So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
-
- Posts: 18007
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4074 times
- Has Liked: 1853 times
So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
People made their views clear at the time, but I only ask because Andy Payton on R/Lancs on Saturday (speaking at the Stanley game) was vehement in his insistence that we should have paid West Brom what they were asking, saying how even at the age of 29 we'd have still got three seasons out of him and might now be glad of his goals.
Personally, because of the poor service the forwards are currently receiving, I don't think he'd have made that much of a difference.
Should we have gone the extra millions?
Personally, because of the poor service the forwards are currently receiving, I don't think he'd have made that much of a difference.
Should we have gone the extra millions?
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Yes and West Brom have a £100m chance at season end so won’t be giving him away.
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Yes because Jay rod can play the Hendrick role perfectly and has a bit of pace about him too. Not only that being a local Lad he’d give that bit extra
It’s sad that the club sold him despite him not wanting to go. Anything for that piece of silver for our board
It’s sad that the club sold him despite him not wanting to go. Anything for that piece of silver for our board
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
He didn't want to go?Right_winger wrote:Yes because Jay rod can play the Hendrick role perfectly and has a bit of pace about him too. Not only that being a local Lad he’d give that bit extra
It’s sad that the club sold him despite him not wanting to go. Anything for that piece of silver for our board
Where have you dug that up from?
I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
He certainly didn't push for a moveGodIsADeeJay81 wrote:He didn't want to go?
Where have you dug that up from?
I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..
This user liked this post: ElectroClaret
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:19 pm
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 277 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Dont think Jay would have made any difference to any of our results, as Electro mentioned, the service to the strikers has been abysmal, a lot of hearts ruling heads as far as Jay is concerned, we wont pay the Baggies what they want so lets forget the lad now. As we all are too aware of, the board have made it very clear that they wont be splashing out much in January , certainly not the 20 odd million wanted by West Brom, i think they are resigned to relegation and dont give a toss about the players, the fans or SD. They have lined their pockets and not willing to dig into them.
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
No, because I don't think one player can make the difference.
Even if we had/got Messi I don't think our problems would evaporate.
Yes, Jayrod might have made some difference but insufficient to change
things that much. It's not as if we've been close to winning games.
Now, I don't think he would come or WBA would let him leave
and we may have decided/realised that we need more than one player coming in anyway.
Hopefully Riggs and Dyche can pull something out of the hat in January
as we'll more than likely need reinforcements even if we somehow manage to get a reasonable number of
points on the board before then.
Even if we had/got Messi I don't think our problems would evaporate.
Yes, Jayrod might have made some difference but insufficient to change
things that much. It's not as if we've been close to winning games.
Now, I don't think he would come or WBA would let him leave
and we may have decided/realised that we need more than one player coming in anyway.
Hopefully Riggs and Dyche can pull something out of the hat in January
as we'll more than likely need reinforcements even if we somehow manage to get a reasonable number of
points on the board before then.
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
How exactly have the board lined their pockets given that they don't take anything out of the club?
This user liked this post: piston broke
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Jay didn’t want to move he was forced by the board for the transfer feeGodIsADeeJay81 wrote:He didn't want to go?
Where have you dug that up from?
I thought he signed that last extension to his contract to see if we could get promoted and when we didn't, off he went ..
-
- Posts: 8367
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 2977 times
- Has Liked: 2075 times
- Location: Burnley
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
You can't say that Tall Paul, this isn't the board for facts!
Its for people making stuff up for whatever reason floats their boat.
Its for people making stuff up for whatever reason floats their boat.
-
- Posts: 2586
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 955 times
- Has Liked: 169 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
IMO he would have made a difference, we could us good players like him
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
we should have got some better scouts
-
- Posts: 4077
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:32 pm
- Been Liked: 1104 times
- Has Liked: 709 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
In a word Yes - the money is irrelevant, if the manager wants him that much we should pay the price (which didn’t seem unreasonable)
-
- Posts: 5367
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 1904 times
- Has Liked: 1980 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Yep absolutely. He can drop deeper much more effectively than any of our current squad and can also play wide better than Ash. So for example on Monday night when Brady was so poor it's much easier to reshuffle.
He'd have given us a different option in Europe - we could have rested some wide mf/forwards for example, and who knows he may have made the difference to progress to the groups, thereby bolstering confidence rather than denting it and increasing disappointment.
He's local and would have given the crowd a focal point as well.
