Martin Atkinson (West Yorkshire) v Fulham

How to Score
A. Decision Making (including use of advantage) - out of 25
B. Consistency - out of 25
C. Fitness and Positioning - of 25
D. Control and Authority - out of 25

Didn’t think it was one of Mr Atkinson’s better games but still decent -
14
19
17
20

17
19
20
20

Not his best game. Looked like there was a 2 footed lunge ( got the ball ) in front of the dugouts from my angle.
Let a bit of the physical stuff go which I don't mind when you've got Mitrovic and Barnes going at it with the centre backs.

19
20
20
20
Pretty good performance by him, I thought.
Missed a couple of fairly obvious fouls by them, but
OK really.

Not one of his best but still better than we usually get. Thought it was criminal not to book Seri(?) in the opening 10 minutes just because it was early in the game.

20
20
20
20
Nothing contentious, no glaring errors. Forgot he was on the pitch which is it should be.

Played advantage when he could and allowed for the dreadful conditions
18
20
19
20

A. 17
B. 19
C. 20
D. 22

bfcjg wrote:Played advantage when he could and allowed for the dreadful conditions
18
20
19
20

And gave us 'advantage' when we didn't have any!

I thoroughly enjoyed his meticulous marking out of our free kick in added time, ensuring the Fulham defensive wall retreated the full 10 yards. That ball was never going near the the box as we played out the remaining 3 seconds by the corner flag.

Infuriating at times, however, he played to the conditions and let play keep going.

Ok by me.

Tried to keep the game flowing but got a few of the advantages wrong today. Not his best game TBH.

A. 18
B. 20
C. 20
D. 18

A 16
B 21
C 20
D 18

A. 19
B. 20
C. 22
D. 22

Attrocious conditions to play and officiate in.
Got most stuff right just a couple of advantages wrong.

19
20
21
20

wow we must have won judging by these scores. If fulham had equalised he would heve been a ****.

corporal jones wrote:wow we must have won judging by these scores. If fulham had equalised he would heve been a ****.

We did win. Atkinson would still be the best ref if we had lost.

A - 20
B - 20
C - 20
D - 20

A 20
B 20
C 20
D 20

corporal jones wrote:wow we must have won judging by these scores. If fulham had equalised he would heve been a ****.

Why?
What major decisions did he get wrong that went against us?
The only debatable wrong decision was the penalty claim against Taylor, which looked like a penalty to me "live" but wasn't perhaps clear-cut from Atkinson's position.
[We'd have wanted it - but not got it. Ranieri hasn't made any fuss about it, so couldn't have been as bad a decision as some on here have been claiming]