes because Jay rod can play the Hendrick role perfectly and has a bit of pace about him too. Not only that being a local Lad he’d give that bit extra

It’s sad that the club sold him despite him not wanting to go. Anything for that piece of silver for our board
He didn't want to go?
Where have you dug that up from?

I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..

taio
Posts: 11638
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3244 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by taio » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:44 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:He didn't want to go?
Where have you dug that up from?

I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..
He certainly didn't push for a move
This user liked this post: ElectroClaret

moaninclaret
Posts: 747
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:19 pm
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 277 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by moaninclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:48 pm

Dont think Jay would have made any difference to any of our results, as Electro mentioned, the service to the strikers has been abysmal, a lot of hearts ruling heads as far as Jay is concerned, we wont pay the Baggies what they want so lets forget the lad now. As we all are too aware of, the board have made it very clear that they wont be splashing out much in January , certainly not the 20 odd million wanted by West Brom, i think they are resigned to relegation and dont give a toss about the players, the fans or SD. They have lined their pockets and not willing to dig into them.

jurek
Posts: 1793
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 309 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by jurek » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:55 pm

No, because I don't think one player can make the difference.
Even if we had/got Messi I don't think our problems would evaporate.

Yes, Jayrod might have made some difference but insufficient to change
things that much. It's not as if we've been close to winning games.

Now, I don't think he would come or WBA would let him leave
and we may have decided/realised that we need more than one player coming in anyway.

Hopefully Riggs and Dyche can pull something out of the hat in January
as we'll more than likely need reinforcements even if we somehow manage to get a reasonable number of
points on the board before then.

Tall Paul
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2564 times
Has Liked: 692 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Tall Paul » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:56 pm

How exactly have the board lined their pockets given that they don't take anything out of the club?
This user liked this post: piston broke

Right_winger
Posts: 2105
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
Been Liked: 492 times
Has Liked: 411 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Right_winger » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:56 pm

GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:He didn't want to go?
Where have you dug that up from?

I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..
Jay didn’t want to move he was forced by the board for the transfer fee

Funkydrummer
Posts: 8367
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
Been Liked: 2977 times
Has Liked: 2075 times
Location: Burnley

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Funkydrummer » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:56 pm

Narr.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Lancasterclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:57 pm

You can't say that Tall Paul, this isn't the board for facts!

Its for people making stuff up for whatever reason floats their boat.

Belgianclaret
Posts: 2586
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
Been Liked: 955 times
Has Liked: 169 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Belgianclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:08 pm

IMO he would have made a difference, we could us good players like him

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:11 pm

we should have got some better scouts

SalisburyClaret
Posts: 4077
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
Been Liked: 1104 times
Has Liked: 709 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by SalisburyClaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 6:49 pm

In a word Yes - the money is irrelevant, if the manager wants him that much we should pay the price (which didn’t seem unreasonable)

Vino blanco
Posts: 5367
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
Been Liked: 1904 times
Has Liked: 1980 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Vino blanco » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:31 pm

He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 619 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by BabylonClaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:50 pm

Yep absolutely. He can drop deeper much more effectively than any of our current squad and can also play wide better than Ash. So for example on Monday night when Brady was so poor it's much easier to reshuffle.

He'd have given us a different option in Europe - we could have rested some wide mf/forwards for example, and who knows he may have made the difference to progress to the groups, thereby bolstering confidence rather than denting it and increasing disappointment.

He's local and would have given the crowd a focal point as well.

Plus the gaffer wanted him. Wanted him so badly he spent all the window chasing him. That we failed to land him despite a long chase and to the exclusion of all others is poor management. As a number of us said at the time.

Steve1956
Posts: 17272
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6490 times
Has Liked: 2918 times
Location: Fife

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Steve1956 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:51 pm

West Brom have some cracking players,I fully expect us to be shopping there next month

boatshed bill
Posts: 15260
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3164 times
Has Liked: 6759 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by boatshed bill » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:52 pm

No.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 5793
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 1884 times
Has Liked: 841 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:54 pm

SalisburyClaret wrote:In a word Yes - the money is irrelevant, if the manager wants him that much we should pay the price (which didn’t seem unreasonable)
Totally agree they should have landed the managers number one target especially after delivering a 7th place finish.

theroyaldyche
Posts: 2653
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by theroyaldyche » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:55 pm

No. We should be aiming better than what we have. Vydra is better than j rod

gsyclaret
Posts: 780
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:55 pm
Been Liked: 163 times
Has Liked: 46 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by gsyclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:04 pm

Who ?