Plus the gaffer wanted him. Wanted him so badly he spent all the window chasing him. That we failed to land him despite a long chase and to the exclusion of all others is poor management. As a number of us said at the time.
He'd have given us a different option in Europe - we could have rested some wide mf/forwards for example, and who knows he may have made the difference to progress to the groups, thereby bolstering confidence rather than denting it and increasing disappointment.
He's local and would have given the crowd a focal point as well.
Plus the gaffer wanted him. Wanted him so badly he spent all the window chasing him. That we failed to land him despite a long chase and to the exclusion of all others is poor management. As a number of us said at the time.
-
- Posts: 17272
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6490 times
- Has Liked: 2918 times
- Location: Fife
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
West Brom have some cracking players,I fully expect us to be shopping there next month
-
- Posts: 15260
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3164 times
- Has Liked: 6759 times
-
- Posts: 5793
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 1884 times
- Has Liked: 841 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Totally agree they should have landed the managers number one target especially after delivering a 7th place finish.SalisburyClaret wrote:In a word Yes - the money is irrelevant, if the manager wants him that much we should pay the price (which didn’t seem unreasonable)
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
No. We should be aiming better than what we have. Vydra is better than j rod
-
- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:33 pm
- Been Liked: 383 times
- Has Liked: 236 times
- Location: Skipton
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
No doubt about it. A big YES from me.
-
- Posts: 3095
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 710 times
- Has Liked: 619 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
No he's not. Not yet anyway.theroyaldyche wrote:No. We should be aiming better than what we have. Vydra is better than j rod
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 614 times
- Has Liked: 680 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
West Brom are so full of brilliant players that they got relegated
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 14571
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am
- Been Liked: 3437 times
- Has Liked: 6339 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
In the championship..Vino blanco wrote:He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.
Against Brentford.
-
- Posts: 3321
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:15 pm
- Been Liked: 701 times
- Has Liked: 174 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
I've got more pace and vision than our strikers at the moment.Vino blanco wrote:He is playing well tonight on tv, much more pace and vision than any of our strikers. Could have had a couple of goals.
This user liked this post: Chip Harrison
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Perhaps. I really don't think it's worth us going back at any price in January as they don't need to sell him to be honest, he's very important to them and I can't imagine they need the money.
-
- Posts: 2602
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Been Liked: 858 times
- Has Liked: 265 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
...with the usual outcome. Come January, West Brom’s players will be thinking they have a better chance of playing PL football next season if they stay put.Steve1956 wrote:West Brom have some cracking players,I fully expect us to be shopping there next month
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4644 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
J-Rod would have helped but not massively,as he wouldn't have got any service,same as our other strikers.
And it's by no means certain he would have played often,look at how much game time Vydra has had since signing.
And it's by no means certain he would have played often,look at how much game time Vydra has had since signing.
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
Without a doubt, he would have raised morale and added an edge.
Let's hope he still can.
Let's hope he still can.
-
- Posts: 30707
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 11052 times
- Has Liked: 5659 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
at this point there is more chance of him being in the PL next season with the boingers than us and that is going to be a major issue for us. Summer was the time for us to move the club forwards, we didn't and we all know why.
-
- Posts: 2653
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:26 pm
- Been Liked: 505 times
- Has Liked: 245 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
BabylonClaret wrote:No he's not. Not yet anyway.
Yes he is. Jay rod is past it and we should be aiming higher
-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
- Been Liked: 1035 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
I know time is a healer and all that, but I heard at the time he wouldn’t sign for Burnley again. We were arguing over peanuts in Premier League terms, and forced Jay to tell his employers he wanted to join Burnley, only to then pull the plug when so close.
An awkward situation to put the lad in, and apparently it’s then he said he wouldn’t have anything to do with us again.
I’m answer to the opening post though, yes, we should have got him.
An awkward situation to put the lad in, and apparently it’s then he said he wouldn’t have anything to do with us again.
I’m answer to the opening post though, yes, we should have got him.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
J-Rod? How about Danny Ings? A second coming of the Vings combination would suit me fine.
-
- Posts: 67892
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 32538 times
- Has Liked: 5278 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
There was clearly an interest in Rodriguez but there was also clearly no interest in Ingsontario claret wrote:J-Rod? How about Danny Ings? A second coming of the Vings combination would suit me fine.
Re: So, In Hindsight, Should We Have Got J-Rod?
No we shouldn’t. Should not have even been interested.
No value, no longevity.
No value, no longevity.