Brady

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Vegas Claret
Posts: 30273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10916 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:15 pm

Image

piston broke
Posts: 5548
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 1447 times
Has Liked: 1229 times
Location: Ferkham Hall

Re: Brady

Post by piston broke » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:16 pm

but necessary.

Lowbankclaret
Posts: 6571
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm
Been Liked: 1233 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Brady

Post by Lowbankclaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:16 pm

Never a red, just a yellow for me.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10916 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:17 pm

Lowbankclaret wrote:Never a red, just a yellow for me.
2 footed off the floor from behind challenge - yeah I can see why that wasn't a red !!!

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4487
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 757 times

Re: Brady

Post by quoonbeatz » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:18 pm

definitely stupid but not a red card.

one of those you see every game when someone breaks and gets stopped by a cynical tackle. compare it with the one by shelvey on pogba tonight and its hardly a foul.

taio
Posts: 11520
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3220 times
Has Liked: 340 times

Re: Brady

Post by taio » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:18 pm

need to see it back but looked like he scissored him.and out of control so red was correct

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Brady

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:18 pm

piston broke wrote:but necessary.
Absolutely. Rather risk the red than risk the goal.

There have been too many occasions where we couldve took one for the team and the opposition score. Obvious one was Martial last season.

Il Duce
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Brady

Post by Il Duce » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:18 pm

It was necessary to bring him down, just a shame he did it in that manner.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:18 pm

piston broke wrote:but necessary.
How?

Tall Paul
Posts: 7170
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 690 times

Re: Brady

Post by Tall Paul » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:19 pm

It was harsh, but don't think we can have too many complaints.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10916 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:19 pm

quoonbeatz wrote:definitely stupid but not a red card.

one of those you see every game when someone breaks and gets stopped by a cynical tackle. compare it with the one by shelvey on pogba tonight and its hardly a foul.
watch it again, stone wall red
https://www.flashscore.com/match/jDNRGc2c/#video

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 10272
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3327 times
Has Liked: 1938 times

Re: Brady

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:19 pm

Why didn’t he just trip him?

Stupid tackle and deserved the red.

Il Duce
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Brady

Post by Il Duce » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:20 pm

Richardsbfc wrote:How?
There have been many occasions (for us and other teams) when a team breaks and scores then fans/pundits question why the opposition didn’t attempt a ‘professional foul’. This COULD have been one of those times. Of course, without hindsight you never know.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Wokingclaret
Posts: 2068
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 292 times
Has Liked: 766 times

Re: Brady

Post by Wokingclaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:20 pm

Thanks Bill Shatner

quoonbeatz
Posts: 4487
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2560 times
Has Liked: 757 times

Re: Brady

Post by quoonbeatz » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:21 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:watch it again, stone wall red
https://www.flashscore.com/match/jDNRGc2c/#video
don't need to, thanks.

watched it at the time and seen plenty of replays.

its cynical but the vast majority of times thats a yellow card.

Bosscat
Posts: 25359
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 8426 times
Has Liked: 18093 times

Re: Brady

Post by Bosscat » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:21 pm

Be interesting to see if Sean asks for it to be removed...

Can see why it was given but it wasn't a Straight red for me just a yellow. The reactions by some players after warranted cards also....

A slap on the wrist though for Brady not being the Messiah .... just being a very Naughty Boy

LTUK89
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 6:41 am
Been Liked: 51 times
Has Liked: 42 times

Re: Brady

Post by LTUK89 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:21 pm

100% the right decision to chop him! Took one for the team, shame it was a red. Well in Brady.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:24 pm

Il Duce wrote:There have been many occasions (for us and other teams) when a team breaks and scores then fans/pundits question why the opposition didn’t attempt a ‘professional foul’. This COULD have been one of those times. Of course, without hindsight you never know.
6 defenders (7 including Heaton)
3 attackers

Not a great deal of danger.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17773
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4044 times
Has Liked: 1846 times

Re: Brady

Post by ElectroClaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:26 pm

There was certainly defending cover.

