Is Lowton injured or

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:29 pm

is he being sold ? Bardsley is injured so Lowton would certainly have played today. Dont want both our RB`s injured

piston broke · Post by **piston broke** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:30 pm

Being protected for Fulham?

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:32 pm

FCBurnley wrote:is he being sold ? Bardsley is injured so Lowton would certainly have played today. Dont want both our RB`s injured

I think you've (sort of) answered your own question. We don't want both injured, hence why he was left out.

FCBurnley · Post by **FCBurnley** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:38 pm

FactualFrank wrote:I think you've (sort of) answered your own question. We don't want both injured, hence why he was left out.

Just seems strange to then risk Tarks in his place

whiffa · Post by **whiffa** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:46 pm

FCBurnley wrote:Just seems strange to then risk Tarks in his place

We have 4 fit first choice CB available, we can afford to risk one.

Silkyskills1 · Post by **Silkyskills1** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:56 pm

Suggests that Bardsley's injury is of more concern then. Going to need another RB.if that's the case.

FactualFrank · Post by **FactualFrank** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 3:57 pm

Silkyskills1 wrote:Suggests that Bardsley's injury is of more concern then. Going to need another RB.if that's the case.

To me it suggests that Bardsley is a doubt for the Fulham game, but it doesn't say anything more than that.

TheFamilyCat · Post by **TheFamilyCat** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:00 pm

FCBurnley wrote:is he being sold ? Bardsley is injured so Lowton would certainly have played
today. Dont want both our RB`s injured

Yeah, Bardsley’s injured so we’re going to sell our other right back.

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:09 pm

Believe both Bardsley & Lowton have injuries and there was no way we were going to risk Lowton today

Ooogeorgeorgeoghani · Post by **Ooogeorgeorgeoghani** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:47 pm

Lowton injured his toe apparently !

Lancasterclaret · Post by **Lancasterclaret** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 4:50 pm

According to Chris Boden both will be fine for Fulham

Cheshireclaret · Post by **Cheshireclaret** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:34 pm

Lowton has broken his toe but is actually able to still play, so as stated above, should be fine for Fulham.

warksclaret · Post by **warksclaret** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:52 pm

Maybe playing Tarks today at RB was to see if he could handle the role but allows Gibson to come in too

CoolClaret · Post by **CoolClaret** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:57 pm

warksclaret wrote:Maybe playing Tarks today at RB was to see if he could handle the role but allows Gibson to come in too

Yeah good point, incase Lowton goes down we need a contingency plan with Bardo picking up a knock.

Pimlico_Claret · Post by **Pimlico_Claret** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:14 pm

Tbh with his recent performances I'd hope he's 3rd choice behind Bardsley and Tarks.

GrahamBranchsPerm · Post by **GrahamBranchsPerm** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:20 pm

Spoke to Bard's brother in the gym this morning. Injured his stomach after 5 mins at Hudds, obviously played on until the hour mark. Out for c10 days, in contention for Fulham.

UTC

Is Lowton injured or

Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or

Re: Is Lowton injured or