Strasbourg shooting
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 9:35 pm
Sadly this doesn't come as a shock anymore https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46530265
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/
http://www.uptheclarets.com/messageboard/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34998
Damo wrote:The amount of comments on this thread shows how normal these events have become
No one said that this kind of thing wouldn't happen if guns were illegal. You made that up.claretonthecoast1882 wrote:It’s also at least 30 posts down due to not being in America and spijed probably won’t bring his whataboutery to this as he only cares when it’s caused by the nra. Apparently if these guns are illegal it wouldn’t happen, who knew they were allowed in Strasbourg.
Sadly more people have lost their lives due to a coward.
So you're saying it's a false flag attack? Got a source?SmudgetheClaret wrote:Usually these shootings happen when a country wants to deflect the media away from other matters,now has there been anything going on in France mmmm let me think ??
bfcjg wrote:All the gunman has to do is lose his gun,get to a channel port, find a people smuggler get to the UK and Corbyn and his disciples will welcome them with open arms as desperate people looking for a better life, improve our culture etc. Why even JK Rowling might put him up in one of her twenty bedtlrooms.
What a weird and not-so-wonderful post.SmudgetheClaret wrote:Usually these shootings happen when a country wants to deflect the media away from other matters,now has there been anything going on in France mmmm let me think ??
That's got to be the most stupid question every as if I would have a source ? opinions don't need a source you should know that with the drivel you pump out on a gargantuan rate..Imploding Turtle wrote:So you're saying it's a false flag attack? Got a source?
Well it's a wonderful time of year..and a tad weirdBuxtonclaret wrote:What a weird and not-so-wonderful post.
Seriously enough for you to quote it.Imploding Turtle wrote:And some people wonder why they and their opinions aren't taken seriously.
I'd quote a mental patient too if it got across the point of how mental they are.bfcjg wrote:Seriously enough for you to quote it.
Named as Cherif C a known radicalised locally born person.Think that tells us all we need to know. Source BBC news.Svenster wrote:BBC reporting it's a local man from Strasbourg.
That he's a ****?Lord Rothbury wrote:Named as Cherif C a known radicalised locally born person.Think that tells us all we need to know. Source BBC news.
That's just what a some think about you and your opinions.Imploding Turtle wrote:And some people wonder why they and their opinions aren't taken seriously.
Yes at least you've got something rightImploding Turtle wrote:That he's a ****?
I bet you argue with the mirror. Then again...Imploding Turtle wrote:What's the weapon of choice for mass shooters over here then?
In what way am I a "left-wing troll"? Is it because my views are left-wingy and sometimes i'm not entirely serious with my posts? Or do you think my left-wing views are fake in an attempt to troll? If the latter then can you provide an example of one of my "fake" opinions?Falcon wrote:To be fair he's the only left wing troll on here, and has about 10 right wing trolls to argue with at any given time.
I don't agree in the main with IT but at least he is consistent with his opinions and I wouldn't call him/her a troll.Imploding Turtle wrote:In what way am I a "left-wing troll"? Is it because my views are left-wingy and sometimes i'm not entirely serious with my posts? Or do you think my left-wing views are fake in an attempt to troll? If the latter then can you provide an example of one of my "fake" opinions?
*** The Amri Affair is the ongoing subject of a commission of inquiry (Untersuchungsausschuss) launched in July of this year.MacCruiskeen
"Possibly OT, possibly related, possibly a reprise of the Berlin Christmas Market Attack of 2014***:....
*cough* La bonne vieille question de savoir à qui profite le crime...
The shooting happened close to a Christmas market in one of the central squares, Place Kléber.
Police said the suspect was already known to the security services as a possible terrorist threat.
Déjà-vu?
"Meretricious." "And a Happy New Year."