Im_not_Robbie_Blake
Posts: 1869
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
Been Liked: 383 times
Has Liked: 236 times
Location: Skipton

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Im_not_Robbie_Blake » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:08 pm

No doubt about it. A big YES from me.

BabylonClaret
Posts: 3095
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
Been Liked: 710 times
Has Liked: 619 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by BabylonClaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:18 pm

theroyaldyche wrote:No. We should be aiming better than what we have. Vydra is better than j rod
No he's not. Not yet anyway.

Pimlico_Claret
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 614 times
Has Liked: 680 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Pimlico_Claret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:20 pm

West Brom are so full of brilliant players that they got relegated
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

GodIsADeeJay81
Posts: 14571
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
Been Liked: 3437 times
Has Liked: 6339 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by GodIsADeeJay81 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:31 pm

Vino blanco wrote:He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.
In the championship..



Against Brentford.

Nonayforever
Posts: 3321
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
Been Liked: 701 times
Has Liked: 174 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Nonayforever » Mon Dec 03, 2018 9:52 pm

Vino blanco wrote:He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.
I've got more pace and vision than our strikers at the moment.
This user liked this post: Chip Harrison

beddie
Posts: 5228
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1408 times
Has Liked: 520 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by beddie » Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:47 pm

Perhaps. I really don't think it's worth us going back at any price in January as they don't need to sell him to be honest, he's very important to them and I can't imagine they need the money.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2602
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 265 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by scouseclaret » Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:04 pm

Steve1956 wrote:West Brom have some cracking players,I fully expect us to be shopping there next month
...with the usual outcome. Come January, West Brom’s players will be thinking they have a better chance of playing PL football next season if they stay put.
This user liked this post: Steve1956

tiger76
Posts: 25697
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
Been Liked: 4644 times
Has Liked: 9849 times
Location: Glasgow

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by tiger76 » Mon Dec 03, 2018 11:26 pm

J-Rod would have helped but not massively,as he wouldn't have got any service,same as our other strikers.

And it's by no means certain he would have played often,look at how much game time Vydra has had since signing.

IanMcL
Posts: 30413
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6389 times
Has Liked: 8738 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by IanMcL » Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:07 am

Without a doubt, he would have raised morale and added an edge.
Let's hope he still can.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30707
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11052 times
Has Liked: 5659 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Dec 04, 2018 1:14 am

at this point there is more chance of him being in the PL next season with the boingers than us and that is going to be a major issue for us. Summer was the time for us to move the club forwards, we didn't and we all know why.

theroyaldyche
Posts: 2653
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
Been Liked: 505 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by theroyaldyche » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:13 am

BabylonClaret wrote:No he's not. Not yet anyway.


Yes he is. Jay rod is past it and we should be aiming higher

Claretforever
Posts: 2937
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
Been Liked: 1035 times
Has Liked: 509 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by Claretforever » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:36 am

I know time is a healer and all that, but I heard at the time he wouldn’t sign for Burnley again. We were arguing over peanuts in Premier League terms, and forced Jay to tell his employers he wanted to join Burnley, only to then pull the plug when so close.

An awkward situation to put the lad in, and apparently it’s then he said he wouldn’t have anything to do with us again.

I’m answer to the opening post though, yes, we should have got him.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by ontario claret » Tue Dec 04, 2018 1:56 pm

J-Rod? How about Danny Ings? A second coming of the Vings combination would suit me fine.

ClaretTony
Posts: 67892
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 32538 times
Has Liked: 5278 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by ClaretTony » Tue Dec 04, 2018 1:58 pm

ontario claret wrote:J-Rod? How about Danny Ings? A second coming of the Vings combination would suit me fine.
There was clearly an interest in Rodriguez but there was also clearly no interest in Ings

SGr
Posts: 4413
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?

Post by SGr » Tue Dec 04, 2018 3:18 pm

No we shouldn’t. Should not have even been interested.

No value, no longevity.

Post Reply