Il Duce
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Brady

Post by Il Duce » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:28 pm

Richardsbfc wrote:6 defenders (7 including Heaton)
3 attackers

Not a great deal of danger.

Ok Captain Hindsight, so we have never conceded a goal when we have had defensive numerical advantage? Never conceded a goal from distance?

We won. Yes it was a rash tackle and he was probably foolish to make one in such manner. But we won. Get over it.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:33 pm

Il Duce wrote:Ok Captain Hindsight, so we have never conceded a goal when we have had defensive numerical advantage? Never conceded a goal from distance?

We won. Yes it was a rash tackle and he was probably foolish to make one in such manner. But we won. Get over it.
Silly Statement.

No danger and covering defenders 30+ yard from goal.

SGr
Posts: 4412
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1022 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Brady

Post by SGr » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:35 pm

Necessary foul. Unnecessary method.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Brady

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:36 pm

Definitely a clever foul and one which was needed. We were on the back foot.

Socrates
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Brady

Post by Socrates » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:36 pm

It was a red, and Brady wants flogging for it.

Both feet are off the ground plus it’s Mike f’ing Dean reffing.

Just tug the guys shirt. Utterly idiotic decision.

AngleseyClaret
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 9:49 pm
Been Liked: 115 times
Has Liked: 32 times

Re: Brady

Post by AngleseyClaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:38 pm

The ref was card happy tonight and issuing many cards for no reason, no way was Brady's a red card

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10916 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:40 pm

Dyche has no complaints with it being a red

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Brady

Post by duncandisorderly » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:40 pm

Straight red all day long. It really is.

Socrates
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Brady

Post by Socrates » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:41 pm

AngleseyClaret wrote:The ref was card happy tonight and issuing many cards for no reason, no way was Brady's a red card
Mike Dean

Standard game for him.

RVclaret
Posts: 13836
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 3707 times
Has Liked: 2499 times

Re: Brady

Post by RVclaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:42 pm

Definite red.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Brady

Post by duncandisorderly » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:42 pm

AngleseyClaret wrote:The ref was card happy tonight and issuing many cards for no reason, no way was Brady's a red card
Can't speak for the game itself, but that tackle in isolation is a red all decade long.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17773
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4044 times
Has Liked: 1846 times

Re: Brady

Post by ElectroClaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:43 pm

Didn't think it was at first, but on seeing the replay, its a stonewaller.

jedi_master
Posts: 7104
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 3580 times
Has Liked: 1023 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Brady

Post by jedi_master » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:44 pm

Red or not it was a mindless decision by him to bring the guy down in that manner.

Just clip his heels.

McNeil’s shirt for the foreseeable.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:44 pm

How can it be a necessary foul to make? Bizarre comments here.

Just watched it again and absolutely no need for it. Deserves to be fined heavily for letting his side down for this game but also the next 3 games.

Gnulty
Posts: 457
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:21 pm
Been Liked: 179 times
Has Liked: 119 times
Location: Moorway

Re: Brady

Post by Gnulty » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:45 pm

Not a straight red for Brady and the ref should have kept his second yellow for Schindler in his pocket.. Anyway, we deserved the points. UTC!

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:45 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Definitely a clever foul and one which was needed. We were on the back foot.
Let’s start hacking players down all over the pitch just in case ...

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Brady

Post by duncandisorderly » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:45 pm

ElectroClaret wrote:Didn't think it was at first, but on seeing the replay, its a stonewaller.
Appen it was like that at the game. See it again though and it's an outrageous tackle, really. It's probably the worst tackle by a Burnley player since Ball on Dunn.

EarbyClaret
Posts: 1376
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
Been Liked: 498 times

Re: Brady

Post by EarbyClaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:45 pm

Critical stage of the match and with that challenge he gives the ref a decision to make - the ref is Mike Dean so no surprise to see the red card.