JackRiddler...Earlier today I was thinking this was going to happen. ...Just saying.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board2/view ... 0&start=15" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
On 17 May 2017 the Interior Ministry of Berlin stated that already in November 2016 intelligence was given that Anis Amri was involved in criminal offenses concerning drug trafficking. On this basis authorities would have been able to apprehend Amri already at the time, however they did not.An investigation was launched trying to find out to what extent these informations were withheld by the State Criminal Police Office of Berlin after the attack happened.[110] Several days later, while the investigation for obstruction of justice was still going on, a speaker of the Interior Ministry said that manipulations of the file of Amri have been carried out by officers of the criminal investigation department after the attack.[111] On 22 May 2017 a commission of inquiry was initiated starting in July. Meanwhile, a special prosecuter was appointed to the case.[112] In addition to the ongoing investigation concerning manipulations of the file and withholding of information, national TV reported on 1 June, that officers who were ordered by an investigating judge in Berlin to observe Amri until October 2016 for criminal offenses and possible terrorist links did not do so and instead included untrue records regarding observating actions in his file.[113]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Berl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... of_justice
I don't think you're allowed to suggest these events are becoming the norm.Damo wrote:The amount of comments on this thread shows how normal these events have become
Yeah. Because if you say that then you'll get arrested and thrown in jail. Just like if you say you're English.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:I don't think you're allowed to suggest these events are becoming the norm.
And of course no one over here will mock the victims.Lord Beamish wrote:I have to say that I hope these things aren’t becoming ‘the norm’. I think this is one of those fortuitous occasions where my desire and reality intersect.
The feel of this is far different to the near ubiquitous nature of Mass Shootings in the United States. These still illicit shock and anger in the populace, rather than resignation and recriminations.
If you are ready to concede that GodIsADeeJay81 has always been a new moniker for Sydney1st, and that that whole charade about it being a friend of yours who set up the account was just a way of leaving your baggage-laden old account behind and coming back with a clean slate, then I might be able to engage you an something other than mockery.GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:So if they aren't becoming the norm, what are they then?
Terror attacks are appearing to happen regularly now, so at what point is it the norm?
GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:So if they aren't becoming the norm, what are they then?
Terror attacks are appearing to happen regularly now, so at what point is it the norm?
yeah but that was the Irish, and they're the same colour as the English... ahem...Imploding Turtle wrote:I guess we're talking about two different things. Mass shootings are clearly not the norm nor are they becoming the norm.
However i would argue that terror attacks aren't becoming the norm either, since if this rate of terrorism is a sign of it being normalised then what the hell was the 70s, 80s and 90s when terrorism was a far bigger threat?
I admitted a while ago who I was, but it was someone else who created the account.Lord Beamish wrote:If you are ready to concede that GodIsADeeJay81 has always been a new moniker for Sydney1st, and that that whole charade about it being a friend of yours who set up the account was just a way of leaving your baggage-laden old account behind and coming back with a clean slate, then I might be able to engage you an something other than mockery.
Mass shootings in the US are the norm, they're regular enough and most of the world is meh when another happens, which should be any time in the next couple of weeks.Imploding Turtle wrote:I guess we're talking about two different things. Mass shootings are clearly not the norm nor are they becoming the norm.
However i would argue that terror attacks aren't becoming the norm either, since if this rate of terrorism is a sign of it being normalised then what the hell was the 70s, 80s and 90s when terrorism was a far bigger threat?
Why were you weirdly talking between your two accounts on Twitter in order to cover your tracks?GodIsADeeJay81 wrote:I admitted a while ago who I was, but it was someone else who created the account.
Plus I've asked for my own account to be unblocked several times now but the mods don't seem to be that arsed about doing it.
Next?
next couple of hoursGodIsADeeJay81 wrote:Mass shootings in the US are the norm, they're regular enough and most of the world is meh when another happens, which should be any time in the next couple of weeks.
Because he’s full of sh!te and thinks we all came down in the last shower of rain.Bordeauxclaret wrote:Why were you weirdly talking between your two accounts on Twitter in order to cover your tracks?
it always comes down to colour with you peopleRick_Muller wrote:yeah but that was the Irish, and they're the same colour as the English... ahem...
I have no idea what you’re alluding to, I was being sarcastic - as in in the 70’s 80’s and 90’s under the greater threat of Irish republican terrorism no one could blame Asian Muslims for it, which is usually what happens on here...ClaretMoffitt wrote:it always comes down to colour with you people
claretonthecoast1882 wrote:The IRA weren't/aren't terrorists though. Jeremy & Diane have told us all often enough