As others have said, grab his arm or run across in - either would have done.

Just back to fitness and now banned absolutely no point appealing that.

Run in the team for McNeil who on the evidence of the last two games could really make a sustained impact.

SandyLaneClaret
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2016 5:29 pm
Been Liked: 16 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Brady

Post by SandyLaneClaret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:46 pm

Yellow card all day long. It really is

Conroy92
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 497 times
Has Liked: 30 times

Re: Brady

Post by Conroy92 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:50 pm

Astounded by people slaying Brady for being "stupid"

Had he not made the challenge and they went through and scored you'd be calling him 10 fold!

Took one for the team, you might not like it and its unethical, but im glad he made a challenge to stop that run.

PaintYorkClaretnBlue
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:42 pm
Been Liked: 660 times
Has Liked: 1219 times

Re: Brady

Post by PaintYorkClaretnBlue » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:51 pm

duncandisorderly wrote:Appen it was like that at the game. See it again though and it's an outrageous tackle, really. It's probably the worst tackle by a Burnley player since Ball on Dunn.
Behave.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30273
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 10916 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brady

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:52 pm

SandyLaneClaret wrote:Yellow card all day long. It really is
Dyche disagrees with you

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Brady

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:52 pm

Richardsbfc wrote:Let’s start hacking players down all over the pitch just in case ...
You have made your point. But you are being purposely obtuse.

Good result. Thats the main thing. I would have taken 2-1 and 10 men all day. And thats what we got.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Brady

Post by duncandisorderly » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:54 pm

PaintYorkClaretnBlue wrote:Behave.
Hyperbole maybe, but name a worse one.

Richardsbfc
Posts: 242
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:44 am
Been Liked: 66 times
Has Liked: 84 times

Re: Brady

Post by Richardsbfc » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:54 pm

cricketfieldclarets wrote:You have made your point. But you are being purposely obtuse.

Good result. Thats the main thing. I would have taken 2-1 and 10 men all day. And thats what we got.
Coward
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

nil_desperandum
Posts: 7298
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
Been Liked: 1823 times
Has Liked: 3948 times

Re: Brady

Post by nil_desperandum » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:54 pm

AngleseyClaret wrote:The ref was card happy tonight and issuing many cards for no reason, no way was Brady's a red card
Out of interest. Which of those cards did he get wrong? All seemed correct to me - for both teams.

Socrates
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 912 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Brady

Post by Socrates » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:56 pm

Conroy92 wrote:Astounded by people slaying Brady for being "stupid"

Had he not made the challenge and they went through and scored you'd be calling him 10 fold!

Took one for the team, you might not like it and its unethical, but im glad he made a challenge to stop that run.
It’s a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

Tug his shirt. Clip his heels. Don’t two foot him like that.

It’s stupid.

duncandisorderly
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:58 pm
Been Liked: 970 times
Has Liked: 232 times

Re: Brady

Post by duncandisorderly » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:58 pm

Luke Shaw vs Newcastle. That's how you deliberately stop play to earn a yellow card.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3321 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Brady

Post by TVC15 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:59 pm

Think that’s a red - both feet off the ground and no attempt at getting the ball.

As for the worst could by a Burnley player since Kevin Ball challenge....mmmm....that’s just a bit silly !
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets

Conroy92
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:06 pm
Been Liked: 497 times
Has Liked: 30 times

Re: Brady

Post by Conroy92 » Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:59 pm

I know what your saying but in his defence, he's coming from a long way behind him, unless he'd stretched his legs he might not have reached him!

Dodobdobodobo
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:57 pm
Been Liked: 117 times
Has Liked: 303 times

Re: Brady

Post by Dodobdobodobo » Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:00 pm

A bit harsh when you look at Shelvey and Lascelles only getting yellows.
These 2 users liked this post: WestMidsClaret LeadBelly

Post Reply